ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Valentine Peyton Elementary · Stockton

Valentine Peyton Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Valentine Peyton posts 42% meeting the standard and 18.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2525 Gold Brook Drive, 95212 (opens in new tab)·Stockton Unified·Stockton·Grades TK-8·787 students·65% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 933-7420·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4345
% Exceeded19%21%
% Met+42%43%
Growth-1.5-2.9
Absence18.1%17.9%
Suspension1.1%1.6%
Scope Score
43
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #2,757 statewide · #2 of 49 in Stockton Unified

Valentine Peyton Elementary scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 52nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “42% proficient” and call it done. Valentine Peyton deserves a closer read. The school sits in Stockton, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 23rd to the 52nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1500 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 42% meet the standard today, versus 45% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 355%44%42%41%37%
Grade 440%40%35%36%40%
Grade 540%54%47%34%47%
Grade 643%53%56%60%52%
Grade 760%59%74%67%61%
Grade 851%61%66%71%74%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 365%48%47%49%51%
Grade 445%36%38%41%40%
Grade 526%34%38%29%37%
Grade 640%37%35%53%40%
Grade 748%47%63%49%48%
Grade 831%40%52%60%56%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
22%
63%
Grade 3 · 37% proficient
23%
17%
60%
Grade 4 · 40% proficient
22%
25%
53%
Grade 5 · 47% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.9pp across grades; the floor rises 10.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
18.6%
State 21.3%
2.7pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-1.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
42.0%
State 42.7%
0.7pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.1%
State 17.9%
0.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.1%
State 1.6%
0.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
15.4%
State 18.0%
2.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Valentine Peyton Elementary in Stockton, 46.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Valentine Peyton Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 19.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 51.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 336 students tested.

All students at this school: 49% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 49%, district —, state 43%49%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 44%, district 22%, state 32%44% · −5 vs school
MaleMale: this school 48%, district 23%, state 42%48% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 50%, district 25%, state 44%50% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 42%, district 22%, state 32%42% · −7 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 60%, district 40%, state 72%60% · +11 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 67%, district 47%, state 65%67% · +19 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 0%, district 8%, state 15%0% · −49 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 19%, district 5%, state 11%19% · −30 vs school

7 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 10.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -0.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.1%, district 30.3%, state 17.9%18.1% · +0.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 1.6%1.1% · −0.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (21.0% vs 13.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.7%
Grades 7–813.3%
TK/K21.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 24:126:1
Teaching staff37 teachers
Avg. experience16.6 years
Fully credentialed44%
First-year teachers3%
Intern / emergency permit0.9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$61,234 – $113,543
Principal salary$168,098 – $177,626
Superintendent salary$306,800

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,678, CA average $14,815$16,678 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$1,842 per student

$1,842 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,318 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support13%
Student services13%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,856 per pupil
2019$14,735 per pupil
2018$15,106 per pupil
2017$12,022 per pupil
2016$11,055 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic42.1%
District 71.3% · CA 56.1%
Asian30.5%
District 8.4% · CA 10.2%
Other17.5%
District 8.2% · CA 9.0%
Black7.0%
District 8.6% · CA 4.8%
White2.9%
District 3.5% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 64.8% (1pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$112K · CA $85K
Median home value$539K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+29% · CA 35%
ZIP population28,437
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 787 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 29% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Valentine Peyton Elementary a good elementary school?

Valentine Peyton Elementary has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 52nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,757 statewide. 18.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.7 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Valentine Peyton Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 42.0% of students at Valentine Peyton Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 494 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Valentine Peyton Elementary rank in California?

Valentine Peyton Elementary ranks #2,757 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 52nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Valentine Peyton Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Valentine Peyton Elementary decreases by 1.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Valentine Peyton Elementary?

18.1% of students at Valentine Peyton Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Valentine Peyton Elementary compare to other schools in Stockton?

Valentine Peyton Elementary scores 43/100 (52nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 787 students. Use the schools in Stockton page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Valentine Peyton Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Valentine Peyton Elementary in Stockton, 46.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Valentine Peyton Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 19.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 51.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 336 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
18.6%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 47th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-1.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
42.0%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 50th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 54th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
15.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 47th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37315%22%29%34%37%−6
Grade 48323%17%13%47%40%−5
Grade 59122%25%23%30%47%−1
Grade 69218%34%23%25%52%+6
Grade 78430%31%24%15%61%+13
Grade 89532%42%17%9%74%+28
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37318%33%21%29%51%+5
Grade 48313%27%24%36%40%−2
Grade 59121%16%26%36%37%+2
Grade 69217%23%35%25%40%+5
Grade 78430%18%19%33%48%+14
Grade 89536%20%21%23%56%+24
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111869%20%58%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged33646.1%+19+8
Hispanic/Latino22047.7%+21+9
Asian15859.5%+13−15
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Valentine Peyton Elementary ←4318.6%42.0%−1.51.1%
Aspire Vincent Shalvey Academy2.8 mi6033.7%61.1%+10.40.5%
Aspire River Oaks Charter2 mi5829.7%59.8%−15.00.1%
Astronaut Jose' M. Hernandez Academy1.6 mi4316.0%29.1%−17.41.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193223#422217.3%45.1%6.4%0.9%-27.4pp
20224161#224114.9%42.6%29.4%0.6%-1.9pp
20234258#239116.6%41.0%25.5%0.5%-2.1pp
20243941#337117.9%38.5%22.7%0.3%-13.1pp
20254352#275718.6%42.0%18.1%1.1%-1.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.0%15.2%+7.2pp
Male5.1%20.5%+15.4pp
Asian3.8%13.4%+9.6pp
Black/African American13.3%16.4%+3.1pp
White2.9%11.9%+9.0pp
Hispanic/Latino7.6%21.5%+13.9pp
Two or More Races8.9%26.0%+17.1pp
Students with Disabilities10.0%26.9%+16.9pp
English Learners5.0%11.1%+6.1pp
Homeless22.2%25.0%+2.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6.9%19.7%+12.8pp
All Students6.4%18.1%+11.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction