ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Redwood Middle · Thousand Oaks

Redwood Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Redwood posts 56% meeting the standard, and 29.6% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4743
% Exceeded30%17%
% Met+56%39%
Growth-7.4+1.5
Absence15.4%18.5%
Suspension4.5%3.7%
Scope Score
47
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #768 statewide · #4 of 6 in Conejo Valley Unified

Redwood Middle scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 66th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “56% proficient” and call it done. Redwood deserves a closer read. The school sits in Thousand Oaks, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 78th to the 66th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 56% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 663%66%68%65%65%
Grade 761%59%69%62%67%
Grade 861%59%63%64%58%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 647%51%47%55%51%
Grade 745%43%51%50%49%
Grade 851%40%43%42%43%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

28%
37%
35%
Grade 6 · 65% proficient
35%
32%
33%
Grade 7 · 67% proficient
28%
30%
42%
Grade 8 · 58% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor slips 6.3pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
29.6%
State 16.8%
12.8pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-7.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
55.5%
State 39.3%
16.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.4%
State 18.5%
3.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
4.5%
State 3.7%
0.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.7%
State 18.0%
8.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Redwood Middle in Thousand Oaks, 40.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Redwood Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.1% Math proficient); White students (76.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 61.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 175 students tested.

All students at this school: 55% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 55%, district —, state 39%55%
MaleMale: this school 55%, district 60%, state 42%55% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 55%, district 62%, state 44%55% · −0 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 67%, district 69%, state 56%67% · +12 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 37%, district 40%, state 32%37% · −18 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 33%, district 37%, state 32%33% · −22 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 14%, district 21%, state 15%14% · −41 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 9%, state 11%5% · −51 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 62%, district 71%, state 56%62% · +7 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 21%, district 23%, state 22%21% · −34 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 95%, district 86%, state 72%95% · +40 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 8.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.4%, district 13.8%, state 18.5%15.4% · −3.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.5%, district —, state 3.7%4.5% · +0.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.1%
Grades 7–814.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 21:123:1
Teaching staff31 teachers
Avg. experience16.3 years
Fully credentialed80%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,015 – $123,634
Principal salary$158,682 – $180,239
Superintendent salary$316,924

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,402, CA average $14,815$16,402 · spent at this school
Federal share$4 per student

$4 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,979 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support11%
Student services8%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,901 per pupil
2019$10,885 per pupil
2018$11,119 per pupil
2017$10,744 per pupil
2016$10,214 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White46.9%
District 49.6% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic38.9%
District 31.9% · CA 56.1%
Other8.3%
District 9.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian4.1%
District 8.4% · CA 10.2%
Black1.9%
District 1.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 27.5% (36pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$119K · CA $85K
Median home value$937K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+44% · CA 35%
ZIP population42,236
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 38% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Redwood Middle a good middle school?

Redwood Middle has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 66th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #768 statewide. 29.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.8 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Redwood Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 55.5% of students at Redwood Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 29.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 29.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,148 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Redwood Middle rank in California?

Redwood Middle ranks #768 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 66th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Redwood Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Redwood Middle decreases by 7.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Redwood Middle?

15.4% of students at Redwood Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 4.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Redwood Middle compare to other schools in Thousand Oaks?

Redwood Middle scores 47/100 (66th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 589 students. Use the schools in Thousand Oaks page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Redwood Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Redwood Middle in Thousand Oaks, 40.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Redwood Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.1% Math proficient); White students (76.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 61.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 175 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
29.6%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 64th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-7.4pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 35th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
55.5%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 63th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.4%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 54th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.5%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 47th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 34th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 616728%37%17%19%65%+18
Grade 720135%32%16%16%67%+19
Grade 820228%30%26%16%58%+12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 617029%22%21%28%51%+16
Grade 720433%16%24%27%49%+15
Grade 820425%18%24%33%43%+10
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1120316%22%40%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17540.8%−1+3
White26776.0%+2+14
Hispanic/Latino22244.4%−1+6
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Redwood Middle ←4729.6%55.5%−7.44.5%
Colina Middle2 mi4926.1%53.6%+1.53.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195378#44826.3%54.6%6.1%2.6%+0.8pp
20224976#52727.1%53.0%14.6%4.0%-8.7pp
20235680#43029.1%57.0%16.6%6.7%-4.6pp
20245582#39928.5%56.3%11.9%3.7%-7.3pp
20254766#76829.6%55.5%15.4%4.5%-7.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.6%14.8%+10.2pp
Male7.3%15.9%+8.6pp
Asian0.0%3.8%+3.8pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino8.4%22.6%+14.2pp
Two or More Races2.3%13.5%+11.2pp
Students with Disabilities15.0%29.0%+14.0pp
English Learners14.1%33.3%+19.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.3%23.8%+13.5pp
All Students6.1%15.3%+9.2pp
Black/African American27.3%
Homeless39.5%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction