Public school · Los Angeles Unified

Wonderland Avenue Elementary

Los Angeles · TK–5 · 435 students (2024–25)

99thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,721 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

89 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Wonderland Avenuehigher than 99 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Wonderland Avenuehigher than 99 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Wonderland Avenuehigher than 99 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Well above California in English and math: 90% and 91% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. Source

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 250
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Get an email when Wonderland Avenue Elementary’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 70%
Met standard: 20%
Below standard: 10%

90% met or exceeded · 250 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Los Angeles Unified
Exceeded	70%	24%	23%
Met	20%	22%	22%
Nearly met	6%	21%	22%
Not met	4%	33%	33%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 74%
Met standard: 17%
Below standard: 9%

91% met or exceeded · 250 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Los Angeles Unified
Exceeded	74%	21%	20%
Met	17%	20%	22%
Nearly met	4%	25%	25%
Not met	5%	34%	33%

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence

In 2025, students in grades 4–5 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Exceptional in English and Accelerated in math.grades 4–5 · 2025

+27 ptsEnglish · above expected+18 ptsMath · above expected

Source: CDE growth model, 2025
Students: students with scores in both years in grades 4–5: 157
Comparison: 157 students in grades 4–5 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

About 7 in 10 reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2025

70%English · exceeded the standard74%Math · exceeded the standard

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 250
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

Low-income students here (76 tested, grades 3–5, spring 2025) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (35% and 30%).grades 3–5 · spring 2025

92%English · met or exceeded88%Math · met or exceeded

Source: CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2025
Students: low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–5: 76
Comparison: California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 76 students.

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school90%

California46%

Tested: 250 here · 1,232,086 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school90%

Los Angeles Unified45%

Tested: 250 here · 111,662 in Los Angeles Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 596 schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Los Angeles Unified
Exceeded	70%	24%	23%
Met	20%	22%	22%
Nearly met	6%	21%	22%
Not met	4%	33%	33%

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school91%

California41%

Tested: 250 here · 1,241,652 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school91%

Los Angeles Unified42%

Tested: 250 here · 112,947 in Los Angeles Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 596 schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Los Angeles Unified
Exceeded	74%	21%	20%
Met	17%	20%	22%
Nearly met	4%	25%	25%
Not met	5%	34%	33%

Progress over time

Are students making progress?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201994%307 tested

→

202590%250 tested

This school

California, same grades50% → 46%2019 → 2025 · 1,332,547 → 1,232,086 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201987%307 tested

→

202591%250 tested

This school

California, same grades44% → 41%2019 → 2025 · 1,338,625 → 1,241,652 tested

A comparison of two years, not individual student growth. Each year is a different group of students.

Explore every year, the trend charts & underlying data

English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2019.

English met or exceeded, grades 3–5

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)90%46%

Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)91%41%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results; in 2020 and 2021 that was COVID.

English went from 94% in 2019 to 90% in 2025. Math went from 87% in 2019 to 91% in 2025, with 2024 and 2025 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	This school	California
2019	94% 307 tested	50% 1,332,547 tested
2022	95% 262 tested	45% 1,260,830 tested
2023	92% 264 tested	44% 1,247,801 tested
2024	93% 252 tested	45% 1,235,509 tested
2025	90% 250 tested	46% 1,232,086 tested

Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	This school	California
2019	87% 307 tested	44% 1,338,625 tested
2022	88% 263 tested	38% 1,265,943 tested
2023	87% 265 tested	40% 1,256,519 tested
2024	90% 250 tested	41% 1,249,262 tested
2025	91% 250 tested	41% 1,241,652 tested

The state’s growth measure157 students · grades 4–5 · 2025

English+27ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)

Math+18ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 27 points above that prediction, and in math 18 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.

School pattern, spring 2025High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.

School pattern, spring 2025Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.

School pattern, spring 2025Strong All-AroundAt least half of students met or exceeded the standard in every tested grade, in both subjects, and the state’s growth measure was Average or above in both.

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

11 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

21in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified school18in 100 at the average California elementary school

48 of 442 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school11 in 100

at the average Los Angeles Unified school21 in 100

at the average California elementary school18 in 100

0of 445 students were suspended at least once, 2024–25

0.2%at the average Los Angeles Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school

Attendance by grade

Chronically absent, 2024–25	Per 100 students	Students
TK and kindergarten	15	13 of 85
Grades 1–3	12	22 of 190
Grades 4–5	8	13 of 167

School Experience Survey, 2025–26

What students and families say

How students, families and staff at Wonderland Avenue answered LAUSD’s 2025–26 School Experience Survey, beside the same questions across LAUSD schools at the same level.

This schoolLAUSD, same levelEach track 0–100%

Students

153 of 169 students answered (91%).

Safety12 points above LAUSD“I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.89%LAUSD 77%1 question

One question, 153 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions89%LAUSD 77%153 answered

Belonging7 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.75%LAUSD 68%5 questions

Average of 5 questions, 147–153 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learn81%LAUSD 78%147 answered
I am happy to be at this school84%LAUSD 74%153 answered
I feel like I am part of this school78%LAUSD 72%153 answered
I feel accepted for who I am at this school78%LAUSD 72%152 answered
Most kids at this school are kind to each other54%LAUSD 42%151 answered

Caring adults4 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.79%LAUSD 75%8 questions

Average of 8 questions, 148–153 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Teachers go out of their way to help students78%LAUSD 78%148 answered
The teachers at this school treat students fairly72%LAUSD 69%153 answered
Teachers care if I'm absent from school78%LAUSD 70%153 answered
Adults at this school treat all students with respect76%LAUSD 73%153 answered
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering me70%LAUSD 71%148 answered
There is at least one adult at my school who supports me87%LAUSD 80%149 answered
Teachers at my school know me87%LAUSD 78%148 answered
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help me82%LAUSD 79%153 answered

Engagement5 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.73%LAUSD 68%6 questions

Average of 6 questions, 149–151 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activities91%LAUSD 81%149 answered
My teachers make learning fun78%LAUSD 67%149 answered
Students have a voice in decision making at this school68%LAUSD 55%151 answered
Teachers encourage students to make decisions80%LAUSD 72%151 answered
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of class69%LAUSD 74%150 answered
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activities55%LAUSD 59%149 answered

High expectations2 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.86%LAUSD 84%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 149 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work better89%LAUSD 88%149 answered
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I choose83%LAUSD 81%149 answered

Bullying6 points below LAUSDShare who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days. A lower share means fewer reported it.18%LAUSD 24%4 questions

Average of 4 questions, 149–151 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?29%LAUSD 31%151 answered
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?18%LAUSD 30%149 answered
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?22%LAUSD 25%150 answered
Been bullied online?4%LAUSD 12%150 answered

All 43 questions, as a table

Question	Here	LAUSD elementary schools	Answers
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	89%	77%	153
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed	81%	78%	147
I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	84%	74%	153
I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	72%	153
I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	72%	152
Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed	54%	42%	151
Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	78%	148
The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed	72%	69%	153
Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	70%	153
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed	76%	73%	153
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed	70%	71%	148
There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed	87%	80%	149
Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed	87%	78%	148
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed	82%	79%	153
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	91%	81%	149
My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	67%	149
Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	68%	55%	151
Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	80%	72%	151
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed	69%	74%	150
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	55%	59%	149
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed	89%	88%	149
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed	83%	81%	149
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days	29%	31%	151
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days	18%	30%	149
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days	22%	25%	150
Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days	4%	12%	150
The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed	88%	82%	149
Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed	58%	54%	152
Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	85%	80%	151
What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?Share who answered “Four-year college degree” or “Graduate degree”	—	—	0
I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”	90%	78%	149
I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”	89%	75%	149
I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”	91%	74%	149
I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	89%	64%	152
I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”	86%	61%	148
I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”	74%	49%	148
I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”	86%	65%	148
I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”	95%	72%	149
I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”	93%	75%	147
I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”	81%	56%	146
How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well”	85%	72%	149
When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful”	87%	70%	151
How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully”	93%	78%	151

Families

248 of 341 family surveys came back (73%).

Safety5 points below LAUSD“My child is safe on school grounds”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.86%LAUSD 91%1 question

One question, 243 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

My child is safe on school grounds86%LAUSD 91%243 answered

Belonging7 points below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.87%LAUSD 94%4 questions

Average of 4 questions, 242–248 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and online90%LAUSD 92%247 answered
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and online90%LAUSD 96%247 answered
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this school83%LAUSD 94%242 answered
I feel welcome to participate at this school85%LAUSD 94%248 answered

Caring adults11 points below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.83%LAUSD 94%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 247 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Teachers take my concerns seriously83%LAUSD 94%247 answered
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progress83%LAUSD 95%247 answered

Engagement14 points below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.77%LAUSD 91%3 questions

Average of 3 questions, 247–248 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

This school informs me about school activities in different ways82%LAUSD 94%248 answered
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's education66%LAUSD 89%248 answered
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school84%LAUSD 91%247 answered

Bullying taken seriously17 points below LAUSD“Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.63%LAUSD 80%1 question

One question, 247 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school63%LAUSD 80%247 answered

All 34 questions, as a table

Question	Here	LAUSD elementary schools	Answers
My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	86%	91%	243
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed	90%	92%	247
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed	90%	96%	247
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	83%	94%	242
I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	85%	94%	248
Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed	83%	94%	247
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed	83%	95%	247
This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed	82%	94%	248
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed	66%	89%	248
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	84%	91%	247
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	63%	80%	247
Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed	81%	89%	247
Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed	82%	90%	247
Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed	81%	94%	247
Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	64%	85%	247
I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed	72%	91%	247
This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	52%	79%	247
This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed	71%	89%	248
This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed	79%	87%	247
This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed	84%	92%	248
I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	91%	248
I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	97%	95%	247
I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	61%	87%	247
I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	86%	88%	247
This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed	82%	95%	248
School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed	55%	87%	143
This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed	76%	91%	238
This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed	78%	91%	224
I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	79%	91%	247
This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed	72%	86%	248
I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed	59%	83%	181
I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed	69%	88%	169
My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	84%	92%	247
Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	67%	82%	246

Staff

31 of 45 staff answered (69%), 18 of them teachers.

Safety3 points above LAUSD“I feel safe on school grounds during the day”: share giving one of the two most positive answers.100%LAUSD 97%1 question

One question, 30 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

I feel safe on school grounds during the day100%LAUSD 97%30 answered

Caring adults6 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.95%LAUSD 89%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 30–31 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests90%LAUSD 84%31 answered
Adults at this school treat all students with respect100%LAUSD 94%30 answered

High expectations2 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.97%LAUSD 95%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 30–31 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

This school sets high standards for academic performance for all students97%LAUSD 95%30 answered
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to students97%LAUSD 95%31 answered

Bullying seen as minor11 points above LAUSD“Harassment or bullying among students”: share who called it a mild or insignificant problem.97%LAUSD 86%1 question

One question, 29 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

Harassment or bullying among students97%LAUSD 86%29 answered

All 49 questions, as a table

Question	Here	LAUSD elementary schools	Answers
I feel safe on school grounds during the dayNo share published for this question	100%	97%	30
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	90%	84%	31
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed	100%	94%	30
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	97%	95%	30
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	97%	95%	31
Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem	97%	86%	29
I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed	97%	84%	31
Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed	97%	84%	31
I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	90%	81%	30
The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed	100%	95%	31
I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolNo share published for this question	100%	88%	30
At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed	71%	85%	31
This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed	94%	82%	31
This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	87%	75%	31
How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”	100%	86%	30
How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”	90%	80%	30
I feel comfortable talking with the school leadership about issues and concernsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	97%	78%	31
Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed	90%	81%	30
This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed	87%	80%	30
This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed	79%	75%	29
Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem	100%	93%	29
The informal observation process has increased the number of instruction-focused interactions with my school leader(s) about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	74%	9
During the informal observation process, my school leader provided actionable feedback about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	85%	9
The informal observation process provided the opportunity to reflect on my instructional practice about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	83%	9
The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	75%	9
During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)Share who answered “Two times this year” or “Three or more times this year”	—	—	4
I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	75%	4
I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	84%	4
I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	86%	4
I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	88%	1
Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”	—	16%	18
With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”	—	50%	18
Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”	—	59%	18
How often does school leadership visit your classroom to observe you teach (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”	—	41%	18
How often does school leadership provide useful feedback to you based on their observations (teachers)Share who answered “Often” or “Always”	—	68%	18
Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”	—	51%	18
Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”	—	66%	17
I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	79%	18
I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	79%	18
I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	94%	18
I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	91%	18
What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	74%	18
The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	74%	18
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	71%	18
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	75%	18
The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	77%	18
The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	81%	18
The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	76%	18
I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed	—	88%	18

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades. Theme figures are our average of the questions listed under each theme, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers; we show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group’s answers only when at least 10% of that group responded. Los Angeles Unified School District survey results (opens in a new tab)

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

76 tested per subject

English92% / 35%

Math88% / 30%

White

114 tested per subject

English88% / 60%

Math90% / 56%

Asian

65 tested per subject

English100% / 71%

Math100% / 71%

Two or more races

43 tested per subject

English86% / 60%

Math84% / 55%

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Met or exceeded the standardgrades 3–5 · spring 2025

Group and subject	Here	vs Los Angeles Unified	vs California
Low-income · 76 tested
English	92%	+5339%	+5735%
Math	88%	+5236%	+5830%
White · 114 tested
English	88%	+1969%	+2860%
Math	90%	+2367%	+3456%
Asian · 65 tested
English	100%	+2278%	+2971%
Math	100%	+2179%	+2971%
Two or more races · 43 tested
English	86%	+2561%	+2660%
Math	84%	+2757%	+2955%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Low-income students here did far better than the same group statewide.

Read the student-group results as sentences

At Wonderland Avenue Elementary in Los Angeles, 92.1% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 38.9% district-wide for those same grades and 35.2% statewide for those same grades. Wonderland Avenue Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 53.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (88.2% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (87.7% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 14.0 percentage points: Two or More Races students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 76 ELA grade test records.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

White52%
Asian17%
Two or more races16%
Hispanic or Latino8%
Not reported4%
Black or African American—
Filipino—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Unallocated share3%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2024–25	Here
White	52%
Asian	17%
Two or more races	16%
Hispanic or Latino	8%
Not reported	4%
Black or African American	—
Filipino	—
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Pacific Islander	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About 1 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (27%, 116 of 435). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers18

Average experience19 years

First-year teachers0%

94% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 94.44%: 17 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 18 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

ElementaryWonderland Avenue ElementaryThis campus · grades K-5
MiddleHubert Howe Bancroft MiddleHistorical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
High schoolHollywood Senior HighInferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
47th percentile · Developing · middle · 2025
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

High-school links

Hollywood Senior High
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
67th percentile · Solid · high · 2025
Fairfax Senior High
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
38th percentile · Developing · high · 2025

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

High-school endpoint evidence · Hollywood Senior High

Hollywood Senior HighScope 62estimated path

An inferred path through a middle-school overlap points to Hollywood Senior High. UC records 28 enrollees from Hollywood Senior High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 20 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — if a child starting here today later attended Hollywood Senior High, that would be around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 61% of Hollywood Senior High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

28 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 20 authorized AP subjects (AP Course Audit 2025 - 2026) → full record on Hollywood Senior High's page

Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Getting in

Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.

lausd.k12.ca.us

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

8510 Wonderland Avenue, Los Angeles 90046

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (323) 654-4401 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby elementary schoolsStatewide percentile

Larchmont Charter1.7 mi · Charter school. Check how it admits students.73rdSolid
West Hollywood Elementary1.8 mi80thStrong
Gardner Street Elementary1.9 mi72ndSolid

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2025 statewide percentile

Temecula International AcademyRiverside County Office of Education · 285 enrolled · 26.7% meal eligibility74thSolid
Sycamore RidgeDel Mar Union Elementary · 386 enrolled · 26.7% meal eligibility89thStrong
Mary Farmar ElementaryBenicia Unified · 477 enrolled · 26.6% meal eligibility72ndSolid
Sakamoto ElementaryOak Grove Elementary · 571 enrolled · 26.6% meal eligibility79thStrong
Castle Rock ElementaryWalnut Valley Unified · 684 enrolled · 26.6% meal eligibility90thStrong
Castlebay Lane CharterLos Angeles Unified · 666 enrolled · 26.7% meal eligibility93rdStrong

How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 18.7–34.7% meal eligibility and 218–870 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Wonderland Avenue Elementary a good elementary school?

Wonderland Avenue Elementary is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 89 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Wonderland Avenue Elementary was well above California in English and math: 90% and 91% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Wonderland Avenue Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 90% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 91% the math standard; 70% and 74% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 41% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 250 students were tested in English and 250 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Wonderland Avenue Elementary rank in California?

Wonderland Avenue Elementary is in the 99th percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2025). Wonderland Avenue Elementary ranks #13 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Wonderland Avenue Elementary getting better or worse?

SchoolScope compares Wonderland Avenue Elementary's grade 3 results in 2023 with its grade 5 results in 2025, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 90th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Wonderland Avenue Elementary?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 10.9% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 48 chronically absent of 442 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.0%; 0 unduplicated suspended students of 445 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 11.3%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.1%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Wonderland Avenue Elementary compare to other schools in Los Angeles?

Wonderland Avenue Elementary is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 435 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Wonderland Avenue Elementary?

What middle school does Wonderland Avenue Elementary feed into?

By attendance boundary, Wonderland Avenue Elementary is zoned to Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle. Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle has a Scope Score of 35 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Wonderland Avenue Elementary is ranked #13 statewide · #1 of 579 in Los Angeles Unified.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Exceeded standard	72.7%	21.4%	42%
Met or exceeded	90.7%	42.7%	23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)	Strong	average	20%
Chronic absenteeism	11.3%	17.9%	5%
Suspension rate	0.1%	1.6%	5%

Exceeded standard: ↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 100 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded: ↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 87 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): ↑ vs CA average · ≈90th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism: ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.9pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate: ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 63 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELA	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	92	55%	30%	9%	5%	86%	+43
Grade 4	75	89%	7%	3%	1%	96%	+51
Grade 5	83	70%	19%	7%	4%	89%	+41

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
Math	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	92	71%	18%	8%	3%	89%	+44
Grade 4	75	77%	21%	0%	1%	99%	+57
Grade 5	83	73%	12%	5%	10%	86%	+51

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 45.4%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met+
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA	75	93.3%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA	89	92.1%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA	88	93.2%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math	75	96.0%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math	89	86.5%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math	86	88.4%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA	82	86.6%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA	97	94.8%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA	85	92.9%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math	83	83.1%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math	97	93.8%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math	85	83.5%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA	87	92.0%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA	85	96.5%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA	90	96.7%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math	88	93.2%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math	85	89.4%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math	90	81.1%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA	95	91.6%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA	111	95.5%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA	101	94.1%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math	95	91.6%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math	111	88.3%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math	101	82.2%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT
Schoolwide	82	56%	26%	16%	2%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	MET+	vs district	vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	76	92.1%	+53	+57
White	114	87.7%	+19	+28
Asian	65	100.0%	+22	+29

Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	EXC	MET+	Grade gap	Cohort growth	Susp
Wonderland Avenue Elementary ←	—	8999th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	72.7%	90.7%	−0.1pp	+86 pts	0.1%
Larchmont Charter	1.7 mi	4873rd percentile · Solid · statewide · 2025	36.0%	62.4%	−6.1pp	—	0.3%
West Hollywood Elementary	1.8 mi	5480th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	35.0%	63.8%	+4.9pp	—	0.5%
Gardner Street Elementary	1.9 mi	4772nd percentile · Solid · statewide · 2025	21.7%	44.7%	+10.7pp	—	0.1%
California average	—	39School average · no percentile	21.4%	42.7%	−2.9pp	—	1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders5.6%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records

Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706

Average elementary principal salary$154,576

Average middle school principal salary$169,556

Average high school principal salary$170,030

Superintendent salary$440,000

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2019	91/100	99	#31	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
2022	95/100	99	#16	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,704 schools
2023	93/100	99	#26	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,696 schools
2024	87/100	99	#24	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,711 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 9.8% → 2025 · 10.9% · +1.1pp
Suspension rate2024 · 0.0% → 2025 · 0.0% · +0.0pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Exc	Met+
2025 · ELA	250	70.4%	90.0%
2025 · Math	250	73.6%	90.8%
2024 · ELA	252	73.0%	92.9%
2024 · Math	250	68.8%	90.0%
2023 · ELA	264	76.5%	91.7%
2023 · Math	265	70.6%	87.2%
2022 · ELA	262	84.0%	95.0%
2022 · Math	263	68.4%	87.8%
2019 · ELA	307	75.9%	93.8%
2019 · Math	307	68.4%	87.3%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

Year	Scope	Pctile	Rank	Exc	Met+	Absent	Susp	Grade gap
2019	—	—	—	72.1%	90.5%	14.0%	0.1%	-3.5pp
2022	—	—	—	76.2%	91.5%	15.4%	0.1%	-3.7pp
2023	—	—	—	73.3%	89.1%	19.7%	0.1%	+3.4pp
2024	—	—	—	70.9%	91.6%	10.4%	0.1%	-3.9pp
2025	89	99	#13	72.7%	90.7%	11.3%	0.1%	-0.1pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years

Group	2018–19	2024–25	Δ
Female	16.7%	11.2%	-5.5pp
Male	10.8%	10.6%	-0.2pp
Asian	3.8%	1.4%	-2.4pp
Black/African American	46.2%	—	—
Hispanic/Latino	25.0%	18.9%	-6.1pp
Two or More Races	11.9%	12.9%	+1.0pp
White	15.4%	10.8%	-4.6pp
Students with Disabilities	23.3%	8.7%	-14.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	15.3%	9.8%	-5.5pp
All Students	14.1%	10.9%	-3.2pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored

Group	ELA	n	CDE band	Math	n	CDE band
All Students	+27	157	Exceptional	+18	157	Accelerated
English Only	+27	125	not categorised	+15	125	not categorised
White	+24	70	Exceptional	+14	70	Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	+28	50	Exceptional	+15	50	Accelerated
Asian	+30	44	Exceptional	+23	44	Exceptional
Two or More Races	+29	26	Exceptional	+11	26	Accelerated
Students with Disabilities	−1	14	Average	−10	14	Moderate
English Learner	+30	13	Exceptional	+33	13	Exceptional
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only	+32	13	not categorised	+32	13	not categorised

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

ELA · 2023 · Grade 3

66%

exceeded standard · 87% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2023 · 82 ELA test records with scores

ELA · 2025 · Grade 5

70%

exceeded standard · 89% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2025 · 83 ELA test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 83 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · reported-school field

State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

157 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

98th pctile · +27 pts

State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

157 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

89th pctile · +18 pts

this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$18,180 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$691 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 435

Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 435

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 52%Instruction support 16%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$18,180 per pupil

2020$16,355 per pupil

2019$15,793 per pupil

2018$13,247 per pupil

2017$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 90046

ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 90046
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$96,250
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	64.58%
ZCTA population	48,296
Median age	40.2 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/wonderland-avenue-elementary-0010"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Wonderland Avenue Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Wonderland Avenue Elementary

Compare schools

Get an email when Wonderland Avenue Elementary’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

Are children building strong foundations?

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

Are students making progress?

English

Math

Annual values & tested counts

Attendance and discipline

What students and families say

Students

Families

Staff

How each student group did

Low-income

White

Asian

Two or more races

Students and staff

Student mix

The school path beyond this campus

Middle-school links

High-school links

Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.

Location and visiting

Questions to ask

Schools to explore

Similar student populations

Common questions

Explore the data

Additional workforce records

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful