School district · Los Angeles County

Alhambra Unified schools

Alhambra Unified’s 13 public elementary schools run from the 42nd to the 88th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 13 schools

from 42nd to 88th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • William Northrup Elementary: 88th percentile, Strong
  • Ramona Elementary: 84th percentile, Strong
  • Monterey Highlands Elementary: 83rd percentile, Strong
  • Fremont Elementary: 81st percentile, Strong
  • Garfield Elementary: 78th percentile, Strong
  • Brightwood Elementary: 78th percentile, Strong
  • Martha Baldwin Elementary: 76th percentile, Strong
  • Park Elementary: 75th percentile, Strong
  • Ynez Elementary: 66th percentile, Solid
  • Emery Park Elementary: 63rd percentile, Solid
  • Repetto Elementary: 55th percentile, Solid
  • Marguerita Elementary: 50th percentile, Solid
  • Granada Elementary: 42nd percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
4Solid
8Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 13 schools

from 69th to 96th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Monterey Highlands Elementary: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Brightwood Elementary: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Ramona Elementary: 91st percentile, Strong
  • William Northrup Elementary: 89th percentile, Strong
  • Repetto Elementary: 87th percentile, Strong
  • Martha Baldwin Elementary: 87th percentile, Strong
  • Ynez Elementary: 86th percentile, Strong
  • Fremont Elementary: 84th percentile, Strong
  • Park Elementary: 82nd percentile, Strong
  • Garfield Elementary: 80th percentile, Strong
  • Emery Park Elementary: 75th percentile, Strong
  • Marguerita Elementary: 74th percentile, Solid
  • Granada Elementary: 69th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
2Solid
11Strong

High · 3 schools

from 70th to 87th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Mark Keppel High: 87th percentile, Strong
  • Alhambra High: 71st percentile, Solid
  • San Gabriel High: 70th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
2Solid
1Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 13 of the 16 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 16 ranked schools

Schools around Alhambra Unified

16 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Alhambra Unified score highest?

William Northrup Elementary is highest, at the 88th percentile.

That’s higher than 88 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Alhambra Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 10 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Alhambra Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Alhambra Unified score highest?

Monterey Highlands Elementary and Brightwood Elementary are highest, both at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Alhambra Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 10 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Alhambra Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Alhambra Unified score highest?

Mark Keppel High is highest, at the 87th percentile.

That’s higher than 87 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Alhambra Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Context

The average high school in Alhambra Unified had 8 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

The district

Where does Alhambra Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Alhambra Unified spent $20,649 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 56 cents of every Alhambra Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction56%
  • Instruction support13%
  • Student services14%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance11%
  • Other1%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$285.2 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 44 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 99% of its $288.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 115 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 64% of the money. The plan itself puts 81% of it toward staff.

  • High Quality Administrative, Certificated, Classified and Substitute Staff $93.5 million
  • Students with Disabilities (SWD) Programs $67.0 million
  • Facilities Operations $21.7 million
  • 41 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

4 of the plan’s 44 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $10.2 million
  • English learners $6.1 million

Largest of these

  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) for Unduplicated Pupils$6.2 million
  • Dual Language Immersion Program (DLIP)$4.9 million
  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)$4.0 million
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $30.6 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025-2026, it planned $30.4 million and estimates it spent $31.2 million, $0.8 million (3%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $10.6 million (4%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Students with Disabilities (SWD) Programs, which went from $63.3 million to $67.0 million.

Largest cuts

  • Staff & Student Technology Systems−⁠$984,386
  • Textbook Sufficiency−⁠$903,179
  • Campus Safety−⁠$799,212

Largest increases

  • Students with Disabilities (SWD) Programs+⁠$3.7 million
  • After School Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) and Care+⁠$3.1 million
  • High Quality Administrative, Certificated, Classified and Substitute Staff+⁠$2.7 million

Ask: What did Staff & Student Technology Systems pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $984,386 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2 · Experiences & Well-Being10 in 1009 in 1001 fewer in 100

Goals 1, 3 and 4 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • High Quality Administrative, Certificated, Classified and Substitute Staff · $93,543,592
  • Students with Disabilities (SWD) Programs · $67,013,473
  • Facilities Operations · $21,660,160
The full plan4 goals, 7 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($285.2 million).

Where does the money go?

67% to Goal 1, Student Learning. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Student Learning$191.1 million67% of action budgets

“The District will provide an equitable, safe and inclusive education ensuring each learner is life- and future-ready (LFR)” p. 17 ↗

17 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $184.4 million (+⁠$6.7 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. High Quality Administrative, Certificated, Classified and Substitute Staff$93.5 millionaction 1.15 · p. 71 ↗
  2. Students with Disabilities (SWD) Programs$67.0 millionaction 1.6 · p. 70 ↗
  3. Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) for Unduplicated Pupils$6.2 millionaction 1.3 · p. 70 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $5.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Dual Language Immersion Program (DLIP)$4.9 millionaction 1.10 · p. 71 ↗
  5. Career Technical Education (CTE)/ Dual Enrollment (DE)$4.7 millionaction 1.8 · p. 71 ↗

12 more funded actions in this goal

  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) · action 1.2 · p. 70 ↗$4.0 million
  • Arts Education · action 1.11 · p. 71 ↗$3.0 million
  • Expanded and Enhanced Certificated Training · action 1.12 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.8 million
  • English Learner (EL) Program · action 1.5 · p. 70 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $643,285 is state funding counted toward those services$1.3 million
  • CTE/​DE for Low Income Students · action 1.9 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.2 million
  • Textbook Sufficiency · action 1.1 · p. 70 ↗$1.2 million
  • Teacher Training and Certification (TT&C) Program · action 1.16 · p. 71 ↗$0.5 million
  • Educational Technology Training and Innovation · action 1.13 · p. 71 ↗$0.4 million
  • Students with Disabilities (SWD) Inclusive Practices/​Differentiated Assistance (DA) · action 1.7 · p. 71 ↗$0.3 million
  • Administrative Staff Support, Mentoring and Professional Development (PD) · action 1.18 · p. 71 ↗$0.1 million
  • Equity School Plans · action 1.4 · p. 70 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Staff Training and Support · action 1.17 · p. 71 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Students with Disabilities (SWD) Programs+⁠$3.7 million$63.3 million → $67.0 million · p. 70 ↗
  2. High Quality Administrative, Certificated, Classified and Substitute Staff+⁠$2.7 million$90.8 million → $93.5 million · p. 71 ↗
  3. Career Technical Education (CTE)/ Dual Enrollment (DE)+⁠$0.9 million$3.7 million → $4.7 million · p. 71 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) for Unduplicated Pupils · $5.7 million → $6.2 million · p. 70 ↗+⁠$0.5 million
  • Dual Language Immersion Program (DLIP) · $4.9 million → $4.9 million · p. 71 ↗+⁠$1,160
  • Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) · $4.0 million → $4.0 million · p. 70 ↗+⁠$44,489
  • Arts Education · $3.4 million → $3.0 million · p. 71 ↗−⁠$0.4 million
  • Expanded and Enhanced Certificated Training · $2.7 million → $2.8 million · p. 71 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • English Learner (EL) Program · $0.9 million → $1.3 million · p. 70 ↗+⁠$0.4 million
  • CTE/​DE for Low Income Students · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 71 ↗+⁠$32,123
  • Textbook Sufficiency · $2.1 million → $1.2 million · p. 70 ↗−⁠$0.9 million
  • Teacher Training and Certification (TT&C) Program · $616,388 → $463,979 · p. 71 ↗−⁠$152,409
  • Educational Technology Training and Innovation · $628,595 → $439,740 · p. 71 ↗−⁠$188,855
  • Students with Disabilities (SWD) Inclusive Practices/​Differentiated Assistance (DA) · $328,325 → $336,533 · p. 71 ↗+⁠$8,208
  • Administrative Staff Support, Mentoring and Professional Development (PD) · $55,750 → $55,000 · p. 71 ↗−⁠$750
  • Equity School Plans · $120,215 → $7,600 · p. 70 ↗−⁠$112,615
  • Staff Training and Support · $98,854 → $7,000 · p. 71 ↗−⁠$91,854

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 17 ↗.

Goal 2Experiences & Well-Being$40.7 million14% of action budgets

“The District will nurture a positive school experience that promotes well-being, growth, and development for all” p. 36 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $36.5 million (+⁠$4.2 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. School Meal Program$16.9 millionaction 2.9 · p. 72 ↗
  2. After School Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) and Care$11.0 millionaction 2.6 · p. 72 ↗
  3. Counseling and Health Services Support for Unduplicated Pupils$4.4 millionaction 2.5 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Positive School Climate$3.6 millionaction 2.3 · p. 71 ↗
  5. Extracurricular Activities$1.5 millionaction 2.8 · p. 72 ↗

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Health Services · action 2.4 · p. 71 ↗$1.5 million
  • Athletics · action 2.7 · p. 72 ↗$1.0 million
  • Positive Behavior Outcomes · action 2.2 · p. 71 ↗$0.6 million
  • Positive School Attendance and Reduction of Chronic Absenteeism · action 2.1 · p. 71 ↗$0.3 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. After School Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) and Care+⁠$3.1 million$7.9 million → $11.0 million · p. 72 ↗
  2. School Meal Program+⁠$1.0 million$15.8 million → $16.9 million · p. 72 ↗
  3. Athletics+⁠$748,356$245,163 → $993,519 · p. 72 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Counseling and Health Services Support for Unduplicated Pupils · $4.5 million → $4.4 million · p. 72 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Positive School Climate · $4.2 million → $3.6 million · p. 71 ↗−⁠$0.6 million
  • Extracurricular Activities · $1.6 million → $1.5 million · p. 72 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Health Services · $1.4 million → $1.5 million · p. 71 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Positive Behavior Outcomes · $611,935 → $646,877 · p. 71 ↗+⁠$34,942
  • Positive School Attendance and Reduction of Chronic Absenteeism · $300,681 → $316,759 · p. 71 ↗+⁠$16,078

How the plan measures it · 2 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 36 ↗.

Goal 3Families & Community Partnerships$5.9 million2% of action budgets

“The District will actively collaborate with families and community partners to promote and support student success” p. 44 ↗

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.9 million (−⁠$13,269)

Largest funded actions

  1. Certificated Adjunct Duties$2.7 millionaction 3.8 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Community Schools$1.3 millionaction 3.4 · p. 72 ↗
  3. Communication and Outreach$1.2 millionaction 3.2 · p. 72 ↗
  4. Caregiver and Community Collaboration to Increase Engagement for Unduplicated Pupils$0.6 millionaction 3.6 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Foster/​Homeless Youth$0.2 millionaction 3.7 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $59,991 is state funding counted toward those services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Caregiver and Community Collaboration and Engagement · action 3.5 · p. 72 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Student Voices · action 3.3 · p. 72 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Communication and Outreach−⁠$44,078$1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 72 ↗
  2. Foster/​Homeless Youth+⁠$24,198$172,205 → $196,403 · p. 72 ↗
  3. Community Schools+⁠$19,011$1.2 million → $1.3 million · p. 72 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Certificated Adjunct Duties · $2.7 million → $2.7 million · p. 72 ↗+⁠$3,720
  • Caregiver and Community Collaboration to Increase Engagement for Unduplicated Pupils · $580,544 → $562,175 · p. 72 ↗−⁠$18,369
  • Caregiver and Community Collaboration and Engagement · $36,849 → $36,848 · p. 72 ↗−⁠$1
  • Student Voices · $6,950 → $9,200 · p. 72 ↗+⁠$2,250

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 44 ↗.

Goal 4Safety & Operational Effectiveness$47.4 million17% of action budgets

“The District will support student learning and well-being by prioritizing safety and operational effectiveness” p. 50 ↗

11 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $47.7 million (−⁠$341,256)

Largest funded actions

  1. Facilities Operations$21.7 millionaction 4.10 · p. 73 ↗
  2. Afterschool and Extended Year Campus Safety & Learning Environment for Unduplicated Pupils$8.7 millionaction 4.3 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Transportation Operations$4.3 millionaction 4.11 · p. 73 ↗
  4. Campus Safety$4.1 millionaction 4.1 · p. 72 ↗
  5. Technology Support of Unduplicated Pupils$2.3 millionaction 4.5 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

6 more funded actions in this goal

  • Transportation for Unduplicated Pupils · action 4.12 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.3 million
  • Technology Staff · action 4.4 · p. 73 ↗$1.9 million
  • Staff & Student Technology Systems · action 4.9 · p. 73 ↗$1.2 million
  • Technology Infrastructure · action 4.7 · p. 73 ↗$0.4 million
  • Cybersecurity · action 4.8 · p. 73 ↗$0.3 million
  • Technology Operations · action 4.6 · p. 73 ↗$0.2 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Afterschool and Extended Year Campus Safety & Learning Environment for Unduplicated Pupils+⁠$1.6 million$7.1 million → $8.7 million · p. 72 ↗
  2. Staff & Student Technology Systems−⁠$1.0 million$2.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 73 ↗
  3. Campus Safety−⁠$0.8 million$4.9 million → $4.1 million · p. 72 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Facilities Operations · $21.0 million → $21.7 million · p. 73 ↗+⁠$0.7 million
  • Transportation Operations · $4.1 million → $4.3 million · p. 73 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Technology Support of Unduplicated Pupils · $2.9 million → $2.3 million · p. 73 ↗−⁠$0.6 million
  • Transportation for Unduplicated Pupils · $2.5 million → $2.3 million · p. 73 ↗−⁠$0.3 million
  • Technology Staff · $1.7 million → $1.9 million · p. 73 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Technology Infrastructure · $626,864 → $447,808 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$179,056
  • Cybersecurity · $377,730 → $305,490 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$72,240
  • Technology Operations · $182,001 → $175,820 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$6,181

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 50 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 14,597 students
1. Asian: 47%2. Hispanic or Latino: 42%3. Two or more races: 3%4. Filipino: 3%5. Not reported: 2%6. White: 2%7. Black or African American: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Asian47%
  2. Hispanic or Latino42%
  3. Two or more races3%
  4. Filipino3%
  5. Not reported2%
  6. White2%
  7. Black or African American<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

48%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 6,990 of 14,548 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Alhambra Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 48% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,240 of 2,557 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (6)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Alhambra Unified rank highest?

Elementary: William Northrup Elementary, 88th percentile (Strong). Middle: 2 schools at the 96th percentile (Strong): Monterey Highlands Elementary and Brightwood Elementary. High: Mark Keppel High, 87th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Alhambra Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Alhambra Unified good?

Alhambra Unified’s 13 public elementary schools run from the 42nd to the 88th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 8 Strong, 4 Solid and 1 Developing. Alhambra Unified’s 13 public middle schools run from the 69th to the 96th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 11 Strong and 2 Solid. Alhambra Unified’s 3 public high schools run from the 70th to the 87th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Strong and 2 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Alhambra Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Alhambra Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Alhambra Unified had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Alhambra Unified had 8 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Alhambra Unified spend per student?

Alhambra Unified spent $20,649 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 56 cents of every Alhambra Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Alhambra Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $285.2 million into 44 funded actions in 4 goals, 99% of its $288.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $191.1 million, 67% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Alhambra Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.