ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy · Morgan Hill

P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

353 West Main Avenue, 95037 (opens in new tab)·Morgan Hill Unified·Morgan Hill·Grades TK-5·359 students·69% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(408) 201-6500
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3245
% Exceeded7%21%
% Met+24%43%
Growth-8.2-2.9
Absence21.8%17.9%
Suspension3.1%1.6%
Scope Score
32
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,552 statewide · #8 of 9 in Morgan Hill Unified

P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy scores 32 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 21st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Morgan Hill, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 9th to the 21st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 24% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 333%21%17%18%22%
Grade 423%31%23%16%20%
Grade 529%41%30%16%23%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 330%17%20%28%31%
Grade 416%25%25%28%34%
Grade 512%19%23%12%14%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
78%
Grade 3 · 22% proficient
11%
8%
81%
Grade 4 · 19% proficient
18%
77%
Grade 5 · 23% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
7.1%
State 21.3%
14.2pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-8.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
23.9%
State 42.7%
18.7pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
21.8%
State 17.9%
3.8pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.1%
State 1.6%
1.4pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.3%
State 18.0%
6.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy in Morgan Hill, 15.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 14.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (18.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 119 students tested.

All students at this school: 24% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 24%, district —, state 43%24%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 20%, district 28%, state 32%20% · −4 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 18%, district 24%, state 32%18% · −6 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 24%, district 43%, state 44%24% · +0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 40%, state 42%23% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 11%, district 7%, state 11%11% · −13 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 15%, district 19%, state 22%15% · −9 vs school

5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 10.2pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 21.8%, district 22.0%, state 17.9%21.8% · +3.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.1%, district —, state 1.6%3.1% · +1.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (28.8% vs 18.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.5%
TK/K28.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy
32/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 22:120:1
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience7.9 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers23%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,686 – $136,327
Principal salary$165,090 – $190,116
Superintendent salary$321,636

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,010, CA average $14,815$19,010 · spent at this school
Federal share$114 per student

$114 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,433 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support10%
Student services13%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,457 per pupil
2019$11,117 per pupil
2018$11,628 per pupil
2017$9,890 per pupil
2016$9,618 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic77.2%
District 52.6% · CA 56.1%
White10.9%
District 25.0% · CA 19.9%
Other7.5%
District 12.6% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.1%
District 8.5% · CA 10.2%
Black1.4%
District 1.3% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 69.4% (6pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$163K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.24M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+46% · CA 35%
ZIP population51,943
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 12% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy a good elementary school?

P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy has a Scope Score of 32 out of 100, placing it in the 21st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,552 statewide. 7.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.2 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 23.9% of students at P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 7.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 7.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 331 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy rank in California?

P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy ranks #4,552 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 21st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy decreases by 8.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy?

21.8% of students at P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy compare to other schools in Morgan Hill?

P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy scores 32/100 (21st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 359 students. Use the schools in Morgan Hill page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy in Morgan Hill, 15.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 14.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (18.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 119 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
7.1%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 36th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-8.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 49th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
23.9%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 36th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
21.8%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 44th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.1%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 38th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 42th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3462%20%11%67%22%−22
Grade 46111%8%23%57%20%−25
Grade 5575%18%23%54%23%−25
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3484%27%25%44%31%−14
Grade 46118%16%33%33%34%−7
Grade 5582%12%28%59%14%−22
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11582%10%41%47%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11915.2%−15−23
Hispanic/Latino12918.6%−16−20
English Learners698.7%+0−2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
P. A. Walsh STEAM Academy ←327.1%23.9%−8.23.1%
Paradise Valley Engineering Academy1.7 mi5931.1%57.3%+0.41.7%
Nordstrom Elementary2 mi5327.6%55.2%−2.30.9%
El Toro Health Science Academy0.1 mi3913.4%39.1%−7.42.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019259#50225.8%23.9%14.1%0.0%-10.8pp
20223547#30179.6%25.8%33.9%1.9%+11.0pp
20233848#29598.5%22.9%33.8%4.1%+8.2pp
2024214#54965.4%19.5%27.7%4.4%-8.6pp
20253221#45527.1%23.9%21.8%3.1%-8.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 23 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female12.7%25.6%+12.9pp
Male15.5%19.2%+3.7pp
Asian7.7%0.0%-7.7pp
Hispanic/Latino14.5%23.9%+9.4pp
Students with Disabilities24.3%21.9%-2.4pp
English Learners10.3%15.1%+4.8pp
Homeless18.4%31.6%+13.2pp
Military-Connected6.8%15.4%+8.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.4%25.9%+11.5pp
All Students14.2%22.1%+7.9pp
Filipino16.7%
Two or More Races8.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction