ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Judson & Brown Elementary · Redlands

Judson & Brown Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Judson & Brown posts 49% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

1401 East Pennsylvania Avenue, 92374 (opens in new tab)·Redlands Unified·Redlands·Grades TK-5·484 students·51% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(909) 307-2430·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4645
% Exceeded24%21%
% Met+49%43%
Growth-14.7-2.9
Absence14.9%17.9%
Suspension0.7%1.6%
Scope Score
46
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #2,378 statewide · #8 of 16 in Redlands Unified

Judson & Brown Elementary scores 46 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 59th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “49% proficient” and call it done. Judson & Brown deserves a closer read. The school sits in Redlands, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 72nd to the 59th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 49% meet the standard today, versus 55% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 359%58%47%55%56%
Grade 457%36%58%52%56%
Grade 557%54%39%66%45%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 360%51%51%57%57%
Grade 446%37%43%41%40%
Grade 551%36%28%45%38%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

33%
23%
44%
Grade 3 · 56% proficient
29%
27%
44%
Grade 4 · 56% proficient
24%
21%
55%
Grade 5 · 45% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 8.7pp across grades; the floor slips 10.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
23.6%
State 21.3%
2.3pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-14.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
48.5%
State 42.7%
5.9pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.9%
State 17.9%
3.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.7%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
15.8%
State 18.0%
2.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Judson & Brown Elementary in Redlands, 38.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Judson & Brown Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 3.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 15.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 108 students tested.

All students at this school: 49% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 49%, district —, state 43%49%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 44%, district 35%, state 32%44% · −5 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 37%, district 35%, state 32%37% · −12 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 47%, district 45%, state 44%47% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 51%, district 43%, state 42%51% · +2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 43%, district 58%, state 56%43% · −6 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 25%, district 13%, state 15%25% · −24 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 55%, district 69%, state 72%55% · +6 vs school

6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 13.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.9%, district 22.1%, state 17.9%14.9% · −3.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.7%, district —, state 1.6%0.7% · −1.0pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (19.0% vs 9.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–69.8%
TK/K19.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff24 teachers
Avg. experience17.7 years
Fully credentialed99%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$64,599 – $135,595
Principal salary$155,150 – $180,671
Superintendent salary$338,978

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,220, CA average $14,815$18,220 · spent at this school
Federal share$304 per student

$304 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,828 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support13%
Student services11%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,906 per pupil
2019$12,721 per pupil
2018$11,919 per pupil
2017$10,625 per pupil
2016$10,377 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic56.0%
District 56.7% · CA 56.1%
White22.1%
District 20.3% · CA 19.9%
Other9.5%
District 9.4% · CA 9.0%
Asian8.1%
District 7.7% · CA 10.2%
Black4.3%
District 5.9% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 50.6% (13pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$103K · CA $85K
Median home value$552K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+35% · CA 35%
ZIP population45,262
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 38% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Judson & Brown Elementary a good elementary school?

Judson & Brown Elementary has a Scope Score of 46 out of 100, placing it in the 59th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,378 statewide. 23.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Judson & Brown Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 48.5% of students at Judson & Brown Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 23.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 23.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 416 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Judson & Brown Elementary rank in California?

Judson & Brown Elementary ranks #2,378 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 59th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Judson & Brown Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Judson & Brown Elementary decreases by 14.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Judson & Brown Elementary?

14.9% of students at Judson & Brown Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Judson & Brown Elementary compare to other schools in Redlands?

Judson & Brown Elementary scores 46/100 (59th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 484 students. Use the schools in Redlands page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Judson & Brown Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Judson & Brown Elementary in Redlands, 38.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Judson & Brown Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 3.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 15.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 108 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
23.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 52th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-14.7pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 44th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
48.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 54th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 55th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.7%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
15.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 48th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37933%23%25%19%56%+12
Grade 46329%27%13%32%56%+11
Grade 56624%21%23%32%45%−2
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37927%30%25%18%57%+11
Grade 46313%27%37%24%40%−2
Grade 56617%21%23%39%38%+3
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/116612%26%48%14%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10838.0%−3−0
Hispanic/Latino11747.0%+5+8
White4346.5%−18−15
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Judson & Brown Elementary ←4623.6%48.5%−14.70.7%
Kimberly Elementary2.8 mi5936.1%57.3%−3.90.5%
Highland Grove Elementary3.1 mi5324.9%52.9%+1.21.9%
McKinley Elementary2.4 mi5218.4%43.7%+10.10.2%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195372#156930.4%54.9%3.3%0.5%-5.7pp
20223958#239322.4%45.3%14.9%0.2%-9.4pp
20234052#274022.6%44.4%14.9%0.0%-16.2pp
20245475#141026.1%52.6%14.2%0.5%-0.3pp
20254659#237823.6%48.5%14.9%0.7%-14.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female2.9%16.1%+13.2pp
Male3.5%13.4%+9.9pp
Asian0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Black/African American3.7%21.4%+17.7pp
White0.0%
Hispanic/Latino5.7%17.9%+12.2pp
Two or More Races3.1%13.3%+10.2pp
Students with Disabilities4.9%29.7%+24.8pp
English Learners0.0%3.8%+3.8pp
Homeless7.7%23.5%+15.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5.4%20.7%+15.3pp
All Students3.2%14.7%+11.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction