ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Culver City High · Culver City

Culver City High: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Culver City posts 56% meeting the standard, and 32.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

4401 Elenda Street, 90230 (opens in new tab)·Culver City Unified·Culver City·Grades 9-12·2,012 students·25% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(310) 842-4200
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6344
% Exceeded33%16%
% Met+56%36%
Grad rate97.2%87.6%
College readiness72.2%35.4%
Absence13.1%30.2%
Suspension1.9%3.6%
Scope Score
63
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #246 statewide

Culver City High scores 63 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 89th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.

Most rating sites would stop at “56% proficient” and call it done. Culver City deserves a closer read. The school sits in Culver City, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Culver City's low-income kids hit 58.3% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,160 high schools statewide

Has held the 89th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 56% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 1175%72%77%76%68%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 1140%41%40%41%43%

The story this school is actually telling

Proficient by 11th grade
56%
State 36%
Graduate
97%
State 88%
Pass an AP exam
72%
State 35%

Of 100 students here: 56 are proficient by 11th grade → 97 graduate → 72 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.

58.3%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Culver City's most underrated number

58.3% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Culver City low-income: 58.3%State low-income: 38.2%

The 7 things our score weighs

Graduation rate
97.2%
State 87.6%
9.6pp above state avg
Exceeded standard
32.8%
State 15.8%
17.0pp above state avg
College readiness
72.2%
State 35.4%
AP exam pass rate above state avg
Met or exceeded
55.7%
State 35.7%
20.0pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.1%
State 30.2%
17.1pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.9%
State 3.6%
1.8pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.0%
State 18.0%
1.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Culver City High in Culver City, 58.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 44.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Culver City High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (60.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 41.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 168 students tested.

All students at this school: 56% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 56%, district —, state 36%56%
MaleMale: this school 55%, district 58%, state 42%55% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 56%, district 61%, state 44%56% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 46%, district 44%, state 32%46% · −10 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 43%, district 37%, state 32%43% · −13 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 74%, district 76%, state 56%74% · +18 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 34%, district 36%, state 26%34% · −22 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 72%, district 73%, state 56%72% · +17 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 18%, district 28%, state 15%18% · −38 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 73%, district 74%, state 72%73% · +18 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 19%, district 14%, state 11%19% · −37 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 33%, district 43%, state 46%33% · −22 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.1%, district 16.9%, state 30.2%13.1% · −17.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.9%, district —, state 3.6%1.9% · −1.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 9–1212.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff106 teachers
Avg. experience13.8 years
Fully credentialed93%
First-year teachers8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,905 – $120,580
Principal salary$146,567 – $173,015
Superintendent salary$283,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Course Breadth
AP courses offered41
AP exam qualifiers260 students
CTE pathway completers99 students

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,980, CA average $14,815$18,980 · spent at this school
Federal share$200 per student

$200 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,208 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support15%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,510 per pupil
2019$12,217 per pupil
2018$11,949 per pupil
2017$12,209 per pupil
2016$11,853 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic40.4%
District 37.5% · CA 56.1%
White23.5%
District 25.0% · CA 19.9%
Black14.2%
District 10.2% · CA 4.8%
Other12.5%
District 17.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian9.4%
District 10.3% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 25.3% (39pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$107K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.02M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+58% · CA 35%
ZIP population31,009
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 45% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Culver City High a good school?

Yes, in the band that matters most: Culver City High is Strong, sitting at the 88.6th percentile of California high schools (CDE/Scope Score, 2024-25). Almost everyone graduates — 97.2% — and the AP catalog is genuinely broad at 41 courses. The complication is what happens underneath that number. Students with Disabilities score 37.8 points below the school's own average, the largest gap on record here. A school can be Strong overall and still leave one group of students well behind the rest, and that's true of this one.

What happens to students after they leave Culver City High?

Almost everyone gets a diploma — the graduation rate is 97.2% (CDE 2024-25). Fewer leave having completed the specific coursework that makes them eligible for a four-year university: A-G completion sits at 80.5%. That's a 16.7-point gap between walking the stage and being on track for a four-year school. If college eligibility matters to your family, ask the counseling office directly what share of current juniors and seniors are on the A-G track, not just what share will graduate.

Does Culver City High live up to what it says about itself?

Partly, and it's worth knowing exactly where. The school advertises 'a strong Advanced Placement program across the curriculum,' and the number backs that up — 41 AP courses is a genuinely wide catalog. But two other claims outrun what the data can confirm. The school describes AVID as 'college readiness support for students preparing for four-year universities,' yet A-G completion (the actual measure of four-year eligibility) is 80.5%, meaning about one in five graduates isn't on that path despite nearly universal graduation. And ELD is described as providing 'academic and language support for multilingual learners,' but only 17.0% of English Learners reach the top ELPAC proficiency level (CDE 2024-25). Neither gap means the programs are failing — it means the outcomes don't yet match the description, and that's a fair, direct question to ask on a tour: how many AVID and ELD students are actually reflected in those A-G and ELPAC numbers?

Does Culver City High work for kids like mine?

It depends heavily on which group you're asking about. Students with Disabilities score 37.8 points below the school's own average — the largest subgroup gap on record here (CDE 2024-25). That's a fact about outcomes, not a judgment on the students; it's the single most useful number on this page if your child receives special education services, and it's worth asking the school directly what support looks like at the classroom level, not just what's listed in the course catalog.

How do English Learners do at Culver City High?

17.0% of English Learners reach ELPAC Level 4, the top proficiency tier (CDE ELPAC, 2024-25). That's a specific, checkable number and one we rarely see surfaced elsewhere. It sits next to a school description that frames ELD as full academic and language support for multilingual learners — worth asking how participation and progress are tracked for students still below that top tier.

Who is actually teaching at Culver City High?

Teachers here average 13.8 years of experience, 93.3% are fully credentialed, and just 8.5% are in their first year (CDE 2024-25). That's a stable, experienced staff by the numbers — a fact about staffing conditions, not a rating of any individual teacher.

What does Culver City High spend per student?

$18,980 per pupil, below the state average of $23,518 (CDE 2024-25). That gap doesn't tell you the school is underfunded relative to what it needs, and it doesn't make the school better or worse on its own — it's context for the outcomes above, not a score.

What can my student actually take at Culver City High?

The catalog is wide: 41 AP courses across subjects (CDE course enrollment data, 2024-25). What we can't tell from this record is how students actually do on those AP exams — pass-rate data isn't available here. Course access is real and worth having; ask the school directly what AP exam pass rates look like before assuming the catalog size alone tells the whole story.

What we found when we looked closer

Culver City High is a Strong school — 88.6th percentile among California high schools, with a 97.2% graduation rate (CDE 2024-25) — and that verdict holds up on the numbers that matter most in aggregate. What complicates it is what the same year's data shows once you break it apart by outcome type and student group.

Start with graduation and college readiness, two numbers that should move together and don't quite. Almost every student graduates: 97.2%. But A-G completion, the measure of whether a student finished the specific coursework required for four-year university eligibility, sits at 80.5%. That's a 16.7-point gap between getting a diploma and being positioned for a four-year school. A graduation rate this high can make a school look uniformly strong at a glance; the A-G number is the one that tells you what happens to the roughly one in five students for whom that isn't true.

The school's own description of itself mostly checks out, but not entirely. Culver City High advertises 'a strong Advanced Placement program across the curriculum,' and with 41 AP courses on offer, that's accurate — a genuinely broad catalog. Two other claims sit less comfortably next to the record. AVID is described as 'college readiness support for students preparing for four-year universities,' but the A-G completion gap above suggests that readiness isn't reaching everyone it's meant to. ELD is described as providing 'academic and language support for multilingual learners,' yet only 17.0% of English Learners reach ELPAC Level 4, the top proficiency tier (CDE ELPAC, 2024-25). Neither of these gaps means the programs don't work. It means the school's language about them is ahead of what the outcome data can currently confirm, and that's worth a direct question on a visit rather than something to read into either direction on your own.

The sharpest gap on this page is Students with Disabilities, who score 37.8 points below the school's own average — the largest subgroup gap on record here. A Strong band and an 88.6th percentile describe the school's majority pattern; this number describes what that pattern leaves out. It's a fact about outcomes for this group, not a mark against the students themselves, and it's the single most important line on this page if that's the group your child belongs to.

Day to day, the school looks calm by the numbers: 13.1% chronic absenteeism and a 1.9% suspension rate, both relatively low. Socioeconomically disadvantaged students are suspended at a modestly higher rate — 1.4 points above the school average — which is worth naming as an outcome, though this data doesn't tell you whether discipline is applied evenly across groups, only that the rate differs.

What this record can't answer: whether the 41 AP courses translate into strong exam pass rates, and whether AVID and ELD participation actually reaches the students most in need of it, or just the students already positioned to succeed. Both are fair questions to bring to a campus tour, not gaps to guess at from a spreadsheet.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Graduation rate · 25%
97.2%
↑ vs CA 87.6% · 62th pctile
Exceeded standard · 22%
32.8%
↑ vs CA 15.8% · 68th pctile
College readiness · 20%
72.2%
↑ vs CA 35.4% · 71th pctile
Met or exceeded · 18%
55.7%
↑ vs CA 35.7% · 64th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.1%
↑ vs CA 30.2% · 64th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.9%
↑ vs CA 3.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 1147642%26%20%12%68%+21
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 1147423%20%19%38%43%+20
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1148715%30%47%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16858.3%+14+20
Hispanic/Latino21760.8%+9+22
White9483.0%+3+21
03Peer comparison · nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Culver City High ←6332.8%55.7%1.9%
Alexander Hamilton Senior High1.9 mi5417.8%42.1%1.6%
Phoenix Continuation2.4 mi304.2%8.3%1.1%
Culver Park High0.1 mi283.3%6.5%2.6%
California average4415.8%35.7%3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Graduation Rate
97.2%
AP Exam Prepared
72.2%
A-G Completion
69.6%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
80.5%
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196587#26327.5%57.3%8.0%3.2%
20226389#22330.6%56.3%26.5%2.8%
20236490#20931.9%58.7%23.8%3.1%
20246490#21431.3%58.5%16.3%1.8%
20256389#24632.8%55.7%13.1%1.9%
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.9%14.0%+5.1pp
Male6.0%11.1%+5.1pp
Asian4.7%9.5%+4.8pp
Black/African American5.1%13.0%+7.9pp
White2.9%4.0%+1.1pp
Hispanic/Latino8.1%14.1%+6.0pp
Two or More Races9.6%12.8%+3.2pp
Students with Disabilities13.0%20.8%+7.8pp
English Learners13.5%22.9%+9.4pp
Homeless24.1%17.2%-6.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.1%15.0%+5.9pp
All Students7.4%12.5%+5.1pp
Filipino13.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,160 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction