Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 11Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
65%
Proficient
28%
Below Proficient
7%
93% proficient or advanced · 114 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Los Angeles Unified
Advanced
65%
16%
14%
Proficient
28%
16%
17%
Developing
7%
20%
22%
Minimal
0%
48%
47%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Grade 11 tests are one part of the picture. Graduation, preparation and college destinations answer different questions below.
Ask: How do you help students strengthen their skills while keeping graduation and post-school plans on track?
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grade 11Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school100%
California57%
Tested: 114 here · 414,559 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school100%
Los Angeles Unified59%
Tested: 114 here · 34,143 in Los Angeles Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 235 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Los Angeles Unified
Advanced
88%
27%
26%
Proficient
12%
30%
33%
Developing
0%
21%
21%
Minimal
0%
22%
20%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grade 11Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school93%
California32%
Tested: 114 here · 413,523 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school93%
Los Angeles Unified31%
Tested: 114 here · 34,113 in Los Angeles Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 234 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Los Angeles Unified
Advanced
65%
16%
14%
Proficient
28%
16%
17%
Developing
7%
20%
22%
Minimal
0%
48%
47%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grade 11
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID100%57%
This schoolCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grade 11
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID93%32%
This schoolCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
2026 was the highest year in this series in both subjects. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grade 11
Year
This school
California
2015
92% 97 tested
56% 420,327 tested
2016
93% 116 tested
59% 434,097 tested
2017
94% 89 tested
60% 444,040 tested
2018
93% 122 tested
56% 439,134 tested
2019
96% 102 tested
57% 439,947 tested
2022
98% 124 tested
55% 427,007 tested
2023
97% 99 tested
55% 442,128 tested
2024
98% 113 tested
56% 435,296 tested
2025
98% 108 tested
57% 432,651 tested
2026
100% 114 tested
57% 414,559 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grade 11
Year
This school
California
2015
66% 93 tested
30% 418,491 tested
2016
81% 116 tested
32% 432,383 tested
2017
83% 89 tested
32% 442,457 tested
2018
77% 122 tested
31% 437,883 tested
2019
85% 102 tested
32% 438,107 tested
2022
79% 121 tested
27% 424,390 tested
2023
82% 99 tested
27% 440,912 tested
2024
90% 113 tested
28% 434,711 tested
2025
79% 108 tested
30% 431,903 tested
2026
93% 114 tested
32% 413,523 tested
School pattern, spring 2025High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2025Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
After graduation
Do students finish prepared, and where do they go?
Preparation · separate measures and cohorts
College / career Prepared
99%
Across California: 52%
2024–25 · Students in the CDE College/Career Indicator cohort
Source and definition
California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator overall Prepared. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate.
Completed UC/CSU courses
100%
Average California high school: 56%
2024–25 · High-school graduates completing A–G
Source and definition
California Department of Education, A–G completion records. Course completion is separate from college enrollment.
Destinations · class of 2023
Where graduates went
94% enrolled in college within 12 months · 125 high-school completers
University of California40 · 32%
California State University55 · 44%
California community college5 · 4%
In-state private2 · 2%
Out-of-state, 4-year16 · 13%
Out-of-state, 2-year0 · 0%
Not enrolled7 · 6%
Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: count ÷ completers. A dash is unavailable, not zero. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.
One destination in detail
University of California
UC fall 2025 entry · matched school records · counts, not a school rating
UC reports fall first-year applicants, admits and enrollees separately. These records do not establish the school’s effect on admission. “+” is a partial SchoolScope sum across linked codes; missing contributions may be zero. A reported zero remains zero. Never assume zero or a positive hidden value for missing or masked counts.
Fall 2025Applied 101 · Admitted 85 · Enrolled 42
Fall 2024Applied 94 · Admitted 81 · Enrolled 35
Fall 2023Applied 114 · Admitted 86 · Enrolled 43
Fall 2022Applied 102 · Admitted 77 · Enrolled 28
Fall 2021Applied 114 · Admitted 83 · Enrolled 39
Fall 2020Applied 91 · Admitted 67 · Enrolled 33
Fall 2019Applied 106 · Admitted 59 · Enrolled 33
Fall 2018Applied 75 · Admitted 61 · Enrolled 43
Fall 2017Applied 88 · Admitted 55 · Enrolled 32
Fall 2016Applied 63 · Admitted 37 · Enrolled 19
Fall 2015Applied 62 · Admitted 39 · Enrolled 21
Fall 2014Applied 71 · Admitted 43 · Enrolled 21
Fall 2013Applied 64 · Admitted 52 · Enrolled 26
Fall 2012Applied 55 · Admitted 44 · Enrolled 21
Fall 2011Applied 42 · Admitted 36 · Enrolled 25
Fall 2010Applied 34 · Admitted 23 · Enrolled 12
Fall 2009Applied 40 · Admitted 29 · Enrolled 14
Fall 2008Applied 29 · Admitted 21 · Enrolled 10
Fall 2007Applied 19 · Admitted 14 · Enrolled 10
Fall 2006Applied 14 · Admitted 8 · Enrolled 5
Campus records · fall 2025
BerkeleyApplied 53 · Admitted 9 · Enrolled 3
DavisApplied 49 · Admitted 31 · Enrolled 7
IrvineApplied 85 · Admitted 23 · Enrolled 12
Los AngelesApplied 69 · Admitted 6 · Enrolled 4
MercedApplied 46 · Admitted 43 · Enrolled Masked
RiversideApplied 66 · Admitted 62 · Enrolled 8
San DiegoApplied 76 · Admitted 5 · Enrolled Masked
Santa BarbaraApplied 56 · Admitted 21 · Enrolled 5
Santa CruzApplied 22 · Admitted 20 · Enrolled Masked
Do not add campus application or admission counts: a student may appear at multiple campuses.
Federal Civil Rights Data Collection historical snapshot, not confirmation of current availability.
Ask before choosing courses
Which courses will run when my child attends, what prerequisites apply, and how do students get support entering advanced or career pathways?
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
4 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
28in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified school22in 100 at the average California high school
19 of 461 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school4 in 100
at the average Los Angeles Unified school28 in 100
at the average California high school22 in 100
0of 462 students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
0.7%at the average Los Angeles Unified school2.9%at the average California high school
School Experience Survey, 2025–26
What students and families say
How students, families and staff at Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation answered LAUSD’s 2025–26 School Experience Survey, beside the same questions across LAUSD schools at the same level.
This schoolLAUSD, same levelEach track 0–100%
Students
457 of 457 students answered (100%).
Safety18 points above LAUSD“I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.83%LAUSD 65%1 question
One question, 457 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions83%LAUSD 65%457 answered
Belonging10 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.71%LAUSD 61%6 questions
Average of 6 questions, 453–457 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learn74%LAUSD 65%453 answered
I am happy to be at this school66%LAUSD 64%455 answered
I feel like I am part of this school64%LAUSD 59%454 answered
I feel accepted for who I am at this school72%LAUSD 66%453 answered
Most kids at this school are kind to each other70%LAUSD 46%457 answered
LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer) students at this school are accepted80%LAUSD 63%453 answered
Caring adults9 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.70%LAUSD 61%8 questions
Average of 8 questions, 448–457 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Teachers go out of their way to help students69%LAUSD 62%451 answered
The teachers at this school treat students fairly64%LAUSD 60%455 answered
Teachers care if I'm absent from school68%LAUSD 54%454 answered
Adults at this school treat all students with respect70%LAUSD 59%457 answered
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering me64%LAUSD 59%453 answered
There is at least one adult at my school who supports me79%LAUSD 68%452 answered
Teachers at my school know me68%LAUSD 61%448 answered
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help me78%LAUSD 66%454 answered
Engagement9 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.70%LAUSD 61%6 questions
Average of 6 questions, 452–455 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activities82%LAUSD 73%452 answered
My teachers make learning fun53%LAUSD 48%453 answered
Students have a voice in decision making at this school56%LAUSD 53%455 answered
Teachers encourage students to make decisions71%LAUSD 64%452 answered
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of class82%LAUSD 74%453 answered
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activities75%LAUSD 53%454 answered
High expectations12 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.80%LAUSD 68%3 questions
Average of 3 questions, 452–453 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work better79%LAUSD 71%453 answered
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I choose83%LAUSD 70%453 answered
Adults at this school have helped me learn the details of getting into college (completing applications, financial aid, etc)80%LAUSD 63%452 answered
BullyingSame as LAUSDShare who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days. A lower share means fewer reported it.10%LAUSD 10%5 questions
Average of 5 questions, 451–456 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?17%LAUSD 15%456 answered
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?10%LAUSD 15%453 answered
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?4%LAUSD 6%455 answered
Been bullied online?6%LAUSD 6%454 answered
Had sexual jokes, comments, or gestures made to you?10%LAUSD 10%451 answered
All 46 questions, as a table
Question
Here
LAUSD high schools
Answers
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
83%
65%
457
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed
74%
65%
453
I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
66%
64%
455
I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
64%
59%
454
I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
72%
66%
453
Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed
70%
46%
457
LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer) students at this school are acceptedShare who agreed or strongly agreed
80%
63%
453
Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
69%
62%
451
The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed
64%
60%
455
Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
68%
54%
454
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed
70%
59%
457
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed
64%
59%
453
There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed
79%
68%
452
Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed
68%
61%
448
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed
78%
66%
454
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
73%
452
My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed
53%
48%
453
Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
56%
53%
455
Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
71%
64%
452
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
74%
453
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
75%
53%
454
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed
79%
71%
453
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed
83%
70%
453
Adults at this school have helped me learn the details of getting into college (completing applications, financial aid, etc)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
80%
63%
452
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days
17%
15%
456
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days
10%
15%
453
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days
4%
6%
455
Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days
6%
6%
454
Had sexual jokes, comments, or gestures made to you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days
10%
10%
451
The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed
68%
61%
452
Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed
79%
54%
455
Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
69%
457
What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?Share who answered “Four-year college degree” or “Graduate degree”
—
—
417
I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”
83%
72%
454
I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”
84%
73%
454
I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”
81%
72%
454
I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
55%
57%
455
I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”
59%
48%
450
I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”
57%
44%
449
I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”
68%
54%
449
I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”
85%
76%
453
I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”
92%
81%
451
I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”
76%
67%
453
How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well”
82%
69%
454
When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful”
87%
74%
454
How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully”
86%
79%
454
Families
365 of 436 family surveys came back (84%).
Safety9 points above LAUSD“My child is safe on school grounds”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.90%LAUSD 81%1 question
One question, 354 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
My child is safe on school grounds90%LAUSD 81%354 answered
Belonging2 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.89%LAUSD 87%4 questions
Average of 4 questions, 353–365 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and online91%LAUSD 87%361 answered
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and online86%LAUSD 88%360 answered
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this school92%LAUSD 86%353 answered
I feel welcome to participate at this school88%LAUSD 87%365 answered
Caring adults4 points below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.82%LAUSD 86%2 questions
Average of 2 questions, 360–361 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Teachers take my concerns seriously82%LAUSD 85%361 answered
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progress83%LAUSD 86%360 answered
Engagement1 point above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.84%LAUSD 83%3 questions
Average of 3 questions, 361–364 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
This school informs me about school activities in different ways88%LAUSD 86%364 answered
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's education81%LAUSD 83%364 answered
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school81%LAUSD 80%361 answered
High expectations5 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.94%LAUSD 89%2 questions
Average of 2 questions, 349 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
School staff expect my child to attend college93%LAUSD 87%349 answered
School staff expect my child to graduate from high school95%LAUSD 90%349 answered
Bullying taken seriously2 points above LAUSD“Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.80%LAUSD 78%1 question
One question, 356 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school80%LAUSD 78%356 answered
All 40 questions, as a table
Question
Here
LAUSD high schools
Answers
My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
90%
81%
354
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed
91%
87%
361
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed
86%
88%
360
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
92%
86%
353
I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
88%
87%
365
Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
85%
361
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed
83%
86%
360
This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed
88%
86%
364
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed
81%
83%
364
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
81%
80%
361
School staff expect my child to attend collegeShare who agreed or strongly agreed
93%
87%
349
School staff expect my child to graduate from high schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
95%
90%
349
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
80%
78%
356
Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed
87%
84%
361
Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed
88%
83%
361
Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
84%
361
Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
83%
82%
357
I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed
86%
85%
356
This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
85%
84%
364
School staff help me understand the requirements for CSU/UC admissionShare who agreed or strongly agreed
90%
81%
341
School staff help me understand which courses my child needs to graduate from high schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
91%
86%
345
School staff help me understand how to apply for financial aid for collegeShare who agreed or strongly agreed
83%
85%
112
School staff help me understand how to help my child apply for collegeShare who agreed or strongly agreed
84%
85%
113
This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed
84%
84%
363
This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed
88%
86%
363
This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed
90%
86%
360
I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
89%
86%
364
I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
84%
80%
357
I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
91%
88%
361
I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
85%
84%
357
This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed
92%
89%
364
School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed
81%
83%
267
This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed
91%
87%
351
This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed
84%
83%
350
I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
85%
82%
361
This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed
89%
86%
363
I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed
77%
78%
309
I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed
79%
80%
253
My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
92%
89%
355
Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
77%
357
Staff
42 of 42 staff answered (100%), 24 of them teachers.
Safety7 points above LAUSD“I feel safe on school grounds during the day”: share giving one of the two most positive answers.100%LAUSD 93%1 question
One question, 39 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
I feel safe on school grounds during the day100%LAUSD 93%39 answered
Caring adults12 points below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.71%LAUSD 83%2 questions
Average of 2 questions, 39–42 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests55%LAUSD 77%42 answered
Adults at this school treat all students with respect87%LAUSD 88%39 answered
High expectations4 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.94%LAUSD 90%2 questions
Average of 2 questions, 40–42 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all students95%LAUSD 88%42 answered
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to students92%LAUSD 92%40 answered
Bullying seen as minor9 points above LAUSD“Harassment or bullying among students”: share who called it a mild or insignificant problem.90%LAUSD 81%1 question
One question, 39 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its high schools.
Harassment or bullying among students90%LAUSD 81%39 answered
All 52 questions, as a table
Question
Here
LAUSD high schools
Answers
I feel safe on school grounds during the dayNo share published for this question
100%
93%
39
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
55%
77%
42
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed
87%
88%
39
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
95%
88%
42
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
92%
92%
40
Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem
90%
81%
39
I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed
88%
78%
40
Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed
82%
82%
40
I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
85%
77%
40
The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed
90%
92%
40
I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolNo share published for this question
74%
84%
38
At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed
95%
84%
41
This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed
68%
77%
41
This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
42%
71%
41
How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”
90%
84%
40
How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”
80%
73%
40
I feel comfortable talking with the school leadership about issues and concernsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
48%
71%
40
Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed
97%
78%
38
This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed
86%
71%
37
This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed
68%
66%
37
Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem
92%
87%
39
The curriculum at this school is focused on helping students get ready for college (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
96%
81%
22
Teachers expect most students in this school to go to college (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
100%
81%
22
Teachers in this school feel that it is a part of their job to prepare students academically to succeed in college (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
96%
87%
22
The informal observation process has increased the number of instruction-focused interactions with my school leader(s) about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
66%
11
During the informal observation process, my school leader provided actionable feedback about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
78%
11
The informal observation process provided the opportunity to reflect on my instructional practice about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
77%
11
The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
68%
11
During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)Share who answered “Two times this year” or “Three or more times this year”
—
—
7
I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
50%
7
I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
60%
7
I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
65%
7
I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
—
76%
7
Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”
14%
17%
22
With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”
24%
28%
21
Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”
18%
35%
22
How often does school leadership visit your classroom to observe you teach (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”
18%
18%
22
How often does school leadership provide useful feedback to you based on their observations (teachers)Share who answered “Often” or “Always”
23%
48%
22
Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”
14%
27%
21
Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”
14%
40%
22
I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
77%
76%
22
I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
86%
76%
22
I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
100%
92%
22
I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
100%
91%
22
What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
50%
61%
22
The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
50%
60%
22
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
50%
57%
22
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
54%
60%
22
The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
64%
67%
22
The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
54%
68%
22
The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
50%
62%
22
I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed
91%
86%
22
Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades. Theme figures are our average of the questions listed under each theme, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers; we show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group’s answers only when at least 10% of that group responded. Los Angeles Unified School District survey results (opens in a new tab)
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grade 11 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
73 tested per subject
English
100% / 49%
Math
90% / 23%
Hispanic or Latino
59 tested per subject
English
100% / 49%
Math
93% / 21%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrade 11 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Los Angeles Unified
vs California
Low-income · 73 tested
English
100%
+4654%
■+5149%
Math
90%
+6426%
■+6723%
Hispanic or Latino · 59 tested
English
100%
+4753%
■+5149%
Math
93%
+6825%
■+7221%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Filipino students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students here did far better than the same groups statewide.
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation in Wilmington, 100.0% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grade 11, compared to 53.7% district-wide for those same grades and 49.1% statewide for those same grades. Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 46.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (90.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); Hispanic students (100.0% met or exceeded the ELA standard). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 73 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino55%
2Filipino19%
3Black or African American11%
4Asian8%
5White4%
6Two or more races3%
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
55%
Filipino
19%
Black or African American
11%
Asian
8%
White
4%
Two or more races
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 2 in 3 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (65%, 296 of 452). California: 63%.
92% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 91.67%: 16.5 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 18 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
90th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 57.5–73.5% meal eligibility and 226–904 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation a good high school?
Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter high schools. Its Scope Score is 94 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation was well above California in English and math: 100% and 93% met or exceeded the standard in grade 11, against 57% and 32% statewide. The Scope Score combines 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate, exceeded standard, college/career readiness, met or exceeded the standard, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 100% of students tested in grade 11 met or exceeded the English standard and 93% the math standard; 88% and 65% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 57% and 32% met or exceeded, 27% and 16% exceeded. 114 students were tested in English and 114 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation rank in California?
Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation is in the 99th percentile of 1,500 California comprehensive high schools (Strong, 2025). Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation ranks #9 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 4.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 19 chronically absent of 461 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.0%; 0 unduplicated suspended students of 462 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 7.7%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.4%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation compare to other schools in Wilmington?
Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation is in the 99th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter high schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 452 students. Use the schools in Wilmington page or the map view to compare nearby high schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation?
At Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation in Wilmington, 100.0% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grade 11, compared to 53.7% district-wide for those same grades and 49.1% statewide for those same grades. Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 46.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (90.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); Hispanic students (100.0% met or exceeded the ELA standard). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 73 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What AP courses are offered at Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation?
Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation had own-school AP authorizations for 17 of the 40 subjects in the College Board's 2025–26 AP program: 2-D Art and Design, 3-D Art and Design, Biology, Calculus AB, Computer Science Principles, Drawing, English Language and Composition, English Literature and Composition, Environmental Science, European History, Macroeconomics, Psychology, Research, Seminar, Spanish Language and Culture, Statistics, United States History. The audit records authorization, not whether a section ran that year or how students performed on AP exams. Data source: College Board AP Course Audit, analyzed by SchoolScope.
How many students from Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation go to UC?
In fall 2025, 42 Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation graduates enrolled at University of California campuses, universitywide. That figure can't be split into a per-campus sum — students apply to several UC campuses at once, so campus-level counts don't add up to the universitywide total. UC is one destination among many: this says nothing about graduates who chose a CSU, a private college, a community college, or work, and it is a count, not a rate or a ranking. Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 92.9% · index 63 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
Exceeded standard
↑ vs CA 20.3% · index 99 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
CCI overall Prepared
↑ vs CA 51.7% · index 84 on SchoolScope's high-school calibration scale; the state rate above is CDE's statewide student rate, not this school-model index
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.8% · index 88 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 22.7% · index 68 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▲ 1.0pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 3.3% · index 64 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 11
114
88%
12%
0%
0%
100%
+51
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 11 ELA equal-school mean: 49.3%; n=2069 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 11
114
65%
28%
7%
0%
93%
+67
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 11 Math equal-school mean: 25.5%; n=2061 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 11 · ELA
108
98.2%
2025 · Grade 11 · Math
108
78.7%
2024 · Grade 11 · ELA
113
98.2%
2024 · Grade 11 · Math
113
90.3%
2023 · Grade 11 · ELA
99
97.0%
2023 · Grade 11 · Math
99
81.8%
2022 · Grade 11 · ELA
124
97.6%
2022 · Grade 11 · Math
121
79.3%
2019 · Grade 11 · ELA
102
96.1%
2019 · Grade 11 · Math
102
85.3%
2018 · Grade 11 · ELA
122
93.4%
2018 · Grade 11 · Math
122
77.0%
2017 · Grade 11 · ELA
89
94.4%
2017 · Grade 11 · Math
89
83.2%
2016 · Grade 11 · ELA
116
93%
2016 · Grade 11 · Math
116
81%
2015 · Grade 11 · ELA
97
92%
2015 · Grade 11 · Math
93
66%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
114
53%
39%
8%
0%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
73
100.0%
+46
+51
Hispanic/Latino
59
100.0%
+47
+51
Filipino
28
100.0%
+21
+23
03Nearest high schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance
Scroll for more columns →
School
Dist
Scope · percentile · band
EXC
MET+
Susp
Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation ←
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
2025 Scope Score · CDE overall Prepared model · CCI 2025: 94/100. No verified earlier Scope Scores are available here. The score models differ, so their results do not form one trend.
Scroll for more columns →
Measure
Source record
This school · CCI overall Prepared
CDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · student group ALL (all students) · all students in the current four-year graduation cohort, plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Overall CCI Prepared rate 99.1% · numerator 111 students classified Prepared · denominator 112 CCI students.
California · CCI overall Prepared
CDE statewide CCI cohort · CCI source year 2025 · student group ALL (all students) · overall Prepared rate 51.7% · numerator 257,567 students classified Prepared · denominator 497,814 CCI students.
AP pathway among CCI Prepared studentsCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · student group ALL (all students) ·AP pathway rate 100.0% · AP-pathway numerator 111 · denominator 111 (CCI Prepared students).This measure uses Prepared students as its denominator, not the whole CCI cohort; it is not an AP exam-taking rate or a count of AP courses offered. That cohort includes all students in the current four-year graduation cohort plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. In 2025 the pathway accepts two qualifying AP exams, two qualifying AP courses, or a combination of one of each in different subjects.
CDE's overall Prepared rate is this version's 20% high-school college-readiness score factor. The school rate is 111 of 112 CCI students, not the AP-only pathway or A–G completion rate. The California figure is CDE's statewide CCI student cohort, not an average of SchoolScope's comparable high schools or the SchoolScope school-rank pool.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Graduation Rate
99.1%
AP pathway among Prepared
100.0%
2025 CDE CCI cohort · AP courses, exams, or both; share of students already Prepared, not course offerings
A-G Completion
100.0%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
94.4%
These source periods and populations differ: graduation uses an adjusted cohort, while A-G completion and college-going use separately reported groups. The rates are shown individually, without a shared performance tier.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
2019
65.7%
90.7%
4.3%
0.7%
2022
64.4%
88.5%
6.5%
0.5%
2023
60.1%
89.4%
9.7%
0.6%
2024
67.3%
94.3%
6.7%
0.5%
2025
61.1%
88.4%
7.7%
0.4%
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
1.2%
5.2%
+4.0pp
Male
0.9%
2.3%
+1.4pp
Asian
0.0%
0.0%
+0.0pp
Black/African American
1.9%
2.0%
+0.1pp
Filipino
1.0%
2.3%
+1.3pp
Hispanic/Latino
0.8%
5.9%
+5.1pp
White
5.6%
0.0%
-5.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
0.7%
3.9%
+3.2pp
All Students
1.1%
4.1%
+3.0pp
Two or More Races
—
7.7%
—
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06UC admissions, universitywideFollow separately reported UC application, admission and enrollment counts.2014–2025 · summed across CEEB codes at query time+
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Mean GPA (applied)
Mean GPA (admitted)
Mean GPA (enrolled)
2025
101
85
42
3.96
3.98
4.05
2024
94
81
35
3.97
3.99
4.12
2023
114
86
43
3.95
4.06
4.17
2022
102
77
28
3.90
3.96
4.06
2021
114
83
39
3.73
3.83
3.89
2020
91
67
33
3.79
3.89
4.00
2019
106
59
33
3.63
3.87
4.00
2018
75
61
43
3.69
3.81
3.79
2017
88
55
32
3.64
3.92
3.89
2016
63
37
19
3.54
3.67
3.81
2015
62
39
21
3.66
3.88
3.93
2014
71
43
21
3.56
3.73
3.77
Source: UC admissions by source school. Dated fall first-year UC applicants, admitted students, and enrollees. GPA is each group's mean weighted, capped high-school GPA for 10th/11th-grade college-preparatory courses. SchoolScope leaves GPA unavailable when several CEEB codes contribute rather than combining their means. Masked means no numeric bound; — means unavailable, and a reported zero remains zero. For missing or masked counts, never assume zero or a positive hidden value. A + marks a partial SchoolScope sum of observed counts, not a complete total; missing contributions may be zero. No admit rate is computed here. Complete, matching counts can support a historical descriptive rate, but do not establish a school's effect or predict individual chances. Series shown from 2014.
07UC admissions by campusInspect campus records without adding overlapping populations.latest falls on file+
Scroll for more columns →
Campus
Year
Applied
Admitted
Enrolled
Berkeley
2025
53
9
3
Berkeley
2024
39
9
5
Berkeley
2023
51
9
5
Berkeley
2022
49
8
3
Berkeley
2021
49
10
4
Davis
2025
49
31
7
Davis
2024
37
16
4
Davis
2023
37
25
6
Davis
2022
33
14
masked
Davis
2021
38
16
masked
Irvine
2025
85
23
12
Irvine
2024
80
29
9
Irvine
2023
90
26
9
Irvine
2022
93
24
9
Irvine
2021
86
15
8
Los Angeles
2025
69
6
4
Los Angeles
2024
68
7
5
Los Angeles
2023
83
10
7
Los Angeles
2022
82
9
7
Los Angeles
2021
76
8
6
Merced
2025
46
43
masked
Merced
2024
13
13
masked
Merced
2023
22
21
masked
Merced
2022
27
25
masked
Merced
2021
32
32
5
Riverside
2025
66
62
8
Riverside
2024
53
47
5
Riverside
2023
54
38
4
Riverside
2022
48
35
6
Riverside
2021
66
44
4
San Diego
2025
76
5
masked
San Diego
2024
53
8
masked
San Diego
2023
69
19
masked
San Diego
2022
58
10
masked
San Diego
2021
69
19
masked
Santa Barbara
2025
56
21
5
Santa Barbara
2024
61
21
5
Santa Barbara
2023
64
31
9
Santa Barbara
2022
38
15
masked
Santa Barbara
2021
69
8
masked
Santa Cruz
2025
22
20
masked
Santa Cruz
2024
30
20
masked
Santa Cruz
2023
36
23
masked
Santa Cruz
2022
27
20
masked
Santa Cruz
2021
45
26
8
Universitywide
2025
101
85
42
Universitywide
2024
94
81
35
Universitywide
2023
114
86
43
Universitywide
2022
102
77
28
Universitywide
2021
114
83
39
Source: UC admissions by source school. Dated fall first-year UC applicants, admitted students, and enrollees. Campus totals are not interchangeable with Universitywide; students can apply to several campuses. Universitywide is separately reported; never derive it by adding campus rows. Universitywide applicant and admit counts are unduplicated. Masked means no numeric bound; — means unavailable, and a reported zero remains zero. For missing or masked counts, never assume zero or a positive hidden value. A + marks a partial SchoolScope sum of observed counts, not a complete total; missing contributions may be zero. No admit rate is computed here; these records do not establish a school's effect or predict individual chances.
Authorization ≠ a section running this year — the Ledger records what the school may teach, not seat counts.
09Advanced coursework — 2023-24 federal civil-rights snapshotInspect the dated federal advanced-coursework snapshot.dated historical snapshot+
Scroll for more columns →
Measure
This school
AP offered
offered
AP course count
11
AP enrollment (male/female)
240
IB participation
not reported
Dual enrollment
offered · 375 enrolled
Algebra I in grade 8
not reported
Calculus sections
1
Physics sections
2
Chemistry sections
4
Reported male/female enrollment (CRDC)
446
Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. Participation counts and comparisons use reported male and female categories in both course and enrollment records. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.
10College destinationsRead the completion cohort and its reported college destinations.class of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate+
Scroll for more columns →
Destination
Completers
% (derived)
University of California
40
32.0%
California State University
55
44.0%
California community college
5
4.0%
In-state private
2
1.6%
Out-of-state, 4-year
16
12.8%
Out-of-state, 2-year
0
0.0%
Not enrolled
7
5.6%
125 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 94% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.
11Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$18,180 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$462 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 452
Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 452
District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
12ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 90744
ShowHide table 12 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 90744
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$60,847
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
9.46%
ZCTA population
52,800
Median age
33.5 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/dr-richard-a-vladovic-harbor-teacher-preparation-2921"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Dr. Richard A. Vladovic Harbor Teacher Preparation — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=1,500 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · UC fall first-year source records — masked = no numeric bound; + = partial observed count; Universitywide separately reported · AP Course Ledger 2025 - 2026 (November refresh; authorization not enrollment) · CRDC 2023-24 historical snapshot · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.