Rosewood Avenue Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Rosewood Avenue posts 54% meeting the standard, and 26.9% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 47 | 27% | 54% | -21.8 | 23.8% | 0.9% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Rosewood Avenue Elementary scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 62nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “54% proficient” and call it done. Rosewood Avenue deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Rosewood Avenue's low-income kids hit 54.3% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 37th to the 62nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1300 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 54% of students meet the standard today, above the 37% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 40% | 59% | 45% | 39% | 74% |
| Grade 4 | 54% | 56% | 53% | 52% | 45% |
| Grade 5 | 49% | 60% | 52% | 53% | 60% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 40% | 56% | 60% | 46% | 72% |
| Grade 4 | 22% | 48% | 45% | 33% | 32% |
| Grade 5 | 19% | 40% | 41% | 37% | 43% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 16.1pp across grades; the floor slips 14.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Rosewood Avenue's most underrated number
54.3% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
How every group of students does here
At Rosewood Avenue Elementary in Los Angeles, 54.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Rosewood Avenue Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 13.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (43.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (51.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.4 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 94 students tested.
8 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 15.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$1,746 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 218 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 38% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Rosewood Avenue Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Rosewood Avenue Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Rosewood Avenue Elementary rank in California?
Is Rosewood Avenue Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Rosewood Avenue Elementary?
How does Rosewood Avenue Elementary compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Rosewood Avenue Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 85
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 39 | 44% | 31% | 10% | 15% | 74% | +31 |
| Grade 4 | 44 | 18% | 27% | 25% | 30% | 45% | +1 |
| Grade 5 | 40 | 28% | 33% | 15% | 25% | 60% | +12 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 39 | 36% | 36% | 10% | 18% | 72% | +26 |
| Grade 4 | 44 | 16% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 32% | −10 |
| Grade 5 | 40 | 20% | 23% | 18% | 40% | 43% | +7 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 40 | 13% | 25% | 40% | 23% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 94 | 54.3% | +13 | +16 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 54 | 51.9% | +11 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosewood Avenue Elementary ← | — | 47 | 26.9% | 54.3% | −21.8 | 0.9% |
| Wonderland Avenue Elementary | 2.2 mi | 91 | 72.7% | 90.7% | −0.1 | 0.1% |
| Third Street Elementary | 2.4 mi | 90 | 68.3% | 88.9% | +1.1 | 0.1% |
| Canfield Avenue Elementary | 2.4 mi | 76 | 54.1% | 72.1% | −5.4 | 0.2% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 37 | 37 | #3459 | 18.2% | 37.3% | 17.0% | 0.7% | -6.6pp |
| 2022 | 43 | 65 | #1992 | 30.9% | 53.3% | 42.9% | 0.4% | -7.7pp |
| 2023 | 46 | 66 | #1927 | 28.0% | 49.4% | 32.2% | 0.1% | -5.9pp |
| 2024 | 43 | 52 | #2725 | 23.5% | 43.3% | 25.1% | 1.2% | +2.0pp |
| 2025 | 47 | 62 | #2166 | 26.9% | 54.3% | 23.8% | 0.9% | -21.8pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 21.9% | 27.2% | +5.3pp |
| Male | 13.2% | 21.7% | +8.5pp |
| Asian | 5.0% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 19.3% | 45.9% | +26.6pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 16.0% | 25.2% | +9.2pp |
| Two or More Races | 61.5% | 8.3% | -53.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 23.8% | 7.7% | -16.1pp |
| English Learners | 10.3% | 26.3% | +16.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 19.2% | 27.0% | +7.8pp |
| All Students | 17.2% | 24.5% | +7.3pp |
| Filipino | — | 27.6% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction