ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Vail Ranch Middle · Temecula

Vail Ranch Middle: 58% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 39%. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.

Vail Ranch posts 58% meeting the standard, against 39% across the state. The number below is the one to ask about on a visit.

33340 Camino Piedra Rojo, 92592 (opens in new tab)·Temecula Valley Unified·Temecula·Grades 6-8·765 students·27% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 302-5188
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5043
% Exceeded25%17%
% Met+58%39%
Growth-10.1+1.5
Absence16.4%18.5%
Suspension4.9%3.7%
Scope Score
50
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #654 statewide · #7 of 9 in Temecula Valley Unified

Vail Ranch Middle scores 50 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 71st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “58% proficient” and call it done. Vail Ranch deserves a closer read. The school sits in Temecula, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Vail Ranch's low-income kids hit 48.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 82nd to the 71st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 58% meet the standard today, versus 62% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 666%51%57%56%65%
Grade 757%67%64%63%66%
Grade 866%63%64%60%56%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 660%44%49%52%58%
Grade 755%45%49%48%54%
Grade 866%48%48%49%47%

The story this school is actually telling

The floor · met or exceeded
57.8%

of students met or exceeded the standard, versus 39.3% statewide.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 6→8
10.1pp

proficiency runs 62% in this year's grade 6 against 52% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

28%
38%
34%
Grade 6 · 66% proficient
25%
41%
34%
Grade 7 · 66% proficient
19%
37%
44%
Grade 8 · 56% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 9.1pp across grades; the floor slips 9.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

48.8%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Vail Ranch's most underrated number

48.8% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Vail Ranch low-income: 48.8%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
25.3%
State 16.8%
8.5pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-10.1pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
57.8%
State 39.3%
18.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.4%
State 18.5%
2.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
4.9%
State 3.7%
1.2pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
27.3%
State 18.0%
9.3pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Vail Ranch Middle in Temecula, 48.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Vail Ranch Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.8% Math proficient); White students (67.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 203 students tested.

All students at this school: 58% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 58%, district —, state 39%58%
MaleMale: this school 57%, district 56%, state 42%57% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 58%, district 57%, state 44%58% · +0 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 61%, state 56%63% · +5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 46%, district 48%, state 32%46% · −12 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 45%, district 46%, state 32%45% · −13 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 16%, district 20%, state 15%16% · −42 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 58%, district 61%, state 56%58% · +0 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 75%, district 76%, state 72%75% · +17 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 58%, district 71%, state 65%58% · +0 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 50%, district 59%, state 46%50% · −8 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 16.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.4%, district 17.9%, state 18.5%16.4% · −2.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.9%, district —, state 3.7%4.9% · +1.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.8%
Grades 7–817.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 24:121:1
Teaching staff39 teachers
Avg. experience22.4 years
Fully credentialed92%
First-year teachers3%
Intern / emergency permit0.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,061 – $142,641
Principal salary$167,753 – $186,958
Superintendent salary$336,447

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,959, CA average $14,815$17,959 · spent at this school
Federal share$576 per student

$576 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,149 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support9%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,888 per pupil
2019$10,891 per pupil
2018$10,666 per pupil
2017$9,650 per pupil
2016$9,797 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White40.8%
District 36.0% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic30.6%
District 38.4% · CA 56.1%
Other17.1%
District 15.6% · CA 9.0%
Asian8.8%
District 6.6% · CA 10.2%
Black2.8%
District 3.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 26.8% (37pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$134K · CA $85K
Median home value$709K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population80,035
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 52% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Vail Ranch Middle a good middle school?

Vail Ranch Middle has a Scope Score of 50 out of 100, placing it in the 71st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #654 statewide. 25.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 8.5 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Vail Ranch Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 57.8% of students at Vail Ranch Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 25.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 32.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 25.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,477 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Vail Ranch Middle rank in California?

Vail Ranch Middle ranks #654 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 71st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Vail Ranch Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Vail Ranch Middle decreases by 10.1 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Vail Ranch Middle?

16.4% of students at Vail Ranch Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 4.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Vail Ranch Middle compare to other schools in Temecula?

Vail Ranch Middle scores 50/100 (71st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 765 students. Use the schools in Temecula page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Vail Ranch Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Vail Ranch Middle in Temecula, 48.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Vail Ranch Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.8% Math proficient); White students (67.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 203 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
25.3%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 59th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-10.1pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 44th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
57.8%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 65th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.4%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 53th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 45th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
27.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 58th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 622628%38%20%14%65%+19
Grade 725025%41%15%19%66%+18
Grade 826119%37%26%18%56%+10
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 622727%31%28%15%58%+23
Grade 725229%25%27%18%54%+20
Grade 826124%23%23%30%47%+15
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1126721%31%43%5%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20348.8%−4+11
White29167.4%−0+6
Hispanic/Latino23052.2%−4+13
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Vail Ranch Middle ←5025.3%57.8%−10.14.9%
Temecula Middle1.9 mi6632.6%63.2%+11.12.6%
Erle Stanley Gardner Middle2 mi5127.5%55.8%−0.44.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195682#37025.7%61.7%6.2%4.2%+3.0pp
20225179#46322.1%53.0%23.8%2.5%+7.7pp
20235679#45023.4%55.2%20.7%7.7%+3.3pp
20245582#40224.3%54.6%16.7%3.2%+0.5pp
20255071#65425.3%57.8%16.4%4.9%-10.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.9%16.1%+10.2pp
Male6.5%16.8%+10.3pp
Asian3.1%4.2%+1.1pp
Black/African American4.8%26.1%+21.3pp
White0.0%3.2%+3.2pp
Hispanic/Latino4.1%19.1%+15.0pp
American Indian/Alaska Native0.0%
Two or More Races2.8%14.0%+11.2pp
Students with Disabilities12.9%26.7%+13.8pp
English Learners6.8%0.0%-6.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.4%22.6%+14.2pp
All Students6.2%16.4%+10.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction