Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering posts 36% meeting the standard and 13.4% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 46 | 13% | 36% | -1.5 | 23.6% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering scores 46 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 62nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering deserves a closer read. It sits at the 62nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: 42.1% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 39th to the 62nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 middle schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 36% of students meet the standard today, above the 32% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 33% | 30% | 23% | 34% | 37% |
| Grade 7 | 36% | 35% | 29% | 35% | 42% |
| Grade 8 | 31% | 30% | 28% | 40% | 40% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 28% | 29% | 27% | 31% | 34% |
| Grade 7 | 31% | 27% | 26% | 29% | 33% |
| Grade 8 | 34% | 19% | 23% | 30% | 29% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 1.6pp across grades; the floor rises 2.4pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering in Wilmington, 39.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering trails its district average for low-income students by 1.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 991 students tested.
7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 4.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$2,128 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering a good middle school?
What are Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering's CAASPP test scores?
How does Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering rank in California?
Is Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering?
How does Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering compare to other schools in Wilmington?
How does Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 46
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 60
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 66
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 350 | 10% | 27% | 30% | 33% | 37% | −9 |
| Grade 7 | 342 | 10% | 32% | 27% | 31% | 42% | −6 |
| Grade 8 | 362 | 11% | 28% | 28% | 33% | 40% | −7 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 353 | 18% | 16% | 26% | 39% | 34% | −1 |
| Grade 7 | 340 | 16% | 17% | 22% | 45% | 33% | −1 |
| Grade 8 | 359 | 15% | 14% | 27% | 44% | 29% | −3 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 362 | 4% | 19% | 59% | 18% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 991 | 39.0% | −2 | +1 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 983 | 39.6% | −1 | +1 |
| Students with Disabilities | 179 | 9.5% | −7 | −7 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilmington Middle Science, Technology, Engineering ← | — | 46 | 13.4% | 35.7% | −1.5 | 0.1% |
| Alexander Fleming Middle | 2.2 mi | 47 | 17.7% | 41.5% | +8.9 | 0.2% |
| Andrew Carnegie Middle | 2.4 mi | 47 | 15.4% | 39.6% | +1.0 | 0.2% |
| Stephen M. White Middle | 2.2 mi | 44 | 19.2% | 43.8% | +0.7 | 0.0% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 35 | 39 | #1232 | 11.0% | 32.1% | 18.7% | 0.0% | +2.1pp |
| 2022 | 27 | 25 | #1631 | 8.7% | 28.2% | 39.7% | 0.0% | -5.0pp |
| 2023 | 36 | 37 | #1364 | 7.7% | 26.2% | 32.1% | 0.1% | +0.4pp |
| 2024 | 40 | 56 | #978 | 11.4% | 33.0% | 26.0% | 0.3% | +2.3pp |
| 2025 | 46 | 62 | #852 | 13.4% | 35.7% | 23.6% | 0.1% | -1.5pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 17.3% | 25.1% | +7.8pp |
| Male | 20.0% | 22.4% | +2.4pp |
| Black/African American | 46.2% | 32.4% | -13.8pp |
| White | 7.7% | 14.3% | +6.6pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 18.0% | 23.3% | +5.3pp |
| Pacific Islander | 45.5% | — | — |
| Students with Disabilities | 23.7% | 32.9% | +9.2pp |
| English Learners | 17.3% | 27.5% | +10.2pp |
| Homeless | 39.5% | 41.9% | +2.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 19.7% | 24.3% | +4.6pp |
| All Students | 18.7% | 23.7% | +5.0pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction