Public middle school
Urban Promise Academy Middle
3rdStatewide percentile · Needs Support
among 2,177 California middle schools · 2025 test results
At Urban Promise Academy Middle, the average Standard Met or Exceeded rate is 14.6% across reported grade–subject rows (2025 CAASPP).
Scope Score 14 of 100 — built from exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. It places the school; it is not a grade. · How this is calculated
Math
6%California 37%English
20%California 49%Sources, grades and tested counts for Math and English
Math: Grades 6 & 8 · 2025 · Met or Exceeded · 263 school test records. California 37% · 2,946,081 test records · all tested grades 3–8 and 11; a different grade population from this school figure.
English: Grades 6 & 8 · 2025 · Met or Exceeded · 252 school test records. California 49% · 2,931,356 test records · all tested grades 3–8 and 11; a different grade population from this school figure.
Source and calculation for this school’s result
Source: SchoolScope calculation from CDE CAASPP, 2024–25 academic year (test year 2025); available ELA and math rates for grades 6–8, averaged equally across grade–subject rows.
Get an email when Urban Promise Academy Middle’s 2025–26 results land
One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.
Almost done — check your email and confirm to start getting alerts. Sent to .
You’re set. We’ll email your account address when the results land.
Urban Promise Academy Middle · 2024-25 grades 6–8 ELA and math: 6 equally weighted Met or Exceeded rates for All Students tested with scores average 14.6%.
CDE / ETS CAASPP · 2024-25 · Urban Promise Academy Middle, grades 6–8 ELA and math, All Students tested with scores: 6 Met or Exceeded grade–subject rate cells, equally weighted; not a distinct-student share.
Across the reported grades and subjects, the average Met + Exceeded rate is 14.6% and the average Exceeded rate is 3.0%.
Ask on a visit
What instruction helps students move beyond meeting the standard here, given the reported 14.6% Met + Exceeded and 3.0% Exceeded averages?
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 14 | 3% | 15% | Weak · ≈p30 ref | 26.8% | 7.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 39 | 17% | 40% | Average · ≈p50 ref | 18.1% | 3.6% |
Growth positions are approximate percentiles on a calibrated reference scale, not counted school ranks. The CA midpoint is the model's reference 50.
2025 results · Grades 6 & 8 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Share at Standard Met or Exceeded
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 23% | 35% |
| 2022 | 14% | 23% |
| 2023 | 9% | 20% |
| 2024 | 12% | 23% |
| 2025 | 6% | 20% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. A test achievement level does not set the SchoolScope performance band.
Grade comparisons and the full academic source record
Has stayed near the 3rd percentile since 2019.
Urban Promise Academy's reported results deserve a closer read. 98.0% of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
378 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 120 tracked
Urban Promise Academy Middle scores 14 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 3rd percentile of 2,177 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
The average Standard Met or Exceeded rate across reported grade–subject rows is 15% in 2025, below 26% in 2019. These years test different student groups.
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 40% | 22% | 17% | 19% | 15% |
| Grade 7 | 26% | 16% | 21% | 20% | 22% |
| Grade 8 | 30% | 25% | 24% | 27% | 25% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 25% | 19% | 7% | 11% | 5% |
| Grade 7 | 16% | 15% | 16% | 6% | 13% |
| Grade 8 | 20% | 9% | 11% | 13% | 8% |
California's 2025 Dashboard growth model: ELA −8 and math −9 scale-score pts vs expected.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
For the 2023→2025 school-grade groups (minimum rounded subject-mean endpoint n=120), SchoolScope's middle cohort gain sits approximately at the 30th percentile on its calibrated reference scale. California's 2025 Dashboard weighted matched-student growth estimate reports ELA −8 pts vs expected and math −9 pts vs expected for this school. These are scale-score points relative to predictions from students' prior results. The measures use different methods and units; one published year cannot establish a lasting pattern.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; it is not two independent annual observations. It covers grades 4–8 only. SchoolScope shows it separately from the Scope Score: California follows matched students, while our scored cohort measure compares school-grade groups across years.
SchoolScope school-grade cohort proxy, 2023 to 2025: n=120 minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the two endpoints. These are school grade groups, not matched children. See the dated ELA endpoint records.
CDE ELA, 2025 Dashboard: −8 pts vs expected for matched students in grades 4–8. Source detail
CDE math, 2025 Dashboard: −9 pts vs expected for matched students in grades 4–8. Source detail
3rd percentile · Needs Support · California comprehensive middle schools · 2025
Statewide rank: #2,109 of 2,177 · California comprehensive middle schools · 2025
#30 of 33 in Oakland Unified · Statewide percentile: 3rd · Ranked comprehensive middle schools · 2025
What helps students meet or exceed the standard in ELA and math across grades 6–8?
Urban Promise Academy Middle vs. California · 2024-25 grade 6 ELA Met or Exceeded rates for socioeconomically disadvantaged students tested with scores: 15.5% vs. 37.1%.
CDE / ETS CAASPP · 2024-25 · Urban Promise Academy Middle and California, socioeconomically disadvantaged students tested with scores in grade 6 ELA: same-group, grade and subject Met or Exceeded rates; no causal inference.
Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide in grades 6–8.
At Urban Promise Academy Middle in Oakland, 20.1% of socioeconomically disadvantaged students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 6, 7 and 8, compared to 24.0% district-wide for those same grades and 37.7% statewide for those same grades. Urban Promise Academy Middle's rate for socioeconomically disadvantaged students trails its district average by 4.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: socioeconomically disadvantaged students (7.8% met or exceeded the Math standard); Hispanic students (19.2% met or exceeded the ELA standard). Among the reported ELA and Math proficiency gaps supplied for this school, the largest is 17.9 percentage points: students with disabilities trail the school-wide rate in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 369 ELA grade test records.
Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA in grades 6–8 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
Ask on a visit
What support reaches students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged in ELA, given their reported results in grades 6–8 are behind the same group statewide?
How the all-students rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; school: 772 eligible test records, ELA and math, all school tested grades. state: equal school mean of 2,177 comprehensive middle composites. The district all-students reference is unavailable here.
How socioeconomically disadvantaged rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 752 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
369 known ELA test records
- school: 752 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
- district: 25,934 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 3,798,521 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How hispanic/latino rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 693 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
338 known ELA test records
- school: 693 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
- district: 15,841 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 3,304,057 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How male rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 434 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
213 known ELA test records
- school: 434 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
- district: 16,519 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 3,005,929 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How english learners rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 401 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
192 known ELA test records
- school: 401 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
- district: 10,392 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 945,854 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How female rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 338 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
165 known ELA test records
- school: 338 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
- district: 15,472 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 2,872,108 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How students with disabilities rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 95 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
48 known ELA test records
- school: 95 eligible test records across 6 published grade–subject rate records
- district: 4,941 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 773,488 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
6 of 13 student groups have no published rate here. That can reflect privacy suppression or missing source data; it is not evidence of a gap.
