ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Anna McKenney Intermediate · Marysville

Anna McKenney Intermediate: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Anna McKenney Intermediate posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 5.4pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

1904 Huston, 95901 (opens in new tab)·Marysville Joint Unified·Marysville·Grades 6-8·590 students·76% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(530) 741-6187·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2743
% Exceeded5%17%
% Met+24%39%
Growth+5.4+1.5
Absence22.9%18.5%
Suspension9.9%3.7%
Scope Score
27
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #1,870 statewide · #5 of 5 in Marysville Joint Unified

Anna McKenney Intermediate scores 27 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 16th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. Anna McKenney Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Marysville, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 16th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 24% meet the standard today, versus 30% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 636%32%39%30%30%
Grade 745%34%33%34%26%
Grade 826%40%38%28%39%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 626%17%15%17%15%
Grade 729%8%12%16%15%
Grade 817%15%15%8%17%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

25%
70%
Grade 6 · 30% proficient
22%
73%
Grade 7 · 27% proficient
9%
30%
61%
Grade 8 · 39% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
5.4%
State 16.8%
11.4pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+5.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
23.6%
State 39.3%
15.7pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
22.9%
State 18.5%
4.4pp above state avg
Suspension rate
9.9%
State 3.7%
6.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.9%
State 18.0%
0.1pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Anna McKenney Intermediate in Marysville, 29.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Anna McKenney Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (30.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 409 students tested.

All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 39%23%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 24%, state 32%22% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 25%, district 26%, state 42%25% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 22%, district 28%, state 44%22% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 24%, state 32%21% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 29%, district 32%, state 56%29% · +6 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 10%, state 15%9% · −14 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 8%, state 11%3% · −21 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 26%, district 34%, state 56%26% · +2 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 9%, district 17%, state 26%9% · −15 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 25%, district 26%, state 72%25% · +2 vs school

6 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.1pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 22.9%, district 20.1%, state 18.5%22.9% · +4.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 9.9%, district —, state 3.7%9.9% · +6.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–624.5%
Grades 7–822.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff28 teachers
Avg. experience10.9 years
Fully credentialed78%
First-year teachers18%
Intern / emergency permit2.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,394 – $128,590
Principal salary$109,013 – $121,763
Superintendent salary$246,328

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,779, CA average $14,815$17,779 · spent at this school
Federal share$809 per student

$809 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,205 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction56%
Instruction support10%
Student services16%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,060 per pupil
2019$12,355 per pupil
2018$12,248 per pupil
2017$11,862 per pupil
2016$10,899 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic43.7%
District 49.2% · CA 56.1%
White33.7%
District 28.9% · CA 19.9%
Other10.8%
District 10.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian5.9%
District 8.7% · CA 10.2%
Black5.8%
District 3.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 76.4% (13pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$70K · CA $85K
Median home value$381K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+18% · CA 35%
ZIP population37,732
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 21% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Anna McKenney Intermediate a good middle school?

Anna McKenney Intermediate has a Scope Score of 27 out of 100, placing it in the 16th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,870 statewide. 5.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.4 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Anna McKenney Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.6% of students at Anna McKenney Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 5.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 18.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 5.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,061 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Anna McKenney Intermediate rank in California?

Anna McKenney Intermediate ranks #1,870 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 16th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Anna McKenney Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Anna McKenney Intermediate increases by 5.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Anna McKenney Intermediate?

22.9% of students at Anna McKenney Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 9.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Anna McKenney Intermediate compare to other schools in Marysville?

Anna McKenney Intermediate scores 27/100 (16th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 590 students. Use the schools in Marysville page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Anna McKenney Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Anna McKenney Intermediate in Marysville, 29.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Anna McKenney Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (30.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 409 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
5.4%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 37th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+5.4pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 42th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.6%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 38th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
22.9%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 44th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
9.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 25th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.9%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 45th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61695%25%30%40%30%−16
Grade 71895%22%28%46%26%−21
Grade 81709%30%34%27%39%−7
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61715%10%30%56%15%−20
Grade 71904%11%23%63%15%−19
Grade 81725%12%28%55%17%−15
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111732%19%58%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged40929.6%−1−9
Hispanic/Latino24030.4%−0−8
White16735.3%−3−26
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Anna McKenney Intermediate ←275.4%23.6%+5.49.9%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192515#17137.2%29.8%10.9%8.7%-9.7pp
20223136#13924.7%24.3%29.4%4.6%+3.2pp
20233125#16445.4%25.4%26.0%7.0%-0.7pp
20242010#19895.2%22.1%24.6%11.4%-4.9pp
20252716#18705.4%23.6%22.9%9.9%+5.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.2%24.9%+14.7pp
Male11.6%21.3%+9.7pp
Asian0.0%2.9%+2.9pp
Black/African American15.0%21.6%+6.6pp
Hispanic/Latino9.5%21.9%+12.4pp
Two or More Races13.8%16.7%+2.9pp
Students with Disabilities16.5%33.8%+17.3pp
English Learners3.8%10.3%+6.5pp
Foster Youth6.7%
Homeless45.0%42.3%-2.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.9%26.0%+14.1pp
All Students10.9%23.0%+12.1pp
Filipino35.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction