Lewis H. Britton Middle: The score is middle of the pack. The trajectory isn't.
Lewis H. Britton sits mid-pack on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the same students across grades.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 44 | 15% | 38% | Strong · p94 | 25.7% | 7.0% |
| CA average · Middle School | 38 | 17% | 39% | Average · p50 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Lewis H. Britton Middle scores 44 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 70th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “38% proficient” and call it done. Lewis H. Britton deserves a closer read. The school sits in Morgan Hill, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +13.2pp separates this year's grade 6 from its grade 8. The state average rises 0.1pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G6 → 2025 G8 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 45th to the 70th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 middle schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 38% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 40% | 38% | 26% | 40% | 31% |
| Grade 7 | 40% | 43% | 37% | 39% | 49% |
| Grade 8 | 43% | 44% | 33% | 43% | 49% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 35% | 29% | 19% | 27% | 26% |
| Grade 7 | 36% | 34% | 29% | 31% | 38% |
| Grade 8 | 39% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 35% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 4.2pp across grades; the floor rises 18.0pp. The state average rises 0.1pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
California's own answer to the same question
California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and here the two measures disagree. Ours puts this school around the 94th percentile of California middle schools; the state's puts it around the 61st in reading and math together — a harder read than ours. We are not going to pretend one of those is the answer. Neither measure sees an individual child's classroom, and a disagreement this size is worth asking the principal about directly.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Lewis H. Britton Middle in Morgan Hill, 28.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lewis H. Britton Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 1.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 294 students tested.
6 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 14.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +5.7pp.
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
— 2 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The road from this school ends at Live Oak High, which sent 22 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 22 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Live Oak High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 75% of Live Oak High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$59 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 39% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lewis H. Britton Middle a good middle school?
What are Lewis H. Britton Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Lewis H. Britton Middle rank in California?
Is Lewis H. Britton Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Lewis H. Britton Middle?
How does Lewis H. Britton Middle compare to other schools in Morgan Hill?
How does Lewis H. Britton Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 197 | 9% | 22% | 26% | 42% | 31% | −15 |
| Grade 7 | 236 | 16% | 33% | 24% | 28% | 49% | +1 |
| Grade 8 | 180 | 13% | 36% | 24% | 27% | 49% | +3 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 201 | 10% | 16% | 26% | 48% | 26% | −8 |
| Grade 7 | 236 | 18% | 19% | 22% | 40% | 38% | +4 |
| Grade 8 | 181 | 20% | 15% | 25% | 40% | 35% | +3 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 181 | 12% | 27% | 51% | 11% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 294 | 28.6% | −1 | −10 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 375 | 34.4% | +0 | −4 |
| White | 135 | 57.0% | −6 | −5 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis H. Britton Middle ← | — | 44 | 14.5% | 38.1% | +13.2pp | +67 pts | 7.0% |
| California average | — | 38 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5pp | — | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 33 | 45 | #1104 | 14.4% | 38.7% | 15.2% | 10.5% | +3.7pp |
| 2022 | 32 | 50 | #1084 | 13.7% | 35.8% | 27.8% | 11.7% | +1.0pp |
| 2023 | 25 | 38 | #1360 | 10.0% | 28.5% | 20.7% | 14.3% | +6.5pp |
| 2024 | 35 | 51 | #1091 | 12.7% | 34.9% | 21.0% | 5.5% | +2.3pp |
| 2025 | 44 | 70 | #679 | 14.5% | 38.1% | 25.7% | 7.0% | +13.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 15.4% | 27.1% | +11.7pp |
| Male | 15.2% | 24.9% | +9.7pp |
| Asian | 3.8% | 15.8% | +12.0pp |
| White | 7.1% | 0.0% | -7.1pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 16.2% | 30.2% | +14.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 21.4% | 25.0% | +3.6pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 22.8% | 34.4% | +11.6pp |
| English Learners | 19.1% | 31.4% | +12.3pp |
| Homeless | 25.0% | 38.2% | +13.2pp |
| Military-Connected | 13.3% | 17.6% | +4.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 18.7% | 31.9% | +13.2pp |
| All Students | 15.3% | 25.9% | +10.6pp |
| Filipino | — | 18.2% | — |
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +3 | 580 | Average | +6 | 581 | Accelerated |
| English Only | +2 | 391 | not categorised | +6 | 392 | not categorised |
| Hispanic or Latino | +1 | 358 | Average | +1 | 358 | Average |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0 | 281 | Average | +2 | 282 | Average |
| English Learner | +3 | 146 | Average | +2 | 145 | Average |
| White | +6 | 127 | Accelerated | +18 | 127 | Accelerated |
| English Learners Only | −1 | 80 | not categorised | −1 | 79 | not categorised |
| Students with Disabilities | −4 | 77 | Average | +8 | 76 | Accelerated |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | +1 | 66 | not categorised | +3 | 66 | not categorised |
| Homeless Youth | −6 | 62 | Moderate | −2 | 60 | Average |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | +13 | 61 | Accelerated | −1 | 59 | Average |
| Asian | +3 | 33 | Average | +9 | 34 | Accelerated |
| Two or More Races | −4 | 20 | Average | −4 | 20 | Average |
| Filipino | −5 | 11 | Average | +10 | 11 | Accelerated |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/lewis-h-britton-middle-5384"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Lewis H. Britton Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction