Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet posts 41% meeting the standard and 16.4% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 48 | 16% | 41% | -11.4 | 28.3% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 63rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “41% proficient” and call it done. Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 35.7% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 13th to the 63rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 2700 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 41% of students meet the standard today, above the 12% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 12% | 7% | 33% | 30% | 52% |
| Grade 4 | 14% | 9% | 23% | 39% | 32% |
| Grade 5 | 31% | 45% | 44% | 69% | 48% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 6% | 19% | 30% | 19% | 52% |
| Grade 4 | 2% | 3% | 17% | 17% | 26% |
| Grade 5 | 7% | 28% | 41% | 52% | 33% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 15.6pp across grades; the floor slips 4.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet in Los Angeles, 47.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet outperforms its district average for low-income students by 6.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.4% Math proficient); Black students (45.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 8.8 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 57 students tested.
8 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Grades 4–6 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of TK/K students (38.5% vs 22.6%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$6,398 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 140 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet a good elementary school?
What are Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet's CAASPP test scores?
How does Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet rank in California?
Is Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet?
How does Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 59
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 30% | 22% | 35% | 13% | 52% | +9 |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 11% | 21% | 26% | 42% | 32% | −13 |
| Grade 5 | 27 | 15% | 33% | 30% | 22% | 48% | +0 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 26% | 26% | 17% | 30% | 52% | +6 |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 5% | 21% | 16% | 58% | 26% | −15 |
| Grade 5 | 27 | 11% | 22% | 37% | 30% | 33% | −2 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 27 | 4% | 11% | 63% | 22% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 57 | 47.4% | +6 | +9 |
| Black/African American | 44 | 45.5% | +10 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Bradley Global Awareness Magnet ← | — | 48 | 16.4% | 40.6% | −11.4 | 0.3% |
| Sixty-First Street Elementary | 3.1 mi | 61 | 18.8% | 38.5% | −3.7 | 0.4% |
| Saturn Street Elementary | 2.9 mi | 58 | 25.8% | 45.1% | −7.8 | 0.2% |
| Queen Anne Place Elementary | 2.5 mi | 58 | 29.6% | 56.4% | +7.1 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 28 | 13 | #4795 | 2.1% | 12.0% | 26.7% | 0.6% | +9.8pp |
| 2022 | 38 | 54 | #2620 | 4.2% | 18.3% | 54.6% | 0.1% | +23.4pp |
| 2023 | 35 | 41 | #3394 | 7.9% | 31.4% | 45.9% | 2.0% | +11.2pp |
| 2024 | 58 | 80 | #1125 | 14.5% | 37.7% | 38.6% | 0.3% | +35.8pp |
| 2025 | 48 | 63 | #2138 | 16.4% | 40.6% | 28.3% | 0.3% | -11.4pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 27.6% | 31.9% | +4.3pp |
| Male | 26.9% | 29.3% | +2.4pp |
| Black/African American | 31.1% | 36.6% | +5.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 17.4% | 17.5% | +0.1pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 17.4% | 21.7% | +4.3pp |
| English Learners | 17.4% | 26.3% | +8.9pp |
| Foster Youth | 10.0% | — | — |
| Homeless | 48.0% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 27.8% | 33.1% | +5.3pp |
| All Students | 27.2% | 30.5% | +3.3pp |
| Filipino | — | 36.4% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction