Mark Keppel High: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Mark Keppel posts 42.2% exceeding the standard — versus 15.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 67 | 42% | 67% | 94.1% | 70.4% | 2.6% | 0.6% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Mark Keppel High scores 67 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 93rd percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “67% proficient” and call it done. Mark Keppel deserves a closer read. The school sits in Alhambra, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Mark Keppel's low-income kids hit 71.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 93rd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 67% meet the standard today, versus 72% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 74% | 74% | 75% | 73% | 75% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 69% | 60% | 55% | 54% | 59% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 67 are proficient by 11th grade → 94 graduate → 70 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
Mark Keppel's most underrated number
71.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Mark Keppel High in Alhambra, 71.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 56.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Mark Keppel High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 14.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (54.8% Math proficient); Asian students (77.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 58.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 269 students tested.
5 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$680 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 2,201 students, this school is well above the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 50% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mark Keppel High a good high school?
What are Mark Keppel High's CAASPP test scores?
How does Mark Keppel High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Mark Keppel High?
How does Mark Keppel High compare to other schools in Alhambra?
How does Mark Keppel High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 61
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 70
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 523 | 48% | 27% | 12% | 13% | 75% | +28 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 523 | 36% | 23% | 16% | 24% | 59% | +36 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 531 | 17% | 33% | 43% | 8% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 269 | 71.4% | +15 | +33 |
| Asian | 313 | 77.0% | +4 | +3 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 128 | 64.8% | +14 | +26 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Keppel High ← | — | 67 | 42.2% | 67.1% | — | 0.6% |
| Gabrielino High | 1.7 mi | 65 | 35.1% | 60.6% | — | 2.5% |
| San Gabriel High | 1.6 mi | 60 | 26.7% | 50.9% | — | 2.2% |
| Alhambra High | 1.9 mi | 58 | 26.9% | 51.2% | — | 2.9% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 74 | 95 | #98 | 47.7% | 71.8% | 0.8% | 0.7% | — |
| 2022 | 69 | 94 | #129 | 41.1% | 67.3% | 4.3% | 0.4% | — |
| 2023 | 68 | 94 | #129 | 42.1% | 65.3% | 10.7% | 1.4% | — |
| 2024 | 67 | 93 | #140 | 40.0% | 63.6% | 2.6% | 1.9% | — |
| 2025 | 67 | 93 | #156 | 42.2% | 67.1% | 2.6% | 0.6% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0.2% | 1.9% | +1.7pp |
| Male | 0.1% | 1.8% | +1.7pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | 1.4% | +1.4pp |
| Filipino | 0.0% | 0.7% | +0.7pp |
| White | 1.9% | 0.0% | -1.9pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 0.4% | 3.3% | +2.9pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 1.6% | +1.6pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 0.0% | 7.8% | +7.8pp |
| English Learners | 0.0% | 3.9% | +3.9pp |
| Foster Youth | 11.1% | 18.2% | +7.1pp |
| Homeless | 0.0% | 15.4% | +15.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0.2% | 2.5% | +2.3pp |
| All Students | 0.1% | 1.8% | +1.7pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction