ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Herman (Leonard) Intermediate · San Jose

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate: One in three kids exceed the standard. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate is one of the strongest middle schools in San Jose by raw achievement. The catch worth understanding: the cohort doesn't gain ground year-over-year.

5955 Blossom Avenue, 95123 (opens in new tab)·Oak Grove Elementary·San Jose·Grades 5-8·723 students·31% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 226-1886·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5243
% Exceeded39%17%
% Met+68%39%
Growth-18.2+1.5
Absence13.7%18.5%
Suspension2.5%3.7%
Scope Score
52
🏫 Solid Base · Solid
ranked #551 statewide · #2 of 3 in Oak Grove Elementary

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate scores 52 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 75th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.

Most rating sites would stop at “68% proficient” and call it done. Herman (Leonard) Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate's low-income kids hit 57.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 75th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 68% of students meet the standard today, above the 62% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 584%77%82%80%95%
Grade 677%83%85%86%89%
Grade 762%77%70%59%72%
Grade 871%74%64%68%67%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 558%60%67%67%84%
Grade 650%67%69%68%71%
Grade 749%52%55%49%54%
Grade 864%51%57%58%57%

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
38.9%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 16.8%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 6→8
18.2pp

proficiency runs 80% in this year's grade 6 against 62% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

51%
38%
11%
Grade 6 · 89% proficient
36%
36%
28%
Grade 7 · 72% proficient
28%
40%
32%
Grade 8 · 68% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 23.2pp across grades; the floor slips 21.8pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

57.4%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate's most underrated number

57.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate low-income: 57.4%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
38.9%
State 16.8%
22.1pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-18.2pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
68.3%
State 39.3%
29.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.7%
State 18.5%
4.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.5%
State 3.7%
1.1pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
38.2%
State 18.0%
20.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Herman (Leonard) Intermediate in San Jose, 57.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Herman (Leonard) Intermediate outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (53.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 55.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 209 students tested.

All students at this school: 66% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 66%, district —, state 39%66%
MaleMale: this school 67%, district 46%, state 42%67% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 66%, district 46%, state 44%66% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 45%, district 29%, state 32%45% · −21 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 50%, district 30%, state 32%50% · −17 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 86%, district 73%, state 72%86% · +20 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 69%, district 61%, state 56%69% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 23%, district 13%, state 11%23% · −44 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 18%, district 14%, state 15%18% · −48 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 75%, district 59%, state 56%75% · +9 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 88%, district 60%, state 65%88% · +21 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.7%, district 17.0%, state 18.5%13.7% · −4.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.5%, district —, state 3.7%2.5% · −1.1pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly three times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (16.3% vs 0.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–60.8%
Grades 7–816.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 24:123:1
Teaching staff33 teachers
Avg. experience13.2 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$66,630 – $123,563
Principal salary$165,780 – $0
Superintendent salary$257,400

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,702, CA average $14,815$18,702 · spent at this school
Federal share$367 per student

$367 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,793 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support9%
Student services8%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,463 per pupil
2019$12,416 per pupil
2018$12,806 per pupil
2017$11,772 per pupil
2016$11,254 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic37.9%
District 52.0% · CA 56.1%
Asian28.2%
District 21.5% · CA 10.2%
White18.5%
District 12.3% · CA 19.9%
Other12.4%
District 11.7% · CA 9.0%
Black2.9%
District 2.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 31.1% (33pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$144K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.17M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+46% · CA 35%
ZIP population69,677
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 59% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Herman (Leonard) Intermediate a good middle school?

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate has a Scope Score of 52 out of 100, placing it in the 75th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #551 statewide. 38.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 22.1 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Herman (Leonard) Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 68.3% of students at Herman (Leonard) Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 38.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 29.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 38.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,286 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Herman (Leonard) Intermediate rank in California?

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate ranks #551 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 75th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Herman (Leonard) Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Herman (Leonard) Intermediate decreases by 18.2 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Herman (Leonard) Intermediate?

13.7% of students at Herman (Leonard) Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Herman (Leonard) Intermediate compare to other schools in San Jose?

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate scores 52/100 (75th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 723 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Herman (Leonard) Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Herman (Leonard) Intermediate in San Jose, 57.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Herman (Leonard) Intermediate outperforms its district average for low-income students by 26.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (53.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 55.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 209 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
38.9%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 74th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-18.2pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 18th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
68.3%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 73th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.5%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 55th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
38.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 73th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 56475%20%5%0%95%+47
Grade 66351%38%6%5%89%+42
Grade 729736%36%17%12%72%+24
Grade 828628%40%19%14%67%+21
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 56463%22%11%5%84%+49
Grade 66344%27%25%3%71%+36
Grade 729535%19%20%27%54%+20
Grade 828240%17%16%27%57%+24
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1135135%24%35%6%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20957.4%+26+19
Hispanic/Latino25953.3%+21+14
Asian20790.3%+17+16
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Herman (Leonard) Intermediate ←5238.9%68.3%−18.22.5%
Bret Harte Middle2.1 mi7151.0%77.7%−2.43.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195480#41029.4%61.9%8.6%7.7%+3.9pp
20225583#36134.1%67.1%18.6%4.2%-12.4pp
20235681#42039.2%66.6%14.0%5.4%-16.7pp
20245481#42735.3%64.5%14.9%5.1%-14.0pp
20255275#55138.9%68.3%13.7%2.5%-18.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.3%14.7%+7.4pp
Male9.8%12.6%+2.8pp
Asian1.3%0.5%-0.8pp
Black/African American6.5%19.0%+12.5pp
White3.2%0.0%-3.2pp
Hispanic/Latino14.1%26.1%+12.0pp
Two or More Races2.5%5.8%+3.3pp
Students with Disabilities21.5%42.1%+20.6pp
English Learners11.7%17.9%+6.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.9%28.9%+11.0pp
All Students8.6%13.6%+5.0pp
Homeless42.9%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction