ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Dolores Huerta Middle · Burbank

Dolores Huerta Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Dolores Huerta posts 43% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

420 South Mariposa Street, 91506 (opens in new tab)·Burbank Unified·Burbank·Grades 6-8·931 students·31% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(818) 729-3900
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3843
% Exceeded18%17%
% Met+43%39%
Growth-4.9+1.5
Absence16.5%18.5%
Suspension5.8%3.7%
Scope Score
38
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,294 statewide · #3 of 3 in Burbank Unified

Dolores Huerta Middle scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 42nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “43% proficient” and call it done. Dolores Huerta deserves a closer read. The school sits in Burbank, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 54th to the 42nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 43% meet the standard today, versus 49% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 658%51%48%44%52%
Grade 759%50%43%49%54%
Grade 850%43%47%44%46%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 642%34%40%34%37%
Grade 746%41%39%35%38%
Grade 836%34%33%33%33%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

23%
29%
48%
Grade 6 · 52% proficient
17%
37%
46%
Grade 7 · 54% proficient
14%
32%
54%
Grade 8 · 46% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 8.9pp across grades; the floor slips 5.9pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
18.0%
State 16.8%
1.1pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-4.9pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
43.3%
State 39.3%
4.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.5%
State 18.5%
2.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
5.8%
State 3.7%
2.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
7.2%
State 18.0%
10.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Dolores Huerta Middle in Burbank, 32.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Dolores Huerta Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 11.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 309 students tested.

All students at this school: 43% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 43%, district —, state 39%43%
MaleMale: this school 40%, district 51%, state 42%40% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 46%, district 54%, state 44%46% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 31%, district 40%, state 32%31% · −12 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 49%, district 55%, state 56%49% · +6 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 25%, district 39%, state 32%25% · −18 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 17%, district 22%, state 15%17% · −26 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 53%, district 66%, state 56%53% · +10 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 8%, district 19%, state 11%8% · −35 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 71%, district 71%, state 72%71% · +28 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 50%, district 65%, state 65%50% · +7 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 14%, district 44%, state 26%14% · −29 vs school
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 14.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.5%, district 16.6%, state 18.5%16.5% · −2.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.8%, district —, state 3.7%5.8% · +2.1pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.6%
Grades 7–818.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 25:125:1
Teaching staff38 teachers
Avg. experience13.6 years
Fully credentialed88%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$55,004 – $114,912
Principal salary$146,052 – $180,526
Superintendent salary$309,540

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $8,776, CA average $14,815$8,776 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$460 per student

$460 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,445 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,045 per pupil
2019$11,768 per pupil
2018$12,056 per pupil
2017$11,331 per pupil
2016$10,459 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic39.5%
District 31.2% · CA 56.1%
White37.0%
District 48.8% · CA 19.9%
Other15.5%
District 13.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian5.0%
District 4.9% · CA 10.2%
Black3.0%
District 1.8% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 30.6% (33pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$106K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.10M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+48% · CA 35%
ZIP population18,612
Median age45 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 45% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolores Huerta Middle a good middle school?

Dolores Huerta Middle has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 42nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,294 statewide. 18.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Dolores Huerta Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 43.3% of students at Dolores Huerta Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,770 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Dolores Huerta Middle rank in California?

Dolores Huerta Middle ranks #1,294 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 42nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Dolores Huerta Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Dolores Huerta Middle decreases by 4.9 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Dolores Huerta Middle?

16.5% of students at Dolores Huerta Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 5.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Dolores Huerta Middle compare to other schools in Burbank?

Dolores Huerta Middle scores 38/100 (42nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 931 students. Use the schools in Burbank page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Dolores Huerta Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Dolores Huerta Middle in Burbank, 32.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Dolores Huerta Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 11.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 309 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
18.0%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 51th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-4.9pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 37th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
43.3%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 53th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.5%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 53th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
5.8%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 41th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
7.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 31th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 628023%29%24%24%52%+5
Grade 726817%37%22%24%54%+6
Grade 833814%32%24%30%46%−0
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 628020%18%33%30%37%+2
Grade 726719%18%28%34%38%+4
Grade 833715%18%24%42%33%+1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1134218%27%43%12%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged30932.0%−12−6
Hispanic/Latino36139.9%−8+1
White31954.2%−5−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Dolores Huerta Middle ←3818.0%43.3%−4.95.8%
John Muir Middle2 mi5826.1%55.6%+5.33.7%
Luther Burbank Middle2.2 mi4719.4%49.0%−2.55.1%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194054#93019.5%48.5%5.3%4.1%-6.9pp
20223853#102015.8%42.0%20.3%2.6%-4.3pp
20234255#98516.6%41.7%18.0%6.2%-3.9pp
20243544#123815.3%39.9%16.1%7.0%-0.6pp
20253842#129418.0%43.3%16.5%5.8%-4.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.3%15.6%+11.3pp
Male6.4%17.3%+10.9pp
Asian0.0%6.3%+6.3pp
Black/African American5.6%17.9%+12.3pp
White2.5%7.1%+4.6pp
Hispanic/Latino5.8%18.8%+13.0pp
Two or More Races4.9%11.3%+6.4pp
Students with Disabilities9.0%22.9%+13.9pp
English Learners3.7%28.9%+25.2pp
Homeless8.3%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.6%25.1%+16.5pp
All Students5.3%16.5%+11.2pp
Filipino24.4%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction