Charter school · Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified

Orange County School of Computer Science — Rating & test scores

5350 Fairmont Boulevard, Yorba Linda · 753 students · Grades 6–8

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 78

SolidScope Score · 67th percentile. Higher than 67 in 100 of the 2,529 California public middle schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

Above California in English (reading and writing) and math: 55% and 46% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 6–8, spring 2026, against 49% and 37%.

Source for this line
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 541 in English, 545 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 6, 7 and 8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).

Overview

Is this school a good middle school?

Solid. Orange County School of Computer Science is higher than most California middle schools on test results and attendance. Orange County School of Computer Science is lower than most on progress in both subjects.

Test results, spring 2026

English, Proficient or Advanced6655%
Math, Proficient or Advanced7446%
English, Advanced6318%
Math, Advanced7023%

Progress in a year, 2025

English10−14 pts
Math9−18 pts

Showing up, 2025–26

Attendance5714 in 100
Orange County School of Computer Science’s place among California middle schools, out of 100Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified’s other middle schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

One more thing to know

On spring 2025 tests, students in grades 6–8 scored lower than California students who had the same scores the year before, in English (−14 pts) and math (−18 pts). The state calls both results Moderate.

Each bar is Orange County School of Computer Science’s place among 2,529 California public middle schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 6–8. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

Source for the sentence
CDE growth model, 2025. Students with scores in both years in grades 6–8: 656 in English, 655 in math. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

Progress

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 14 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 18 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.

English

−14

points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Hispanic or Latino309−16 points
Low-income298−19 points
White209−13 points
English learners89−26 points
Asian84−8 points

Math

−18

points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Hispanic or Latino308−22 points
Low-income297−23 points
White209−17 points
English learners89−14 points
Asian84+3 points

Grades 6–8, 2025, 656 students in English, 655 in math with scores in both years. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.

How the state’s growth measure works

The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 14 points below that expected score, and in math 18 points below it.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Nearby

How does it compare with schools nearby?

5 of the 6 middle schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Orange County School of Computer Science. Each school is compared with every California middle school.

Scope Score

7 middle schools within 5.0 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.

  1. El Rancho CharterCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 9095th
  2. KraemerNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 9095th
  3. Col. J. K. TuffreeNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 8791st
  4. Yorba LindaNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 8587th
  5. Cerro VillaOrange Unified · by addressScope Score 8177th
  6. Orange County School of Computer ScienceScope Score 7867th
  7. Valadez Middle School AcademyNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 7336th
Placentia-Yorba Linda UnifiedA neighborhood school in another districtCharter

A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer. A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats.

Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map

Scores and family income

Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.

25%50%75%0%25%50%75%100%

5 of 7 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.

English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.

Schools like it

How does this school compare with schools like it?

Orange County School of Computer Science’s Scope Score is 78. 339 California middle schools, counting Orange County School of Computer Science, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 79. Orange County School of Computer Science’s result is higher than 163 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 339

  1. Students from low-income families: 44%

    Elkhorn

    Stockton

    Scope Score 98Strong · 99th percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 36%

    Scope Score 96Strong · 99th percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 43%

    Scope Score 93Strong · 97th percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 37%

    Scope Score 93Strong · 97th percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 48%

    Scope Score 92Strong · 97th percentile

339 California public middle schools where 36% to 48% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public middle school we score where 36% to 48% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Orange County School of Computer Science’s share. The count includes Orange County School of Computer Science. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

English results were lower than in 2025; math results were similar. English went from 61% to 55% and math from 44% to 46%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2025 to 2026

Grades 6–8. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

25%50%75%2025202664%61%62%Placentia-Yorba Linda UnifiedDistrict55%Orange County School of Computer ScienceThis school49%CaliforniaCalifornia

Math

25%50%75%2025202649%44%50%Placentia-Yorba Linda UnifiedDistrict46%Orange County School of Computer ScienceThis school37%CaliforniaCalifornia

Each spring tests a different group of students. Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified’s line combines its 5 middle schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grades 6–8: share at the top two levels
SpringOrange County School of Computer SciencePlacentia-Yorba Linda UnifiedCaliforniaTested here
202561%64%49%710
202655%62%49%541
Math, grades 6–8: share at the top two levels
SpringOrange County School of Computer SciencePlacentia-Yorba Linda UnifiedCaliforniaTested here
202544%49%36%714
202646%50%37%545

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

Above California in both subjects.

English

55%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

21243718
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified67%California49%

Math

46%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

28262323
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified56%California37%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 55% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 46% in math, against 49% and 37% across California.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Results for each grade, spring 2026

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced52%55%55%
Advanced19%19%17%
Proficient33%36%38%
Developing level26%24%24%
Minimal22%21%21%
Tested58226257
California48%51%49%
Difference+4+4+6

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced41%44%49%
Advanced20%18%28%
Proficient21%26%21%
Developing level32%24%26%
Minimal27%32%25%
Tested59227259
California37%38%36%
Difference+4+6+13

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 6–8 · This school18%37%24%21%541
English, grades 6–8 · California19%30%23%28%1,254,039
English, grades 6–8 · Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified34%33%17%16%4,871
Math, grades 6–8 · This school23%23%26%28%545
Math, grades 6–8 · California21%16%23%40%1,254,800
Math, grades 6–8 · Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified38%18%21%23%4,908

Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined: 541 tested in English, 545 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 49% of students. 82 of 592 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

14in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (82 of 592 students).

At the average Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified middle school: 14 in 100. At the average California middle school: 18 in 100.

Suspensions: 1.5% of students were suspended at least once (9 of 596). Average California middle school 3.7%.

Students, 2024–25

753

students in grades 6–8.

Hispanic or Latino 49%White 28%Asian 12%Two or more races 7%Black or African American 2%Filipino 2%

Family income

42%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 320 of 753. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

38

teachers, with 5 years of experience on average.

50% were in their first year.

89% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

English learners

65%

of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (20 of 31 students).

Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified: 53%. California: 47%.

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.

Missing school, by grade
Grade 6
12 of 65 students in grade 6 were chronically absent.
Grades 7–8
13 in 100 students in grades 7–8 were chronically absent (70 of 527).
Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
Hispanic or Latino49%
White28%
Asian12%
Two or more races7%
Black or African American2%
Filipino2%
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 19.4 of 21.7 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Student groups

How do kids like mine do here?

Seven student groups at Orange County School of Computer Science have test results. Each bar compares one group with the same group across California.

This schoolThe same group, California
  • Asian64 tested75%California 71%
  • Two or more races30 tested67%California 50%
  • White138 tested47%California 50%
  • Hispanic or Latino265 tested34%California 25%
  • Low-income276 tested33%California 26%
  • Homeless66 tested27%California 17%
  • Students with disabilities66 tested17%California 9%

Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 6–8 math, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Every group’s results, with the district

Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.

Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Placentia-Yorba Linda Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 275 tested in English, 276 in math
English42%−951%+339%
Math33%−538%+726%
Hispanic or Latino · 265 tested
English46%−551%+739%
Math34%034%+925%
White · 138 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English57%−1572%−562%
Math47%−1562%−350%
Asian · 61 tested in English, 64 in math · grades 7 and 8 only
English75%−1287%−176%
Math75%−1287%+471%
Two or more races · 30 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English70%−1484%+763%
Math67%−471%+1750%
Students with disabilities · 66 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English20%+218%+614%
Math17%017%+89%
Homeless · 66 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English35%−439%+728%
Math27%027%+1017%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

Military-family students and English learners: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Family and staff answers

What would families and staff tell you?

Families can answer a short set of questions about Orange County School of Computer Science. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  2. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  3. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

Staff

Staff can’t answer for this school yet

We don’t check staff emails for Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.

Ask us to add your district

Money

How much is spent on each student here?

$20,213 for each student in 2024–25. California’s middle schools spent $19,269 for each student.

$20,213

for each student at this school, 2024–25
Spent at the school
$10,384
The school’s share of district office costs
$9,829
Of the total, from federal funds
$805
  • Orange County School of Computer Science$20,213
  • Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified middle schools$19,094
  • California middle schools$19,269

The district and California figures combine their middle schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,241 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓

The neighborhood

What is the area around this school like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 92886. They are not figures for the families at Orange County School of Computer Science.

Typical household income in a year

$153,397

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 92886.

Typical home value
$1,116,500
People who live in this ZIP code
49,704
Typical age
44.0 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
56%

What you can do

Who can act on this school’s results?

Orange County School of Computer Science’s own board decides its plan.

State support

The state hasn’t placed Orange County School of Computer Science in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 7 questions to Orange County School of Computer Science. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What changes for a student who falls behind in math?18 points lower in math than California students who had the same score the year before, grades 6–8, 2025 (655 students)
  2. Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
  3. Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

Before you apply

  1. Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
  2. What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Getting in

What comes after this school, and how do I get in?

Ask Orange County School of Computer Science how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. No assigned next school.

Orange County School of Computer Science is a charter, so a student’s later schools follow the family’s home address, not this campus, unless the family applies elsewhere. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

  1. Elementary
    Fairmont Elementary
    Scope Score 89Strong · 92nd percentile · 2026Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
  2. Middle · this school
    Orange County School of Computer Science
    Grades 6–8Scope Score 78Solid · 67th percentile
  3. High
    Esperanza High
    Scope Score 83Strong · 81st percentile · 2025Its zone partly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

These links come from past records and from distance. Confirm your child’s school with the district. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

  • Fairmont Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 89 · Strong · 92nd percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Glenknoll Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 86 · Strong · 87th percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Glenview Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 76 · Solid · 53rd percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Woodsboro Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 93 · Strong · 97th percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

Middle-school links

  • Travis Ranch

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

High-school links

  • Esperanza High

    Its zone partly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 83 · Strong · 81st percentile · high · 2025

    61% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Yorba Linda High

    Its zone partly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 86 · Strong · 87th percentile · high · 2025

    39% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking. Older zone links come from the federal School Attendance Boundary Survey (NCES SABS).

Where the path ends: Esperanza High
Esperanza HighScope Score 83 · Strong · 81st percentile · 2025estimated path

The road from this school ends at Esperanza High. UC records 27 enrollees from Esperanza High for fall 2025. The AP Course Audit lists 27 AP courses its teachers are authorized to teach in 2025–26. Those figures come from dated records. A child starting here today would reach Esperanza High around 2029, and a school can change a lot in 3 years. By the state’s 2023 count, 81% of the students who finished high school at Esperanza High enrolled in college within 12 months, UC or not.

27 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 27 authorized AP courses (AP Course Audit 2025–26) → full record on Esperanza High's page
Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Where it is

Where is this school?

Address
5350 Fairmont Boulevard, Yorba Linda 92886Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Cameron ShepherdAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated August 19, 2025.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 7 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Orange County School of Computer Science how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓

Is Orange County School of Computer Science a good middle school?

Orange County School of Computer Science has a Scope Score of 78. It scored higher than 67 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools (Solid, 67th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 14 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 14 in 100 at the average Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified middle school. 1.5% of students (9 of 596) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. See the details ↓

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 14 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 18 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.

  • Included in this measure: 656 students in English, 655 in math

See the details ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 42% of low-income students in grades 6–8 at Orange County School of Computer Science in Yorba Linda scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. See the details ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $6.4 million is planned for 86 funded actions in 7 goals. That’s 71% of its $8.9 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

Its own plan

What does this school’s own plan commit to?

$6.4 million is planned for 86 funded actions in 7 goals. That’s 71% of its $8.9 million general fund budget.

$6.4million

planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27

The three largest actions in the plan

  • Districtwide Staffing$4.1 million
  • Professional Development, Training, and Task Forces$172,285
  • Additional Transportation Support$152,100

These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 176 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 176 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 70% of the money. The plan itself puts 74% of it toward staff.

  • Districtwide Staffing $4.1 million
  • Professional Development, Training, and Task Forces $172,285
  • Additional Transportation Support $152,100
  • 83 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

25 of the plan’s 86 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

  • Math $22,081
  • Catch-up help $120,858
  • English learners $397,446

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • English Language Development (ELD) Professional Development$74,883
  • Bilingual Community Liaisons$27,733
  • English Learner Snapshot$27,733
For high-need students

It plans $967,495 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $671,621 and estimates it spent $548,085, $123,536 (18%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $123,536 under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grades 6–8 only: 55% in English and 46% in math, spring 2026.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2, 4, 5 and 761%55%down 6 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2, 4, 5 and 744%46%up 2 pts
Chronically absentGoals 1, 2, 5 and 715 in 10014 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoals 1, 2, 5 and 71.5%1.5%no change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25English learners · Goal 34%7%up 3 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25English learners · Goal 312%26%up 14 pts
Chronically absentEnglish learners · Goal 322 in 10026 in 1004 more in 100
Suspended at least onceEnglish learners · Goal 30 of 510 of 43no change

Goal 6 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Districtwide Staffing · $4,137,249
  • Professional Development, Training, and Task Forces · $172,285
  • Additional Transportation Support · $152,100
The full plan7 goals, 85 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($6.4 million).

Where does the money go?

71% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars. Tap a box to open its goal.

G2
G3
G4
G5
G7

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1OCSCS will provide innovative, rigorous, and relevant educational experiences that empower students to become…$153,6882% of action budgets

“OCSCS will provide innovative, rigorous, and relevant educational experiences that empower students to become responsible, ethical, and contributing citizens” p. 23 ↗

10 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. SPED Inclusion$85,347action 1.14 · p. 113 ↗
  2. Middle School Athletics$27,733action 1.5 · p. 113 ↗
  3. Enrichment$15,130action 1.15 · p. 113 ↗
  4. Foundational Math$6,950action 1.2 · p. 113 ↗
  5. Computer Science$5,534action 1.4 · p. 113 ↗

5 more funded actions in this goal

How the plan measures it · 13 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 23 ↗.

Goal 2 · Maintenance of Progress GoalOCSCS will continue to provide the necessary resources, skills, and opportunities for all students to meet or…$4.5 million71% of action budgets

“OCSCS will continue to provide the necessary resources, skills, and opportunities for all students to meet or exceed grade level expectations” p. 31 ↗

7 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Districtwide Staffing$4.1 millionaction 2.1 · p. 114 ↗
  2. Professional Development, Training, and Task Forces$0.2 millionaction 2.2 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. State Testing$0.1 millionaction 2.4 · p. 114 ↗
  4. Training for Classified Staff$0.1 millionaction 2.6 · p. 114 ↗
  5. Math Curriculum and Instructionunder $0.1 millionaction 2.7 · p. 114 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Resource Distribution · action 2.5 · p. 114 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Instructional Materials, Supplies, and Services · action 2.3 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

How the plan measures it · 14 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 31 ↗.

Goal 3OCSCS will close the academic achievement gap for English Learner (EL) students$413,8426% of action budgets

17 funded actions · p. 38 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. English Language Development (ELD) Professional Development$74,883action 3.1 · p. 114 ↗
  2. Special Education Staff Training$27,733action 3.4 · p. 114 ↗
  3. Bilingual Community Liaisons$27,733action 3.12 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Administrative Support$27,733action 3.13 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Needs-Responsive Schools$27,733action 3.20 · p. 116 ↗

12 more funded actions in this goal

  • English Learner Snapshot · action 3.21 · p. 116 ↗$27,733
  • English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) · action 3.5 · p. 115 ↗$24,555
  • ELD Teacher Support · action 3.8 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • Translation Services · action 3.9 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • English Language Assessment Center · action 3.10 · p. 115 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • ELD Coordination · action 3.16 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • Guided Language Acquisition and Design (GLAD) · action 3.18 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • English Learner Master Plan · action 3.19 · p. 116 ↗$24,555
  • Additional EL Sections at Secondary Schools · action 3.2 · p. 114 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$19,395
  • District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) and English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC) Groups · action 3.11 · p. 115 ↗$3,982
  • EL Progress Monitoring and Intervention · action 3.15 · p. 116 ↗$3,982
  • Additional Instructional Materials for EL Support · action 3.6 · p. 115 ↗$1,051

How the plan measures it · 16 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 38 ↗.

Goal 4OCSCS will close the academic achievement gap for Long-Term English Learner (LTEL) students$278,9344% of action budgets

12 funded actions · p. 50 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. English Language Development Curriculum$27,733action 4.3 · p. 116 ↗
  2. OCDE LTEL Network$27,733action 4.5 · p. 117 ↗
  3. At-risk for LTEL$27,733action 4.8 · p. 117 ↗
  4. LTEL Identification$27,733action 4.9 · p. 117 ↗
  5. Academic Progress Check-ins$27,733action 4.10 · p. 117 ↗

7 more funded actions in this goal

  • Professional Development · action 4.11 · p. 117 ↗$27,733
  • Goal-Setting · action 4.12 · p. 117 ↗$27,733
  • Progress Monitoring · action 4.13 · p. 117 ↗$27,733
  • English Learner Sections at Secondary Schools · action 4.2 · p. 116 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • LTEL Engagement · action 4.7 · p. 117 ↗$24,555
  • EL Progress Monitoring · action 4.4 · p. 116 ↗$3,982
  • ELAC and DELAC · action 4.6 · p. 117 ↗$3,982

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 50 ↗.

Goal 5OCSCS will close the academic achievement gap for Socio-Economically Disadvantaged (SED) students$263,0304% of action budgets

5 funded actions · p. 58 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Additional Transportation Support$152,100action 5.7 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. McKinney Vento Support Staff$27,733action 5.1 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. McKinney Vento Tutoring$27,733action 5.2 · p. 118 ↗
  4. McKinney Vento Classified Support$27,733action 5.3 · p. 118 ↗
  5. McKinney Vento Program Support$27,733action 5.4 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

How the plan measures it · 16 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 58 ↗.

Goal 6OCSCS will close the academic achievement gap for Foster Youth (FY) students$148,4602% of action budgets

7 funded actions · p. 67 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Mentoring Services for FY$27,733action 6.2 · p. 119 ↗
  2. Trauma-Informed Practices$27,733action 6.3 · p. 119 ↗
  3. Collaboration with Child Welfare Agencies$27,733action 6.4 · p. 119 ↗
  4. Family and Caregiver Engagement$27,733action 6.5 · p. 119 ↗
  5. Foster Youth Enrollment$27,733action 6.7 · p. 119 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Tutoring Services for FY · action 6.1 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$5,946
  • Professional Development for Staff · action 6.6 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3,851

How the plan measures it · 8 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 67 ↗.

Goal 7OCSCS will close the academic achievement gap for all Unduplicated Pupils (UPs) through districtwide and…$608,20710% of action budgets

“OCSCS will close the academic achievement gap for all Unduplicated Pupils (UPs) through districtwide and schoolwide actions” p. 73 ↗

28 funded actions

Largest funded actions

  1. Teacher Collaboration and Intervention Design$27,733action 7.1 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Professional Learning Communities PD$27,733action 7.2 · p. 119 ↗
  3. District Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSA)$27,733action 7.16 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Administrative Support$27,733action 7.18 · p. 121 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. College and Career Technicians$27,733action 7.19 · p. 121 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

23 more funded actions in this goal

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support · action 7.20 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Data Dashboard and Analysis System · action 7.21 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Collaborative Task Forces · action 7.22 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Attendance Tracking and Early Intervention · action 7.23 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • School and District Attendance Review Teams · action 7.24 · p. 121 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$27,733
  • Professional Development for Core Content Curriculum and Instruction · action 7.25 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Student Study Team and 504 Plan Coordination · action 7.26 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Suicide Prevention · action 7.29 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Learning Recovery Programs · action 7.30 · p. 121 ↗$27,733
  • Secondary Intervention Classrooms · action 7.32 · p. 122 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$27,733
  • Career Technical Education (CTE) · action 7.33 · p. 122 ↗$27,733
  • Dual Enrollment · action 7.36 · p. 122 ↗$27,733
  • Site-level Awareness · action 7.39 · p. 122 ↗$27,733
  • Additional Support Staff at High Impact Sites · action 7.12 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • Additional Health Support at High Impact Sites · action 7.13 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • District Leadership · action 7.17 · p. 121 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$24,555
  • Site Discretionary Funding for UPs · action 7.11 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$15,652
  • Mental Health Support and Resources for Students and Families at Secondary Sites · action 7.9 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$4,482
  • Tier I Intervention · action 7.4 · p. 119 ↗$3,982
  • PYLUSD Induction Program · action 7.8 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3,982
  • Interpretation Services · action 7.38 · p. 122 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3,982
  • SPSA Development · action 7.37 · p. 122 ↗$2,276
  • Dual Language Academy · action 7.35 · p. 122 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1,000

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 73 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
12
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census Bureau
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #815 of 2,529 California middle schools we score · #6 of 7 in Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math20%5342%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math49%5723%
Chronically absent14 in 100565%
Suspension rate1.5% (9 of 596)595%
English learners: top level17%435%
Grade gap (G6→G8, different students)+5.9pp—not scored

Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. The weights above add to 80%: the remaining 20%, for measures with no value here, is shared out among the measures above.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–267867#815California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–197 in 1003.0% (19 of 644)—
2021–22not on filenot on file—
2022–23not on filenot on file—
2023–2414 in 1002.0% (11 of 555)—
2024–2515 in 1001.5% (12 of 786)−2
2025–2614 in 1001.5% (9 of 596)+6

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 6 and grade 8 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English54118%55%
2026 · Math54523%46%
2025 · English71026%61%
2025 · Math71424%44%
2024 · English52324%59%
2024 · Math52626%50%
2023 · English49220%56%
2023 · Math49828%48%
2022 · English53221%58%
2022 · Math53024%47%
2019 · English58231%71%
2019 · Math58336%64%
2018 · English63928%75%
2018 · Math63839%64%
2017 · English67230%73%
2017 · Math67038%62%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · English13159%
2025 · Grade 7 · English28266%
2025 · Grade 8 · English29757%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math13143%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math28446%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math29941%
2024 · Grade 7 · English28960%
2024 · Grade 8 · English23456%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math29052%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math23647%
2023 · Grade 7 · English24654%
2023 · Grade 8 · English24658%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math25248%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math24649%
2022 · Grade 7 · English24264%
2022 · Grade 8 · English29052%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math24156%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math28939%
2019 · Grade 7 · English28867%
2019 · Grade 8 · English29475%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math28866%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math29562%
2018 · Grade 7 · English29477%
2018 · Grade 8 · English34573%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math29471%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math34458%
2017 · Grade 7 · English35077%
2017 · Grade 8 · English32269%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math35065%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math32058%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide25915%24%49%12%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income27542%−9+3
Hispanic or Latino26546%−5+7
White (grades 7 and 8 only)13857%−15−5
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students−14656Moderate−18655Moderate
English-only students−13479not categorized−19478not categorized
Hispanic or Latino−16309Moderate−22308Minimal
Low-income−19298Moderate−23297Minimal
White−13209Moderate−17209Moderate
English learners−2689Minimal−1489Moderate
Asian−884Moderate+384Average
Students with disabilities−2577Minimal−1277Moderate
Homeless−1875Moderate−1575Moderate
Recently reclassified as fluent in English−2159not categorized−1759not categorized
English learners only−3830not categorized−330not categorized
Two or more races026Average−1726Moderate
Filipino−2316Minimal−1416Moderate
Long-term English learners (grades 6–8 only)−3516Minimal−1416Moderate

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-term English learner counts cover grades 6–8 only (CDE’s rule), so that row is not comparable to the All students row. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure
California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English−14 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 6–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 6–8

656 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

California growth model, English: −14 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Moderate, against SchoolScope's −2-point median for California middle school records.

State model · math−18 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 6–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 6–8

655 students

CDE growth category: Moderate

California growth model, math: −18 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Moderate, against SchoolScope's −3-point median for California middle school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 15 in 100 → 2025–26 · 14 in 100 · −1 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 1.5% (12 of 786) → 2025–26 · 1.5% (9 of 596) · 0.0 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female6 in 10018 in 100+12 in 100
Male7 in 10010 in 100+3 in 100
Asian2 of 856 of 70—
Filipino0 of 140 of 11—
Hispanic or Latino9 in 10015 in 100+6 in 100
Two or more races0 of 324 of 41—
White7 in 10016 in 100+9 in 100
Students with disabilities12 of 5620 of 94—
English learners9 of 6211 of 42—
Homeless10 of 4519 of 83—
Low-income14 in 10018 in 100+4 in 100
All students7 in 10014 in 100+7 in 100
Black or African American—1 of 11—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$12,415 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 24,296 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

Central federal expenditures attributed here$805 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 753

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,635 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 66%Instruction support 12%Student services 8%Administration 4%Buildings & maintenance 10%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$251,228,04566.35%66%
Instruction support$44,130,93411.66%12%
Student services$30,162,1107.97%8%
Administration$14,097,5203.72%4%
Buildings & maintenance$36,708,3199.70%10%
Total$378,625,863100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $378,625,863 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$12,415 per pupil
2020$11,178 per pupil
2019$11,385 per pupil
2018$11,108 per pupil
2017$10,858 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 92886 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 92886 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$153,397
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)56%
ZIP-area population49,704
Median age44.0 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 92886 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/bernardo-yorba-middle-8621"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Orange County School of Computer Science — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyzeRequest a correction