ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Eleanor J. Toll Middle

Middle School
Composite Score
out of 100
State Percentile
of middle schools
State Rank
of 1,714 California middle schools
🌱
Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself.

Composite scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data from the California Dept. of Education (CAASPP, chronic absenteeism, suspension rates). They are not official CDE ratings and should not be the sole basis for school decisions. See methodology.

School overview

Enrollment
1,349 students
Student-Teacher Ratio
22:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
56%
Teachers
60 full-time

Dashboard indicators

ELA Year-over-Year
Maintained
+2.7 pts DFS change
Math Year-over-Year
Increased Significantly
+15.5 pts DFS change
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
29.1%
English learners at Level 4 (Well Developed) · 381 tested

Data source: California School Dashboard 2025, ELPAC 2024

Student demographics

Hispanic14.7%
White74.5%
Asian4.7%
Black0.9%
Other5.2%

Performance breakdown

Performance breakdown for Eleanor J. Toll Middle
CategoryPercentage
Exceeded Standard23.2%
Met Standard23.5%
Below Standard53.3%

What other rankings don't show you

Most rating sites report "47% proficient" for Eleanor J. Toll Middle and stop there. Here's what that number hides:

23.2% of students exceeded standard while 23.5% met it. That exceeded rate is 5.9 points above the state average of 17.3%. That's 7.8 points below the Glendale Unified district average of 31.0%. Compared to the 2 nearby schools within ~3 miles, this exceeded rate is 4.4 points higher (vs 18.8% average). The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Proficiency drops by 5.7 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth — a signal that the school may not be sustaining early gains.

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance maintained and Math increased significantly year-over-year. 29.1% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism is 16.0%, better than the state average of 19.3%.

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters →

Key metrics

% Exceeded Standard
23.2%
Students scoring above proficient
% Met or Above
46.8%
Students meeting standard
Growth (G6→G8)
-5.7pp
Change in proficiency rate
Chronic Absenteeism
16.0%
Students missing 10%+ of days
Suspension Rate
6.4%
Students suspended at least once
Total Tested
2,770
Across all grades & subjects

Grade trajectory

ELA Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8
Math Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th35320.1%30.0%23.5%26.4%50.1%
7th55320.6%30.7%21.2%27.5%51.4%
8th49120.0%30.4%22.4%27.3%50.3%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th34630.4%19.9%22.5%27.2%50.3%
7th54723.8%15.9%26.5%33.8%39.7%
8th48024.6%14.2%21.9%39.4%38.8%
K-12 Feeder PathBoundary data

Feeder patterns derived from 2015-16 NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries may have changed. Contact your school district for current information.

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog