School district · Contra Costa County

Antioch Unified schools

Antioch Unified’s 18 public elementary schools run from the bottom 1% to the 44th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 18 schools

from bottom 1% to 44th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Rocketship Delta Prep: 44th percentile, Developing
  • Diablo Vista Elementary: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Thomas Gaines Virtual Academy: 42nd percentile, Developing
  • Antioch Charter Academy II: 42nd percentile, Developing
  • Muir (John) Elementary: 37th percentile, Developing
  • Turner Elementary: 34th percentile, Developing
  • Orchard Park: 34th percentile, Developing
  • Kimball Elementary: 32nd percentile, Developing
  • Antioch Charter Academy: 21st percentile, Needs Support
  • Sutter Elementary: 20th percentile, Needs Support
  • Jack London Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
  • Lone Tree Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
  • Mission Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
  • Marsh Elementary: 8th percentile, Needs Support
  • Belshaw Elementary: 7th percentile, Needs Support
  • Grant Elementary: 6th percentile, Needs Support
  • Carmen Dragon Elementary: 3rd percentile, Needs Support
  • Fremont Elementary: bottom 1%, Needs Support
10Needs Support
8Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 9 schools

from bottom 1% to 78th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Antioch Charter Academy II: 78th percentile, Strong
  • Thomas Gaines Virtual Academy: 57th percentile, Solid
  • Antioch Charter Academy: 46th percentile, Developing
  • Orchard Park: 40th percentile, Developing
  • Prospects High (Alternative): 13th percentile, Needs Support
  • Dallas Ranch Middle: 12th percentile, Needs Support
  • Black Diamond Middle: 9th percentile, Needs Support
  • Park Middle: 1st percentile, Needs Support
  • Antioch Middle: bottom 1%, Needs Support
5Needs Support
2Developing
1Solid
1Strong

High · 4 schools

from bottom 1% to 74th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Dozier-Libbey Medical High: 74th percentile, Solid
  • Deer Valley High: 12th percentile, Needs Support
  • Antioch High: 4th percentile, Needs Support
  • Prospects High (Alternative): bottom 1%, Needs Support
3Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 5 of the 26 ranked schools teach two levels, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 26 ranked schools
  • 2 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Antioch Unified

28 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Antioch Unified score highest?

Rocketship Delta Prep is highest, at the 44th percentile.

That’s higher than 44 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Antioch Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 15 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Antioch Unified had 27 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Antioch Unified score highest?

Antioch Charter Academy II is highest, at the 78th percentile.

That’s higher than 78 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Antioch Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 6 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Antioch Unified had 29 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Antioch Unified score highest?

Dozier-Libbey Medical High is highest, at the 74th percentile.

That’s higher than 74 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Antioch Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 1 high school
Context

The average high school in Antioch Unified had 38 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

2 high schools not ranked statewide

Continuation schools enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with schools of its kind.

The district

Where does Antioch Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Antioch Unified spent $23,302 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Antioch Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction61%
  • Instruction support12%
  • Student services12%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance10%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$94.2 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 31 funded actions in 7 goals. That’s 28% of its $338.9 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 195 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 46% of the money. The plan itself puts 65% of it toward staff.

  • Interventions and Acceleration $17.7 million
  • Special Education Services $14.6 million
  • Program Monitoring $10.7 million
  • 28 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

6 of the plan’s 31 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.2 million
  • Math $0.2 million
  • Catch-up help $18.4 million
  • English learners $1.1 million

Largest of these

  • Interventions and Acceleration$17.7 million
  • English Learner Program$1.1 million
  • Interventions and Acceleration Opportunities$717,855
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $58.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $54.2 million and estimates it spent $54.5 million, within 1% of the plan.

What changed

The total is $8.1 million (8%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Literacy, which went from $7.7 million to $248,102.

Largest cuts

  • Literacy−⁠$7.4 million
  • Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Initiatives−⁠$3.8 million
  • Instructional Technology and Support−⁠$1.8 million

Largest increases

  • Special Education Services+⁠$3.1 million
  • Interventions and Acceleration+⁠$2.6 million
  • Program Monitoring+⁠$1.8 million

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • English Learner Program$1.1 million

Ask: What did Literacy pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $7.4 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 527%28%up 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 514%16%up 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 2 and 534 in 10032 in 1002 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoals 2 and 54.9%3.6%down 1.3 pts

Goal 6 tracks named schools and Goals 3, 4 and 7 track other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Interventions and Acceleration · $17,677,171
  • Special Education Services · $14,562,223
  • Program Monitoring · $10,710,313
The full plan7 goals, 74 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($94.2 million).

Where does the money go?

36% to Goal 7, Effective and Conductive Learning Environments. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4
G7

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
  • small actions drawn together

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Empower students to see themselves as scholars who can identify their learning targets and monitor their…$18.1 million19% of action budgets

“Empower students to see themselves as scholars who can identify their learning targets and monitor their progress towards mastering grade-level standards” p. 25 ↗

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $23.1 million (−⁠$5.0 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Special Education Services$14.6 millionaction 1.7 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Professional Development$1.5 millionaction 1.4 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. English Learner Program$1.1 millionaction 1.5 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $85,500 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Opportunity Alternative Program$0.4 millionaction 1.8 · p. 150 ↗
  5. Literacy$0.2 millionaction 1.2 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $11,900 is state funding counted toward those services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Mathematics · action 1.1 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $131,569 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Science · action 1.3 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Literacy−⁠$7.4 million$7.7 million → $0.2 million · p. 150 ↗
  2. Special Education Services+⁠$3.1 million$11.5 million → $14.6 million · p. 150 ↗
  3. Professional Development−⁠$0.5 million$2.0 million → $1.5 million · p. 150 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • English Learner Program · $1.1 million · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • Opportunity Alternative Program · $422,886 → $359,098 · p. 150 ↗−⁠$63,788
  • Mathematics · $10,000 → $151,569 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$141,569
  • Science · $258,161 → $131,569 · p. 150 ↗−⁠$126,592

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 19 measures · 1 quoted

  • 9th Grade Algebra 1 Pass Rate (8) p. 27 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 68.14%
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 70%

18 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Promote environments prioritizing emotional well-being, resilience, and holistic development for students…$7.2 million8% of action budgets

“Promote environments prioritizing emotional well-being, resilience, and holistic development for students, staff, and the broader school community” p. 45 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $11.0 million (−⁠$3.8 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Initiatives$5.5 millionaction 2.1 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Community Building Initiatives and Resources$1.5 millionaction 2.2 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Homeless and Foster Youth Supports and Resources$0.1 millionaction 2.3 · p. 151 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Initiatives−⁠$3.8 million$9.3 million → $5.5 million · p. 151 ↗
  2. Homeless and Foster Youth Supports and Resources−⁠$75,445$201,073 → $125,628 · p. 151 ↗
  3. Community Building Initiatives and Resources+⁠$13,887$1.5 million → $1.5 million · p. 151 ↗

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 1 quoted

  • Wellness Room Implementation p. 48 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 7,378 wellness room interventions were recorded.
    Target for year 3
    2026-2027 9,000 wellness room interventions will be recorded.

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Cultivate inclusive school communities where every student, parent, and staff member feels acknowledged…$7.5 million8% of action budgets

“Cultivate inclusive school communities where every student, parent, and staff member feels acknowledged, listened to, and valued” p. 63 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $8.2 million (−⁠$750,409)

Largest funded actions

  1. Spanish Dual Immersion Program$3.4 millionaction 3.2 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. College and Career Support Services and Programs$2.5 millionaction 3.7 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.9 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Visual and Performing Arts$1.4 millionaction 3.6 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Seal of Biliteracyunder $0.1 millionaction 3.3 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Project-Based Learningunder $0.1 millionaction 3.5 · p. 152 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. College and Career Support Services and Programs−⁠$0.5 million$3.0 million → $2.5 million · p. 152 ↗
  2. Visual and Performing Arts−⁠$0.4 million$1.8 million → $1.4 million · p. 152 ↗
  3. Spanish Dual Immersion Program+⁠$0.1 million$3.3 million → $3.4 million · p. 151 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Title not confirmed · $213,182 · p. 151 ↗not compared
  • Seal of Biliteracy · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 152 ↗unchanged
  • Project-Based Learning · $63,000 → $600 · p. 152 ↗−⁠$62,400

How the plan measures it · 17 measures · 1 quoted

  • Graduation Rates (5E) p. 63 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-2023 All Students: 82% …
    Target for year 3
    2025-2026 All Students: 86% …

16 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4Improve our systems of support for students who are struggling to reduce the percentage of general education…$26.2 million28% of action budgets

“Improve our systems of support for students who are struggling to reduce the percentage of general education students across the district who are referred for Special Education. The District has been identified for a third year as being in Continuous Improvement and Monitoring by the California Department of Education, due to overidentification of students in special education” p. 85 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $24.2 million (+⁠$2.0 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Interventions and Acceleration$17.7 millionaction 4.4 · p. 153 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $187,095 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. CARE (Children Accessing Resources in Education) Teams and Support Staff$8.4 millionaction 4.3 · p. 153 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6.4 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Assessments and Monitoring$0.1 millionaction 4.2 · p. 153 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $500 is state funding counted toward those services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Interventions and Acceleration+⁠$2.6 million$15.1 million → $17.7 million · p. 153 ↗
  2. CARE (Children Accessing Resources in Education) Teams and Support Staff−⁠$0.7 million$9.1 million → $8.4 million · p. 153 ↗
  3. Assessments and Monitoring+⁠$82,075$28,425 → $110,500 · p. 153 ↗

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 85 ↗.

Goal 5 · Focus GoalBy the end of the 2024-2025 academic year, English Learners (ELs) will demonstrate a 5% improvement in…$229,224under 1% of action budgets

“By the end of the 2024-2025 academic year, English Learners (ELs) will demonstrate a 5% improvement in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics proficiency as measured by the CAASPP, and a 3% decrease in Chronic Absenteeism on the California Dashboard. By the end of the 2024-2025 academic year, Foster Youth will demonstrate a 5% improvement in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics proficiency as measured by the CAASPP, a 3% decrease in Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rate, while simultaneously increasing graduation rates by 3% on the California Dashboard” p. 96 ↗

2 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $159,186 (+⁠$70,038)

Largest funded actions

  1. Targeted Resources and Supports for Foster Youth$179,224action 5.2 · p. 153 ↗
  2. Targeted Resources and Supports for English Learners$50,000action 5.1 · p. 153 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Targeted Resources and Supports for Foster Youth+⁠$70,038$109,186 → $179,224 · p. 153 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Targeted Resources and Supports for English Learners · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 153 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 96 ↗.

Goal 6 · Equity Multiplier Focus Goal2024-2025 Bidwell, Grant, Live Oak, Prospects, and Thomas Gaines Virtual Academy (TGVA) were designated to…$1.2 million1% of action budgets

“2024-2025 Bidwell, Grant, Live Oak, Prospects, and Thomas Gaines Virtual Academy (TGVA) were designated to receive Equity Multiplier funds based on the formula for mobility and socioeconomically disadvantaged students applied in 2022-23. 2025-2026 Bidwell, Belshaw, Live Oak, Prospects, and Thomas Gaines Virtual Academy (TGVA) were designated to receive Equity Multiplier funds based on the formula for mobility and socioeconomically disadvantaged students applied in 2023-2024. By the end of the 2025.26 academic year, all targeted student groups (see below in "Measuring and Reporting Results") at Belshaw will have reduced chronic absenteeism rates by 2% as reported by the California School Dashboard. By the end of the 2025.26 academic year, all targeted student groups (see below in "Measuring and Reporting Results") at Bidwell, Live Oak, and Prospects will have increased graduation rates and College and Career Readiness by 1% as reported by the California School Dashboard. By the end of the 2025.26 academic year, all targeted student groups (see below in "Measuring and Reporting Results") at Belshaw, Bidwell and Live Oak will have reduced suspension rates by 1% as reported by the California School Dashboard. By the end of the 2025.26 academic year, all targeted student groups (see below in "Measuring and Reporting Results") at Belshaw and Prospects will demonstrate a 2-3 point improvement in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics proficiency as measured by the CAASPP. By the end of the 2025.26 academic year, English Learners (see below in "Measuring and Reporting Results") at TGVA will have increased progress in English proficiency by 2% as reported by the California School Dashboard. 2026-2027 Bidwell, Live Oak, Prospects, Thomas Gaines Virtual Academy (TGVA), and Antioch High School were designated to receive Equity Multiplier funds based on the formula for mobility and socioeconomically disadvantaged students applied in 2025-2026. By end of 2026-27 school year, student groups with the lowest performance level on the following state indicators will improve by: Antioch High School English Language Arts (+10 DFS)-Socioeconomically disadvantaged, Hispanic, White Mathematics (+10 DFS)- Socioeconomically disadvantaged, Hispanic, White College/​Career (5% increase)- English Learner, Students with disabilities” p. 107 ↗

3 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Interventions and Acceleration Opportunities$717,855action 6.2 · p. 153 ↗
  2. Student and Family Outreach and Supports$354,589action 6.3 · p. 153 ↗
  3. Mobile Truancy Teams$99,500action 6.1 · p. 153 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Interventions and Acceleration Opportunities−⁠$0.7 million$1.4 million → $0.7 million · p. 153 ↗
  2. Student and Family Outreach and Supports−⁠$611,064$965,653 → $354,589 · p. 153 ↗
  3. Mobile Truancy Teams−⁠$179,978$279,478 → $99,500 · p. 153 ↗

How the plan measures it · 8 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 107 ↗.

Goal 7 · Maintenance of Progress GoalEffective and Conductive Learning Environments$34.0 million36% of action budgets

7 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan · p. 117 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Program Monitoring$10.7 millionaction 7.7 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.0 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Highly Qualified & Diverse Staff$10.6 millionaction 7.1 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Class Size Reductions$6.8 millionaction 7.6 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Curriculum$3.4 millionaction 7.8 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $230,860 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Instructional Technology and Support$1.1 millionaction 7.4 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Teacher Pre-Induction and Induction Program · action 7.2 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $401,400 is state funding counted toward those services$0.8 million
  • School Learning Commons · action 7.5 · p. 154 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Instructional Technology and Support−⁠$1.8 million$3.0 million → $1.1 million · p. 154 ↗
  2. Program Monitoring+⁠$1.8 million$8.9 million → $10.7 million · p. 154 ↗
  3. Curriculum+⁠$1.0 million$2.4 million → $3.4 million · p. 154 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Highly Qualified & Diverse Staff · $10.6 million → $10.6 million · p. 154 ↗unchanged
  • Class Size Reductions · $7.1 million → $6.8 million · p. 154 ↗−⁠$0.3 million
  • Teacher Pre-Induction and Induction Program · $644,471 → $828,790 · p. 154 ↗+⁠$184,319
  • School Learning Commons · $458,904 → $458,776 · p. 154 ↗−⁠$128

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 117 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 16,199 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 51%2. Black or African American: 23%3. White: 10%4. Two or more races: 5%5. Filipino: 5%6. Asian: 5%7. Pacific Islander: 2%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino51%
  2. Black or African American23%
  3. White10%
  4. Two or more races5%
  5. Filipino5%
  6. Asian5%
  7. Pacific Islander2%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

78%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 12,563 of 16,057 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Antioch Unified extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

It also qualified the year before.

Which students, on which measures

Homeless students
graduation, chronic absence and college and career readiness
Long-term English learners
English and math

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 43% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,008 of 2,337 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

3 schools getting state support, 2025–26

Belshaw Elementary (Targeted support) · Muir (John) Elementary (Extra targeted support) · Prospects High (Alternative) (Most intensive support, graduation rate)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Antioch Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Rocketship Delta Prep, 44th percentile (Developing). Middle: Antioch Charter Academy II, 78th percentile (Strong). High: Dozier-Libbey Medical High, 74th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Antioch Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Antioch Unified good?

Antioch Unified’s 18 public elementary schools run from the bottom 1% to the 44th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 8 Developing and 10 Needs Support. Antioch Unified’s 9 public middle schools run from the bottom 1% to the 78th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong, 1 Solid, 2 Developing and 5 Needs Support. Antioch Unified’s 4 public high schools run from the bottom 1% to the 74th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 3 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Antioch Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Antioch Unified had 27 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Antioch Unified had 29 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Antioch Unified had 38 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Antioch Unified spend per student?

Antioch Unified spent $23,302 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Antioch Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Antioch Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $94.2 million into 31 funded actions in 7 goals, 28% of its $338.9 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $34.0 million, 36% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Antioch Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.