ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Park Village Elementary · San Diego

Park Village Elementary: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Park Village posts 57.8% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

7930 Park Village Road, 92129 (opens in new tab)·Poway Unified·San Diego·Grades TK-5·671 students·9% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(858) 484-5621·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7245
% Exceeded58%21%
% Met+81%43%
Growth+1.1-2.9
Absence5.3%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%
Scope Score
72
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #420 statewide · #9 of 26 in Poway Unified

Park Village Elementary scores 72 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 93rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “81% proficient” and call it done. Park Village deserves a closer read. It sits at the 93rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The headline number: 57.8% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 93rd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 81% meet the standard today, versus 86% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 386%79%91%79%78%
Grade 486%87%82%90%81%
Grade 589%78%84%75%81%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 388%84%90%80%79%
Grade 485%89%83%90%86%
Grade 582%82%84%72%78%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

60%
18%
22%
Grade 3 · 78% proficient
61%
19%
20%
Grade 4 · 80% proficient
58%
23%
19%
Grade 5 · 81% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 1.5pp across grades; the floor rises 3.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
57.8%
State 21.3%
36.4pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+1.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
80.5%
State 42.7%
37.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
5.3%
State 17.9%
12.6pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
0.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
36.2%
State 18.0%
18.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Park Village Elementary in San Diego, 43.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 50.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Park Village Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.4% Math proficient); Asian students (88.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 16 students tested.

All students at this school: 81% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 81%, district —, state 43%81%
MaleMale: this school 80%, district 70%, state 42%80% · −0 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 90%, district 87%, state 72%90% · +9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 81%, district 70%, state 44%81% · +1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 72%, district 68%, state 56%72% · −9 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 57%, district 34%, state 15%57% · −23 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 44%, district 46%, state 32%44% · −36 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 73%, district 71%, state 56%73% · −8 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 62%, district 50%, state 32%62% · −19 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 5.3%, district 9.7%, state 17.9%5.3% · −12.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −0.9pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (7.2% vs 3.6%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–63.6%
TK/K7.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff31 teachers
Avg. experience19.2 years
Fully credentialed77%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$58,959 – $127,725
Principal salary$160,698 – $181,289
Superintendent salary$362,500

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,567, CA average $14,815$18,567 · school-level
Federal share$319 per student

$319 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,880 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,246 per pupil
2019$11,959 per pupil
2018$12,266 per pupil
2017$11,181 per pupil
2016$10,952 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian46.4%
District 25.5% · CA 10.2%
White26.2%
District 37.6% · CA 19.9%
Other17.3%
District 17.8% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic9.4%
District 17.4% · CA 56.1%
Black0.8%
District 1.6% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 8.8% (55pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$156K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.11M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+66% · CA 35%
ZIP population52,965
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 78% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Park Village Elementary a good elementary school?

Park Village Elementary has a Scope Score of 72 out of 100, placing it in the 93rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #420 statewide. 57.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 36.4 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Park Village Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 80.5% of students at Park Village Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 57.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 57.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 658 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Park Village Elementary rank in California?

Park Village Elementary ranks #420 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 93rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Park Village Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Park Village Elementary increases by 1.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Park Village Elementary?

5.3% of students at Park Village Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Park Village Elementary compare to other schools in San Diego?

Park Village Elementary scores 72/100 (93rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 671 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Park Village Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Park Village Elementary in San Diego, 43.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 50.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Park Village Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.4% Math proficient); Asian students (88.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 16 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
57.8%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 85th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+1.1pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 42th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
80.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 79th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
5.3%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 71th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 57th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
36.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 76th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310960%18%14%8%78%+35
Grade 411461%19%9%11%81%+36
Grade 510558%23%10%9%81%+33
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 311049%30%13%8%79%+33
Grade 411458%28%7%7%86%+44
Grade 510660%18%12%9%78%+43
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1110655%24%19%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1643.8%−7+6
Asian15588.4%+1+14
White8969.7%−3+8
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Park Village Elementary ←7257.8%80.5%+1.10.7%
Pacific Sky2.1 mi7950.3%79.6%+5.80.4%
Deer Canyon Elementary1.7 mi7861.1%81.7%+4.62.7%
Adobe Bluffs Elementary2.4 mi7659.6%85.7%−19.50.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197695#27059.8%86.0%4.9%0.5%-1.8pp
20227496#21860.3%83.1%10.6%0.0%-1.8pp
20237897#18865.0%85.7%9.1%0.3%-6.5pp
20247193#40759.8%81.2%8.0%0.4%-6.3pp
20257293#42057.8%80.5%5.3%0.7%+1.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female3.2%4.5%+1.3pp
Male6.1%5.0%-1.1pp
Asian4.0%3.7%-0.3pp
Filipino0.0%
White1.8%2.1%+0.3pp
Hispanic/Latino15.9%7.5%-8.4pp
Two or More Races2.7%7.5%+4.8pp
Students with Disabilities10.2%7.4%-2.8pp
English Learners4.7%12.3%+7.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.1%16.9%+5.8pp
All Students4.8%4.7%-0.1pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction