Greenfield High: Three in four leave college-ready. But suspensions run 3× the state rate.
Greenfield has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 48 | 11% | 30% | 94.2% | 77.9% | 13.7% | 10.0% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Greenfield High scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 59th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “30% proficient” and call it done. Greenfield deserves a closer read. The school sits in Greenfield, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Greenfield's low-income kids hit 49.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 59th percentile since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 30% of students meet the standard today, above the 26% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 40% | 49% | 53% | 50% | 51% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 13% | 12% | 11% | 13% | 9% |
The story this school is actually telling
of students leave measurably college-ready, versus 35.4% statewide.
of students were suspended, versus 3.6% statewide — a school visit will tell you more than this number.
Of 100 students here: 30 are proficient by 11th grade → 94 graduate → 78 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
Greenfield's most underrated number
49.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask about the discipline philosophy and what a typical suspension is for. Numbers can't tell you whether a campus feels strict or chaotic — a visit can.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Greenfield High in Greenfield, 49.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 52.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Greenfield High trails its district average for low-income students by 3.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (8.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (49.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 50.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 253 students tested.
Showing up, and staying in class
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$9,250 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 21% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Greenfield High a good high school?
What are Greenfield High's CAASPP test scores?
How does Greenfield High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Greenfield High?
How does Greenfield High compare to other schools in Greenfield?
How does Greenfield High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 297 | 18% | 33% | 24% | 26% | 51% | +3 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 308 | 4% | 5% | 21% | 70% | 9% | −15 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 310 | 3% | 18% | 65% | 13% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 253 | 49.4% | −3 | +11 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 292 | 49.7% | −3 | +11 |
| English Learners | 32 | 6.3% | −2 | −4 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenfield High ← | — | 48 | 10.7% | 29.6% | — | 10.0% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 47 | 52 | #987 | 6.1% | 26.3% | 17.6% | 18.8% | — |
| 2022 | 50 | 68 | #681 | 9.1% | 30.2% | 23.9% | 5.5% | — |
| 2023 | 50 | 67 | #713 | 9.2% | 32.1% | 18.3% | 9.2% | — |
| 2024 | 51 | 69 | #661 | 12.4% | 31.5% | 23.0% | 5.5% | — |
| 2025 | 48 | 59 | #875 | 10.7% | 29.6% | 13.7% | 10.0% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 17.5% | 11.6% | -5.9pp |
| Male | 16.7% | 13.9% | -2.8pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 17.0% | 12.5% | -4.5pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 24.8% | 18.8% | -6.0pp |
| English Learners | 19.5% | 16.3% | -3.2pp |
| Homeless | 27.1% | 17.9% | -9.2pp |
| Military-Connected | 16.5% | 5.4% | -11.1pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 17.8% | 13.4% | -4.4pp |
| All Students | 17.1% | 12.8% | -4.3pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction