ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Abbott Middle · San Mateo

Abbott Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Abbott posts 35% meeting the standard and 16.9% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

600 36th Avenue, 94403 (opens in new tab)·San Mateo-Foster City·San Mateo·Grades 6-8·721 students·61% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(650) 312-7600·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4343
% Exceeded17%17%
% Met+35%39%
Growth-0.6+1.5
Absence20.9%18.5%
Suspension5.6%3.7%
Scope Score
43
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,000 statewide · #6 of 6 in San Mateo-Foster City

Abbott Middle scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 55th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Abbott deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Mateo, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 55th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 35% meet the standard today, versus 41% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 652%37%34%43%42%
Grade 747%38%34%44%44%
Grade 852%46%37%39%37%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 632%27%22%22%26%
Grade 728%24%28%35%29%
Grade 838%29%20%33%30%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

19%
23%
58%
Grade 6 · 42% proficient
20%
24%
56%
Grade 7 · 44% proficient
13%
24%
63%
Grade 8 · 37% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 6.1pp across grades; the floor slips 5.1pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
16.9%
State 16.8%
0.0pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-0.6pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
34.8%
State 39.3%
4.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.9%
State 18.5%
2.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
5.6%
State 3.7%
1.9pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.1%
State 18.0%
3.9pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Abbott Middle in San Mateo, 22.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Abbott Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (22.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.1 percentage points for homeless students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 411 students tested.

All students at this school: 35% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 35%, district —, state 39%35%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 17%, district 21%, state 32%17% · −18 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 17%, district 25%, state 32%17% · −18 vs school
MaleMale: this school 32%, district 50%, state 42%32% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 37%, district 52%, state 44%37% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 8%, state 11%3% · −32 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 69%, district 70%, state 56%69% · +35 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 15%, state 15%7% · −27 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 59%, district 68%, state 56%59% · +24 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 5%, district 11%, state 22%5% · −30 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 72%, district 84%, state 72%72% · +38 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 23%, district 38%, state 46%23% · −11 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 2.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.9%, district 16.6%, state 18.5%20.9% · +2.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.6%, district —, state 3.7%5.6% · +1.9pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–617.2%
Grades 7–822.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 21:118:1
Teaching staff41 teachers
Avg. experience9.5 years
Fully credentialed68%
Intern / emergency permit5.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,604 – $128,965
Principal salary$189,953 – $0
Superintendent salary$376,500

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,477, CA average $14,815$22,477 · spent at this school
Federal share$796 per student

$796 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,745 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,293 per pupil
2019$13,645 per pupil
2018$12,968 per pupil
2017$12,491 per pupil
2016$11,067 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic62.1%
District 41.4% · CA 56.1%
Other15.5%
District 16.6% · CA 9.0%
White14.7%
District 16.3% · CA 19.9%
Asian6.8%
District 24.9% · CA 10.2%
Black0.8%
District 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 61.0% (3pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$175K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.75M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+61% · CA 35%
ZIP population43,276
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 27% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Abbott Middle a good middle school?

Abbott Middle has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 55th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,000 statewide. 16.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Abbott Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.8% of students at Abbott Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 16.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 16.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,378 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Abbott Middle rank in California?

Abbott Middle ranks #1,000 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 55th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Abbott Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Abbott Middle decreases by 0.6 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Abbott Middle?

20.9% of students at Abbott Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 5.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Abbott Middle compare to other schools in San Mateo?

Abbott Middle scores 43/100 (55th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 721 students. Use the schools in San Mateo page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Abbott Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Abbott Middle in San Mateo, 22.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 26.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Abbott Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (22.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.1 percentage points for homeless students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 411 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
16.9%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 50th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-0.6pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 58th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
34.8%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 46th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.9%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
5.6%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 42th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.1%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 40th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 621619%23%24%34%42%−4
Grade 722420%24%15%41%44%−3
Grade 824013%24%19%44%37%−9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 621913%13%21%52%26%−9
Grade 723515%14%20%52%29%−5
Grade 824420%10%21%48%30%−2
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1124610%17%52%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged41122.1%−4−16
Hispanic/Latino41522.4%−2−16
English Learners2164.2%−3−6
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Abbott Middle ←4316.9%34.8%−0.65.6%
Ralston Intermediate1.2 mi8463.5%86.5%+7.11.8%
Tierra Linda Middle2 mi8456.9%82.5%+5.30.5%
Borel Middle1.6 mi4823.3%43.1%+11.34.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194361#78318.5%41.4%9.2%6.0%+3.2pp
20224058#91813.5%33.5%30.3%3.7%+5.5pp
20233845#121112.9%29.4%32.7%5.9%+0.3pp
20244157#95215.3%35.9%25.0%6.0%+3.2pp
20254355#100016.9%34.8%20.9%5.6%-0.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 16 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.4%20.4%+10.0pp
Male8.0%21.4%+13.4pp
Asian1.4%2.0%+0.6pp
Black/African American16.7%
White3.2%7.4%+4.2pp
Hispanic/Latino11.1%24.7%+13.6pp
Pacific Islander30.0%61.5%+31.5pp
Two or More Races7.0%11.9%+4.9pp
Students with Disabilities17.5%30.9%+13.4pp
English Learners10.9%29.6%+18.7pp
Homeless25.6%34.2%+8.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.1%27.4%+14.3pp
All Students9.2%20.9%+11.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction