Public school · Poway Unified

Design 39 Campus

Q: Is Design 39 Campus a good elementary school?

Design 39 Campus is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 81 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Design 39 Campus was well above California in English and math: 84% and 81% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Q: What are Design 39 Campus's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 84% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 81% the math standard; 54% and 56% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 41% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 412 students were tested in English and 412 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

Q: How does Design 39 Campus rank in California?

Design 39 Campus is in the 98th percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2025). Design 39 Campus ranks #77 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Q: Is Design 39 Campus getting better or worse?

SchoolScope compares Design 39 Campus's grade 3 results in 2023 with its grade 5 results in 2025, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 93rd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.

Q: What do attendance and suspension records show for Design 39 Campus?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 5.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 62 chronically absent of 1,217 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.5%; 6 unduplicated suspended students of 1,222 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 5.6%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.5%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

Q: How does Design 39 Campus compare to other schools in San Diego?

Design 39 Campus is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 1,216 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.

San Diego · TK–8 · 1,216 students (2024–25)

How to read this →

98thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,721 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

81 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Design 39 Campushigher than 98 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Design 39 Campushigher than 98 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Design 39 Campushigher than 98 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Well above California in English and math: 84% and 81% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. Source

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 412
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Get an email when Design 39 Campus’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 54%
Met standard: 30%
Below standard: 16%

84% met or exceeded · 412 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Poway Unified
Exceeded	54%	24%	49%
Met	30%	22%	26%
Nearly met	13%	21%	14%
Not met	3%	33%	11%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 56%
Met standard: 25%
Below standard: 19%

81% met or exceeded · 412 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Poway Unified
Exceeded	56%	21%	47%
Met	25%	20%	25%
Nearly met	15%	25%	17%
Not met	4%	34%	11%

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence

In 2025, students in grades 4–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 4–8 · 2025

+9 ptsEnglish · above expected+19 ptsMath · above expected

Source: CDE growth model, 2025
Students: students with scores in both years in grades 4–8: 664 in English, 663 in math
Comparison: 664 students in English and 663 in math in grades 4–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

About half reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2025

54%English · exceeded the standard56%Math · exceeded the standard

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 412
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

Low-income students here (43 tested, grades 5 and 6 and 8, spring 2025) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (37% and 24%).grades 5 and 6 and 8 · spring 2025

67%English · met or exceeded56%Math · met or exceeded

Source: CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2025
Students: low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 5 and 6 and 8: 43
Comparison: California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 43 students.

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school84%

California46%

Tested: 412 here · 1,232,086 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school84%

Poway Unified75%

Tested: 412 here · 7,519 in Poway Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 26 schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Poway Unified
Exceeded	54%	24%	49%
Met	30%	22%	26%
Nearly met	13%	21%	14%
Not met	3%	33%	11%

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school81%

California41%

Tested: 412 here · 1,241,652 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school81%

Poway Unified72%

Tested: 412 here · 7,538 in Poway Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 26 schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California	Poway Unified
Exceeded	56%	21%	47%
Met	25%	20%	25%
Nearly met	15%	25%	17%
Not met	4%	34%	11%

Progress over time

Are students making progress?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201975%346 tested

→

202584%412 tested

This school

California, same grades50% → 46%2019 → 2025 · 1,332,547 → 1,232,086 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201972%345 tested

→

202581%412 tested

This school

California, same grades44% → 41%2019 → 2025 · 1,338,625 → 1,241,652 tested

A comparison of two years, not individual student growth. Each year is a different group of students.

Explore every year, the trend charts & underlying data

English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2019.

English met or exceeded, grades 3–5

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)84%46%

Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)81%41%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results; in 2020 and 2021 that was COVID.

English went from 75% in 2019 to 84% in 2025. Math went from 72% in 2019 to 81% in 2025, with 2024 and 2025 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	This school	California
2019	75% 346 tested	50% 1,332,547 tested
2022	78% 398 tested	45% 1,260,830 tested
2023	76% 413 tested	44% 1,247,801 tested
2024	81% 433 tested	45% 1,235,509 tested
2025	84% 412 tested	46% 1,232,086 tested

Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	This school	California
2019	72% 345 tested	44% 1,338,625 tested
2022	78% 395 tested	38% 1,265,943 tested
2023	78% 413 tested	40% 1,256,519 tested
2024	81% 434 tested	41% 1,249,262 tested
2025	81% 412 tested	41% 1,241,652 tested

The state’s growth measure664 students in English, 663 in math · grades 4–8 · 2025

English+9ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

Math+19ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 9 points above that prediction, and in math 19 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.

School pattern, spring 2025High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.

School pattern, spring 2025Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.

School pattern, spring 2025Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

5 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

8in 100 at the average Poway Unified school18in 100 at the average California elementary school

62 of 1,217 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school5 in 100

at the average Poway Unified school8 in 100

at the average California elementary school18 in 100

0.5%of students were suspended at least once (6 of 1,222), 2024–25

0.8%at the average Poway Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school

Attendance by grade

Chronically absent, 2024–25	Per 100 students	Students
TK and kindergarten	4	5 of 142
Grades 1–3	5	18 of 368
Grades 4–6	5	23 of 448
Grades 7–8	6	16 of 259

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grades 3–8 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

43 tested per subject · grades 5 and 6 and 8

English67% / 37%

Math56% / 24%

Asian

322 tested per subject

English95% / 73%

Math93% / 71%

White

251 English · 250 math tested

English77% / 61%

Math71% / 53%

Two or more races

73 tested per subject · grades 4–6 and 8

English88% / 61%

Math73% / 50%

Hispanic or Latino

57 tested per subject · grades 3, 5 and 6 and 8

English72% / 37%

Math58% / 27%

Students with disabilities

75 tested per subject · grades 3–7

English51% / 17%

Math44% / 15%

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Met or exceeded the standardgrades 3–8 · spring 2025

Group and subject	Here	vs Poway Unified	vs California
Low-income · 43 tested · grades 5 and 6 and 8 only
English	67%	+1750%	+3037%
Math	56%	+1937%	+3224%
Asian · 322 tested
English	95%	+887%	+2273%
Math	93%	+687%	+2271%
White · 251 tested in English, 250 in math
English	77%	+572%	+1661%
Math	71%	+665%	+1853%
Two or more races · 73 tested · grades 4–6 and 8 only
English	88%	+1177%	+2761%
Math	73%	+568%	+2350%
Hispanic or Latino · 57 tested · grades 3, 5 and 6 and 8 only
English	72%	+1854%	+3537%
Math	58%	+1642%	+3127%
Students with disabilities · 75 tested · grades 3–7 only
English	51%	+1239%	+3417%
Math	44%	+935%	+2915%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Poway Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students and students with disabilities here did far better than the same groups statewide.

Read the student-group results as sentences

At Design 39 Campus in San Diego, 67.4% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 5, 6 and 8, compared to 50.0% district-wide for those same grades and 37.3% statewide for those same grades. Design 39 Campus’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (55.8% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (95.3% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 40.3 percentage points: students with disabilities in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 43 ELA grade test records.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

Asian42%
White29%
Two or more races12%
Hispanic or Latino10%
Filipino5%
Black or African American1%
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Unallocated share<1%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2024–25	Here
Asian	42%
White	29%
Two or more races	12%
Hispanic or Latino	10%
Filipino	5%
Black or African American	1%
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Pacific Islander	—
Not reported	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

7 in 100 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (7%, 84 of 1,216). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers56

Average experience10 years

First-year teachers5%

93% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 93.44%: 46.9 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 50.2 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

ElementaryDesign 39 CampusThis campus · grades K-8
MiddleDesign 39 CampusThis campus · grades K-8
High schoolDel Norte HighInferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

Black Mountain Middle
Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16
89th percentile · Strong · middle · 2025
55% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Oak Valley Middle
Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16
95th percentile · Strong · middle · 2025
45% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

High-school links

Del Norte High
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
97th percentile · Strong · high · 2025
Mt. Carmel High
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
84th percentile · Strong · high · 2025
Westview High
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
97th percentile · Strong · high · 2025

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

High-school endpoint evidence · Del Norte High

Del Norte HighScope 86estimated path

An inferred path through a middle-school overlap points to Del Norte High. UC records 185 enrollees from Del Norte High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 22 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — if a child starting here today later attended Del Norte High, that would be around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 93% of Del Norte High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

185 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 22 authorized AP subjects (AP Course Audit 2025 - 2026) → full record on Del Norte High's page

Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Getting in

Design 39 Campus runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.

Ask Poway Unified which school serves your address.

powayusd.com

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

17050 Del Sur Ridge Road, San Diego 92127

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (858) 676-6639 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby elementary schoolsStatewide percentile

Del Sur Elementary0.8 mi91stStrong
Stone Ranch Elementary1.1 mi98thStrong
Monterey Ridge Elementary1.2 mi97thStrong

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2025 statewide percentile

La Canada ElementaryLa Canada Unified · 633 enrolled · 6.8% meal eligibility99thStrong
J. M. Amador ElementaryDublin Unified · 909 enrolled · 7.2% meal eligibility99thStrong
Cherry Chase ElementarySunnyvale · 622 enrolled · 7.2% meal eligibility99thStrong
Greenbrook ElementarySan Ramon Valley Unified · 732 enrolled · 6.6% meal eligibility93rdStrong
Painted Rock ElementaryPoway Unified · 613 enrolled · 7.5% meal eligibility84thStrong
Evelyn Costa ElementaryLammersville Joint Unified · 612 enrolled · 6.2% meal eligibility97thStrong

How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 0–14.9% meal eligibility and 608–2,432 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Design 39 Campus a good elementary school?

Design 39 Campus is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 81 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Design 39 Campus was well above California in English and math: 84% and 81% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Design 39 Campus's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 84% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 81% the math standard; 54% and 56% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 41% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 412 students were tested in English and 412 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Design 39 Campus rank in California?

Design 39 Campus is in the 98th percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2025). Design 39 Campus ranks #77 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Design 39 Campus getting better or worse?

SchoolScope compares Design 39 Campus's grade 3 results in 2023 with its grade 5 results in 2025, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 93rd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Design 39 Campus?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 5.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 62 chronically absent of 1,217 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.5%; 6 unduplicated suspended students of 1,222 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 5.6%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.5%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Design 39 Campus compare to other schools in San Diego?

Design 39 Campus is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 1,216 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Design 39 Campus?

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Design 39 Campus is ranked #77 statewide · #2 of 26 in Poway Unified.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Exceeded standard	55.2%	21.4%	42%
Met or exceeded	82.7%	42.7%	23%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)	Strong	average	20%
Chronic absenteeism	5.6%	17.9%	5%
Suspension rate	0.5%	1.6%	5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)	52.5%	17.8%	5%

Exceeded standard: ↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 83 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded: ↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 81 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5): ↑ vs CA average · ≈93rd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism: ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 70 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 2.0pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate: ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 59 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.9pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC): ↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 100 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELA	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	124	48%	31%	17%	4%	79%	+36
Grade 4	135	68%	21%	8%	3%	89%	+44
Grade 5	153	47%	38%	12%	3%	85%	+37
Grade 6	140	48%	34%	14%	4%	82%	+36
Grade 7	119	54%	37%	8%	1%	91%	+43
Grade 8	123	47%	38%	11%	4%	85%	+39

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4084 reporting schools

State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2631 reporting schools

State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 46.2%; n=2658 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
Math	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	124	52%	31%	15%	2%	84%	+38
Grade 4	136	56%	27%	13%	4%	83%	+42
Grade 5	152	59%	17%	16%	7%	76%	+41
Grade 6	140	51%	21%	21%	6%	73%	+38
Grade 7	119	66%	18%	12%	4%	84%	+50
Grade 8	123	61%	16%	14%	9%	77%	+45

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 45.4%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.5%; n=4086 reporting schools

State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 33.7%; n=2630 reporting schools

State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 32.1%; n=2658 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met+
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA	125	69.6%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA	156	87.2%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA	152	84.2%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA	138	85.5%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA	128	81.3%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA	132	87.1%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math	125	76.0%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math	156	87.2%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math	153	79.7%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math	138	72.5%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math	130	72.3%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math	132	78.8%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA	126	65.1%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA	142	77.5%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA	145	83.5%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA	131	76.3%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA	128	89.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA	109	82.6%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math	126	78.6%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math	142	78.9%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math	145	77.9%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math	130	68.5%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math	126	79.4%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math	108	77.8%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA	132	70.5%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA	132	81.8%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA	134	82.1%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA	130	88.5%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA	117	86.3%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA	130	83.8%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math	131	78.6%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math	131	80.2%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math	133	76.7%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math	130	71.5%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math	117	67.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math	130	67.7%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA	127	72.4%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA	102	72.5%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA	117	81.2%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA	108	81.5%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA	105	95.2%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA	115	87.0%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math	127	67.7%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math	101	76.2%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math	117	74.4%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math	107	62.6%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math	105	76.2%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math	115	80.0%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT
Schoolwide	278	41%	35%	24%	0%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	MET+	vs district	vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	43	67.4%	+17	+30
Asian	322	95.3%	+8	+22
White	251	76.9%	+5	+16

Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	EXC	MET+	Grade gap	Cohort growth	Susp
Design 39 Campus ←	—	8198th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	55.2%	82.7%	−0.8pp	+91 pts	0.5%
Del Sur Elementary	0.8 mi	6791st percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	53.1%	80.2%	−5.6pp	—	0.1%
Stone Ranch Elementary	1.1 mi	8198th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	56.5%	79.3%	+8.7pp	—	0.7%
Monterey Ridge Elementary	1.2 mi	7697th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	61.9%	82.1%	−13.0pp	—	0.2%
California average	—	39School average · no percentile	21.4%	42.7%	−2.9pp	—	1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders2.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records

Teacher salary schedule$58,959 – $127,725

Average elementary principal salary$160,698

Average middle school principal salary$175,805

Average high school principal salary$181,289

Superintendent salary$362,500

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2019	65/100	87	#688	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
2022	73/100	93	#353	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,704 schools
2023	71/100	92	#415	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,696 schools
2024	81/100	98	#83	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,711 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 7.1% → 2025 · 5.1% · −2.0pp
Suspension rate2024 · 1.4% → 2025 · 0.5% · −0.9pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Exc	Met+
2025 · ELA	794	52.0%	85.1%
2025 · Math	794	57.6%	79.3%
2024 · ELA	831	49.8%	82.8%
2024 · Math	834	53.2%	78.1%
2023 · ELA	781	48.7%	79.0%
2023 · Math	777	53.4%	76.8%
2022 · ELA	775	47.7%	82.1%
2022 · Math	772	49.0%	73.8%
2019 · ELA	674	46.6%	81.5%
2019 · Math	672	50.0%	72.8%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

Year	Scope	Pctile	Rank	Exc	Met+	Absent	Susp	Grade gap
2019	—	—	—	45.6%	74.1%	14.3%	1.9%	+7.7pp
2022	—	—	—	49.4%	78.3%	16.7%	1.1%	+4.8pp
2023	—	—	—	49.4%	76.9%	14.9%	2.4%	+8.9pp
2024	—	—	—	52.1%	80.7%	7.5%	1.4%	+9.2pp
2025	81	98	#77	55.2%	82.7%	5.6%	0.5%	-0.8pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD

What we can't show

— Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years

Group	2018–19	2024–25	Δ
Female	14.2%	4.2%	-10.0pp
Male	14.6%	5.9%	-8.7pp
Asian	13.9%	2.9%	-11.0pp
Black/African American	9.1%	0.0%	-9.1pp
Filipino	14.7%	1.5%	-13.2pp
Hispanic/Latino	15.2%	6.8%	-8.4pp
Two or More Races	11.6%	4.8%	-6.8pp
White	15.1%	8.7%	-6.4pp
Students with Disabilities	32.0%	10.4%	-21.6pp
English Learners	18.8%	10.2%	-8.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	23.5%	6.1%	-17.4pp
All Students	14.4%	5.1%	-9.3pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored

Group	ELA	n	CDE band	Math	n	CDE band
All Students	+9	664	Accelerated	+19	663	Accelerated
English Only	+9	449	not categorised	+16	448	not categorised
Asian	+13	261	Accelerated	+28	261	Exceptional
White	+4	215	Average	+12	214	Accelerated
English Learner	+8	83	Accelerated	+20	83	Exceptional
Two or More Races	+11	81	Accelerated	+12	81	Accelerated
Students with Disabilities	−2	79	Average	+12	79	Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only	+11	75	not categorised	+23	75	not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	+5	61	Accelerated	+10	61	Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino	+10	58	Accelerated	+10	58	Accelerated
Filipino	+19	40	Accelerated	+17	40	Accelerated

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

ELA · 2023 · Grade 3

39%

exceeded standard · 65% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2023 · 126 ELA test records with scores

ELA · 2025 · Grade 5

47%

exceeded standard · 85% met or exceeded

CDE CAASPP 2025 · 153 ELA test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 126 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · reported-school field

State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

664 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

76th pctile · +9 pts

State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

663 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

91st pctile · +19 pts

this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$12,246 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 35,663 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$248 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,216

Central federal expenditures attributed here$92 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,216

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,880 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 65%Instruction support 12%Student services 8%Administration 5%Buildings & maintenance 9%Other 1%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$12,246 per pupil

2020$11,959 per pupil

2019$12,266 per pupil

2018$11,181 per pupil

2017$10,952 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 92127

ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 92127
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$195,520
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	73.09%
ZCTA population	50,555
Median age	39.0 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/design-39-campus-9056"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Design 39 Campus — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Design 39 Campus

Compare schools

Get an email when Design 39 Campus’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

Are children building strong foundations?

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

Are students making progress?

English

Math

Annual values & tested counts

Attendance and discipline

Parent voices

Teacher & staff voices

How each student group did

Low-income

Asian

White

Two or more races

Hispanic or Latino

Students with disabilities

Students and staff

Student mix

The school path beyond this campus

Middle-school links

High-school links

Design 39 Campus runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.

Location and visiting

Questions to ask

Schools to explore

Similar student populations

Common questions

Explore the data

Additional workforce records

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful