David Lubin Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
David Lubin posts 61% meeting the standard, and 37.8% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 60 | 38% | 61% | -2.2 | 14.1% | 1.0% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
David Lubin Elementary scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “61% proficient” and call it done. David Lubin deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sacramento, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
David Lubin's low-income kids hit 56.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 67th to the 82nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 800 elementary schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 61% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 57% | 60% | 62% | 58% | 58% |
| Grade 4 | 62% | 49% | 48% | 60% | 66% |
| Grade 5 | 66% | 61% | 61% | 71% | 70% |
| Grade 6 | 71% | 47% | 63% | 68% | 80% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 63% | 59% | 55% | 58% | 64% |
| Grade 4 | 63% | 43% | 57% | 58% | 57% |
| Grade 5 | 38% | 32% | 26% | 46% | 48% |
| Grade 6 | 59% | 39% | 53% | 52% | 61% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 7.3pp across grades; the floor rises 11.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
David Lubin's most underrated number
56.8% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At David Lubin Elementary in Sacramento, 56.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. David Lubin Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 27.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.9% Math proficient); White students (76.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 95 students tested.
6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.1pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$227 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 56% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is David Lubin Elementary a good elementary school?
What are David Lubin Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does David Lubin Elementary rank in California?
Is David Lubin Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at David Lubin Elementary?
How does David Lubin Elementary compare to other schools in Sacramento?
How does David Lubin Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 67 | 42% | 16% | 24% | 18% | 58% | +15 |
| Grade 4 | 74 | 41% | 26% | 16% | 18% | 66% | +21 |
| Grade 5 | 53 | 49% | 21% | 13% | 17% | 70% | +22 |
| Grade 6 | 59 | 44% | 36% | 8% | 12% | 80% | +33 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 67 | 36% | 28% | 16% | 19% | 64% | +18 |
| Grade 4 | 74 | 30% | 27% | 28% | 15% | 57% | +15 |
| Grade 5 | 54 | 30% | 19% | 24% | 28% | 48% | +13 |
| Grade 6 | 59 | 42% | 19% | 22% | 17% | 61% | +26 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 54 | 33% | 22% | 39% | 6% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 95 | 56.8% | +27 | +19 |
| White | 98 | 76.5% | +16 | +15 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 91 | 62.6% | +30 | +24 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Lubin Elementary ← | — | 60 | 37.8% | 60.6% | −2.2 | 1.0% |
| Phoebe A. Hearst Elementary | 1.7 mi | 86 | 58.3% | 80.9% | −0.3 | 0.6% |
| William Land Elementary | 1.9 mi | 73 | 44.6% | 68.7% | −13.7 | 0.8% |
| Caleb Greenwood Elementary | 1.7 mi | 69 | 48.2% | 71.5% | +1.8 | 0.8% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 50 | 67 | #1808 | 26.9% | 58.2% | 13.8% | 1.8% | -8.1pp |
| 2022 | 40 | 59 | #2341 | 27.5% | 50.6% | 31.3% | 1.3% | -13.1pp |
| 2023 | 41 | 56 | #2525 | 28.2% | 51.6% | 20.2% | 1.2% | -14.7pp |
| 2024 | 55 | 77 | #1318 | 31.2% | 58.7% | 13.5% | 2.0% | +0.4pp |
| 2025 | 60 | 82 | #1014 | 37.8% | 60.6% | 14.1% | 1.0% | -2.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 14.9% | 12.4% | -2.5pp |
| Male | 13.0% | 15.2% | +2.2pp |
| Asian | 5.4% | 11.9% | +6.5pp |
| Black/African American | 37.3% | 24.0% | -13.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 17.3% | 13.2% | -4.1pp |
| Two or More Races | 15.3% | 16.1% | +0.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 21.1% | 21.7% | +0.6pp |
| English Learners | 12.2% | 10.8% | -1.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 21.9% | 19.5% | -2.4pp |
| All Students | 13.9% | 13.8% | -0.1pp |
| Homeless | — | 27.8% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction