ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary · San Francisco

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary: More than half of kids exceed the standard. But the zoned next school scores lower.

Lilienthal (Claire) holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.

3630 Divisadero Street, 94123 (opens in new tab)·San Francisco Unified·San Francisco·Grades K-8·673 students·23% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(415) 749-3516
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7345
% Exceeded51%21%
% Met+74%43%
Growth+11.0-2.9
Absence11.0%17.9%
Suspension0.4%1.6%
Scope Score
73
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #365 statewide · #7 of 74 in San Francisco Unified

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary scores 73 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 94th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “74% proficient” and call it done. Lilienthal (Claire) deserves a closer read. It sits at the 94th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Lilienthal (Claire)'s low-income kids hit 59.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 94th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathYellow(Declined)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 74% meet the standard today, versus 78% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%78%83%83%72%
Grade 476%89%84%82%75%
Grade 582%77%87%82%83%
Grade 688%72%90%95%83%
Grade 787%87%81%90%97%
Grade 885%85%87%70%94%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 378%76%76%83%65%
Grade 479%85%74%73%74%
Grade 578%64%80%71%76%
Grade 685%80%81%92%82%
Grade 780%84%78%87%96%
Grade 864%76%76%76%94%

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
51.1%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The next step · the zoned path
26pts

the zoned path continues to Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle, which scores 26 points lower — worth asking about on a tour.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

41%
31%
28%
Grade 3 · 72% proficient
58%
18%
24%
Grade 4 · 76% proficient
63%
20%
17%
Grade 5 · 83% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 22.3pp across grades; the floor rises 11.2pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

59.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Lilienthal (Claire)'s most underrated number

59.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Lilienthal (Claire) low-income: 59.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
51.1%
State 21.3%
29.7pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+11.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
74.1%
State 42.7%
31.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
11.0%
State 17.9%
6.9pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.4%
State 1.6%
1.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
37.3%
State 18.0%
19.3pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary in San Francisco, 59.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 20.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (51.4% Math proficient); Asian students (90.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.7 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 74 students tested.

All students at this school: 82% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 82%, district —, state 43%82%
FemaleFemale: this school 80%, district 50%, state 44%80% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 84%, district 49%, state 42%84% · +3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 92%, district 69%, state 72%92% · +10 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 88%, district 71%, state 56%88% · +7 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 84%, district 63%, state 56%84% · +2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 55%, district 36%, state 32%55% · −27 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 55%, district 22%, state 32%55% · −27 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 46%, district 15%, state 26%46% · −36 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 10.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.0%, district 27.1%, state 17.9%11.0% · −6.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.4%, district —, state 1.6%0.4% · −1.2pp vs state

Grades 4–6 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (12.9% vs 7.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.9%
Grades 7–87.5%
TK/K12.2%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Brown Jr. (Willie L) Middle, which scores 26 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 22:122:1
Teaching staff34 teachers
Avg. experience10.5 years
Fully credentialed79%
First-year teachers6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,525 – $131,654
Principal salary$150,963 – $163,648
Superintendent salary$328,879

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,900, CA average $14,815$20,900 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,762 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support12%
Student services15%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$17,416 per pupil
2019$17,139 per pupil
2018$17,228 per pupil
2017$13,640 per pupil
2016$11,532 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian27.3%
District 27.7% · CA 10.2%
White26.3%
District 13.1% · CA 19.9%
Other26.1%
District 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic12.8%
District 36.7% · CA 56.1%
Black7.4%
District 7.3% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 23.2% (41pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$219K · CA $85K
Median home value$2.00M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+84% · CA 35%
ZIP population24,054
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 75% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary a good elementary school?

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary has a Scope Score of 73 out of 100, placing it in the 94th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #365 statewide. 51.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 29.7 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 74.1% of students at Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 51.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 51.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 435 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary rank in California?

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary ranks #365 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 94th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary increases by 11.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary?

11.0% of students at Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.4%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary compare to other schools in San Francisco?

Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary scores 73/100 (94th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 673 students. Use the schools in San Francisco page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary in San Francisco, 59.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 20.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (51.4% Math proficient); Asian students (90.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.7 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 74 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
51.1%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 79th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+11.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 58th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
74.1%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 74th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.0%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 61th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.4%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 60th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
37.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 77th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37441%31%11%18%72%+28
Grade 47358%18%12%12%75%+31
Grade 57063%20%6%11%83%+35
Grade 66557%26%11%6%83%+37
Grade 76782%15%1%1%97%+49
Grade 86354%40%3%3%94%+48
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37441%24%18%18%65%+19
Grade 47439%35%11%15%74%+33
Grade 57066%10%11%13%76%+40
Grade 66560%22%11%8%82%+47
Grade 76782%13%1%3%96%+62
Grade 86367%27%2%5%94%+61
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1113344%32%24%1%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7459.5%+21+21
Asian11890.7%+20+16
White11388.5%+13+27
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Lilienthal (Claire) Elementary ←7351.1%74.1%+11.00.4%
Chinese Immersion School at DeAvila2.3 mi8859.2%81.0%+25.60.1%
Peabody (George) Elementary1.8 mi7652.9%79.8%+12.50.2%
Alamo Elementary2.5 mi7243.1%70.2%+8.50.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20198398#11754.5%77.8%4.2%0.0%+4.8pp
20226893#39249.1%78.2%17.6%0.2%-6.6pp
20238098#13557.1%80.7%14.5%0.0%+4.2pp
20247897#18556.8%79.0%8.8%0.1%-6.6pp
20257394#36551.1%74.1%11.0%0.4%+11.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.1%10.2%+6.1pp
Male4.2%10.8%+6.6pp
Asian1.0%7.1%+6.1pp
Black/African American11.4%20.0%+8.6pp
Filipino6.7%2.7%-4.0pp
White0.0%20.0%+20.0pp
Hispanic/Latino8.8%19.5%+10.7pp
Two or More Races1.0%4.8%+3.8pp
Students with Disabilities4.3%20.8%+16.5pp
English Learners6.5%17.2%+10.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.4%22.3%+12.9pp
All Students4.1%10.5%+6.4pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction