ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Glenview Elementary · Anaheim

Glenview Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Glenview posts 35% meeting the standard and 14.7% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1775 Glenview Avenue, 92807 (opens in new tab)·Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified·Anaheim·Grades TK-6·601 students·50% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 986-7150
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3845
% Exceeded15%21%
% Met+35%43%
Growth-9.2-2.9
Absence17.0%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
38
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,530 statewide · #21 of 22 in Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified

Glenview Elementary scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 39th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Glenview deserves a closer read. The school sits in Anaheim, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 53rd to the 39th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 35% meet the standard today, versus 46% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 350%44%38%35%40%
Grade 451%47%27%38%40%
Grade 556%56%57%49%39%
Grade 668%44%49%52%54%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 343%45%38%42%41%
Grade 441%47%39%32%30%
Grade 533%34%38%37%23%
Grade 649%32%39%40%44%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

21%
19%
60%
Grade 3 · 40% proficient
18%
22%
60%
Grade 4 · 40% proficient
16%
23%
61%
Grade 5 · 39% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.3pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.7%
State 21.3%
6.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-9.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
35.5%
State 42.7%
7.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.0%
State 17.9%
1.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.3%
State 18.0%
3.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Glenview Elementary in Anaheim, 35.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Glenview Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 16.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 29.8 percentage points for homeless students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 170 students tested.

All students at this school: 38% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 38%, district —, state 43%38%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 35%, district 43%, state 32%35% · −3 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 45%, state 32%30% · −7 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 41%, district 62%, state 44%41% · +3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 35%, district 61%, state 42%35% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 36%, district 69%, state 56%36% · −2 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 19%, district 31%, state 22%19% · −19 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 12%, district 23%, state 15%12% · −26 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 13%, state 11%9% · −29 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +0.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.0%, district 15.5%, state 17.9%17.0% · −1.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (23.7% vs 15.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–615.0%
TK/K23.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 24:124:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience9.9 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,890 – $134,287
Principal salary$149,134 – $174,077
Superintendent salary$375,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,021, CA average $14,815$18,021 · spent at this school
Federal share$66 per student

$66 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,635 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction66%
Instruction support12%
Student services8%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,415 per pupil
2019$11,178 per pupil
2018$11,385 per pupil
2017$11,108 per pupil
2016$10,858 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic74.0%
District 45.7% · CA 56.1%
White18.5%
District 26.0% · CA 19.9%
Other4.2%
District 8.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian2.5%
District 19.2% · CA 10.2%
Black0.8%
District 1.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 49.9% (14pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$139K · CA $85K
Median home value$963K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+49% · CA 35%
ZIP population37,296
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 28% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Glenview Elementary a good elementary school?

Glenview Elementary has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 39th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,530 statewide. 14.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Glenview Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 35.5% of students at Glenview Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 517 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Glenview Elementary rank in California?

Glenview Elementary ranks #3,530 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 39th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Glenview Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Glenview Elementary decreases by 9.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Glenview Elementary?

17.0% of students at Glenview Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Glenview Elementary compare to other schools in Anaheim?

Glenview Elementary scores 38/100 (39th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 601 students. Use the schools in Anaheim page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Glenview Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Glenview Elementary in Anaheim, 35.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Glenview Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 16.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (40.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 29.8 percentage points for homeless students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 170 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.7%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 44th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-9.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 42th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
35.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.0%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 55th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38021%19%20%40%40%−3
Grade 48318%22%25%35%40%−5
Grade 59416%23%32%29%39%−9
Grade 66120%34%26%20%54%+8
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38110%31%23%36%41%−5
Grade 48314%16%43%27%30%−11
Grade 5968%15%30%47%23%−12
Grade 66125%20%26%30%44%+9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/119410%18%51%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17035.3%−17−3
Hispanic/Latino23540.0%−11+1
White5137.3%−37−25
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Glenview Elementary ←3814.7%35.5%−9.20.1%
Golden Elementary3.2 mi9570.1%89.4%+3.00.1%
Crescent Elementary1.2 mi7757.5%82.7%+5.20.6%
Nohl Canyon Elementary2.2 mi7553.0%78.3%+11.10.9%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194353#258219.5%45.5%10.5%1.1%-2.0pp
20224569#178021.7%45.6%25.6%1.5%+1.0pp
20234971#164719.2%39.4%22.4%1.6%+9.3pp
20244250#284717.2%38.9%14.0%0.3%+4.7pp
20253839#353014.7%35.5%17.0%0.1%-9.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female11.1%16.6%+5.5pp
Male9.9%17.3%+7.4pp
Asian8.7%13.0%+4.3pp
Hispanic/Latino11.1%17.7%+6.6pp
Two or More Races14.3%9.1%-5.2pp
Students with Disabilities12.8%20.7%+7.9pp
English Learners9.9%16.7%+6.8pp
Homeless22.6%20.0%-2.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.4%22.5%+5.1pp
All Students10.5%16.9%+6.4pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction