Lewis H. Brittonhigher than 54 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Lewis H. Brittonhigher than 54 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Lewis H. Brittonhigher than 54 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Below California in English and math: 42% and 29% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 720 in English, 723 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
1 in 4 students (194 of 760) missed 10% or more of school days, about one and a half times the rate at the average Morgan Hill Unified school.2025–26
26 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?
Source
CDE chronic absenteeism file, 2025–26
Students
all students counted for chronic absence (CDE’s eligible enrollment): 760
Comparison
194 of 760. District and California figures are averages of school rates (5 Morgan Hill Unified schools; 2,531 scored California middle schools), our calculation.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have been below California in every tested year since 2017.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID42%49%
This schoolCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID29%37%
This schoolCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 46% in 2017 to 42% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Math went from 36% in 2017 to 29% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
This school
California
2017
46% 867 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
39% 827 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
41% 753 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
42% 632 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
32% 592 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
41% 602 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
43% 613 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
42% 720 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
This school
California
2017
36% 867 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
36% 826 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
37% 753 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
30% 622 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
25% 592 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
29% 603 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
33% 618 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
29% 723 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure580 students in English, 581 in math · grades 6–8 · 2025
English+3ptsCDE level: Average (3 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+6ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 3 points above that prediction, and in math 6 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
Ask: Math is lower than in 2017 here (36% to 29%), while across California it was 37% in both years. How does the school check what’s working in math?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
26 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
16in 100 at the average Morgan Hill Unified school18in 100 at the average California middle school
194 of 760 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school26 in 100
at the average Morgan Hill Unified school16 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
5.3%of students were suspended at least once (41 of 774), 2025–26
4.0%at the average Morgan Hill Unified school3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
26
63 of 238
Grades 7–8
25
131 of 522
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Lewis H. Britton works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Lewis H. Britton. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
362 tested per subject
English
30% / 39%
Math
18% / 26%
Hispanic or Latino
437 English · 436 math tested
English
32% / 39%
Math
19% / 25%
White
155 English · 156 math tested
English
53% / 62%
Math
44% / 50%
Two or more races
63 English · 62 math tested
English
60% / 62%
Math
39% / 50%
Asian
47 English · 48 math tested
English
77% / 75%
Math
63% / 71%
English learners
84 English · 86 math tested
English
6% / 7%
Math
2% / 7%
Students with disabilities
111 English · 110 math tested
English
10% / 14%
Math
8% / 10%
Homeless
52 tested per subject · grades 7 and 8
English
31% / 28%
Math
16% / 17%
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students did worse than the same groups statewide. White students did worse than the same group statewide in English.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Morgan Hill Unified
vs California
Low-income · 362 tested
English
30%
+129%
−939%
Math
18%
−220%
−826%
Hispanic or Latino · 437 tested in English, 436 in math
English
32%
032%
−739%
Math
19%
−120%
−625%
White · 155 tested in English, 156 in math
English
53%
−861%
−962%
Math
44%
−650%
−650%
Two or more races · 63 tested in English, 62 in math
English
60%
−666%
−262%
Math
39%
−746%
−1150%
Asian · 47 tested in English, 48 in math
English
77%
+869%
+275%
Math
63%
−467%
−871%
English learners · 84 tested in English, 86 in math
English
6%
+15%
−17%
Math
2%
−24%
−57%
Students with disabilities · 111 tested in English, 110 in math
English
10%
−313%
−414%
Math
8%
−311%
−210%
Homeless · 52 tested · grades 7 and 8 only
English
31%
+130%
+328%
Math
16%
−117%
−117%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Morgan Hill Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino60%
2White22%
3Asian6%
4Two or more races5%
5Not reported4%
6Filipino1%
7Black or African American—
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share2%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
60%
White
22%
Asian
6%
Two or more races
5%
Not reported
4%
Filipino
1%
Black or African American
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About half students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (45%, 287 of 637). California: 63%.
88% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 88.30%: 22.7 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 25.7 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
57%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school57%
Morgan Hill Unified48%
California47%
48 of 84 English learners here; 440 of 910 in Morgan Hill Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
21% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
The road from this school ends at Live Oak High. UC records 22 enrollees from Live Oak High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 22 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Live Oak High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 75% of Live Oak High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
For 2025–26, the state put Lewis H. Britton Middle in targeted support (TSI), because a student group is behind: students of two or more races.
Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source ↗
Common questions
Is Lewis H. Britton Middle a good middle school?
Lewis H. Britton Middle is in the 54th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 40 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Lewis H. Britton Middle was below California in English and math: 42% and 29% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Lewis H. Britton Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 42% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 29% the math standard; 13% and 14% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 720 students were tested in English and 723 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Lewis H. Britton Middle rank in California?
Lewis H. Britton Middle is in the 54th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Solid, 2026). Lewis H. Britton Middle ranks #1,154 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Lewis H. Britton Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Lewis H. Britton Middle's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 82nd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Lewis H. Britton Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 25.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 194 chronically absent of 760 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 5.3%; 41 unduplicated suspended students of 774 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Lewis H. Britton Middle compare to other schools in Morgan Hill?
Lewis H. Britton Middle is in the 54th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 637 students. Use the schools in Morgan Hill page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Lewis H. Britton Middle?
At Lewis H. Britton Middle in Morgan Hill, 30% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 29% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 1 point above the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 18% in math; Hispanic students, 32% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 362 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Lewis H. Britton Middle feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Lewis H. Britton Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Live Oak High. Live Oak High is in the 47th percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↓ vs CA 17.7% · index 46 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 40.6% · index 46 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↑ vs CA average · ≈82nd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↓ vs CA 17.8% · index 40 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.4pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 44 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.8pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
231
12%
28%
18%
42%
40%
48%
−8
Grade 7
226
9%
31%
28%
32%
40%
51%
−11
Grade 8
263
18%
27%
26%
29%
45%
49%
−4
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
233
12%
13%
27%
48%
25%
37%
−12
Grade 7
227
10%
18%
30%
42%
28%
38%
−10
Grade 8
263
20%
15%
21%
44%
35%
36%
−1
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
197
31.5%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
236
48.7%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
180
49.4%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
201
26.4%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
236
37.7%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
181
34.8%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
212
40.1%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
184
38.6%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
206
42.7%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
213
27.2%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
185
31.4%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
205
29.3%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
170
26.5%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
196
37.2%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
226
32.7%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
170
19.4%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
196
29.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
226
26.1%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
177
38.4%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
214
43.0%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
241
43.6%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
177
29.4%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
209
34.0%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
236
26.3%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
235
39.6%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
243
40.3%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
275
42.5%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
237
35.0%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
242
35.5%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
274
39.4%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
243
39.9%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
276
36.6%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
308
39.9%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
245
34.3%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
276
35.1%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
305
37.4%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
262
45.8%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
306
43.5%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
299
49.2%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
261
37.5%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
305
33.1%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
301
37.9%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
288
43%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
314
44%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
288
39%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
315
37%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
310
39%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
292
46%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
309
39%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
292
42%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
260
16%
18%
53%
13%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
362
30%
+1
−9
Hispanic/Latino
437
32%
−0
−8
White
155
53%
−8
−9
03Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Scroll for more columns →
School
Dist
Scope · percentile · band
Advanced
Proficient or Advanced
Grade gap
Cohort growth
Susp
Lewis H. Britton Middle ←
—
4054th percentile · Solid · statewide · 2026
14%
35%
+7.2pp
+57 pts
5.3%
Average California middle school
—
40School average · no percentile
18%
41%
+3.0pp
—
3.8%
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
15.2%
10.5%
+3.7pp
2022
—
—
—
27.8%
11.7%
+1.0pp
2023
—
—
—
20.7%
14.4%
+6.5pp
2024
—
—
—
21.0%
5.5%
+2.3pp
2025
—
—
—
25.7%
7.0%
+13.2pp
2026
40
54
#1154
25.4%
5.3%
+7.2pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
15.4%
26.8%
+11.4pp
Male
15.2%
24.4%
+9.2pp
Asian
3.8%
4.3%
+0.5pp
Filipino
7.1%
0.0%
-7.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
16.2%
31.6%
+15.4pp
White
16.7%
19.5%
+2.8pp
Students with Disabilities
22.8%
33.6%
+10.8pp
English Learners
19.1%
28.9%
+9.8pp
Homeless
25.0%
35.8%
+10.8pp
Military-Connected
13.3%
21.4%
+8.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
18.7%
32.5%
+13.8pp
All Students
15.3%
25.5%
+10.2pp
Two or More Races
21.4%
11.1%
-10.3pp
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+3
580
Average
+6
581
Accelerated
English Only
+2
391
not categorised
+6
392
not categorised
Hispanic or Latino
+1
358
Average
+1
358
Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
0
281
Average
+2
282
Average
English Learner
+3
146
Average
+2
145
Average
White
+6
127
Accelerated
+18
127
Accelerated
English Learners Only
−1
80
not categorised
−1
79
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
−4
77
Average
+8
76
Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+1
66
not categorised
+3
66
not categorised
Homeless Youth
−6
62
Moderate
−2
60
Average
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
+13
61
Accelerated
−1
59
Average
Asian
+3
33
Average
+9
34
Accelerated
Two or More Races
−4
20
Average
−4
20
Average
Filipino
−5
11
Average
+10
11
Accelerated
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
13%
exceeded standard · 40% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 212 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
18%
exceeded standard · 45% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 263 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 213 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
580 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +3 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 56th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.56th pctile · +3 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
581 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 65th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.65th pctile · +6 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$11,457 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 8,245 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$59 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 637
Central federal expenditures attributed here$445 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 637
District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,433 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95037+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95037
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$163,182
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
45.77%
ZCTA population
51,943
Median age
39.2 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95037 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.