ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Ethel Dwyer Middle · Huntington Beach

Ethel Dwyer Middle: English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.

Ethel Dwyer has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5743
% Exceeded33%17%
% Met+63%39%
Growth-8.5+1.5
Absence15.5%18.5%
Suspension3.5%3.7%
Scope Score
57
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #377 statewide · #3 of 3 in Huntington Beach City Elementary

Ethel Dwyer Middle scores 57 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 83rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “63% proficient” and call it done. Ethel Dwyer deserves a closer read. The school sits in Huntington Beach, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Ethel Dwyer's low-income kids hit 55.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 83rd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 63% meet the standard today, versus 68% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 673%72%58%64%70%
Grade 777%70%76%63%72%
Grade 867%66%62%69%63%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 662%60%49%60%60%
Grade 765%56%58%53%65%
Grade 864%52%51%55%49%

The story this school is actually telling

The on-ramp · English learner progress
28.0%

of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

↑ how fast newcomers reach fluency
The trajectory · grade 6→8
8.5pp

proficiency runs 65% in this year's grade 6 against 56% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

37%
32%
31%
Grade 6 · 69% proficient
33%
39%
28%
Grade 7 · 72% proficient
22%
41%
37%
Grade 8 · 63% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 14.9pp across grades; the floor slips 6.2pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

55.7%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Ethel Dwyer's most underrated number

55.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Ethel Dwyer low-income: 55.7%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
32.9%
State 16.8%
16.0pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-8.5pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
63.3%
State 39.3%
24.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.5%
State 18.5%
3.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.5%
State 3.7%
0.1pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
28.0%
State 18.0%
10.0pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Ethel Dwyer Middle in Huntington Beach, 55.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 57.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ethel Dwyer Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.4% Math proficient); White students (70.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 318 students tested.

All students at this school: 63% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 63%, district —, state 39%63%
MaleMale: this school 60%, district 66%, state 42%60% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 67%, district 71%, state 44%67% · +4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 66%, district 68%, state 56%66% · +2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 49%, district 53%, state 32%49% · −14 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 48%, district 55%, state 32%48% · −16 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 66%, district 73%, state 56%66% · +3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 87%, district 87%, state 72%87% · +24 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 20%, district 34%, state 15%20% · −43 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 21%, state 11%2% · −61 vs school

7 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.9pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -2.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.5%, district 9.0%, state 18.5%15.5% · −3.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.5%, district —, state 3.7%3.5% · −0.1pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (17.6% vs 10.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.8%
Grades 7–817.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 24:126:1
Teaching staff34 teachers
Avg. experience18.3 years
Fully credentialed84%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$58,666 – $134,768
Principal salary$166,491 – $0
Superintendent salary$302,810

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,548, CA average $14,815$17,548 · spent at this school
Federal share$193 per student

$193 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,808 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support12%
Student services6%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,922 per pupil
2019$10,635 per pupil
2018$10,456 per pupil
2017$9,752 per pupil
2016$9,660 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White44.8%
District 50.4% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic27.9%
District 22.1% · CA 56.1%
Other14.6%
District 16.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian12.2%
District 10.9% · CA 10.2%
Black0.5%
District 0.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 37.1% (27pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$130K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.24M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+55% · CA 35%
ZIP population45,827
Median age45 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 46% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ethel Dwyer Middle a good middle school?

Ethel Dwyer Middle has a Scope Score of 57 out of 100, placing it in the 83rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #377 statewide. 32.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.0 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Ethel Dwyer Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 63.3% of students at Ethel Dwyer Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 32.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 32.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,701 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Ethel Dwyer Middle rank in California?

Ethel Dwyer Middle ranks #377 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 83rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Ethel Dwyer Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Ethel Dwyer Middle decreases by 8.5 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Ethel Dwyer Middle?

15.5% of students at Ethel Dwyer Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Ethel Dwyer Middle compare to other schools in Huntington Beach?

Ethel Dwyer Middle scores 57/100 (83rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 884 students. Use the schools in Huntington Beach page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Ethel Dwyer Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Ethel Dwyer Middle in Huntington Beach, 55.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 57.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ethel Dwyer Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (42.4% Math proficient); White students (70.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 318 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
32.9%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 68th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-8.5pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
63.3%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 69th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.5%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 54th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.5%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 51th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
28.0%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 59th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 627337%32%19%12%70%+23
Grade 729533%39%18%11%72%+24
Grade 828122%41%19%18%63%+17
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 627438%22%23%17%60%+25
Grade 729538%27%20%15%65%+31
Grade 828328%21%24%27%49%+17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1128316%30%46%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged31855.7%−2+17
White37770.3%−1+8
Hispanic/Latino23454.3%−5+15
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Ethel Dwyer Middle ←5732.9%63.3%−8.53.5%
Fulton (Harry C.) Middle3.1 mi7952.3%77.7%+2.62.4%
Mesa View Middle2.6 mi6542.3%65.8%+6.23.1%
Talbert (Samuel E.) Middle2.2 mi6237.3%67.1%+4.74.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195885#29438.2%67.9%6.9%3.8%-1.7pp
20225381#40933.2%62.9%24.5%6.3%-7.1pp
20236287#27430.5%58.8%16.5%4.5%+3.4pp
20245683#38031.3%60.5%16.1%4.7%+0.2pp
20255783#37732.9%63.3%15.5%3.5%-8.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.0%14.7%+8.7pp
Male7.8%16.1%+8.3pp
Asian2.1%8.2%+6.1pp
Filipino8.3%15.0%+6.7pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino6.9%14.5%+7.6pp
Two or More Races6.3%8.6%+2.3pp
Students with Disabilities8.0%26.8%+18.8pp
English Learners7.1%20.7%+13.6pp
Homeless47.1%26.9%-20.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.7%19.1%+6.4pp
All Students6.9%15.4%+8.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction