Hoover (Herbert) Middle: 55% of kids clear the bar — ahead of the state's 39%. But the zoned next school scores lower.
Hoover (Herbert) holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 53 | 25% | 55% | +2.1 | 11.6% | 3.8% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Hoover (Herbert) Middle scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 76th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “55% proficient” and call it done. Hoover (Herbert) deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Francisco, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Hoover (Herbert)'s low-income kids hit 48.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 76th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 55% meet the standard today, versus 60% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 59% | 47% | 49% | 52% | 59% |
| Grade 7 | 65% | 64% | 56% | 61% | 57% |
| Grade 8 | 60% | 60% | 64% | 58% | 60% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 52% | 47% | 45% | 44% | 48% |
| Grade 7 | 61% | 50% | 52% | 53% | 51% |
| Grade 8 | 60% | 55% | 50% | 47% | 51% |
The story this school is actually telling
of students met or exceeded the standard, versus 39.3% statewide.
the zoned path continues to Marshall (Thurgood) High, which scores 30 points lower — a school visit will tell you more than this number.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Hoover (Herbert)'s most underrated number
48.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Hoover (Herbert) Middle in San Francisco, 48.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hoover (Herbert) Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (41.1% Math proficient); Asian students (68.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 55.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 548 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.2pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The zoned path continues to Marshall (Thurgood) High, which scores 30 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for high school.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$124 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 41% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoover (Herbert) Middle a good middle school?
What are Hoover (Herbert) Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Hoover (Herbert) Middle rank in California?
Is Hoover (Herbert) Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Hoover (Herbert) Middle?
How does Hoover (Herbert) Middle compare to other schools in San Francisco?
How does Hoover (Herbert) Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 65
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 330 | 20% | 39% | 18% | 23% | 59% | +13 |
| Grade 7 | 319 | 19% | 38% | 22% | 20% | 57% | +10 |
| Grade 8 | 303 | 21% | 40% | 22% | 18% | 60% | +14 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 330 | 28% | 20% | 28% | 23% | 48% | +13 |
| Grade 7 | 321 | 31% | 20% | 24% | 24% | 51% | +17 |
| Grade 8 | 304 | 33% | 18% | 18% | 31% | 51% | +19 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 301 | 12% | 29% | 53% | 6% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 548 | 48.4% | +10 | +10 |
| Asian | 511 | 68.3% | −2 | −6 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 279 | 37.6% | +12 | −1 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoover (Herbert) Middle ← | — | 53 | 25.4% | 54.6% | +2.1 | 3.8% |
| Roosevelt Middle | 2.6 mi | 66 | 40.4% | 71.0% | −6.4 | 1.1% |
| Presidio Middle | 2.7 mi | 65 | 34.3% | 63.2% | −5.7 | 2.5% |
| Giannini (A.P.) Middle | 1.5 mi | 65 | 39.2% | 71.0% | +0.8 | 0.4% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 57 | 84 | #324 | 30.8% | 59.6% | 5.5% | 5.2% | +4.9pp |
| 2022 | 57 | 86 | #312 | 24.6% | 53.9% | 17.2% | 3.6% | +10.2pp |
| 2023 | 59 | 84 | #355 | 24.3% | 52.6% | 16.4% | 7.6% | +9.7pp |
| 2024 | 54 | 81 | #420 | 24.7% | 52.7% | 11.6% | 4.6% | +4.7pp |
| 2025 | 53 | 76 | #530 | 25.4% | 54.6% | 11.6% | 3.8% | +2.1pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5.6% | 11.4% | +5.8pp |
| Male | 5.4% | 11.7% | +6.3pp |
| Asian | 0.2% | 2.9% | +2.7pp |
| Black/African American | 40.9% | 60.9% | +20.0pp |
| Filipino | 20.0% | 29.4% | +9.4pp |
| White | 4.3% | 5.3% | +1.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.4% | 20.1% | +8.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 4.3% | 10.4% | +6.1pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 13.7% | 28.3% | +14.6pp |
| English Learners | 6.8% | 16.2% | +9.4pp |
| Homeless | 30.4% | 21.2% | -9.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 6.1% | 14.0% | +7.9pp |
| All Students | 5.5% | 11.5% | +6.0pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction