ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
McFadden Institute of Technology · Santa Ana

McFadden Institute of Technology: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

McFadden Institute of Technology posts low test scores — and the same students gain more here than at most schools between grade 3 and grade 5. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

2701 South Raitt, 92704 (opens in new tab)·Santa Ana Unified·Santa Ana·Grades TK-8·1,074 students·90% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 435-3700
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3345
% Exceeded3%21%
% Met+14%43%
Growth+11.8-2.9
Absence19.6%17.9%
Suspension2.8%1.6%
Scope Score
33
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #4,391 statewide · #28 of 38 in Santa Ana Unified

McFadden Institute of Technology scores 33 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 24th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “14% proficient” and call it done. McFadden Institute of Technology deserves a closer read. The school sits in Santa Ana, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 24th percentile since 2022.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 321%21%3%5%
Grade 425%13%20%5%
Grade 523%21%13%31%
Grade 620%23%15%21%22%
Grade 723%23%25%24%33%
Grade 820%16%15%19%30%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 322%18%19%18%
Grade 422%13%13%10%
Grade 53%15%9%16%
Grade 615%15%12%20%20%
Grade 725%15%20%22%19%
Grade 828%12%11%18%22%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

94%
Grade 3 · 6% proficient
95%
Grade 4 · 5% proficient
29%
69%
Grade 5 · 31% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
2.8%
State 21.3%
18.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+11.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
14.2%
State 42.7%
28.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
19.6%
State 17.9%
1.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
2.8%
State 1.6%
1.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
12.0%
State 18.0%
6.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At McFadden Institute of Technology in Santa Ana, 25.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. McFadden Institute of Technology trails its district average for low-income students by 5.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (17.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 801 students tested.

All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 43%23%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 22%, district 26%, state 32%22% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 26%, state 32%22% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 27%, state 42%23% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 23%, district 28%, state 44%23% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 4%, district 6%, state 11%4% · −19 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 20%, district 21%, state 22%20% · −3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 6%, district 7%, state 15%6% · −17 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 0%, district 27%, state 46%0% · −23 vs school

8 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.6%, district 18.6%, state 17.9%19.6% · +1.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.8%, district —, state 1.6%2.8% · +1.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (37.5% vs 16.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.9%
Grades 7–820.4%
TK/K37.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff67 teachers
Avg. experience16.5 years
Fully credentialed84%
First-year teachers4%
Intern / emergency permit0.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$70,919 – $138,788
Principal salary$185,651 – $212,659
Superintendent salary$375,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $30,673, CA average $14,815$30,673 · spent at this school
Federal share$700 per student

$700 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,941 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support14%
Student services11%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,998 per pupil
2019$15,219 per pupil
2018$14,679 per pupil
2017$12,971 per pupil
2016$12,258 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic94.4%
District 95.9% · CA 56.1%
Asian2.1%
District 1.8% · CA 10.2%
White1.5%
District 0.9% · CA 19.9%
Other1.2%
District 1.1% · CA 9.0%
Black0.7%
District 0.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 90.2% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$100K · CA $85K
Median home value$700K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+21% · CA 35%
ZIP population82,120
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,074 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 16% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is McFadden Institute of Technology a good elementary school?

McFadden Institute of Technology has a Scope Score of 33 out of 100, placing it in the 24th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,391 statewide. 2.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 18.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are McFadden Institute of Technology's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 14.2% of students at McFadden Institute of Technology met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 2.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 11.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 2.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 247 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does McFadden Institute of Technology rank in California?

McFadden Institute of Technology ranks #4,391 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 24th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is McFadden Institute of Technology getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at McFadden Institute of Technology increases by 11.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at McFadden Institute of Technology?

19.6% of students at McFadden Institute of Technology are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does McFadden Institute of Technology compare to other schools in Santa Ana?

McFadden Institute of Technology scores 33/100 (24th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,074 students. Use the schools in Santa Ana page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does McFadden Institute of Technology serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At McFadden Institute of Technology in Santa Ana, 25.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. McFadden Institute of Technology trails its district average for low-income students by 5.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (17.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 18.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 801 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
2.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 32th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+11.8pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 62th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
14.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 28th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
19.6%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.8%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 41th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
12.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 43th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3393%3%18%77%5%−38
Grade 4390%5%18%77%5%−40
Grade 5452%29%18%51%31%−17
Grade 62213%19%32%46%22%−24
Grade 72727%26%28%40%33%−15
Grade 82666%24%30%39%30%−16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3395%13%15%67%18%−28
Grade 4400%10%35%55%10%−32
Grade 5457%9%18%67%16%−20
Grade 62236%14%30%50%20%−15
Grade 72785%13%30%51%19%−15
Grade 82728%14%23%55%22%−10
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/113143%14%61%23%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged80125.6%−6−13
Hispanic/Latino82525.3%−7−14
English Learners3123.2%−3−7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
McFadden Institute of Technology ←332.8%14.2%+11.82.8%
California Elementary2.3 mi6136.1%66.5%−3.50.6%
Adams Elementary3.2 mi5928.0%57.1%−5.40.7%
Mamie L. Northcutt Elementary2 mi5118.4%46.6%+2.81.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20222520#46074.2%19.4%34.0%3.4%-9.0pp
20233437#35924.1%16.5%21.7%4.1%-1.4pp
2024248#52821.3%12.8%18.6%1.9%-0.4pp
20253324#43912.8%14.2%19.6%2.8%+11.8pp
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 13 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.6%20.3%+13.7pp
Male9.8%19.3%+9.5pp
Asian6.5%0.0%-6.5pp
Black/African American12.5%35.7%+23.2pp
Hispanic/Latino8.2%20.1%+11.9pp
Students with Disabilities12.5%30.6%+18.1pp
English Learners8.8%20.3%+11.5pp
Foster Youth10.0%40.0%+30.0pp
Homeless7.2%25.5%+18.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7.9%20.4%+12.5pp
All Students8.3%19.8%+11.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction