ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Shandin Hills Middle · San Bernardino

Shandin Hills Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Shandin Hills posts 19% meeting the standard and 3.6% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3543
% Exceeded4%17%
% Met+19%39%
Growth+2.5+1.5
Absence34.5%18.5%
Suspension9.0%3.7%
Scope Score
35
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,457 statewide · #5 of 16 in San Bernardino City Unified

Shandin Hills Middle scores 35 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 35th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “19% proficient” and call it done. Shandin Hills deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Bernardino, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 8th to the 35th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 19% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 624%12%10%14%24%
Grade 731%28%22%20%21%
Grade 823%25%21%20%30%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 69%5%4%4%17%
Grade 710%5%10%9%8%
Grade 89%8%6%12%15%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

21%
76%
Grade 6 · 24% proficient
18%
79%
Grade 7 · 21% proficient
26%
70%
Grade 8 · 30% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 6.6pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
3.6%
State 16.8%
13.3pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+2.5pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
19.0%
State 39.3%
20.3pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
34.5%
State 18.5%
16.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
9.0%
State 3.7%
5.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
22.2%
State 18.0%
4.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Shandin Hills Middle in San Bernardino, 24.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Shandin Hills Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 10.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (24.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.6 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 636 students tested.

All students at this school: 19% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 19%, district —, state 39%19%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 18%, district 28%, state 32%18% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 19%, district 29%, state 32%19% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 22%, district 30%, state 44%22% · +4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 15%, district 29%, state 42%15% · −4 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 9%, state 11%5% · −14 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 3%, district 9%, state 15%3% · −16 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 11%, district 20%, state 26%11% · −8 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 14%, district 19%, state 22%14% · −4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 25%, district 42%, state 56%25% · +6 vs school

5 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 7.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 34.5%, district 29.3%, state 18.5%34.5% · +16.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 9.0%, district —, state 3.7%9.0% · +5.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–632.4%
Grades 7–835.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 19:1, district 22:119:1
Teaching staff39 teachers
Avg. experience9.4 years
Fully credentialed75%
First-year teachers15%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,927 – $136,734
Principal salary$170,815 – $190,823
Superintendent salary$413,775

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,642, CA average $14,815$24,642 · spent at this school
Federal share$473 per student

$473 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,775 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$16,530 per pupil
2019$15,782 per pupil
2018$15,714 per pupil
2017$13,451 per pupil
2016$12,603 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic78.0%
District 82.2% · CA 56.1%
Black13.8%
District 9.3% · CA 4.8%
White4.0%
District 3.9% · CA 19.9%
Other3.1%
District 3.4% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.1%
District 1.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 94.9% (31pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$94K · CA $85K
Median home value$515K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+20% · CA 35%
ZIP population71,711
Median age30 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 11% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Shandin Hills Middle a good middle school?

Shandin Hills Middle has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100, placing it in the 35th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,457 statewide. 3.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 13.3 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Shandin Hills Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 19.0% of students at Shandin Hills Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 3.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 15.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 3.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,346 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Shandin Hills Middle rank in California?

Shandin Hills Middle ranks #1,457 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 35th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Shandin Hills Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Shandin Hills Middle increases by 2.5 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Shandin Hills Middle?

34.5% of students at Shandin Hills Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 9.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Shandin Hills Middle compare to other schools in San Bernardino?

Shandin Hills Middle scores 35/100 (35th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 709 students. Use the schools in San Bernardino page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Shandin Hills Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Shandin Hills Middle in San Bernardino, 24.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Shandin Hills Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 10.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (24.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.6 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 636 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
3.6%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 35th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+2.5pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 68th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
19.0%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 34th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
34.5%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 28th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
9.0%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 29th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
22.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61023%21%23%54%24%−23
Grade 72973%18%27%53%21%−27
Grade 82724%26%30%40%30%−16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61035%12%28%55%17%−19
Grade 72981%7%22%69%8%−26
Grade 82746%9%21%64%15%−17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112693%8%71%19%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged63624.1%−10−14
Hispanic/Latino52524.4%−11−14
English Learners1196.7%−4−4
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Shandin Hills Middle ←353.6%19.0%+2.59.0%
Arrowview Middle2.3 mi358.8%25.4%+14.27.5%
Golden Valley Middle2.2 mi2911.5%33.8%−15.512.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019218#18523.0%17.7%17.6%14.2%+0.0pp
20223236#13882.4%13.8%41.8%6.5%+8.4pp
20232816#18241.5%12.2%40.9%12.3%+6.5pp
20242620#17632.5%13.2%34.4%16.2%+7.3pp
20253535#14573.6%19.0%34.5%9.0%+2.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 14 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female15.6%35.1%+19.5pp
Male19.5%34.6%+15.1pp
Asian27.3%
Black/African American26.3%38.0%+11.7pp
Filipino11.8%
Hispanic/Latino15.7%34.1%+18.4pp
Two or More Races37.5%40.0%+2.5pp
Students with Disabilities20.2%39.0%+18.8pp
English Learners11.3%29.0%+17.7pp
Foster Youth35.3%
Homeless28.0%42.5%+14.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18.3%35.0%+16.7pp
All Students17.6%34.9%+17.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction