School district · Contra Costa County

Pittsburg Unified schools

Pittsburg Unified’s 8 public elementary schools all sit between the 2nd and the 22nd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 8 schools

from 2nd to 22nd · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Foothill Elementary: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
  • Highlands Elementary: 18th percentile, Needs Support
  • Los Medanos Elementary: 18th percentile, Needs Support
  • Parkside Elementary: 16th percentile, Needs Support
  • Heights Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
  • Marina Vista Elementary: 14th percentile, Needs Support
  • Willow Cove Elementary: 8th percentile, Needs Support
  • Stoneman Elementary: 2nd percentile, Needs Support
8Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 3 schools

from 11th to 15th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Rancho Medanos Junior High: 15th percentile, Needs Support
  • Martin Luther King Jr. Junior High: 14th percentile, Needs Support
  • Hillview Junior High: 11th percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
0Strong

High · 1 school

at 13th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Pittsburg Senior High: 13th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Pittsburg Unified

13 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Pittsburg Unified score highest?

Foothill Elementary is highest, at the 22nd percentile.

That’s higher than 22 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Pittsburg Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 5 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Pittsburg Unified had 28 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Pittsburg Unified score highest?

Rancho Medanos Junior High is highest, at the 15th percentile.

That’s higher than 15 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Pittsburg Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average middle school in Pittsburg Unified had 27 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Where does the high school we score in Pittsburg Unified stand?

Pittsburg Senior High is at the 13th percentile.

That’s higher than 13 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). It’s the only public high school we score in Pittsburg Unified.

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

1 high school not ranked statewide

The district

Where does Pittsburg Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Pittsburg Unified spent $21,816 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 62 cents of every Pittsburg Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction62%
  • Instruction support12%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance11%
  • Other1%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$42.0 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 29 funded actions in 6 goals. That’s 17% of its $241.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 185 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 53% of the money. The plan itself puts 87% of it toward staff.

  • High quality certificated staffing, PK -12 $13.2 million
  • Administrative staffing for instructional support and improvement $4.6 million
  • College and Career Readiness For Focus Groups $4.5 million
  • 26 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

7 of the plan’s 29 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.9 million
  • Catch-up help $2.0 million
  • English learners $1.1 million

Largest of these

  • District administrative staffing for instruction and targeted intervention and support$1.2 million
  • Focus on English Learners$1.1 million
  • Early Literacy Initiative Support$888,948
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $41.7 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $41.6 million and estimates it spent $39.3 million, $2.3 million (5%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $2.3 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $172,750 higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is High quality certificated staffing, PK -12, which went from $15.2 million to $13.2 million.

Largest cuts

  • High quality certificated staffing, PK -12−⁠$1.9 million
  • Early Literacy Initiative Support−⁠$727,464
  • Academic Supports, targeted interventions and expanded opportunities−⁠$665,100

Largest increases

  • College and Career Readiness For Focus Groups+⁠$1.5 million
  • Specialized certificated support+⁠$928,418
  • College and Career Readiness Exploration+⁠$355,858
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2, 4 and 533%30%down 3 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2, 4 and 517%18%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 1, 2 and 332 in 10032 in 100no change
Suspended at least onceGoals 1, 2 and 33.7%4.1%up 0.4 pts

Goal 6 isn’t shown because it tracks named schools.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • High quality certificated staffing, PK -12 · $13,236,789
  • Administrative staffing for instructional support and improvement · $4,638,779
  • College and Career Readiness For Focus Groups · $4,514,235
The full plan6 goals, 57 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($42.0 million).

Where does the money go?

39% to Goal 4. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Description - Engaging and Rigorous Teaching and Learning. Pittsburg Unified School District will work…$10.5 million25% of action budgets

“Description - Engaging and Rigorous Teaching and Learning. Pittsburg Unified School District will work towards full implementation of a culturally responsive and sustaining curriculum grounded in academic, performance based, and socio-emotional learning standards and competencies adopted by the state board for all student groups, including English Learners, Students with Disabilities, and Socio Economically Disadvantaged youth. Pittsburg Unified School District (PUSD) will develop high quality engaging instruction supported by detailed pacing guides, analyze data from common assessments, and identify strategic and intensive interventions and enrichment activities that results in students graduating college and career ready. (Goal addressing State Priorities 2,4, 5, 6 and 8)” p. 26 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $8.5 million (+⁠$2.0 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. College and Career Readiness For Focus Groups$4.5 millionaction 1.1 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. College and Career Readiness Exploration$3.3 millionaction 1.3 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. District administrative staffing for instruction and targeted intervention and support$1.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Support for implementation of School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA)$0.7 millionaction 1.6 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Progress Monitoring of Performance and Evaluation of Student Data$0.6 millionaction 1.4 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • College and Career Readiness Supporting Multi-Lingual Learners · action 1.2 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. College and Career Readiness For Focus Groups+⁠$1.5 million$3.0 million → $4.5 million · p. 142 ↗
  2. College and Career Readiness Exploration+⁠$0.4 million$3.0 million → $3.3 million · p. 142 ↗
  3. District administrative staffing for instruction and targeted intervention and support+⁠$0.1 million$1.0 million → $1.2 million · p. 142 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Support for implementation of School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) · $686,659 → $721,763 · p. 142 ↗+⁠$35,104
  • Progress Monitoring of Performance and Evaluation of Student Data · $704,384 → $639,500 · p. 142 ↗−⁠$64,884
  • College and Career Readiness Supporting Multi-Lingual Learners · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 142 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 14 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 26 ↗.

Goal 2Equity, Access, and Success$8.1 million19% of action budgets

“With a focus on equity, PUSD will increase outcomes for all scholars while accelerating growth of outcomes for Hispanic, African-American, English Learner and Students in Special Education Programs. PUSD will provide access to additional opportunities to support our students in attaining proficiency in English Language Arts and Mathematics. (Goal addressing State Priorities 1,4,5,7,8)” p. 42 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $8.9 million (−⁠$793,123)

Largest funded actions

  1. Administrative staffing for instructional support and improvement$4.6 millionaction 2.3 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Focus on English Learners$1.1 millionaction 2.4 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Early Literacy Initiative Support$0.9 millionaction 2.2 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Academic Supports, targeted interventions and expanded opportunities$0.8 millionaction 2.1 · p. 142 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Dedicated/​Targeted supports for our Students with Disabilities$0.5 millionaction 2.5 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Support for implementation of the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) · action 2.7 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Focus on Long-term English Learners · action 2.8 · p. 143 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Dedicated/​Targeted supports for our African American students · action 2.6 · p. 143 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Early Literacy Initiative Support−⁠$0.7 million$1.6 million → $0.9 million · p. 142 ↗
  2. Academic Supports, targeted interventions and expanded opportunities−⁠$0.7 million$1.5 million → $0.8 million · p. 142 ↗
  3. Focus on English Learners+⁠$0.3 million$0.7 million → $1.1 million · p. 143 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Administrative staffing for instructional support and improvement · $4.4 million → $4.6 million · p. 143 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Dedicated/​Targeted supports for our Students with Disabilities · $423,675 → $529,939 · p. 143 ↗+⁠$106,264
  • Support for implementation of the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) · $249,275 → $191,821 · p. 143 ↗−⁠$57,454
  • Focus on Long-term English Learners · $15,000 · p. 143 ↗new or renamed
  • Dedicated/​Targeted supports for our African American students · $3,000 · p. 143 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 19 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 42 ↗.

Goal 3Student and Family Assets$5.3 million13% of action budgets

“Promote a culture of community and partnership among the parents, students, staff, and PUSD community that results in an increase in parent involvement, student participation, improved services, and a positive school climate. PUSD will accomplish this goal by providing multiple opportunities for parents/​guardians to participate in leadership and/​or shared decision-making activities, supporting the implementation and monitoring of Full Service Community Schools and MTSS/​COST/​CARE services across the district. Working collaboratively with educational partners, PUSD will support the Mental Health and Social Emotional Learning of scholars in environments that are conducive to learning. (Goal addressing State Priorities 3,5,6). The expansion of programs and consistency will positively impact the attendance rate to improve beyond the 91 percent daily attendance rate represented currently. The discipline metric will also provide support for evaluating the effectiveness of disciplinary practices” p. 65 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.8 million (−⁠$463,258)

Largest funded actions

  1. Social Emotional/​Mental Health and Behavior supports$3.5 millionaction 3.3 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Parent and Family Engagement For All$0.6 millionaction 3.1 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Full Service Community School Initiative$0.6 millionaction 3.4 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Targeted Parent and Family Engagement for specific underserved families$0.4 millionaction 3.5 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Site support for bringing Equity into Action, aligned with the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA)$0.3 millionaction 3.6 · p. 143 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Social Emotional/​Mental Health and Behavior supports−⁠$0.4 million$3.9 million → $3.5 million · p. 143 ↗
  2. Parent and Family Engagement For All+⁠$167,043$438,925 → $605,968 · p. 143 ↗
  3. Full Service Community School Initiative−⁠$103,629$680,305 → $576,676 · p. 143 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Targeted Parent and Family Engagement for specific underserved families · $375,121 → $400,496 · p. 143 ↗+⁠$25,375
  • Site support for bringing Equity into Action, aligned with the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) · $273,786 → $254,720 · p. 143 ↗−⁠$19,066

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 65 ↗.

Goal 4Recruit and retain high quality and diverse staff: PUSD will focus on recruiting and retaining a highly…$16.5 million39% of action budgets

“Recruit and retain high quality and diverse staff: PUSD will focus on recruiting and retaining a highly qualified diverse staff throughout the district. We will ensure teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject areas and pupils they are teaching. (Goal addressing State Priority 1 and 4) The actions and metrics articulated in the plan support the diversification of our teaching staff to meet the needs of our diverse student population” p. 80 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $17.3 million (−⁠$827,447)

Largest funded actions

  1. High quality certificated staffing, PK -12$13.2 millionaction 4.1 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Professional development for all PUSD Staff$1.6 millionaction 4.4 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Specialized certificated support$1.6 millionaction 4.2 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. High quality certificated staffing, PK -12−⁠$1.9 million$15.2 million → $13.2 million · p. 144 ↗
  2. Specialized certificated support+⁠$0.9 million$0.6 million → $1.6 million · p. 144 ↗
  3. Professional development for all PUSD Staff+⁠$0.2 million$1.5 million → $1.6 million · p. 144 ↗

How the plan measures it · 6 measures · 1 quoted

  • % Certificated Staff of Color New Hires p. 81 ↗
    Baseline
    61% in 2023-2024
    Target for year 3
    70% Certificated New Hires of Color

5 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 5Facilities and Nutrition to Support Student learning$1.3 million3% of action budgets

“PUSD will establish exceptional learning conditions and an environment that promotes trust, respect, and acceptance, that results in students and families feeling safe, welcomed, and valued as members of the district. PUSD will continue to ensure basic services are maintained such as clean and well-maintained facilities, access to school nutrition and remaining committed to safety as a priority. High quality facilities are essential to improving achievement outcomes for our students that performed in the red indicators according to the California state dashboard (Goal addressing State Priority 1, 2, 4 and 6). The actions and metrics in the below section are conjoined to provide the progress monitoring needed to ensure effective implementation of the chosen strategies and support for continuous improvement of the conditions for learning” p. 89 ↗

2 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.1 million (+⁠$236,791)

Largest funded actions

  1. Emergency preparedness and Health and Safety Programs$1.2 millionaction 5.2 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Technology and connectivity$0.2 millionaction 5.1 · p. 144 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Emergency preparedness and Health and Safety Programs+⁠$0.3 million$0.9 million → $1.2 million · p. 144 ↗
  2. Technology and connectivity−⁠$30,000$180,000 → $150,000 · p. 144 ↗

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 89 ↗.

Goal 6 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalEquity Multiplier Focus Goal for Black Diamond - By June 2025, Black Diamond High School will increase…$343,6211% of action budgets

“Equity Multiplier Focus Goal for Black Diamond - By June 2025, Black Diamond High School will increase performance on the English Language Arts portion of the CAASPP for Socio Economically Disadvantaged students from 165.2 points below standard to 156.9 points below standard. By June 2025, Black Diamond will decrease the suspension rate of African-American students by 1.1%. Lastly, by June 2025, Black Diamond will increase the performance of College and Career indicators for English Learners, Hispanic, and Socio Economically Disadvantaged students by 5%” p. 97 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $294,862 (+⁠$48,759)

Largest funded actions

  1. Social-Emotional Learning$114,806action 6.3 · p. 144 ↗
  2. Dual Enrollment and Additional Pathways$92,206action 6.5 · p. 145 ↗
  3. Intervention and Support$60,000action 6.2 · p. 144 ↗
  4. Standards Based Education$56,609action 6.1 · p. 144 ↗
  5. MTSS Implementation$20,000action 6.4 · p. 144 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Social-Emotional Learning+⁠$85,910$28,896 → $114,806 · p. 144 ↗
  2. Dual Enrollment and Additional Pathways+⁠$72,206$20,000 → $92,206 · p. 145 ↗
  3. Intervention and Support−⁠$66,710$126,710 → $60,000 · p. 144 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Standards Based Education · $99,256 → $56,609 · p. 144 ↗−⁠$42,647
  • MTSS Implementation · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 144 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 97 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 10,666 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 66%2. Black or African American: 15%3. Two or more races: 5%4. Filipino: 4%5. White: 4%6. Asian: 3%7. Pacific Islander: 1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino66%
  2. Black or African American15%
  3. Two or more races5%
  4. Filipino4%
  5. White4%
  6. Asian3%
  7. Pacific Islander1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

80%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 8,493 of 10,633 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Pittsburg Unified extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 45% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (871 of 1,916 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

3 schools getting state support, 2025–26

Highlands Elementary (Extra targeted support) · Pittsburg Senior High (Targeted support) · Stoneman Elementary (Extra targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (3)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Pittsburg Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Foothill Elementary, 22nd percentile (Needs Support). Middle: Rancho Medanos Junior High, 15th percentile (Needs Support). High: Pittsburg Senior High, 13th percentile (Needs Support). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Pittsburg Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Pittsburg Unified good?

Pittsburg Unified’s 8 public elementary schools run from the 2nd to the 22nd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 8 Needs Support. Pittsburg Unified’s 3 public middle schools run from the 11th to the 15th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Needs Support. Pittsburg Unified has one public high school we score, Pittsburg Senior High, at the 13th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Pittsburg Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Pittsburg Unified had 28 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Pittsburg Unified had 27 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Pittsburg Unified spend per student?

Pittsburg Unified spent $21,816 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 62 cents of every Pittsburg Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Pittsburg Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $42.0 million into 29 funded actions in 6 goals, 17% of its $241.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $16.5 million, 39% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Pittsburg Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.