ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
John Muir Middle · San Jose

John Muir Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

John Muir posts 38% meeting the standard and 16.5% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1260 Branham Lane, 95118 (opens in new tab)·San Jose Unified·San Jose·Grades 6-8·722 students·54% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 535-6281
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4443
% Exceeded16%17%
% Met+38%39%
Growth+4.8+1.5
Absence25.0%18.5%
Suspension7.7%3.7%
Scope Score
44
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #977 statewide · #4 of 8 in San Jose Unified

John Muir Middle scores 44 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 56th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “38% proficient” and call it done. John Muir deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Jose, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 56th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 38% meet the standard today, versus 45% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 654%30%38%39%35%
Grade 753%51%48%33%43%
Grade 858%48%59%44%48%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 634%25%19%35%33%
Grade 736%33%29%30%41%
Grade 838%28%30%30%29%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
22%
65%
Grade 6 · 35% proficient
16%
27%
57%
Grade 7 · 43% proficient
14%
35%
51%
Grade 8 · 49% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 13.6pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
16.5%
State 16.8%
0.3pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+4.8pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
38.1%
State 39.3%
1.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
25.0%
State 18.5%
6.4pp above state avg
Suspension rate
7.7%
State 3.7%
4.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.6%
State 18.0%
4.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At John Muir Middle in San Jose, 26.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Muir Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (17.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 372 students tested.

All students at this school: 38% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 38%, district —, state 39%38%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 25%, state 32%23% · −15 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 22%, state 32%22% · −16 vs school
MaleMale: this school 40%, district 45%, state 42%40% · +2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 46%, state 44%36% · −2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 8%, district 7%, state 11%8% · −30 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 67%, state 56%63% · +25 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 16%, state 15%9% · −29 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 63%, district 81%, state 72%63% · +25 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 58%, district 68%, state 56%58% · +20 vs school

6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 25.0%, district 24.3%, state 18.5%25.0% · +6.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 7.7%, district —, state 3.7%7.7% · +4.1pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–622.4%
Grades 7–826.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff41 teachers
Avg. experience13.6 years
Fully credentialed82%
First-year teachers12%
Intern / emergency permit2.0%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,000 – $134,400
Principal salary$146,301 – $163,630
Superintendent salary$354,153

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,290, CA average $14,815$24,290 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,330 per student

$1,330 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,059 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,878 per pupil
2019$12,931 per pupil
2018$12,414 per pupil
2017$11,570 per pupil
2016$11,975 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic59.6%
District 54.0% · CA 56.1%
White19.1%
District 20.2% · CA 19.9%
Other9.7%
District 9.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian8.7%
District 14.1% · CA 10.2%
Black2.9%
District 2.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 54.2% (10pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$153K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.49M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+54% · CA 35%
ZIP population32,015
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is John Muir Middle a good middle school?

John Muir Middle has a Scope Score of 44 out of 100, placing it in the 56th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #977 statewide. 16.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are John Muir Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 38.1% of students at John Muir Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 16.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 16.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,358 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does John Muir Middle rank in California?

John Muir Middle ranks #977 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 56th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is John Muir Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at John Muir Middle increases by 4.8 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at John Muir Middle?

25.0% of students at John Muir Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 7.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does John Muir Middle compare to other schools in San Jose?

John Muir Middle scores 44/100 (56th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 722 students. Use the schools in San Jose page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does John Muir Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At John Muir Middle in San Jose, 26.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Muir Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 0.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (17.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 34.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 372 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
16.5%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 50th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+4.8pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 60th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
38.1%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
25.0%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 41th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
7.7%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 34th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 40th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 621813%22%26%39%35%−12
Grade 722316%27%23%35%43%−5
Grade 823114%35%25%26%48%+2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 622518%15%24%44%33%−2
Grade 722622%19%23%36%41%+7
Grade 823517%12%22%49%29%−3
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1123312%21%52%15%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged37226.3%−0−12
Hispanic/Latino39026.9%−4−12
English Learners1439.8%+3−1
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
John Muir Middle ←4416.5%38.1%+4.87.7%
Dartmouth Middle1.7 mi6041.0%64.7%−0.91.8%
Castillero Middle2.8 mi5428.6%54.3%−4.48.0%
Willow Glen Middle2.2 mi3620.7%43.9%−6.08.0%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194463#74618.1%45.4%10.8%6.0%+4.1pp
20224262#82913.9%36.0%29.8%10.9%+10.9pp
20234969#68513.5%37.0%32.2%15.6%+15.9pp
20243852#107013.9%35.1%28.7%14.7%+0.1pp
20254456#97716.5%38.1%25.0%7.7%+4.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.3%25.2%+14.9pp
Male11.2%24.9%+13.7pp
Asian3.6%5.8%+2.2pp
Black/African American11.3%25.0%+13.7pp
White5.3%4.8%-0.5pp
Hispanic/Latino14.3%35.1%+20.8pp
Two or More Races2.6%17.0%+14.4pp
Students with Disabilities21.2%46.2%+25.0pp
English Learners15.7%34.9%+19.2pp
Homeless50.0%84.6%+34.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.6%31.7%+16.1pp
All Students10.8%25.1%+14.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction