ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Willard Middle · Berkeley

Willard Middle: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Willard posts 50.1% exceeding the standard — versus 16.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

2425 Stuart Street, 94705 (opens in new tab)·Berkeley Unified·Berkeley·Grades 6-8·596 students·28% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 644-6330
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7943
% Exceeded50%17%
% Met+77%39%
Growth+6.5+1.5
Absence9.2%18.5%
Suspension3.3%3.7%
Scope Score
79
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #58 statewide · #1 of 3 in Berkeley Unified

Willard Middle scores 79 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 97th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “77% proficient” and call it done. Willard deserves a closer read. The school sits in Berkeley, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Willard's low-income kids hit 61.3% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 97th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 77% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 680%67%76%74%78%
Grade 776%74%73%81%78%
Grade 877%80%73%74%84%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 668%60%72%65%70%
Grade 773%73%69%74%71%
Grade 869%75%68%74%78%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

45%
34%
21%
Grade 6 · 79% proficient
45%
33%
22%
Grade 7 · 78% proficient
53%
30%
17%
Grade 8 · 83% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 8.5pp across grades; the floor rises 5.1pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

61.3%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Willard's most underrated number

61.3% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Willard low-income: 61.3%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
50.1%
State 16.8%
33.3pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+6.5pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
76.5%
State 39.3%
37.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
9.2%
State 18.5%
9.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.3%
State 3.7%
0.3pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
55.6%
State 18.0%
37.6pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Willard Middle in Berkeley, 61.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 47.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Willard Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (47.1% Math proficient); White students (87.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.4 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 155 students tested.

All students at this school: 77% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 77%, district —, state 39%77%
FemaleFemale: this school 76%, district 70%, state 44%76% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 77%, district 68%, state 42%77% · +1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 84%, district 83%, state 56%84% · +7 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 54%, district 45%, state 32%54% · −23 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 69%, district 54%, state 32%69% · −8 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 89%, district 80%, state 56%89% · +12 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 40%, district 26%, state 15%40% · −36 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 83%, district 74%, state 72%83% · +6 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 35%, district 25%, state 26%35% · −42 vs school

5 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -7.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 9.2%, district 16.0%, state 18.5%9.2% · −9.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.3%, district —, state 3.7%3.3% · −0.3pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (10.7% vs 5.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–65.1%
Grades 7–810.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 19:118:1
Teaching staff43 teachers
Avg. experience12.5 years
Fully credentialed77%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,370 – $119,053
Principal salary$151,577 – $196,464
Superintendent salary$302,736

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $28,160, CA average $14,815$28,160 · spent at this school
Federal share$179 per student

$179 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,397 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,919 per pupil
2019$16,909 per pupil
2018$17,280 per pupil
2017$15,081 per pupil
2016$15,042 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White45.0%
District 40.9% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic19.6%
District 22.4% · CA 56.1%
Other15.8%
District 17.2% · CA 9.0%
Black10.1%
District 11.3% · CA 4.8%
Asian9.6%
District 8.3% · CA 10.2%
GenderFemale 49.0%Male 50.0%Non-binary 1.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 27.5% (36pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$168K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.99M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+80% · CA 35%
ZIP population13,991
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 69% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Willard Middle a good middle school?

Willard Middle has a Scope Score of 79 out of 100, placing it in the 97th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #58 statewide. 50.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 33.3 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Willard Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 76.5% of students at Willard Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 50.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 50.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,122 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Willard Middle rank in California?

Willard Middle ranks #58 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 97th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Willard Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Willard Middle increases by 6.5 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Willard Middle?

9.2% of students at Willard Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Willard Middle compare to other schools in Berkeley?

Willard Middle scores 79/100 (97th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 596 students. Use the schools in Berkeley page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Willard Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Willard Middle in Berkeley, 61.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 47.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Willard Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (47.1% Math proficient); White students (87.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.4 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 155 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
50.1%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 87th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+6.5pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 65th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
76.5%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 80th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
9.2%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 63th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.3%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 51th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
55.6%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 97th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 618645%34%11%10%78%+32
Grade 717045%33%14%8%78%+31
Grade 820753%30%9%7%84%+37
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 618549%21%16%14%70%+35
Grade 716850%21%17%11%71%+37
Grade 820659%18%11%11%78%+45
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1120439%29%25%6%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15561.3%+14+23
White25487.0%+1+25
Hispanic/Latino11075.5%+18+37
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Willard Middle ←7950.1%76.5%+6.53.3%
Piedmont Middle2.9 mi7854.9%82.9%−8.11.7%
Albany Middle3.3 mi7043.1%72.5%−2.42.4%
Longfellow Arts and Technology Middle2.1 mi6734.4%60.9%−6.71.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196692#17044.4%73.7%6.0%2.4%-1.1pp
20227998#5242.5%71.3%12.3%3.1%+13.7pp
20237394#12744.4%71.7%10.6%3.6%-3.3pp
20247595#10243.8%73.7%11.1%3.1%+4.6pp
20257997#5850.1%76.5%9.2%3.3%+6.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.2%11.0%+2.8pp
Male3.7%7.0%+3.3pp
Asian0.0%3.4%+3.4pp
Black/African American3.3%18.8%+15.5pp
Hispanic/Latino10.7%15.0%+4.3pp
Two or More Races5.0%8.0%+3.0pp
Students with Disabilities10.9%16.7%+5.8pp
English Learners3.1%8.7%+5.6pp
Homeless15.8%44.4%+28.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.7%16.2%+7.5pp
All Students6.0%8.9%+2.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction