Design 39 Campus: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Design 39 Campus posts 55.2% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 83 | 55% | 83% | -0.8 | 5.6% | 0.5% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Design 39 Campus scores 83 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 98th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “83% proficient” and call it done. Design 39 Campus deserves a closer read. It sits at the 98th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Design 39 Campus's low-income kids hit 67.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 98th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 83% of students meet the standard today, above the 74% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 72% | 70% | 65% | 70% | 79% |
| Grade 4 | 73% | 82% | 77% | 87% | 89% |
| Grade 5 | 81% | 82% | 83% | 84% | 85% |
| Grade 6 | 81% | 88% | 76% | 86% | 82% |
| Grade 7 | 95% | 86% | 89% | 81% | 91% |
| Grade 8 | 87% | 84% | 83% | 87% | 85% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 68% | 79% | 79% | 76% | 84% |
| Grade 4 | 76% | 80% | 79% | 87% | 83% |
| Grade 5 | 74% | 77% | 78% | 80% | 76% |
| Grade 6 | 63% | 72% | 68% | 72% | 73% |
| Grade 7 | 76% | 68% | 79% | 72% | 84% |
| Grade 8 | 80% | 68% | 78% | 79% | 77% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 5.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Design 39 Campus's most underrated number
67.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Design 39 Campus in San Diego, 67.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 50.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Design 39 Campus outperforms its district average for low-income students by 16.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (55.8% Math proficient); Asian students (95.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 40.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 43 students tested.
5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$248 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 1,216 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 76% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Design 39 Campus a good elementary school?
What are Design 39 Campus's CAASPP test scores?
How does Design 39 Campus rank in California?
Is Design 39 Campus getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Design 39 Campus?
How does Design 39 Campus compare to other schools in San Diego?
How does Design 39 Campus serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 82
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 65
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 124 | 48% | 31% | 17% | 4% | 79% | +36 |
| Grade 4 | 135 | 68% | 21% | 8% | 3% | 89% | +44 |
| Grade 5 | 153 | 47% | 38% | 12% | 3% | 85% | +37 |
| Grade 6 | 140 | 48% | 34% | 14% | 4% | 82% | +36 |
| Grade 7 | 119 | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | 91% | +43 |
| Grade 8 | 123 | 47% | 38% | 11% | 4% | 85% | +39 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 124 | 52% | 31% | 15% | 2% | 84% | +38 |
| Grade 4 | 136 | 56% | 27% | 13% | 4% | 83% | +41 |
| Grade 5 | 152 | 59% | 17% | 16% | 7% | 76% | +41 |
| Grade 6 | 140 | 51% | 21% | 21% | 6% | 73% | +38 |
| Grade 7 | 119 | 66% | 18% | 12% | 4% | 84% | +50 |
| Grade 8 | 123 | 61% | 16% | 14% | 9% | 77% | +45 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 278 | 41% | 35% | 24% | 0% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 43 | 67.4% | +17 | +29 |
| Asian | 322 | 95.3% | +8 | +21 |
| White | 251 | 76.9% | +4 | +15 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design 39 Campus ← | — | 83 | 55.2% | 82.7% | −0.8 | 0.5% |
| Willow Grove Elementary | 2.6 mi | 83 | 56.8% | 81.4% | +3.7 | 0.7% |
| Stone Ranch Elementary | 1.1 mi | 82 | 56.5% | 79.3% | +8.7 | 0.7% |
| Rolling Hills Elementary | 2.8 mi | 82 | 58.4% | 78.3% | +13.4 | 1.5% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 72 | 92 | #429 | 45.6% | 74.1% | 14.4% | 1.9% | +7.7pp |
| 2022 | 74 | 96 | #209 | 49.4% | 78.3% | 16.2% | 1.1% | +4.8pp |
| 2023 | 77 | 96 | #222 | 49.4% | 76.9% | 14.6% | 2.4% | +8.9pp |
| 2024 | 81 | 98 | #114 | 52.1% | 80.7% | 7.5% | 1.4% | +9.2pp |
| 2025 | 83 | 98 | #96 | 55.2% | 82.7% | 5.6% | 0.5% | -0.8pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 14.2% | 4.2% | -10.0pp |
| Male | 14.6% | 5.9% | -8.7pp |
| Asian | 13.9% | 2.9% | -11.0pp |
| Black/African American | 9.1% | 0.0% | -9.1pp |
| Filipino | 8.3% | — | — |
| White | 14.7% | 1.5% | -13.2pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 15.2% | 6.8% | -8.4pp |
| Two or More Races | 11.6% | 4.8% | -6.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 32.0% | 10.4% | -21.6pp |
| English Learners | 18.8% | 10.2% | -8.6pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 23.5% | 6.1% | -17.4pp |
| All Students | 14.4% | 5.1% | -9.3pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction