School district · Contra Costa County

Oakley Union Elementary schools

Oakley Union Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Its 7 public elementary schools run from the 2nd to the 37th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 7 schools

from 2nd to 37th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Gehringer Elementary: 37th percentile, Developing
  • Summer Lake Elementary: 30th percentile, Developing
  • Oakley Elementary: 24th percentile, Needs Support
  • Almond Grove Elementary: 24th percentile, Needs Support
  • Iron House Elementary: 15th percentile, Needs Support
  • Vintage Parkway Elementary: 15th percentile, Needs Support
  • Laurel Elementary: 2nd percentile, Needs Support
5Needs Support
2Developing
0Solid
0Strong

Middle · 2 schools

from 6th to 8th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Delta Vista Middle: 8th percentile, Needs Support
  • O'Hara Park Middle: 6th percentile, Needs Support
2Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

Schools around the Oakley Union Elementary district

9 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Oakley Union Elementary district score highest?

Gehringer Elementary is highest, at the 37th percentile.

That’s higher than 37 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Oakley Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 4 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in the Oakley Union Elementary district had 18 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the Oakley Union Elementary district score highest?

Delta Vista Middle is highest, at the 8th percentile.

That’s higher than 8 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Oakley Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

The district

Where does Oakley Union Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Oakley Union Elementary district spent $17,191 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Oakley Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction61%
  • Instruction support12%
  • Student services12%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$23.0 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 45 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 27% of its $86.1 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 195 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 48% of the money. The plan itself puts 79% of it toward staff.

  • SPED Instructional Paraprofessional Support $4.6 million
  • Expanded Learning Intervention/Tutorials $3.6 million
  • Maintain and Update Facilities $2.8 million
  • 42 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

8 of the plan’s 45 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $4.4 million
  • English learners $0.4 million

Largest of these

  • Expanded Learning Intervention/​Tutorials$3.6 million
  • MTSS Teacher on Special Assignment$305,148
  • Bilingual Instructional Paraprofessional Support$276,307
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $5.7 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $5.2 million and estimates it spent $4.9 million, $0.3 million (5%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $0.3 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $1.7 million (7%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Co-Administrators, which went from $2.0 million to $1.2 million.

Largest cuts

  • Co-Administrators−⁠$722,620
  • SPED Instructional Paraprofessional Support−⁠$682,840
  • Counselors and Mental Health Professionals−⁠$561,862

Largest increases

  • Instructional Paraprofessional Support+⁠$319,719
  • Itinerant Teachers+⁠$275,847
  • Enhancing Academic Support Through Online Learning Platforms+⁠$95,510

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Child Welfare and Attendance (CWA)$254,851
  • MTSS SEL Lead$186,704
  • More Inclusive Menu in the Cafeteria$101,040

Ask: What did Co-Administrators pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $722,620 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 436%36%no change
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 424%23%down 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 320 in 10019 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 35.9%5.7%down 0.2 pts

Goals 1 and 2 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • SPED Instructional Paraprofessional Support · $4,583,152
  • Expanded Learning Intervention/​Tutorials · $3,647,865
  • Maintain and Update Facilities · $2,768,128
The full plan4 goals, 36 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($23.0 million).

Where does the money go?

56% to Goal 4. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Ensure equitable access to resources, highly qualified staff, facilities, technological tools, and…$4.9 million21% of action budgets

“Ensure equitable access to resources, highly qualified staff, facilities, technological tools, and infrastructure. Expectation: Through a collaborative approach, we will ensure equitable access to resources, recruit and retain highly qualified staff, and maintain excellent facilities and infrastructure while continuously evaluating our curriculum and technological tools. Key Initiatives: • Establish a strategy to attract and retain skilled educators. • Improve our systematic approach to device inventory and replace learning devices to ensure that all educators and students can access the latest technology that supports personalized and effective learning experiences. • Create a detailed list of facility inspections and upgrades to ensure safety and meet accessibility standards. Additionally, evaluate the system for tracking maintenance requests and repairs to ensure efficiency in maintaining safe, comfortable, and effective learning environments. -Improve cafeteria and kitchen facilities to support a variety of nutritious meal choices, update storage for fresh produce, and provide more seating areas for students to enjoy their meals. • Review and evaluate district-adopted curriculum and digital platforms to ensure that they align with educational goals and provide high-quality resources that enhance the learning experience for students, educators, and educational partners” p. 25 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.2 million (−⁠$262,223)

Largest funded actions

  1. Maintain and Update Facilities$2.8 millionaction 1.6 · p. 148 ↗
  2. Library Program and Services$0.9 millionaction 1.8 · p. 148 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Enhancing and Modernizing Educational Technology Devices for Staff and Students$0.4 millionaction 1.1 · p. 148 ↗
  4. Beginning/​New Teacher Support and Assessment$0.3 millionaction 1.3 · p. 148 ↗
  5. Standard-aligned Instructional Materials for Core Subjects$0.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 148 ↗

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • More Inclusive Menu in the Cafeteria · action 1.12 · p. 149 ↗$0.1 million
  • Instructional Materials for Elective Courses · action 1.7 · p. 148 ↗$0.1 million
  • School Site Leads Stipends · action 1.10 · p. 148 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Recruitment and Retainment · action 1.9 · p. 148 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Enhancing and Modernizing Educational Technology Devices for Staff and Students−⁠$369,919$791,223 → $421,304 · p. 148 ↗
  2. Maintain and Update Facilities+⁠$0.1 million$2.7 million → $2.8 million · p. 148 ↗
  3. Standard-aligned Instructional Materials for Core Subjects−⁠$73,176$321,934 → $248,758 · p. 148 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Library Program and Services · $853,984 → $855,144 · p. 148 ↗+⁠$1,160
  • Beginning/​New Teacher Support and Assessment · $374,052 → $348,549 · p. 148 ↗−⁠$25,503
  • More Inclusive Menu in the Cafeteria · $101,040 · p. 149 ↗new or renamed
  • Instructional Materials for Elective Courses · $54,647 → $96,088 · p. 148 ↗+⁠$41,441
  • School Site Leads Stipends · $49,877 → $49,984 · p. 148 ↗+⁠$107
  • Recruitment and Retainment · $36,007 → $38,676 · p. 148 ↗+⁠$2,669

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 25 ↗.

Goal 2Foster a welcoming environment for all families and community members and maintain a sense of belonging and…$521,2612% of action budgets

“Foster a welcoming environment for all families and community members and maintain a sense of belonging and shared responsibility for students' academic, physical, social, and emotional growth. Expectation: Involve and engage families and community members in meaningful partnerships that honor our diverse school community. Key Initiatives: • Offer programs, advisory councils, and opportunities to our educational partners to guide important decisions that affect our students’ academic, physical, social, and emotional growth. • Systematize family engagement at the district and site levels to provide resources and tools for families to support students in the areas of academic, socio-emotional, and mental health support. • Provide high-quality translation services to ensure that all families can actively participate in their children's education. • Provide informative and responsive communication through tools such as school websites, marquees, newsletters, and other communication methods to ensure a strong connection between school, home, and community. • Provide opportunities to volunteer and ensure communication around the process of volunteer participation” p. 39 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $636,789 (−⁠$115,528)

Largest funded actions

  1. Student and Family Engagement Specialist$165,993action 2.3 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4,079 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Parent and Community Liaisons$104,971action 2.1 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2,187 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. District Bilingual Receptionist$83,716action 2.2 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Parent Portal$56,984action 2.5 · p. 149 ↗
  5. Translation$41,127action 2.8 · p. 149 ↗

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Two-way Communication Tool and District Website · action 2.6 · p. 149 ↗$36,490
  • Family Engagement Events · action 2.9 · p. 149 ↗$17,980
  • Workshops and Virtual Training for Parents and Guardians · action 2.4 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2,000 is state funding counted toward those services$7,000
  • Parent Advisory Groups · action 2.7 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2,000 is state funding counted toward those services$7,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Parent and Community Liaisons−⁠$98,105$203,076 → $104,971 · p. 149 ↗
  2. Translation+⁠$12,057$29,070 → $41,127 · p. 149 ↗
  3. Family Engagement Events−⁠$12,020$30,000 → $17,980 · p. 149 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Student and Family Engagement Specialist · $169,916 → $165,993 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$3,923
  • District Bilingual Receptionist · $82,845 → $83,716 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$871
  • Parent Portal · $56,984 → $56,984 · p. 149 ↗unchanged
  • Two-way Communication Tool and District Website · $36,490 → $36,490 · p. 149 ↗unchanged
  • Workshops and Virtual Training for Parents and Guardians · $15,600 → $7,000 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$8,600
  • Parent Advisory Groups · $12,808 → $7,000 · p. 149 ↗−⁠$5,808

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 39 ↗.

Goal 3Strengthen the overall well-being of all students by fostering an equitable, safe, and inclusive environment.…$4.7 million20% of action budgets

“Strengthen the overall well-being of all students by fostering an equitable, safe, and inclusive environment. Expectation: All students will be provided with a safe and inclusive learning environment that supports, through the implementation of programs, a focus on students’ physical fitness, mental health, and social and emotional wellness. Key Initiatives: • All students can access socio-emotional learning (SEL) strategies and curriculum. • Annual review, revision, and adoption of the district and schools’ comprehensive school safety plan. • Provide appropriate safety training to all staff members. • Increase education, awareness, and understanding about mental health. • Ensure that students are attending school on a regular basis” p. 61 ↗

13 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.9 million (−⁠$1.2 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Co-Administrators$1.2 millionaction 3.15 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Counselors and Mental Health Professionals$1.2 millionaction 3.3 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $123,512 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Campus Supervisors and Crossing Guards$0.9 millionaction 3.2 · p. 149 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Site-based Supplemental Support$0.5 millionaction 3.16 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Child Welfare and Attendance (CWA)$0.3 millionaction 3.5 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $165,743 is state funding counted toward those services

8 more funded actions in this goal

  • Office Clerk · action 3.13 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • MTSS SEL Lead · action 3.4 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $39,307 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • School Resource Officer · action 3.6 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Cybersecurity and Digital Citizenship · action 3.9 · p. 150 ↗$0.1 million
  • Series of Safe School Climate Professional Development · action 3.7 · p. 150 ↗under $0.1 million
  • MTSS Digital Platform · action 3.10 · p. 150 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Explore Other Socio-Emotional (SEL) Learning Resources and Programs · action 3.11 · p. 150 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1,500 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • California Healthy Kids Survey · action 3.12 · p. 150 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Co-Administrators−⁠$0.7 million$2.0 million → $1.2 million · p. 151 ↗
  2. Counselors and Mental Health Professionals−⁠$0.6 million$1.7 million → $1.2 million · p. 150 ↗
  3. Office Clerk+⁠$80,938$129,279 → $210,217 · p. 150 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Campus Supervisors and Crossing Guards · $861,009 → $885,356 · p. 149 ↗+⁠$24,347
  • Site-based Supplemental Support · $520,295 → $515,437 · p. 151 ↗−⁠$4,858
  • Child Welfare and Attendance (CWA) · $254,851 · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • MTSS SEL Lead · $186,704 · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • School Resource Officer · $75,000 → $75,652 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$652
  • Cybersecurity and Digital Citizenship · $60,750 → $60,750 · p. 150 ↗unchanged
  • Series of Safe School Climate Professional Development · $13,847 → $17,819 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$3,972
  • MTSS Digital Platform · $13,250 · p. 150 ↗new or renamed
  • Explore Other Socio-Emotional (SEL) Learning Resources and Programs · $3,150 → $4,500 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$1,350
  • California Healthy Kids Survey · $1,575 → $3,945 · p. 150 ↗+⁠$2,370

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 61 ↗.

Goal 4All students will engage in high-quality learning experiences. Expectation: All OUESD students will have…$12.9 million56% of action budgets

“All students will engage in high-quality learning experiences. Expectation: All OUESD students will have equitable learning experiences across all content areas. Key Initiatives: • Provide professional development to enhance the delivery of high-quality instructional practices. • Implement various assessments, including universal screeners, diagnostic tests, and interim assessments. • Offer learning opportunities for students through intervention and enrichment. • Address specific academic, social-emotional, and physical needs of African American, English Learners, special needs, and socio-economically disadvantaged students. • Implement a Multiple-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)” p. 86 ↗

14 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $13.0 million (−⁠$100,784)

Largest funded actions

  1. SPED Instructional Paraprofessional Support$4.6 millionaction 4.9 · p. 152 ↗
  2. Expanded Learning Intervention/​Tutorials$3.6 millionaction 4.2 · p. 151 ↗
  3. Itinerant Teachers$1.5 millionaction 4.17 · p. 152 ↗
  4. Instructional Paraprofessional Support$1.3 millionaction 4.3 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.0 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Ongoing Professional Development$0.4 millionaction 4.15 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $255,233 is state funding counted toward those services

9 more funded actions in this goal

  • MTSS Teacher on Special Assignment · action 4.11 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Bilingual Instructional Paraprofessional Support · action 4.8 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2,742 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Enhancing Academic Support Through Online Learning Platforms · action 4.14 · p. 152 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $107,143 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Universal Screener, Diagnostic, and Placement Assessments · action 4.16 · p. 152 ↗$0.2 million
  • Extended Day Learning Coordinator · action 4.12 · p. 152 ↗$0.2 million
  • Online Learning Platform That Allow Students to Practice at Their Own Level · action 4.4 · p. 151 ↗$0.1 million
  • Clerk for Student Services · action 4.13 · p. 152 ↗$0.1 million
  • Learning Platforms for Students with Individualize Educational Plans (IEPs) · action 4.1 · p. 151 ↗$0.1 million
  • Additional Long Term English Learners Support · action 4.5 · p. 151 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $13,914 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. SPED Instructional Paraprofessional Support−⁠$0.7 million$5.3 million → $4.6 million · p. 152 ↗
  2. Instructional Paraprofessional Support+⁠$0.3 million$0.9 million → $1.3 million · p. 151 ↗
  3. Itinerant Teachers+⁠$0.3 million$1.2 million → $1.5 million · p. 152 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Expanded Learning Intervention/​Tutorials · $3.6 million → $3.6 million · p. 151 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Ongoing Professional Development · $334,578 → $410,473 · p. 152 ↗+⁠$75,895
  • MTSS Teacher on Special Assignment · $451,819 → $305,148 · p. 152 ↗−⁠$146,671
  • Bilingual Instructional Paraprofessional Support · $237,137 → $276,307 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$39,170
  • Enhancing Academic Support Through Online Learning Platforms · $150,136 → $245,646 · p. 152 ↗+⁠$95,510
  • Universal Screener, Diagnostic, and Placement Assessments · $180,026 → $214,117 · p. 152 ↗+⁠$34,091
  • Extended Day Learning Coordinator · $176,539 → $170,120 · p. 152 ↗−⁠$6,419
  • Online Learning Platform That Allow Students to Practice at Their Own Level · $98,813 → $98,813 · p. 151 ↗unchanged
  • Clerk for Student Services · $71,631 → $72,473 · p. 152 ↗+⁠$842
  • Learning Platforms for Students with Individualize Educational Plans (IEPs) · $64,519 → $54,439 · p. 151 ↗−⁠$10,080
  • Additional Long Term English Learners Support · $33,678 → $41,714 · p. 151 ↗+⁠$8,036

How the plan measures it · 17 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 86 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 5,131 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 47%2. White: 25%3. Black or African American: 10%4. Filipino: 7%5. Two or more races: 6%6. Asian: 5%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino47%
  2. White25%
  3. Black or African American10%
  4. Filipino7%
  5. Two or more races6%
  6. Asian5%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

44%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 2,237 of 5,119 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Oakley Union Elementary extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

It also qualified the year before.

Which students, on which measures

Students with disabilities
math and suspensions

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 48% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (235 of 494 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

2 schools getting state support, 2025–26

Delta Vista Middle (Targeted support) · Iron House Elementary (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (4)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Oakley Union Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Gehringer Elementary, 37th percentile (Developing). Middle: Delta Vista Middle, 8th percentile (Needs Support). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Oakley Union Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Oakley Union Elementary district good?

Oakley Union Elementary’s 7 public elementary schools run from the 2nd to the 37th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Developing and 5 Needs Support. Oakley Union Elementary’s 2 public middle schools run from the 6th to the 8th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Oakley Union Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the Oakley Union Elementary district had 18 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Oakley Union Elementary district spend per student?

The Oakley Union Elementary district spent $17,191 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 61 cents of every Oakley Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Oakley Union Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $23.0 million into 45 funded actions in 4 goals, 27% of its $86.1 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $12.9 million, 56% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Oakley Union Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.