Public school · San Francisco Unified

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary — Rating & test scores

San Francisco · K–8 · 673 students (2024–25)

How to read this →
93rdpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,728 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score
71 / 100

Weighted composite · 2026
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 73% and 74% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 215 in English, 214 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Advanced (exceeded)Proficient (met)Below Proficient

English

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
52%
Proficient
21%
Below Proficient
27%

73% proficient or advanced · 215 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaSan Francisco Unified
Advanced52%24%29%
Proficient21%22%21%
Developing12%21%18%
Minimal15%33%32%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced
50%
Proficient
24%
Below Proficient
26%

74% proficient or advanced · 214 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaSan Francisco Unified
Advanced50%21%27%
Proficient24%21%21%
Developing11%25%21%
Minimal15%33%31%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 4–8 · 2025
+11 ptsEnglish · above expected+19 ptsMath · above expected
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 4–8: 335 in English, 334 in math
Comparison
335 students in English and 334 in math in grades 4–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About half reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
52%English · exceeded the standard50%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 215 in English, 214 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Low-income students here (101 tested, grades 3–8, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (37% and 28%).grades 3–8 · spring 2026
64%English · met or exceeded55%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–8: 101
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 101 students.

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school73%
California46%

Tested: 215 here · 1,208,894 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school73%
San Francisco Unified50%

Tested: 215 here · 11,388 in San Francisco Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 75 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaSan Francisco Unified
Advanced52%24%29%
Proficient21%22%21%
Developing12%21%18%
Minimal15%33%32%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school74%
California42%

Tested: 214 here · 1,211,701 in California.

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school74%
San Francisco Unified48%

Tested: 214 here · 11,372 in San Francisco Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 75 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaSan Francisco Unified
Advanced50%21%27%
Proficient24%21%21%
Developing11%25%21%
Minimal15%33%31%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Progress over time

How have test results changed?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

Latest annual comparison

202576%217 tested
→
202673%215 tested

This school

California, same grades46% → 46%2025 → 2026 · 1,232,086 → 1,208,894 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

Latest annual comparison

202572%218 tested
→
202674%214 tested

This school

California, same grades41% → 42%2025 → 2026 · 1,241,652 → 1,211,701 tested

Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.

Explore the available years, charts & underlying data

English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2015.

Chart: 2017–2026. The table includes all available years.

English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)73%46%
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)74%42%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.

English went from 76% in 2017 to 73% in 2026. Math went from 78% in 2017 to 74% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201575%
227 tested		41%
1,396,572 tested
201679%
225 tested		45%
1,395,534 tested
201776%
229 tested		45%
1,384,680 tested
201882%
217 tested		49%
1,346,907 tested
201977%
227 tested		50%
1,332,547 tested
202281%
223 tested		45%
1,260,830 tested
202385%
215 tested		44%
1,247,801 tested
202482%
216 tested		45%
1,235,509 tested
202576%
217 tested		46%
1,232,086 tested
202673%
215 tested		46%
1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201576%
223 tested		35%
1,401,446 tested
201678%
225 tested		39%
1,401,413 tested
201778%
229 tested		40%
1,392,040 tested
201882%
217 tested		42%
1,352,321 tested
201978%
227 tested		44%
1,338,625 tested
202275%
223 tested		38%
1,265,943 tested
202377%
215 tested		40%
1,256,519 tested
202476%
216 tested		41%
1,249,262 tested
202572%
218 tested		41%
1,241,652 tested
202674%
214 tested		42%
1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure335 students in English, 334 in math · grades 4–8 · 2025
English+11ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)
Math+19ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 11 points above that prediction, and in math 19 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.

School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

14 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
27in 100 at the average San Francisco Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school

92 of 682 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school14 in 100
at the average San Francisco Unified school27 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
0.4%of students were suspended at least once (3 of 685), 2025–26
0.7%at the average San Francisco Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26Per 100 studentsStudents
Grades 4–61531 of 209
Grades 7–81114 of 132

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

101 tested per subject

English64% / 37%
Math55% / 28%

Asian

114 tested per subject

English92% / 73%
Math90% / 71%

White

105 English · 104 math tested

English88% / 61%
Math90% / 53%

Two or more races

103 tested per subject

English82% / 61%
Math83% / 53%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–8 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs San Francisco Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 101 tested
English64%+2638%+2737%
Math55%+2233%+2728%
Asian · 114 tested
English92%+2369%+1973%
Math90%+2268%+1971%
White · 105 tested in English, 104 in math
English88%+1276%+2761%
Math90%+2367%+3753%
Two or more races · 103 tested
English82%+1765%+2161%
Math83%+2756%+3053%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in San Francisco Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

Hispanic or Latino and Black or African American students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Low-income students here did far better than the same group statewide.

Read the student-group results as sentences

At Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary in San Francisco, 64.4% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, compared to 37.6% district-wide for those same grades and 37.2% statewide for those same grades. Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 26.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (55.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (92.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 23.6 percentage points: low-income students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 101 ELA grade test records.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2025–26 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

1. Asian: 26%2. White: 24%3. Two or more races: 18%4. Hispanic or Latino: 12%5. Not reported: 11%6. Black or African American: 7%7. Filipino: 2%Unallocated share: <1%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2025–26
  1. Asian26%
  2. White24%
  3. Two or more races18%
  4. Hispanic or Latino12%
  5. Not reported11%
  6. Black or African American7%
  7. Filipino2%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  9. Pacific Islander—
  10. Unallocated share<1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.
Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26Here
Asian26%
White24%
Two or more races18%
Hispanic or Latino12%
Not reported11%
Black or African American7%
Filipino2%
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About 1 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (23%, 156 of 673). California: 63%.

79% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 79.05%: 24.9 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 31.5 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

  1. ElementaryLilienthal (Claire) ElementaryThis campus · grades K-8
  2. MiddleLilienthal (Claire) ElementaryThis campus · grades K-8
  3. High schoolLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.
All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

  • Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle

    Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16

    77th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Giannini (A.P.) Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    92nd percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Aptos Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    80th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Francisco Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    36th percentile · Developing · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Hoover (Herbert) Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    73rd percentile · Solid · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Denman (James) Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    19th percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Lick (James) Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    20th percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Marina Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    75th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • King Jr. (Martin Luther) Academic Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    21st percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Presidio Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    93rd percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Roosevelt Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    90th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Visitacion Valley Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    11th percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Everett Middle

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    4th percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2026

    20% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

High-school links

  • Marshall (Thurgood) High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Lincoln (Abraham) High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Balboa High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Galileo High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Washington (George) High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Lowell High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Mission High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • O'Connell (John) High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Wallenberg (Raoul) Traditional High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

  • Burton (Phillip and Sala) Academic High

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

Getting in

Lilienthal (Claire) runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.

Ask San Francisco Unified which school serves your address.

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗
3630 Divisadero Street, San Francisco 94123

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

  1. How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
  2. How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
  3. What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
  4. What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (415) 749-3516 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby elementary schoolsStatewide percentile

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
  • Fairmont ElementaryPlacentia-Yorba Linda Unified · 794 enrolled · 23.2% meal eligibility
    92ndStrongScope Score 69/100
  • Lietz ElementaryUnion Elementary · 501 enrolled · 23.2% meal eligibility
    88thStrongScope Score 63/100
  • Lowell ElementaryLong Beach Unified · 609 enrolled · 23.2% meal eligibility
    83rdStrongScope Score 56/100
  • Thomas Edison ElementaryBurbank Unified · 432 enrolled · 23.1% meal eligibility
    78thStrongScope Score 52/100
  • Tony Tobin ElementaryTemecula Valley Unified · 718 enrolled · 23.1% meal eligibility
    84thStrongScope Score 58/100
  • David W. Long ElementaryEtiwanda Elementary · 757 enrolled · 23.2% meal eligibility
    93rdStrongScope Score 70/100
How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 15.2–31.2% meal eligibility and 337–1,346 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary a good elementary school?
Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary is in the 93rd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 71 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary was well above California in English and math: 73% and 74% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 73% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 74% the math standard; 52% and 50% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 215 students were tested in English and 214 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary rank in California?
Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary is in the 93rd percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary ranks #373 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 77th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 13.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 92 chronically absent of 682 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.4%; 3 unduplicated suspended students of 685 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 13.7%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.5%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary compare to other schools in San Francisco?
Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary is in the 93rd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 673 students. Use the schools in San Francisco page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary?
At Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary in San Francisco, 64.4% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, compared to 37.6% district-wide for those same grades and 37.2% statewide for those same grades. Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 26.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (55.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (92.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 23.6 percentage points: low-income students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 101 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary is zoned to Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle. Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle has a Scope Score of 53 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology
Download CSVReport a data issueMethodologyData updatesCDE CAASPP research files (opens in new tab)

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary is ranked #373 statewide · #7 of 73 in San Francisco Unified.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2025–26
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard51.3%21.5%42%
Met or exceeded73.6%43.0%23%
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)Above avgaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism13.7%16.9%5%
Suspension rate0.5%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)31.9%17.3%5%
Exceeded standard
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 79 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 74 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈77th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 2.7pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 73 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students

From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2025–26 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2026
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37753%17%13%17%70%+27
Grade 47046%23%13%19%69%+24
Grade 56857%24%10%9%81%+33
Grade 66667%18%9%6%85%+39
Grade 76466%23%8%3%89%+41
Grade 86671%26%2%2%97%+49

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools

State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4052 reporting schools

State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 48.5%; n=2627 reporting schools

State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2647 reporting schools

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2026
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37651%21%12%16%72%+26
Grade 47041%24%19%16%66%+24
Grade 56859%25%3%13%84%+48
Grade 66668%17%8%8%85%+50
Grade 76470%9%13%8%80%+45
Grade 86683%6%8%3%89%+56

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools

State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.9%; n=4050 reporting schools

State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 35.1%; n=2627 reporting schools

State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 33.9%; n=2651 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA7471.6%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA7375.3%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA7082.9%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA6583.1%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA6797.0%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA6393.7%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math7464.9%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math7474.3%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math7075.7%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math6581.5%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math6795.5%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math6393.7%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA7783.1%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA7382.2%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA6681.8%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA6695.5%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA6789.5%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA6369.8%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math7783.1%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math7372.6%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math6671.2%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math6692.4%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math6786.6%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math6376.2%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA7582.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA7084.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA7087.1%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA7090.0%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA6381.0%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA6387.3%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math7576.0%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math7074.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math7080.0%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math7081.4%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math6377.8%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math6376.2%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA7277.8%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA7389.0%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA7876.9%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA6172.1%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA6387.3%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA5984.8%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math7276.4%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math7384.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math7864.1%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math6180.3%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math6384.1%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math5976.3%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA7873.1%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA7576.0%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA7482.4%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA6788.1%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA7087.1%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA6684.8%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math7878.2%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math7578.7%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math7478.4%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math6785.1%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math7080.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math6663.6%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA7572.0%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA7487.8%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA6886.8%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA7087.1%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA6684.8%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA6479.7%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math7578.7%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math7489.2%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math6877.9%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math7077.1%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math6681.8%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math6471.9%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA8073.8%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA7481.1%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA7574.7%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA6675.8%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA6586.2%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA6681.8%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math8082.5%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math7479.7%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math7570.7%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math6680.3%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math6581.5%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math6668.2%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA7784%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA8174%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA6779%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA6477%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA6682%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA6588%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math7783%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math8174%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math6776%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math6486%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math6674%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math6569%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA8473%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA7272%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA7179%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA6674%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA6685%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA5377%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math8381%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math6974%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math7172%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math6676%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math6674%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math5763%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide13451%31%13%4%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10164.4%+27+27
Asian11492.1%+23+20
White10587.6%+12+27
Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

SchoolDistScope · percentile · bandEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary ←—7193rd percentile · Strong · statewide · 202651.3%73.6%+11.1pp+82 pts0.5%
San Francisco Public Montessori0.9 mi3140th percentile · Developing · statewide · 202619.2%37.8%+0.5pp—1.5%
Sherman Elementary1 mi3957th percentile · Solid · statewide · 202623.6%46.6%−12.7pp—0.4%
Cobb (William L.) Elementary1.1 mi3957th percentile · Solid · statewide · 202622.9%39.7%−10.4pp—0.3%
California average—39School average · no percentile21.5%43.0%−2.7pp—1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
201976/10094#294California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2025 · 10.5% → 2026 · 13.5% · +3.0pp
Suspension rate2025 · 0.3% → 2026 · 0.4% · +0.1pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresExcMet+
2026 · ELA41159.6%81.3%
2026 · Math41061.7%79.0%
2025 · ELA41258.7%83.5%
2025 · Math41358.4%80.4%
2024 · ELA41257.0%83.7%
2024 · Math41260.4%80.3%
2023 · ELA41160.3%85.4%
2023 · Math41155.5%77.6%
2022 · ELA40651.0%81.3%
2022 · Math40652.2%77.3%
2019 · ELA43051.6%81.6%
2019 · Math43058.1%77.4%
2018 · ELA41758.0%83.0%
2018 · Math41757.3%79.6%
2017 · ELA42650.0%78.6%
2017 · Math42651.6%77.2%
2016 · ELA42047%80%
2016 · Math42049%77%
2015 · ELA41244%76%
2015 · Math41249%74%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019———54.5%77.8%4.5%0.1%+4.8pp
2022———49.1%78.2%18.3%0.3%-6.6pp
2023———57.1%80.7%15.2%0.1%+4.2pp
2024———56.8%79.0%8.8%0.1%-6.6pp
2025———51.1%74.1%11.0%0.4%+11.0pp
20267193#37351.3%73.6%13.7%0.5%+11.1pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years
Group2018–192025–26Δ
Female4.1%12.8%+8.7pp
Male4.2%14.3%+10.1pp
Asian1.0%9.6%+8.6pp
Black/African American11.4%21.7%+10.3pp
Filipino0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino8.8%23.8%+15.0pp
Two or More Races1.0%10.7%+9.7pp
White5.2%10.8%+5.6pp
Students with Disabilities4.3%20.0%+15.7pp
English Learners6.5%14.3%+7.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.4%23.3%+13.9pp
All Students4.1%13.5%+9.4pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupELAnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+11335Accelerated+19334Accelerated
English Only+11225not categorised+17225not categorised
White+1398Accelerated+1398Accelerated
Asian+1295Accelerated+3195Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+270Average+1170Accelerated
Two or More Races+1759Accelerated+3058Exceptional
English Learner+1242Accelerated+2142Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino−735Moderate−235Average
Students with Disabilities−232Average032Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+2331not categorised+3431not categorised
Black or African American+317Average−217Average
English Learners Only−1611not categorised−911not categorised

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
64%
exceeded standard · 83% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 77 ELA test records with scores
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
57%
exceeded standard · 81% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 68 ELA test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 68 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

335 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, ELA: +11 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 81st percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.81st pctile · +11 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

334 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, math: +19 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 91st percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.91st pctile · +19 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$17,416 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 51,790 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

Central federal expenditures attributed here$1,528 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 673

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,762 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 60%Instruction support 12%Student services 15%Administration 6%Buildings & maintenance 7%Other 1%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$17,416 per pupil
2020$17,139 per pupil
2019$17,228 per pupil
2018$13,640 per pupil
2017$11,532 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94123
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94123
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$218,603
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)83.95%
ZCTA population24,054
Median age32.9 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/lilienthal-claire-elementary-2479"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction