Culver City Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Culver City posts 54% meeting the standard, and 28.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 52 | 28% | 54% | -4.2 | 8.9% | 2.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Culver City Middle scores 52 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 75th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “54% proficient” and call it done. Culver City deserves a closer read. The school sits in Culver City, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 8.9% chronic absenteeism — versus 18.5% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 75th percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 54% meet the standard today, versus 60% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 67% | 62% | 54% | 55% | 61% |
| Grade 7 | 65% | 63% | 64% | 61% | 63% |
| Grade 8 | 72% | 55% | 60% | 58% | 60% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 58% | 56% | 47% | 45% | 51% |
| Grade 7 | 47% | 43% | 49% | 47% | 47% |
| Grade 8 | 48% | 37% | 39% | 43% | 44% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.2pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Culver City Middle in Culver City, 39.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 44.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Culver City Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (22.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (46.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 58.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 610 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.6pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.6pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$173 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 1,523 students, this school is well above the typical California middle school (≈860).
On the state's science test (CAST), 51% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Culver City Middle a good middle school?
What are Culver City Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Culver City Middle rank in California?
Is Culver City Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Culver City Middle?
How does Culver City Middle compare to other schools in Culver City?
How does Culver City Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 54
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 497 | 28% | 33% | 20% | 19% | 61% | +15 |
| Grade 7 | 483 | 29% | 34% | 19% | 19% | 63% | +15 |
| Grade 8 | 497 | 25% | 36% | 21% | 18% | 60% | +14 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 493 | 34% | 17% | 24% | 25% | 51% | +16 |
| Grade 7 | 482 | 28% | 19% | 21% | 32% | 47% | +13 |
| Grade 8 | 494 | 26% | 17% | 21% | 35% | 44% | +11 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 494 | 24% | 27% | 41% | 9% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 610 | 39.7% | −5 | +1 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 523 | 46.5% | −6 | +8 |
| White | 378 | 77.5% | −3 | +16 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culver City Middle ← | — | 52 | 28.4% | 54.3% | −4.2 | 2.1% |
| ICEF Vista Middle Academy | 1.3 mi | 65 | 25.8% | 60.9% | +12.9 | 0.7% |
| Palms Middle | 1.5 mi | 50 | 26.0% | 49.5% | −0.3 | 1.5% |
| Daniel Webster Middle | 2.5 mi | 47 | 11.1% | 32.2% | −1.3 | 0.7% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 52 | 77 | #470 | 29.5% | 59.6% | 6.5% | 1.7% | -2.3pp |
| 2022 | 45 | 69 | #678 | 25.4% | 52.3% | 8.6% | 0.8% | -12.9pp |
| 2023 | 57 | 81 | #417 | 26.6% | 52.3% | 8.6% | 3.0% | -0.6pp |
| 2024 | 48 | 71 | #645 | 26.5% | 51.7% | 8.8% | 2.4% | -0.0pp |
| 2025 | 52 | 75 | #564 | 28.4% | 54.3% | 8.9% | 2.1% | -4.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 7.0% | 8.7% | +1.7pp |
| Male | 6.0% | 8.9% | +2.9pp |
| Asian | 2.2% | 5.2% | +3.0pp |
| Black/African American | 9.1% | 12.5% | +3.4pp |
| Filipino | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| White | 0.0% | 4.5% | +4.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 8.9% | 11.5% | +2.6pp |
| Two or More Races | 5.4% | 6.7% | +1.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 8.1% | 13.4% | +5.3pp |
| English Learners | 9.8% | 14.2% | +4.4pp |
| Homeless | 24.2% | 38.1% | +13.9pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 11.1% | 13.3% | +2.2pp |
| All Students | 6.5% | 8.8% | +2.3pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction