ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Gray Avenue Middle · Yuba City

Gray Avenue Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Gray Avenue posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

808 Gray Avenue, 95991 (opens in new tab)·Yuba City Unified·Yuba City·Grades 6-8·655 students·93% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(530) 822-5240·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope1543
% Exceeded3%17%
% Met+14%39%
Growth-3.9+1.5
Absence25.2%18.5%
Suspension13.6%3.7%
Scope Score
15
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #2,207 statewide · #9 of 9 in Yuba City Unified

Gray Avenue Middle scores 15 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 1st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “14% proficient” and call it done. Gray Avenue deserves a closer read. The school sits in Yuba City, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 17th to the 1st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELARed(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 14% meet the standard today, versus 26% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 633%25%26%22%20%
Grade 736%28%22%28%20%
Grade 835%31%20%23%17%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 620%10%12%8%11%
Grade 718%8%11%7%11%
Grade 817%12%6%5%7%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
80%
Grade 6 · 20% proficient
16%
80%
Grade 7 · 20% proficient
14%
84%
Grade 8 · 16% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
3.5%
State 16.8%
13.4pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.9pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
14.2%
State 39.3%
25.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
25.2%
State 18.5%
6.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
13.6%
State 3.7%
9.9pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
15.0%
State 18.0%
3.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Gray Avenue Middle in Yuba City, 18.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gray Avenue Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 14.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (9.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 569 students tested.

All students at this school: 14% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 14%, district —, state 39%14%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 14%, district 27%, state 32%14% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 14%, district 24%, state 32%14% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 12%, district 30%, state 42%12% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 16%, district 33%, state 44%16% · +2 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 0%, district 7%, state 11%0% · −14 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 2%, district 8%, state 15%2% · −12 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 16%, district 36%, state 56%16% · +2 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 17%, district 42%, state 72%17% · +3 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 13%, district 34%, state 56%13% · −1 vs school

5 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.8pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 25.2%, district 20.1%, state 18.5%25.2% · +6.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 13.6%, district —, state 3.7%13.6% · +9.9pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–624.2%
Grades 7–826.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff37 teachers
Avg. experience11.7 years
Fully credentialed86%
Intern / emergency permit4.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,443 – $126,004
Principal salary$168,541 – $168,118
Superintendent salary$254,458

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,604, CA average $14,815$20,604 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,349 per student

$1,349 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,585 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,758 per pupil
2019$12,704 per pupil
2018$13,243 per pupil
2017$11,581 per pupil
2016$10,333 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic66.7%
District 47.8% · CA 56.1%
White12.2%
District 21.0% · CA 19.9%
Asian10.8%
District 21.2% · CA 10.2%
Other8.2%
District 8.5% · CA 9.0%
Black2.0%
District 1.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 92.8% (29pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$71K · CA $85K
Median home value$407K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+19% · CA 35%
ZIP population42,579
Median age34 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 6% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gray Avenue Middle a good middle school?

Gray Avenue Middle has a Scope Score of 15 out of 100, placing it in the 1st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #2,207 statewide. 3.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.4 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Gray Avenue Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 14.2% of students at Gray Avenue Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 3.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 10.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 3.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,262 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Gray Avenue Middle rank in California?

Gray Avenue Middle ranks #2,207 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 1st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Gray Avenue Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Gray Avenue Middle decreases by 3.9 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Gray Avenue Middle?

25.2% of students at Gray Avenue Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 13.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Gray Avenue Middle compare to other schools in Yuba City?

Gray Avenue Middle scores 15/100 (1st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 655 students. Use the schools in Yuba City page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Gray Avenue Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Gray Avenue Middle in Yuba City, 18.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Gray Avenue Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 14.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (9.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (17.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 569 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
3.5%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 35th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.9pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 20th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
14.2%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 30th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
25.2%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 41th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
13.6%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 10th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
15.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 41th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62265%15%25%54%20%−26
Grade 71874%16%20%60%20%−28
Grade 82032%14%35%48%17%−29
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62394%7%24%65%11%−24
Grade 71954%7%17%72%11%−23
Grade 82122%5%18%75%7%−26
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112080%6%59%36%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged56918.6%−15−20
Hispanic/Latino43017.9%−12−21
English Learners1560.0%−7−10
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Gray Avenue Middle ←153.5%14.2%−3.913.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192617#16596.2%26.4%17.7%15.7%-0.8pp
20222314#18593.7%19.2%28.0%14.2%+3.8pp
2023236#20523.0%16.1%27.7%10.6%-5.8pp
2024187#20612.3%15.5%26.9%11.2%-1.1pp
2025151#22073.5%14.2%25.2%13.6%-3.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 20 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female16.1%24.5%+8.4pp
Male19.2%26.3%+7.1pp
Asian5.8%14.1%+8.3pp
Black/African American17.4%46.7%+29.3pp
Hispanic/Latino15.4%22.7%+7.3pp
Two or More Races23.1%55.9%+32.8pp
Students with Disabilities29.9%37.4%+7.5pp
English Learners8.7%19.1%+10.4pp
Foster Youth33.3%
Homeless52.9%58.8%+5.9pp
Military-Connected6.3%15.8%+9.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.9%25.7%+7.8pp
All Students17.7%25.4%+7.7pp
Filipino19.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction