ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle · Los Angeles

Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Hubert Howe Bancroft posts 32% meeting the standard and 10.4% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4143
% Exceeded10%17%
% Met+32%39%
Growth-6.3+1.5
Absence24.4%18.5%
Suspension1.5%3.7%
Scope Score
41
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,119 statewide · #120 of 226 in Los Angeles Unified

Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle scores 41 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 50th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Hubert Howe Bancroft deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 22nd to the 50th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 32% of students meet the standard today, above the 23% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 630%21%18%27%42%
Grade 735%33%36%30%38%
Grade 827%36%28%34%32%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 615%16%8%11%25%
Grade 718%13%18%15%32%
Grade 817%14%11%16%23%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

36%
57%
Grade 6 · 43% proficient
10%
28%
62%
Grade 7 · 38% proficient
26%
69%
Grade 8 · 31% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor slips 10.3pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.4%
State 16.8%
6.4pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-6.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
32.1%
State 39.3%
7.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
24.4%
State 18.5%
5.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.5%
State 3.7%
2.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
22.4%
State 18.0%
4.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle in Los Angeles, 36.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (33.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 396 students tested.

All students at this school: 32% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 32%, district —, state 39%32%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 31%, district 36%, state 32%31% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 36%, state 32%29% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 31%, district 41%, state 42%31% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 33%, district 42%, state 44%33% · +1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 14%, state 15%7% · −25 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 12%, district 9%, state 11%12% · −20 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 51%, district 65%, state 56%51% · +19 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 26%, district 30%, state 26%26% · −6 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 46%, district 56%, state 56%46% · +14 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
AsianAsian: too few students to report‹11
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 9.0pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 24.4%, district 24.5%, state 18.5%24.4% · +5.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.5%, district —, state 3.7%1.5% · −2.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.1%
Grades 7–826.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 15:1, district 20:115:1
Teaching staff32 teachers
Avg. experience11.1 years
Fully credentialed84%
First-year teachers13%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $31,822, CA average $14,815$31,822 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,855 per student

$2,855 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic70.0%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White11.6%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Black11.2%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Other5.7%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian1.5%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 91.5% (28pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$61K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.18M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population27,127
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 457 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 18% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle a good middle school?

Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle has a Scope Score of 41 out of 100, placing it in the 50th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,119 statewide. 10.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.4 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 32.1% of students at Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 875 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle rank in California?

Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle ranks #1,119 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 50th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle decreases by 6.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle?

24.4% of students at Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 1.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle compare to other schools in Los Angeles?

Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle scores 41/100 (50th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 457 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle in Los Angeles, 36.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (33.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 30.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 396 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.4%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 43th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-6.3pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 59th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
32.1%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 44th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
24.4%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 42th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.5%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 59th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
22.4%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61077%36%16%42%42%−4
Grade 716410%28%24%37%38%−9
Grade 81675%26%26%42%32%−14
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 610712%13%23%51%25%−10
Grade 716414%18%27%40%32%−2
Grade 816614%9%20%57%23%−9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111654%14%65%17%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged39636.1%−5−2
Hispanic/Latino30433.6%−7−5
Students with Disabilities7710.4%−6−7
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Hubert Howe Bancroft Middle ←4110.4%32.1%−6.31.5%
Magnolia Science Academy 62.4 mi5822.9%48.2%+13.43.7%
John Burroughs Middle1.7 mi5428.8%55.9%−1.61.6%
Joseph Le Conte Middle1.1 mi276.8%22.1%+2.61.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192822#15576.8%23.5%15.0%2.5%-0.8pp
20223444#12155.4%22.1%30.2%1.8%+6.1pp
20233534#14335.8%19.7%29.2%2.4%+5.8pp
20243134#14596.2%22.3%27.1%3.3%+6.1pp
20254150#111910.4%32.1%24.4%1.5%-6.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female13.6%22.8%+9.2pp
Male16.4%26.2%+9.8pp
Asian8.3%
Black/African American37.5%41.8%+4.3pp
Hispanic/Latino10.6%20.6%+10.0pp
Students with Disabilities22.6%29.2%+6.6pp
English Learners12.0%27.7%+15.7pp
Homeless28.6%47.8%+19.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15.5%25.2%+9.7pp
All Students15.0%24.6%+9.6pp
Filipino13.3%
Two or More Races28.6%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction