School district · Santa Clara County

Oak Grove Elementary schools

Oak Grove Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Its 15 public elementary schools run from the 14th to the 83rd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 15 schools

from 14th to 83rd · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Taylor (Bertha) Elementary: 83rd percentile, Strong
  • Indigo: 80th percentile, Strong
  • Ledesma (Rita) Elementary: 79th percentile, Strong
  • Sakamoto Elementary: 77th percentile, Strong
  • Baldwin (Julia) Elementary: 70th percentile, Solid
  • Frost (Earl) Elementary: 69th percentile, Solid
  • Santa Teresa Elementary: 66th percentile, Solid
  • Del Roble Elementary: 55th percentile, Solid
  • Parkview Elementary: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Hayes Elementary: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Oak Ridge Elementary: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Anderson (Alex) Elementary: 20th percentile, Needs Support
  • Edenvale Elementary: 19th percentile, Needs Support
  • Stipe (Samuel) Elementary: 17th percentile, Needs Support
  • Christopher Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
4Needs Support
3Developing
4Solid
4Strong

Middle · 5 schools

from 21st to 94th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Herman (Leonard) Intermediate: 94th percentile, Strong
  • Bernal Intermediate: 81st percentile, Strong
  • Indigo: 80th percentile, Strong
  • Christopher Elementary: 39th percentile, Developing
  • Davis (Caroline) Intermediate: 21st percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
3Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 2 of the 18 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 18 ranked schools

Schools around the Oak Grove Elementary district

18 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Oak Grove Elementary district score highest?

Taylor (Bertha) Elementary is highest, at the 83rd percentile.

That’s higher than 83 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Oak Grove Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 12 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in the Oak Grove Elementary district had 16 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the Oak Grove Elementary district score highest?

Herman (Leonard) Intermediate is highest, at the 94th percentile.

That’s higher than 94 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Oak Grove Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 2 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in the Oak Grove Elementary district had 16 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

The district

Where does Oak Grove Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Oak Grove Elementary district spent $18,793 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 67 cents of every Oak Grove Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction67%
  • Instruction support9%
  • Student services8%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$132.9 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 33 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 82% of its $161.5 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 117 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 88% of the money; their titles are below. The plan itself puts 93% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

3 of the plan’s 33 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $0.3 million
  • English learners $3.1 million

Largest of these

  • English Learner Support Staff$2.6 million
  • Special Education Bilingual Support Staff$508,432
  • Intervention Systems and Programs to Support Extended Learning for English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students$254,890
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $11.0 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $10.9 million and estimates it spent $9.5 million, $1.4 million (13%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $1.4 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $10.9 million (9%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Recruit, hire and retain highly qualified and diverse staff, which went from $75.6 million to $83.1 million.

Largest cuts

  • English Learner Support Staff−⁠$496,651
  • Core and Supplemental Curriculum, Assessment and Data−⁠$336,966

Largest increases

  • Recruit, hire and retain highly qualified and diverse staff+⁠$7.5 million
  • Special Education Support Staff+⁠$4.3 million
  • Expanded Learning Opportunities and Transportation Support for Homeless Youth and Foster Youth+⁠$459,898
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 348%48%no change
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 344%44%no change
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 518 in 10017 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 52.1%2.3%up 0.2 pts

Goal 4 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Recruit, hire and retain highly qualified and diverse staff · $83,149,283
  • Special Education Support Staff · $26,651,911
  • Expanded Learning Opportunities and Transportation Support for Homeless Youth and Foster Youth · $6,770,944
The full plan5 goals, 37 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($132.9 million).

Where does the money go?

67% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1All students will be proficient in meeting and/​or exceeding all Common Core State Standards and 21st century skills$88.4 million67% of action budgets

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $82.2 million (+⁠$6.2 million) · p. 15 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Recruit, hire and retain highly qualified and diverse staff$83.1 millionaction 1.1 · p. 73 ↗
  2. Informational Technology Staff, Online Safety and Site Technology Support$1.8 millionaction 1.8 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Visual and Performing Arts Districtwide and After School Sports at the Intermediate Schools$1.8 millionaction 1.4 · p. 73 ↗
  4. Technology Software and Programs$0.8 millionaction 1.7 · p. 73 ↗
  5. Core and Supplemental Curriculum, Assessment and Data$0.4 millionaction 1.2 · p. 73 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Centralized Administrative Support for English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students, Foster Youth and Homeless Youth · action 1.5 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Core Curriculum Professional Development · action 1.3 · p. 73 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Recruit, hire and retain highly qualified and diverse staff+⁠$7.5 million$75.6 million → $83.1 million · p. 73 ↗
  2. Core and Supplemental Curriculum, Assessment and Data−⁠$336,966$782,929 → $445,963 · p. 73 ↗
  3. Technology Software and Programs+⁠$175,687$614,771 → $790,458 · p. 73 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Informational Technology Staff, Online Safety and Site Technology Support · $1.9 million → $1.8 million · p. 73 ↗−⁠$42,988
  • Visual and Performing Arts Districtwide and After School Sports at the Intermediate Schools · $1.6 million → $1.8 million · p. 73 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Centralized Administrative Support for English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students, Foster Youth and Homeless Youth · $316,854 → $329,301 · p. 73 ↗+⁠$12,447
  • Core Curriculum Professional Development · $130,182 → $42,959 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$87,223

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 15 ↗.

Goal 2We will employ equitable practices to accelerate the academic and language achievement for traditionally…$11.6 million9% of action budgets

“We will employ equitable practices to accelerate the academic and language achievement for traditionally underserved student groups, specifically English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged students, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth and students of color” p. 26 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $11.8 million (−⁠$245,439)

Largest funded actions

  1. Expanded Learning Opportunities and Transportation Support for Homeless Youth and Foster Youth$6.8 millionaction 2.7 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $196,290 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. English Learner Support Staff$2.6 millionaction 2.3 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Professional Development Focused on Needs of English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students$1.1 millionaction 2.2 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Centralized Administrative Support for English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students, Foster Youth and Homeless Youth$0.5 millionaction 2.9 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Intervention Systems and Programs to Support Extended Learning for English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students$0.3 millionaction 2.6 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Academic Language Development through the SEAL Model · action 2.1 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Diverse and Inclusive Programs and Books · action 2.8 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Initial and Summative Language Testing for English Language Learners · action 2.4 · p. 74 ↗$0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. English Learner Support Staff−⁠$0.5 million$3.1 million → $2.6 million · p. 73 ↗
  2. Expanded Learning Opportunities and Transportation Support for Homeless Youth and Foster Youth+⁠$0.5 million$6.3 million → $6.8 million · p. 74 ↗
  3. Professional Development Focused on Needs of English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students+⁠$0.1 million$1.0 million → $1.1 million · p. 73 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Centralized Administrative Support for English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students, Foster Youth and Homeless Youth · $459,516 → $454,649 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$4,867
  • Intervention Systems and Programs to Support Extended Learning for English Learners, Foster Youth, Homeless Youth and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students · $259,173 → $254,890 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$4,283
  • Academic Language Development through the SEAL Model · $322,361 → $232,225 · p. 73 ↗−⁠$90,136
  • Diverse and Inclusive Programs and Books · $188,808 → $107,898 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$80,910
  • Initial and Summative Language Testing for English Language Learners · $95,902 → $86,260 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$9,642

How the plan measures it · 6 measures · 2 quoted

  • CA Dashboard for ELA p. 27 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023: Overall: - 10.4 …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026: Overall: +1 or higher …
  • CA Dashboard for Math p. 28 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023: Overall: - 24.3 …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026: Overall: -14 or higher …

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3We will provide an inclusive learning environment for students with disabilities to best support social…$28.3 million21% of action budgets

“We will provide an inclusive learning environment for students with disabilities to best support social, emotional, and academic development” p. 36 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $23.8 million (+⁠$4.4 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Special Education Support Staff$26.7 millionaction 3.4 · p. 74 ↗
  2. Special Education Behavioral Supports$0.9 millionaction 3.5 · p. 74 ↗
  3. Special Education Bilingual Support Staff$0.5 millionaction 3.3 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Special Education Supplemental Curriculum and Training$0.2 millionaction 3.1 · p. 74 ↗
  5. Special Education Professional Developmentunder $0.1 millionaction 3.2 · p. 74 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Special Education Support Staff+⁠$4.3 million$22.3 million → $26.7 million · p. 74 ↗
  2. Special Education Bilingual Support Staff+⁠$364,931$143,501 → $508,432 · p. 74 ↗
  3. Special Education Behavioral Supports−⁠$0.2 million$1.1 million → $0.9 million · p. 74 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Special Education Supplemental Curriculum and Training · $135,675 → $203,699 · p. 74 ↗+⁠$68,024
  • Special Education Professional Development · $120,195 → $38,970 · p. 74 ↗−⁠$81,225

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 36 ↗.

Goal 4We will actively engage families and community members in supporting the implementation of CCSS instruction…$1.6 million1% of action budgets

“We will actively engage families and community members in supporting the implementation of CCSS instruction and providing input to program decisions” p. 44 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.5 million (+⁠$55,613)

Largest funded actions

  1. Community Liaisons$580,016action 4.3 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Social Worker and Social Work Interns$386,973action 4.1 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Communication and Outreach Directed Towards Families of Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, English Learners and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students$257,851action 4.2 · p. 74 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Parent Access to Information and Decision Input Opportunities$233,826action 4.5 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $202,886 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. School Linked Services$106,500action 4.6 · p. 75 ↗

1 more funded action in this goal

  • District Community Events and Parent Information Nights · action 4.4 · p. 75 ↗$12,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Communication and Outreach Directed Towards Families of Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, English Learners and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students−⁠$83,278$341,129 → $257,851 · p. 74 ↗
  2. Community Liaisons+⁠$80,000$500,016 → $580,016 · p. 75 ↗
  3. Social Worker and Social Work Interns+⁠$34,618$352,355 → $386,973 · p. 74 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Parent Access to Information and Decision Input Opportunities · $211,553 → $233,826 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$22,273
  • School Linked Services · $106,500 → $106,500 · p. 75 ↗unchanged
  • District Community Events and Parent Information Nights · $10,000 → $12,000 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$2,000

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 44 ↗.

Goal 5School and classroom environments support learning, safety, engagement and healthy well-being$3.0 million2% of action budgets

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.6 million (+⁠$379,628) · p. 51 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Student Physical Health and Well-Being$973,913action 5.3 · p. 75 ↗
  2. Mental Health and Socioemotional Counseling Services$881,885action 5.2 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Academic Counselors at Intermediate Schools$600,660action 5.5 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Additional Health Clerk Support of Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students, and English Learners$339,444action 5.4 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Central Office Support for Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students in Areas of Attendance, Safety and Physical Health$178,435action 5.6 · p. 75 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports · action 5.1 · p. 75 ↗$38,941
  • Attendance Improvement and Monitoring · action 5.7 · p. 75 ↗$8,500

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Academic Counselors at Intermediate Schools+⁠$306,306$294,354 → $600,660 · p. 75 ↗
  2. Student Physical Health and Well-Being+⁠$93,835$880,078 → $973,913 · p. 75 ↗
  3. Additional Health Clerk Support of Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students, and English Learners+⁠$51,895$287,549 → $339,444 · p. 75 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Mental Health and Socioemotional Counseling Services · $894,572 → $881,885 · p. 75 ↗−⁠$12,687
  • Central Office Support for Foster Youth, Homeless Youth, English Learners, Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students in Areas of Attendance, Safety and Physical Health · $200,459 → $178,435 · p. 75 ↗−⁠$22,024
  • Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports · $78,638 → $38,941 · p. 75 ↗−⁠$39,697
  • Attendance Improvement and Monitoring · $6,500 → $8,500 · p. 75 ↗+⁠$2,000

How the plan measures it · 10 measures · 3 quoted

  • CA Dashboard Chronic Absenteeism p. 51 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023: Overall: 25.6% …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026: Overall: 14.25% or less …
  • CA Dashboard Suspension Rate p. 52 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023: Overall: 2.9% …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026: Overall: 1.45% or less …
  • Pupil Expulsion Rate p. 52 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023: 0%
    Target for year 3
    0% Expulsion Rate

7 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 8,578 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 52%2. Asian: 21%3. White: 12%4. Two or more races: 7%5. Filipino: 4%6. Black or African American: 3%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino52%
  2. Asian21%
  3. White12%
  4. Two or more races7%
  5. Filipino4%
  6. Black or African American3%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

43%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 3,676 of 8,515 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Oak Grove Elementary extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

It also qualified the year before.

Which students, on which measures

Students with disabilities
English and math

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 49% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (694 of 1,422 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

4 schools getting state support, 2025–26

2 in extra targeted support · 2 in targeted support

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Oak Grove Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Taylor (Bertha) Elementary, 83rd percentile (Strong). Middle: Herman (Leonard) Intermediate, 94th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Oak Grove Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Oak Grove Elementary district good?

Oak Grove Elementary’s 15 public elementary schools run from the 14th to the 83rd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong, 4 Solid, 3 Developing and 4 Needs Support. Oak Grove Elementary’s 5 public middle schools run from the 21st to the 94th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Strong, 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Oak Grove Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the Oak Grove Elementary district had 16 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in the Oak Grove Elementary district had 16 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Oak Grove Elementary district spend per student?

The Oak Grove Elementary district spent $18,793 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 67 cents of every Oak Grove Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Oak Grove Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $132.9 million into 33 funded actions in 5 goals, 82% of its $161.5 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $88.4 million, 67% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Oak Grove Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.