See 6 groups without a published school rate
How asian rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
6 known ELA test records
1 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts
- school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 2 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 6: rate not published; school MATH grade 6: rate not published; school ELA grade 7: rate not published; school MATH grade 7: rate not published
- district: 3,038 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 613,603 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How black/african american rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
8 known ELA test records
2 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts
- school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 4 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 6: rate not published; school MATH grade 6: rate not published; school ELA grade 7: rate not published; school MATH grade 7: rate not published; school ELA grade 8: rate not published; school MATH grade 8: rate not published
- district: 5,708 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 282,988 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How filipino rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
ELA tested count not published
1 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts
- school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 2 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 8: rate not published; school MATH grade 8: rate not published
- district: 213 eligible test records across 13 published grade–subject rate records; district MATH grade 7: rate not published
- state: 131,726 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How white rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
4 known ELA test records
2 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts
- school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 4 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 6: rate not published; school MATH grade 6: rate not published; school ELA grade 7: rate not published; school MATH grade 7: rate not published; school ELA grade 8: rate not published; school MATH grade 8: rate not published
- district: 3,724 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 1,163,964 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How two or more races rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
7 known ELA test records
2 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts
- school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 4 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 6: rate not published; school MATH grade 6: rate not published; school ELA grade 7: rate not published; school MATH grade 7: rate not published; school ELA grade 8: rate not published; school MATH grade 8: rate not published
- district: 3,206 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 337,620 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
How homeless rates were calculated
CDE CAASPP 2025; ELA and math; tested-record weighted; 0 test records. A child tested in both subjects can contribute two records.
7 known ELA test records
1 ELA grade records with unavailable tested counts
- school: 0 eligible test records across 0 published grade–subject rate records; school: 2 unavailable tested counts; school ELA grade 7: rate not published; school MATH grade 7: rate not published; school ELA grade 8: rate not published; school MATH grade 8: rate not published
- district: 1,890 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
- state: 235,862 eligible test records across 14 published grade–subject rate records
ShowHide Student-group results by subject
| Student group · subject | Tested | School | District | California | Vs district |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged · English | 369 | 20.1% | 24.0% | 37.7% | -4.0pp vs district |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged · Math | 383 | 7.8% | 14.2% | 24.2% | -6.4pp vs district |
| Hispanic/Latino · English | 338 | 19.2% | 23.4% | 38.2% | -4.2pp vs district |
| Hispanic/Latino · Math | 355 | 7.3% | 13.2% | 23.6% | -5.9pp vs district |
| English Learners · English | 192 | 3.6% | 3.0% | 7.0% | +0.7pp vs district |
| English Learners · Math | 209 | 0.5% | 2.8% | 6.4% | -2.3pp vs district |
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Among students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged at this school, the grade 8 percentage meeting or exceeding the ELA standard is 8.6 percentage points higher than the grade 6 percentage. CDE CAASPP 2025; separate grade-level student groups, not matched children. The school-level results are from the same year: grade 6 had 123 tested students; grade 8 had 125. District grade-group difference for the same subject and grades: +2.9 percentage points.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
CDE reports ELA and math growth for available student groups in scale-score points versus its model’s prediction. The diamond marks SchoolScope’s median among imported California school records matched by year, subject, group and primary middle level. It is our comparison, not a CDE benchmark.
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
Source and benchmark
1 additional group has at least one imported CDE growth row below SchoolScope’s 30-student narrative threshold. Their available values and counts are in the data appendix. An unlisted group may have no usable record here for several reasons; its absence does not establish its size or performance. These CDE growth figures are context; SchoolScope does not use them in its Scope Score.
What support reaches socioeconomically disadvantaged students in grade 6 ELA?
What it’s like
CDE reported 27.1% chronic absenteeism (above SchoolScope's equal-school mean for scored comprehensive California public/charter middle schools with reported CDE rates) and 7.2% suspension (above its corresponding mean) in 2024–25.
Ask on a visit
How does the school follow up when students begin missing days, given its reported 27.1% chronic-absence rate in 2024–25?
ShowHide How SchoolScope uses climate in its score
These scoring inputs may differ from CDE's reported all-students rates. Their comparisons also average model inputs, not raw CDE rates.
ShowHide Chronic absenteeism trend since 2019
ShowHide Attendance by grade
Teachers and the staffing source record
About 18 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
2024–25: about 18 enrolled students per teacher FTE. CDE school-total enrollment divided by the school's reported teacher full-time equivalents in the NCES CCD 2024–25 final school staff file. SchoolScope rounds the result to a whole student per teacher; the CDE staffing year above dates separate teacher facts. The SchoolScope reporting-district average covers verified schools in our directory under this school's 2024–25 CDE reporting parent; school ratios are weighted by enrollment. The California figure, where shown, also averages available school ratios weighted by enrollment. This schoolwide staffing ratio is not class size.
ShowHide teacher experience, credentials and courses
Proper credential and placement: CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22. The publisher rate is 82.78%; 18.1 teaching-position FTE had proper credential and placement out of 21.8 total teaching-position FTE. This denominator is positions, not the teacher count above.
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family and educator voices
Survey results: unavailable on this profile · Response counts: unknown
Explore school spending and the district budget
CDE ESSA reports $30,048 per student in spending attributed to this school.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spending
CDE ESSA · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 392. Reports may use Census Day enrollment, cumulative enrollment, or annual average daily attendance (ADA); the type is unavailable here. SchoolScope sums four reported school and allocated central expenditure components. These averages do not show an individual child's budget or teaching quality.
Can we visit during a typical school day to see how students receive support?
Getting in
Contact
98.0% of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
On the state's science test (CAST), 8% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
ShowHide school demographics
CDE Census Day · 2024–25 · school 392 students · district 44,647 students · CA 5,806,221 students. CDE Census Day enrollment files. Other includes Filipino, American Indian, Pacific Islander, two or more races, and not reported.
Address rules and the K–12 path
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Oakland Unified.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
The road from this school ends at MetWest High. UC records 8 enrollees from MetWest High for fall 2025. That figure comes from dated records — a child starting here today would reach MetWest High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still.
Schools are grouped by grade stage. Each link's evidence appears on its card. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Feeder path, destinations and source limits
The recorded zoned path continues to MetWest High, a high school.
Direct boundary-overlap evidence here comes from the 2015–16 NCES SABS collection. None of these links confirms a current address assignment. Check each step with the district.
The road from this school ends at MetWest High. UC records 8 enrollees from MetWest High for fall 2025. That figure comes from dated records — a child starting here today would reach MetWest High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still.
Ask on a visit
Is MetWest High still the assigned next school for this address, and what should families verify with the district before planning that transition?
High school
MetWest High · 15th percentile · Needs Support · Published boundary overlapSource: sabs_2016 (2016). This historical boundary overlap does not confirm a current address assignment. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path with the district.
- Urban Promise Academy Middlemiddle scaleThis schoolScope 14/100 · 3rd percentile · California comprehensive middle schools · 2025 test resultsNeeds Support
- MetWest Highhigh scaleHistorical zoned-area majority link · NCES SABS 2015–16; verify current assignmentScope 44/100 · 15th percentile · California comprehensive high schools · 2025 test resultsNeeds Support
3 nearby middle schools — see all options →
ShowHide full feeder path and alternatives
K-12 feeder path
Each school card names its own evidence. Historical boundary links and nearby distance estimates do not confirm a current address assignment; verify the path with the district.
Historical incoming elementary boundary evidence: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey (SABS), 2015–16 collection. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed; confirm current assignments with the district.
Compare schools serving the same grade stage.
Open the comparison tool →Nearby results, school options and enrollment checks
Compare nearby schools and their reported results
2025 · middle schools · combined reading and math measures. Comprehensive schools are compared statewide; alternative and continuation schools are compared within their own class.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Standard Exceeded | Standard Met or Exceeded | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Promise Academy Middle | Public | Needs Support3rd percentile · statewide | 3% | 15% | School being viewed | |
| United for Success Academy Middle | Public | Needs Support3rd percentile · statewide | 3% | 13% | 0.5 mi | |
| Oakland Charter Academy | Charter | Developing26th percentile · statewide | 6% | 19% | 0.8 mi | |
| Downtown Charter Academy | Charter | Strong95th percentile · statewide | 45% | 76% | 0.9 mi |
Your other options
Nearby public schools serving this grade stage, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Does this school serve our address, and what do we need to enroll?
Frequently asked questions
Is Urban Promise Academy Middle a good middle school?
What are Urban Promise Academy Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Urban Promise Academy Middle rank in California?
Is Urban Promise Academy Middle getting better or worse?
What do attendance and suspension records show for Urban Promise Academy Middle?
How does Urban Promise Academy Middle compare to other schools in Oakland?
What do reported student-group results show at Urban Promise Academy Middle?
What high school does Urban Promise Academy Middle feed into?
Read more context for this score. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
Methods, source tables and limitations
How the Scope Score is calculated
The 6 things our score weighs
The school's earlier and later grade-level groups differ by 30 scale-score points across 2023 G6 → 2025 G8. Individual students are not matched; changes in enrollment can affect the comparison. SchoolScope compares this aggregate change with other California schools at the same level.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 3.0% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 14.6% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) | Weak | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 26.8% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 7.1% | 3.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 11.4% | 17.8% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
Interpretation and source limits
Urban Promise Academy posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 6.3pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Explore the underlying data →Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
Urban Promise Academy Middle is ranked #2,109 statewide · #30 of 33 in Oakland Unified.
ShowHide table 01 — Score factors
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 3.0% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 14.6% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) | Weak | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 26.8% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 7.1% | 3.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 11.4% | 17.8% | 5% |
- Exceeded standard
- ↓ vs CA 17.2% · index 34 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↓ vs CA 40.0% · index 30 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
- ↓ vs CA average · ≈30th calibrated reference pctile
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↓ vs CA 18.1% · index 38 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.8pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↓ vs CA 3.6% · index 36 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 3.1pp lower vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↓ vs CA 17.8% · index 37 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2024–25 results by grade
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 124 | 3% | 12% | 19% | 65% | 15% | −31 |
| Grade 7 | 126 | 4% | 18% | 22% | 56% | 22% | −25 |
| Grade 8 | 128 | 4% | 21% | 21% | 54% | 25% | −21 |
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4084 reporting schools
State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2631 reporting schools
State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 46.2%; n=2658 reporting schools
Math · 2024–25 results by grade
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 131 | 0% | 5% | 21% | 75% | 5% | −30 |
| Grade 7 | 131 | 3% | 10% | 21% | 66% | 13% | −21 |
| Grade 8 | 132 | 4% | 4% | 21% | 71% | 8% | −24 |
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.5%; n=4086 reporting schools
State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 33.7%; n=2630 reporting schools
State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 32.1%; n=2658 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met+ |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 · Grade 6 · ELA | 118 | 19.5% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · ELA | 118 | 20.3% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · ELA | 117 | 27.4% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 124 | 11.3% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 118 | 5.9% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 126 | 12.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · ELA | 119 | 16.8% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · ELA | 116 | 20.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · ELA | 118 | 23.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 120 | 6.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 121 | 15.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 117 | 11.1% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · ELA | 352 | 22.4% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · ELA | 352 | 16.1% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · ELA | 352 | 24.6% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 357 | 18.8% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 357 | 15.3% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · Math | 357 | 9.0% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · ELA | 370 | 40.3% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · ELA | 370 | 25.8% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · ELA | 370 | 29.5% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · Math | 374 | 25.4% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · Math | 374 | 16.3% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · Math | 374 | 20.0% |
Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 133 | 0% | 8% | 56% | 37% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 369 | 20.1% | −4 | −18 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 338 | 19.2% | −4 | −19 |
| English Learners | 192 | 3.6% | +1 | −3 |
ShowHide table 03 — Nearest middle schools
| School | Dist | Scope · percentile · band | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Promise Academy Middle ← | — | 143rd percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 2025 | 3.0% | 14.6% | +6.3pp | +30 pts | 7.1% |
| United for Success Academy Middle | 0.5 mi | 143rd percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 2025 | 3.2% | 12.8% | −0.1pp | — | 11.0% |
| Oakland Charter Academy | 0.8 mi | 2626th percentile · Developing · statewide · 2025 | 6.5% | 18.6% | −2.1pp | — | 5.8% |
| Downtown Charter Academy | 0.9 mi | 7395th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025 | 45.2% | 75.8% | −7.6pp | — | 0.5% |
| California average | — | 39School average · no percentile | 17.2% | 40.0% | +1.5pp | — | 3.6% |
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
Additional workforce records
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
| Assessment year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 19/100 | 10 | #1740 | California comprehensive middle schools · 1,953 schools |
| 2022 | 18/100 | 13 | #1824 | California comprehensive middle schools · 2,113 schools |
| 2023 | 14/100 | 6 | #1978 | California comprehensive middle schools · 2,125 schools |
| 2024 | 18/100 | 7 | #1993 | California comprehensive middle schools · 2,152 schools |
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024 · 27.9% → 2025 · 27.1% · −0.8pp |
| Suspension rate2024 · 10.4% → 2025 · 7.2% · −3.2pp |
ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Exc | Met+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · ELA | 378 | 3.7% | 20.9% |
| 2025 · Math | 394 | 2.3% | 8.4% |
| 2024 · ELA | 353 | 4.3% | 22.4% |
| 2024 · Math | 368 | 3.8% | 10.1% |
| 2023 · ELA | 353 | 5.4% | 20.4% |
| 2023 · Math | 358 | 4.5% | 11.2% |
| 2022 · ELA | 352 | 5.7% | 21.0% |
| 2022 · Math | 357 | 2.5% | 14.3% |
| 2019 · ELA | 370 | 6.2% | 31.9% |
| 2019 · Math | 374 | 5.1% | 20.6% |
Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | — | — | 5.7% | 26.2% | 28.1% | 8.5% | -8.1pp |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 4.1% | 17.7% | 37.6% | 5.2% | -3.8pp |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 4.9% | 15.8% | 57.0% | 7.1% | +5.7pp |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 4.0% | 16.2% | 27.6% | 10.1% | +4.6pp |
| 2025 | 14 | 3 | #2109 | 3.0% | 14.6% | 26.8% | 7.1% | +6.3pp |
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
- — Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 18 points in ELA in grades 6–8 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2018–19 | 2024–25 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 25.7% | 25.1% | -0.6pp |
| Male | 32.1% | 28.6% | -3.5pp |
| Asian | 33.3% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 66.7% | 64.3% | -2.4pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 25.4% | 25.8% | +0.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 39.0% | 30.2% | -8.8pp |
| English Learners | 29.0% | 27.2% | -1.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 27.9% | 27.4% | -0.5pp |
| All Students | 28.8% | 27.1% | -1.7pp |
| Homeless | — | 41.7% | — |
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | ELA | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | −8 | 341 | Moderate | −9 | 340 | Moderate |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | −9 | 335 | Moderate | −9 | 334 | Moderate |
| Hispanic or Latino | −10 | 306 | Moderate | −11 | 306 | Moderate |
| English Learner | −11 | 267 | Moderate | −11 | 267 | Moderate |
| English Learners Only | −25 | 162 | not categorised | −18 | 162 | not categorised |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | +7 | 105 | not categorised | −1 | 105 | not categorised |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | −11 | 71 | Moderate | −9 | 71 | Moderate |
| Students with Disabilities | −30 | 46 | Minimal | −16 | 45 | Moderate |
| English Only | −12 | 28 | not categorised | +4 | 27 | not categorised |
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
ShowHide table 07 — Growth source detail
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 120 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
341 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
340 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −1 and the middle half fall between −8 and +6 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
ShowHide table 08 — Funding source detail
Per-pupil spending
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 35,489 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 392
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 392
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $72,359 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 26.07% |
| ZCTA population | 53,259 |
| Median age | 36.1 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/urban-promise-academy-middle-8657"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Urban Promise Academy Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction