ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Charter middle school

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle

Inglewood, CA · Grades 6-8 · 208 students · Inglewood Unified

The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.

75% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 56% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.

SchoolScope archetype

Growth Engine

What this means for your family

Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

How archetypes are assigned →

Contact

Math

56%

Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced

English

75%

Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced

Students

208

Total enrollment

Chronic absence

12%

Students absent 10% or more of school days

What are you trying to decide?

The overall score is a starting point.

Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.

View school performance →

Academic performance

What do the results tell us?

2025 results · Grades 6 & 8 · weighted by students tested within each subject.

Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →

Share at Proficient or Advanced

0%25%50%75%100%2019: 59%2022: 45%2023: 57%2024: 51%2025: 56%2019: 80%2022: 79%2023: 76%2024: 76%2025: 75%201920222023202420250%25%50%75%100%2019: 59%2022: 45%2023: 57%2024: 51%2025: 56%2019: 80%2022: 79%2023: 76%2024: 76%2025: 75%20192022202320242025
● Math┄ English

Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.

Exact annual results
YearMathEnglish
201959%80%
202245%79%
202357%76%
202451%76%
202556%75%

Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.

Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025

Has held the 91st-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

Most rating sites would stop at “66% proficient” and call it done. Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter deserves a closer read. Two-thirds of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter's low-income kids hit 73.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

As a charter, Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

202 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 62 tracked

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle scores 65 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 91st percentile of 2,177 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 66% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

Percentile among 2,177 middle schools statewide
Year detailsYear2019 · 86th percentile · Scope Score 59 of 1002022 · 88th percentile · Scope Score 60 of 1002023 · 87th percentile · Scope Score 59 of 1002024 · 90th percentile · Scope Score 62 of 1002025 · 91st percentile · Scope Score 65 of 100
ELAGreen(Declined)MathGreen(Maintained)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 677%77%70%70%63%
Grade 789%86%80%89%77%
Grade 882%81%81%83%89%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 656%39%49%50%45%
Grade 745%51%45%56%52%
Grade 862%51%64%52%69%
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25

Three in five of students here meet the standard. One in four clear it by a lot.

ELA76% met or exceeded
Exceeded 35%Met 41%Nearly Met 16%Not Met 8%
Math55% met or exceeded
Exceeded 29%Met 26%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 19%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California middle schools · average17% exceeded · 40% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
Scope% Exceeded% Met+Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)AbsenceSuspension
This school6532%66%Strong · p9311.6%1.2%
CA average · Middle School3917%40%Average · p5018.1%3.6%
This schoolCA avg
Scope6539
% Exceeded32%17%
% Met+66%40%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Strong · p93Average · p50
Absence11.6%18.1%
Suspension1.2%3.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

California's own growth model splits here — the 97th percentile in reading against the 54th in math, among middle schools.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 97th percentile of California middle schools in reading and the 54th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 93rd. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 6
29%
exceeded standard · 70% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 8
45%
exceeded standard · 89% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

Both measures, each ranked in its own field
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G6→G8SchoolScope growth measure: 93rd percentile among California middle schools.93rd pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +23 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 97th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.97th pctile · +23 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +2 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 54th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.54th pctile · +2 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

Students & opportunity

Who shares in the school’s results?

Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard ahead of the same group statewide.

73.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. This comparison does not tell us what caused the difference.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 65% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 65%, district —, state 40%65%
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 65%, district 27%, state 26%65% · −0 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 63%, district 26%, state 32%63% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 69%, district 27%, state 44%69% · +4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 61%, district 26%, state 42%61% · −4 vs school

8 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 25.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +18.8pp.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only180 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +23 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 180 students.+23 pts · +23 vs typical
Black students167 studentsBlack students, reading: +26 scale-score points versus expectation, against −4 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 167 students.+26 pts · +30 vs typical
Low-income students137 studentsLow-income students, reading: +24 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 137 students.+24 pts · +27 vs typical
Math
English Only180 studentsEnglish Only, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 180 students.0 pts · +3 vs typical
Black students167 studentsBlack students, math: +2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 167 students.+2 pts · +10 vs typical
Low-income students137 studentsLow-income students, math: +3 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 137 students.+3 pts · +8 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 2 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

The daily experience

What is it like to be a student here?

Students per teacher

Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.

The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 69 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher69 · district 25
Teaching staff10 teachers
Avg. experience10.5 years
Fully credentialed88%
First-year teachers40%
PrincipalRamona Wilder
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$55,106 – $98,339
Principal salary$145,466 – $170,249
Superintendent salary$315,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here show up more, and get suspended less, than the state average.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.6%, district 27.5%, state 18.1%11.6% · −6.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.2%, district —, state 3.6%1.2% · −2.5pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia

Resources & neighborhood

What sits behind the school experience?

Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25

Its district spends $15,268 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $15,268, CA average $14,491$15,268 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,101 per student
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 63%Instruction support 11%Student services 6%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 11%Other 2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,268 per pupil
2019$13,404 per pupil
2018$14,601 per pupil
2017$12,149 per pupil
2016$10,770 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood · ACS 2024

Two-thirds of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

At 208 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 60% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino10.1% · district 59.1% · CA 56.1%
Asian1.0% · district 0.5% · CA 10.2%
Black84.1% · district 36.1% · CA 4.8%
Other4.8% · district 3.6% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch68.8% · CA 64%
Median income$74K · CA $85K
Median home value$739K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+30% · CA 35%
ZIP population29,003
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Culture & philosophy

What is the school’s approach?

School-stated approach · questions for your visit

Look beyond the brochure

A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.

Read the school’s own website ↗

Family voices

What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?

Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”

Educator voices

What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?

Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”

Bring these questions on a visit →

Compare nearby schools

What are the alternatives?

Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.

2025 · middle schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.

Private options →
SchoolTypePerformance bandAdvancedProficient or AdvancedDistanceSelect
Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter MiddleCharterStrong32%66%School being viewed
Century Community CharterCharterSolid11%39%1.5 mi
ICEF View Park Preparatory MiddleCharterSolid13%36%2.0 mi
Lennox MiddlePublicDeveloping9%34%2.7 mi
Open the comparison tool →
More nearby public and private options
Your other options

Your other options

Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.

All schools in Inglewood →

Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.

20 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
District public
Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
Charter
Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
Private
Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.

Moving & enrollment

Which schools could serve my child?

Plan your next step

What should I do next?

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle a good middle school?
Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle has a Scope Score of 65 out of 100, placing it in the 91st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #189 statewide. 32.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 15.1 percentage points above the California average of 17.2%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 65.9% of students at Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 32.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 33.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 32.3% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 404 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle rank in California?
Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle ranks #189 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 91st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle that cohort is 2023 G6 → 2025 G8, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California middle schools — roughly the 93rd percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the middle Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle?
11.6% of students at Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 1.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle compare to other schools in Inglewood?
Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle scores 65/100 (91st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 208 students. Use the schools in Inglewood page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle in Inglewood, 73.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 32.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 40.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (53.2% Math proficient); Black students (77.2% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 141 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.

Behind the evidence

Inspect the full record

Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.

How the Scope Score is calculated

On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.

What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25

Growth carries this score — its returning cohort's growth from grade 6 to grade 8. The test levels clear the state's too.

The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 65 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.

What the score weighs
What we weighHereStateWeight
Exceeded standard32.3%17.2%42%
Met or exceeded65.9%40.0%23%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Strongaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism11.6%18.1%5%
Suspension rate1.2%3.6%5%

Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built

A closer look at the evidence

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle: reading the evidence

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter pairs 66% proficiency with gains that hold up when the school's returning cohort is tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.

Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.

Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Explore the underlying data →
Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle is ranked #189 statewide · #1 of 8 in Inglewood Unified.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard32.3%17.2%42%
Met or exceeded65.9%40.0%23%
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)Strongaverage20%
Chronic absenteeism11.6%18.1%5%
Suspension rate1.2%3.6%5%
Exceeded standard
↑ vs CA 17.2% · index 67 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.0% · index 71 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
↑ vs CA average · 93rd pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 18.1% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 0.6pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 3.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 0.9pp higher vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 67131%32%23%14%63%+17
Grade 76929%48%16%7%77%+29
Grade 86245%44%10%2%89%+42
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 67125%20%31%24%45%+11
Grade 76925%28%25%23%52%+18
Grade 86239%31%21%10%69%+37

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide6215%45%37%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14173.0%+41+35
Black/African American17177.2%+43+44
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle ←6532.3%65.9%+24.8pp+65 pts1.2%
Century Community Charter1.5 mi4211.4%39.1%+0.1pp0.5%
ICEF View Park Preparatory Middle2 mi3813.2%36.2%+8.8pp1.2%
Lennox Middle2.7 mi339.5%33.5%+4.0pp3.5%
California average3917.2%40.0%+1.5pp3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20195986#28029.5%68.6%6.9%1.7%+5.5pp
20226088#26127.4%64.2%8.9%0.3%+7.6pp
20235987#26726.0%64.8%1.7%0.3%+13.1pp
20246290#22031.3%66.6%11.1%0.3%+7.3pp
20256591#18932.3%65.9%11.6%1.2%+24.8pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 05 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+23197Exceptional+2197Average
English Only+23180not categorised0180not categorised
Black or African American+26167Exceptional+2167Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+24137Exceptional+3137Average
Hispanic or Latino+2718Exceptional+3518Exceptional
Students with Disabilities+2612Exceptional−912Moderate

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/wilders-preparatory-academy-charter-middle-6822"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Wilder's Preparatory Academy Charter Middle

Your school plan

0 of 4 steps checked

Your checklist stays in this browser. Checking a step records your progress; it does not confirm admission or enrollment.