Public school · Los Angeles Unified · Los Angeles, California

Charles H. Kim Elementary — Rating & test scores

Los Angeles · TK–5 · 483 students (2024–25)

225 South Oxford Avenue, 90004charleshkimes.lausd.org ↗(213) 368-5600
86thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built →

Scope Score
60

Weighted composite · 2025–26
A weighted mix of six measures.

See this school’s score factors ↓
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Well above California in English (reading and writing) and math, grades 3–5, spring 2026: 64% and 60% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 46% and 42%.

Source
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 206
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 3, 4 and 5 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).

From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap, with building heights from LA County. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

On spring 2025 tests, students in grades 4 and 5 scored above what the state expected in English (+15 pts) and math (+25 pts). The state bases that expectation on each student’s earlier scores.

Sources
The sentence above
CDE growth model, 2025. Students with scores in both years in grades 4 and 5: 110. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

Common questions

How do I get in?

Charles H. Kim is on LAUSD’s list of Schools for Advanced Studies (grades K–5). In LAUSD’s words: “Schools for Advanced Studies (SAS) are Los Angeles Unified schools that have received a designation for equitable and exemplary Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) programs.” From the Choices brochure, pages 55 and 57, read November 2, 2026. It is one of LAUSD’s Schools for Advanced Studies: from elsewhere in LAUSD, a child who meets the SAS criteria can apply for a seat through Choices (late applications from December 1, 2026). Evidence ↓

Is Charles H. Kim a good elementary school?

Charles H. Kim Elementary scores higher than 86 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools: 86th percentile, Strong, spring 2026. Evidence ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 11 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 20 in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school. 0 of 512 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. Evidence ↓

More questions (5)

Did students here score above what the state expected?

Yes, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored +15 points against the state’s expected score in English, which the state calls Accelerated. In math, they scored +25 points, which it calls Exceptional.

  • Included in this measure: 110 students

Evidence ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 63% of low-income students in grades 3–5 at Charles H. Kim Elementary in Los Angeles scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 36% for the same group across California. Evidence ↓

What do families and students say?

93% of families agreed or strongly agreed with “My child is safe on school grounds” (LAUSD elementary schools 91%, 346 answered).

  • 87% of students agreed or strongly agreed with “I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions” (LAUSD elementary schools 77%, 133 answered)
  • Source: Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey, 2025–26

Evidence ↓

Where does it lead?

By the district’s published 2026 attendance boundaries, Charles H. Kim Elementary’s attendance zone is split: 80% of its children are assigned to Virgil Middle and 17% to John Burroughs Middle. Boundaries change, are approximate at the edges and don’t guarantee placement, so confirm your address with the district.

  • Virgil Middle: 65th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools, 2026 Scope Score
  • John Burroughs Middle: 84th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools, 2026 Scope Score

Evidence ↓

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Next steps, ready to copy. Evidence ↓

Academic achievement

How did students here do on state tests?

Well above California in both subjects.

State tests (CAASPP), spring 2026

In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 64% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 60% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.

Source
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 206
Comparison
California: CDE’s grades 3–5 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English, 1,211,701 in math tested). The comparisons use the same grades and year.
AdvancedProficientBelow the standard

English

Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 206 tested

Advanced
35%
Proficient
29%
Below the standard
36%
This school64%
California46%
Los Angeles Unified46%

64% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.

Math

Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 206 tested

Advanced
40%
Proficient
20%
Below the standard
40%
This school60%
California42%
Los Angeles Unified44%

60% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.

Results for each grade, spring 2026English and math · grades 3–5 · every level, with tested counts

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced61%64%69%
Advanced31%34%41%
Proficient30%30%28%
Developing level12%10%13%
Minimal27%26%18%
Tested717461
California44%46%49%
Difference+17+18+20

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 3–5: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Proficient or Advanced58%61%62%
Advanced35%39%48%
Proficient23%22%14%
Developing level24%21%25%
Minimal18%18%13%
Tested717461
California47%42%37%
Difference+11+19+25

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

New to these scores? Read CAASPP scores explained: how to read your child’s report →

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English went from 60% to 64% and math from 62% to 60%.

English · top two levels · grades 3–5

202560%208 tested
→
202664%206 tested

This school

California, same grades46% → 46%2025 → 2026 · 1,232,086 → 1,208,894 tested

Math · top two levels · grades 3–5

202562%208 tested
→
202660%206 tested

This school

California, same grades41% → 42%2025 → 2026 · 1,241,652 → 1,211,701 tested

Each year is a different group of students.

Did students here score above what the state expected?

Yes, in both subjects. California sets an expected score for each student from that student’s own score the year before. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored +15 points against that expected score in English, which the state calls Accelerated. In math, they scored +25 points, which it calls Exceptional.

Source
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 4 and 5: 110
Comparison
Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

Grades 4 and 5 · 2025 · 110 students with scores in both years

Points above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores.

+15 pts

English

The state calls it Accelerated, the fourth of its five growth levels.

+25 pts

Math

The state calls it Exceptional, the highest of its five growth levels.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

All four levelsThe state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal, with tested counts
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 3–5 · This school35%29%12%24%206
English, grades 3–5 · California24%22%21%33%1,208,894
English, grades 3–5 · Los Angeles Unified23%23%22%32%108,229
Math, grades 3–5 · This school40%20%23%17%206
Math, grades 3–5 · California21%21%25%33%1,211,701
Math, grades 3–5 · Los Angeles Unified22%22%25%31%108,401

Below the standard combines the state’s Developing and Minimal levels, its two lowest. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. The state comparison combines CDE’s rows for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation). The district row combines its public schools in the same grades, weighted by students tested.

English and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Each grade’s results: English ↑ · Math ↑

Results since 20178 tested years shown · English and math have been above California in every tested year since 2017

Chart and table: 2017–2026.

English top two levels, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202664%46%
Math top two levels, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202660%42%

The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional.

In grades 3–5, the share at the state’s top two levels in English went from 46% in 2017 to 64% in 2026. In math, it went from 47% in 2017 to 60% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.

Each year’s results and tested counts

English · top two levels · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201746%
320 tested		45%
1,384,680 tested
201856%
295 tested		49%
1,346,907 tested
201960%
273 tested		50%
1,332,547 tested
202265%
247 tested		45%
1,260,830 tested
202363%
219 tested		44%
1,247,801 tested
202465%
202 tested		45%
1,235,509 tested
202560%
208 tested		46%
1,232,086 tested
202664%
206 tested		46%
1,208,894 tested
Math · top two levels · grades 3–5
YearThis schoolCalifornia
201747%
328 tested		40%
1,392,040 tested
201849%
295 tested		42%
1,352,321 tested
201949%
279 tested		44%
1,338,625 tested
202258%
253 tested		38%
1,265,943 tested
202361%
225 tested		40%
1,256,519 tested
202466%
202 tested		41%
1,249,262 tested
202562%
208 tested		41%
1,241,652 tested
202660%
206 tested		42%
1,211,701 tested
How the state’s growth measure worksPoints above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 15 points above that expected score, and in math 25 points above it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.

Life at school

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

11 in 100 students were chronically absent in 2025–26.

State attendance and suspension records, 2025–26

That means they missed 10% or more of school days. At the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school, 20 in 100 were. 0 of 512 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school.

Source
Source
CDE chronic absenteeism and suspension files, 2025–26
Students
chronic absence: 53 of 501 students counted for it; suspension: 0 of 512 students enrolled during the year
Comparison
Each comparison is the rate at the average school (our average of school rates), not a pooled rate. Also: suspensions at the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school 0.2%.

Chronically absent, 2025–26

11 in 100This school
20 in 100At the average Los Angeles Unified elementary school
17 in 100At the average California elementary school

53 of 501 students were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10% or more of school days.

Suspensions, 2025–26

0 of 512

students were suspended at least once. Average California elementary school 1.6%.

Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?

What people say

What do students, families and staff say?

LAUSD School Experience Survey, 2025–26

This schoolLAUSD elementary schools, same questionsEach bar 0–100%

Students

133 of 133 students answered (100%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question87%LAUSD elementary 77% · 133 answered
Belonging · average of 5 questions80%LAUSD elementary 68% · 130–132 answered each
Caring adults · average of 8 questions81%LAUSD elementary 75% · 130–133 answered each
Engagement · average of 6 questions71%LAUSD elementary 68% · 132–133 answered each
High expectations · average of 2 questions89%LAUSD elementary 84% · 133 answered
Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days · average of 4 questions20%LAUSD elementary 24% · 132–133 answered eachShare who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days. A lower share means fewer reported it.
All 43 student questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD elementary schools
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
Safety
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%77%133
Belonging
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%78%132
I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%74%132
I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%72%132
I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%72%130
Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed62%42%132
Caring adults
Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%78%132
The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed79%69%132
Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%70%131
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%73%133
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed63%71%133
There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed80%80%132
Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%78%132
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%79%130
Engagement
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%81%133
My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%67%133
Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed67%55%132
Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%72%132
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed67%74%132
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed47%59%132
High expectations
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%88%133
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%81%133
Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it24%31%132
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it26%30%133
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it23%25%133
Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days; a lower share means fewer reported it9%12%133
Other questions
The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%82%133
Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed58%54%132
Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%80%132
What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?Share who answered “Four-year college degree” or “Graduate degree”——0
I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”81%78%133
I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”77%75%132
I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”85%74%130
I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed73%64%132
I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”67%61%130
I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”54%49%130
I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”70%65%130
I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”75%72%133
I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”83%75%132
I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”61%56%132
How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well”83%72%133
When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful”77%70%133
How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully”83%78%132

“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Families

359 of 392 family surveys came back (92%) · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question93%LAUSD elementary 91% · 346 answered
Belonging · average of 4 questions96%LAUSD elementary 94% · 347–356 answered each
Caring adults · average of 2 questions96%LAUSD elementary 94% · 348 answered
Engagement · average of 3 questions92%LAUSD elementary 91% · 350–358 answered each
Bullying reports taken seriously · 1 question85%LAUSD elementary 80% · 347 answered
All 34 family questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD elementary schools
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
Safety
My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%91%346
Belonging
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%92%349
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%96%350
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%94%347
I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%94%356
Caring adults
Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%94%348
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%95%348
Engagement
This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%94%357
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%89%358
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%91%350
Bullying reports taken seriously
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%80%347
Other questions
Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%89%350
Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%90%350
Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%94%350
Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%85%348
I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%91%345
This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed81%79%356
This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%89%356
This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed83%87%357
This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%92%356
I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%91%358
I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed96%95%347
I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%87%350
I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%88%347
This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%95%357
School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%87%328
This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%91%345
This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%91%343
I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%91%348
This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%86%358
I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%83%335
I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%88%333
My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%92%347
Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%82%349

Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Staff

61 of 61 staff answered (100%), 30 of them teachers · share who agreed or strongly agreed, unless a row says otherwise

Safety · 1 question97%LAUSD elementary 97% · 59 answeredShare giving one of the two most positive answers.
Caring adults · average of 2 questions97%LAUSD elementary 89% · 59–61 answered each
High expectations · average of 2 questions100%LAUSD elementary 95% · 60–61 answered each
Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem · 1 question98%LAUSD elementary 86% · 60 answeredShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem.
All 43 staff questionseach with its answer count, beside LAUSD elementary schools
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
Safety
I feel safe on school grounds during the dayShare giving one of the two most positive answers97%97%59
Caring adults
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%84%61
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%94%59
High expectations
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed100%95%61
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed100%95%60
Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem
Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem98%86%60
Other questions
I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%84%60
Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%84%60
I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed83%81%60
The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%95%60
I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolShare giving one of the two most positive answers93%88%59
At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed93%85%61
This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%82%61
This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%75%61
How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”97%86%59
How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”92%80%59
Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed100%81%59
This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%80%59
This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%75%58
Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem98%93%60
The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed82%75%28
During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)The survey file we hold gives no share for this question, so none is shown——24
I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed92%75%24
I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed96%84%24
I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed100%86%24
I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—88%8
Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”30%16%30
With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”83%50%29
Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”83%59%29
Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”93%51%30
Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”93%66%30
I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed97%79%30
I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed97%79%30
I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed97%94%30
I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed97%91%30
What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed93%74%30
The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%74%30
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed83%71%30
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%75%30
The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed97%77%30
The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed100%81%30
The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%76%30
I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed100%88%28

“—” beside fewer than 20 answers: too few people answered, so the share isn’t shown. Each share counts the answer its row names.

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26. Survey results from Los Angeles Unified School District (opens in a new tab)

Know this school? Add your answers

Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Charles H. Kim works for your family.

Answer the family questionsResponder en español

Work here? Answer 8 questions about Charles H. Kim as a workplace, with your Los Angeles Unified work email.

Answer the staff questions

Ask: Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?

About the survey and these figuresWho answers, what we show, and how a theme figure is made

Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades.

LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers. We show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group only when at least 10% of it responded, so the answers speak for more than the few who chose to reply.

Each row shows the percentage its label describes. For a theme, such as one marked “average of 5 questions”, we average the percentages for its questions, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. Each lane lists every question with its own percentage.

Every learner

How do kids like mine do here?

Three student groups here scored well above the same groups across California in English.

Student groups, grades 3–5, spring 2026

Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students and English learners all score below California’s rate for all students statewide. 63% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in English (grades 3–5, spring 2026), against 36% for the same group across California. The chart gives each group’s figures. Every group’s math results are in the table below.

Source
Source
California Department of Education, CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
grades 3–5; each row gives its tested count. Low-income is CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged”.
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s rows for the whole state combined and weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Charles H. KimSame group, CaliforniaAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students
  • Asian75 tested83%Same group, California 70%
  • Low-income189 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 63%Same group, California 36%
  • Hispanic or Latino97 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 52%Same group, California 36%
  • English learners46 testedAhead of the same group across California, where that group scores below California’s rate for all students: 33%Same group, California 14%

Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–5 English, spring 2026. In math the same groups run from 44% to 88%; every value is in the table below. English learners: grades 3 and 4 only.

Who are the students?

2025–26 · students counted
1. Hispanic or Latino: 48%2. Asian: 35%3. Filipino: 6%4. White: 5%5. Black or African American: 5%Unallocated share: 1%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2025–26
  1. Hispanic or Latino48%
  2. Asian35%
  3. Filipino6%
  4. White5%
  5. Black or African American5%
  6. Two or more races—
  7. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  8. Pacific Islander—
  9. Not reported—
  10. Unallocated share1%
A dash means the share isn’t available; it isn’t zero. The unallocated share is what’s left after the shares we have; it isn’t a student group. Source and comparisons: the full student mix below.

Are English learners moving up on the state’s English test?

65% of English learners here moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026.

Spring 2025 to spring 2026 · English learners with state English test (ELPAC) scores in both years

This school · 73 of 113 English learners65%
Los Angeles Unified · 24,781 of 47,33052%
California · 355,274 of 748,91647%

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.

Who are the families and teachers?

93%of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 451 of 483. California: 63%.

27teachers, 2024–25

12 yearsaverage experience, 2024–25

4%in their first year, 2024–25

90%of teaching positions with proper credential and placement, 2021–22

Ask: How does the school keep low-income students and other student groups on track as they move up through the grades?

All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–5 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Los Angeles Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 189 tested
English63%+2340%+2736%
Math59%+2039%+2831%
Hispanic or Latino · 97 tested
English52%+1141%+1636%
Math44%+539%+1331%
Asian · 75 tested
English83%+776%+1370%
Math88%+880%+1771%
English learners · 46 tested · grades 3 and 4 only
English33%+2013%+1914%
Math46%+2620%+2719%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind across California does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Full student mix, comparisons and sources, 2025–26
Students, 2025–26Here
Hispanic or Latino48%
Asian35%
Filipino6%
White5%
Black or African American5%
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares are of the students the file counts for attendance (CDE’s “eligible enrollment”); unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

How the credential rate is counted

CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22: 90% of teaching positions, 23.3 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 25.9 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Next steps

What comes after Charles H. Kim, and how do I get in?

Virgil Middle, then Los Angeles Senior High.

Charles H. Kim’s attendance zone is split: 80% of its children are assigned to Virgil Middle and 17% to John Burroughs Middle; the largest part, 17%, to Los Angeles Senior High. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

  1. Elementary · this school
    Charles H. Kim Elementary
    Grades TK–5
  2. Middle · part of the zone
    Virgil Middle
    65th · Solid · 202680% of the zone’s children

    Or John Burroughs Middle for another 17% (84th · Strong · 2026).

  3. High · part of the zone
    Los Angeles Senior High
    18th · Needs Support · 202517% of the zone’s children

From the district’s 2026 attendance boundaries. Shares are our estimate of where the zone’s children live, from 2020 Census child counts, or land area where few children were counted; they describe children living in the zone, not a school’s enrolled students. A boundary doesn’t guarantee placement: transfers, permits, magnets and Choices can change the path. Check your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

  • Virgil Middle

    Assigned for part of the zone

    65th percentile · Solid · middle · 2026

    80% of the zone’s children

  • John Burroughs Middle

    Assigned for part of the zone

    84th percentile · Strong · middle · 2026

    17% of the zone’s children

High-school links

  • Ambassador-Global Leadership

    Option for this area, by application · district-published, source year 2026; no single school is assigned

    13th percentile · Needs Support · high · 2025

    83% of the zone’s children

  • UCLA Community K-12

    Option for this area, by application · district-published, source year 2026; no single school is assigned

    61st percentile · Solid · high · 2025

    83% of the zone’s children

  • School for the Visual Arts and Humanities

    Option for this area, by application · district-published, source year 2026; no single school is assigned

    55th percentile · Solid · high · 2025

    83% of the zone’s children

  • Los Angeles High School of the Arts

    Option for this area, by application · district-published, source year 2026; no single school is assigned

    40th percentile · Developing · high · 2025

    83% of the zone’s children

  • New Open World Academy K-12

    Option for this area, by application · district-published, source year 2026; no single school is assigned

    50th percentile · Solid · high · 2025

    83% of the zone’s children

  • Los Angeles Senior High

    Assigned for part of the zone

    18th percentile · Needs Support · high · 2025

    17% of the zone’s children

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.

Where the path ends: Los Angeles Senior High
Los Angeles Senior High18th · Needs Support · 2025 · Scope Score 45district-published assignment for part of the zone

The road from this school ends at Los Angeles Senior High. UC records 13 enrollees from Los Angeles Senior High for fall 2025. The AP Course Audit lists 14 AP courses its teachers are authorized to teach in 2025–26. Those figures come from dated records. A child starting here today would reach Los Angeles Senior High around 2036, and a school can change a lot in 10 years. By the state’s 2023 count, 58% of the students who finished high school at Los Angeles Senior High enrolled in college within 12 months, UC or not.

13 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 14 authorized AP courses (AP Course Audit 2025–26) → full record on Los Angeles Senior High's page
Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.

Applying to Charles H. Kim for 2027–28

  1. Charles H. Kim is on LAUSD’s list of Schools for Advanced Studies (grades K–5). In LAUSD’s words: “Schools for Advanced Studies (SAS) are Los Angeles Unified schools that have received a designation for equitable and exemplary Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) programs.” From the Choices brochure, pages 55 and 57, read November 2, 2026.

    LAUSD Choices brochure ↗

  2. If Charles H. Kim is the school for your address, you don’t apply: you register with LAUSD, and a child who meets the SAS criteria joins its SAS/GATE program. Check which school serves your address first.

    LAUSD Resident School Identifier ↗

  3. On-time Choices applications closed November 6, 2026. Late applications open December 1, 2026, join the end of the waiting list, and the school itself checks SAS eligibility when it contacts you about a seat.

    apply.lausd.net ↗

Compare with other schools

How Choices, lotteries and waitlists work

School website: charleshkimes.lausd.org ↗Office: (213) 368-5600Administrator: Jonathan Paek

Location and visiting

Get directions  (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
225 South Oxford Avenue, Los Angeles 90004

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm which school serves your address with Los Angeles Unified.

Questions for your visit

  1. How many K–2 students did screening find at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help?
  2. How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
  3. When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?
  4. Does the school share its survey results with families, and what has it changed because of them?
  5. How does the school keep low-income students and other student groups on track as they move up through the grades?
  6. When a bullying report comes in, who handles it, and how is the family told? 20% (the average share reporting being bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days, across 4 survey questions), 2025–26; LAUSD elementary schools: 24%

Office (213) 368-5600225 South Oxford Avenue, directions  (opens Google Maps in a new tab)

Nearby elementary schoolsClosest first, by straight-line distance

The closest elementary schools, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.

Nearby elementary schoolsPercentile among California elementary schools, 2026

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map

Source records

Every figure on this page, with its source, grades, year and count.

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #781 of 5,726 California elementary schools we score · #66 of 581 in Los Angeles Unified
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math38%6642%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math62%6523%
5th graders in 2026 against 3rd graders in 2024 (partly different children)+83 scale-score pts6220%
Chronically absent11 in 100605%
Suspension rate0 of 512635%
English learners: top level29%685%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–266086#781California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–198 in 1000 of 684−9
2021–22not on filenot on file−9
2022–23not on filenot on file−5
2023–2414 in 1000 of 513+9
2024–2511 in 1000 of 513+9
2025–2611 in 1000 of 512+6

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 3 and grade 5 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English20635%64%
2026 · Math20640%60%
2025 · English20840%60%
2025 · Math20838%62%
2024 · English20243%65%
2024 · Math20244%66%
2023 · English21937%63%
2023 · Math22532%61%
2022 · English24734%65%
2022 · Math25332%58%
2019 · English27331%60%
2019 · Math27928%49%
2018 · English29531%56%
2018 · Math29526%49%
2017 · English32023%46%
2017 · Math32823%47%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 3 · English8358%
2025 · Grade 4 · English6554%
2025 · Grade 5 · English6070%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math8361%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math6557%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math6067%
2024 · Grade 3 · English6260%
2024 · Grade 4 · English6161%
2024 · Grade 5 · English7972%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math6266%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math6159%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math7972%
2023 · Grade 3 · English5765%
2023 · Grade 4 · English8162%
2023 · Grade 5 · English8164%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math6062%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math8469%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math8153%
2022 · Grade 3 · English8666%
2022 · Grade 4 · English8267%
2022 · Grade 5 · English7961%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math8867%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math8552%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math8054%
2019 · Grade 3 · English9060%
2019 · Grade 4 · English9558%
2019 · Grade 5 · English8864%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math9261%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math9746%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math9040%
2018 · Grade 3 · English10660%
2018 · Grade 4 · English9257%
2018 · Grade 5 · English9751%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math10657%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math9245%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math9746%
2017 · Grade 3 · English10350%
2017 · Grade 4 · English11037%
2017 · Grade 5 · English10752%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math10753%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math11239%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math10949%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide6121%21%48%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income18963%+23+27
Hispanic or Latino9752%+11+16
Asian7583%+7+13
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students+15110Accelerated+25110Exceptional
Low-income+14100Accelerated+24100Exceptional
English learners+863Accelerated+3063Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino+1860Accelerated+2860Exceptional
Recently reclassified as fluent in English+1656not categorized+3156not categorized
Asian+1134Accelerated+2234Exceptional
English-only students+2329not categorized+2429not categorized
Students with disabilities−519Average+419Average

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4 and 5. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure, and grade 5 against the same school’s grade 3 two years earlier, partly different children · two different measures

Grade 5 in 2026 against grade 3 in 2024 · English

English · 2024 · Grade 3
42%
exceeded standard · 60% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 62 English test records with scores
English · 2026 · Grade 5
41%
Advanced · 69% Proficient or Advanced
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 61 English test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 61 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English+15 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 4 and 5

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 4 and 5

110 students

CDE growth category: Accelerated

California growth model, English: +15 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Accelerated, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.

State model · math+25 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 4 and 5

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 4 and 5

110 students

CDE growth category: Exceptional

California growth model, math: +25 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Exceptional, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median English estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4 and 5, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 11 in 100 → 2025–26 · 11 in 100 · 0 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 0 of 513 → 2025–26 · 0 of 512 · 0.0 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female7 in 10013 in 100+6 in 100
Male9 in 1008 in 100−1 in 100
Asian3 in 1003 in 1000 in 100
Black or African American13 in 10022 in 100+9 in 100
Filipino9 in 1003 in 100−6 in 100
Hispanic or Latino12 in 10016 in 100+4 in 100
Two or more races0 in 100——
White5 in 1000 in 100−5 in 100
Students with disabilities12 in 10024 in 100+12 in 100
English learners9 in 1009 in 1000 in 100
Low-income9 in 10011 in 100+2 in 100
All students8 in 10011 in 100+3 in 100

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$18,180 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$2,445 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 483

Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 483

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 52%Instruction support 17%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$5,655,379,38451.81%52%
Instruction support$1,791,152,34816.41%17%
Student services$1,344,873,23212.32%12%
Administration$763,652,7807.00%7%
Buildings & maintenance$1,099,649,06210.07%10%
Other$260,356,5952.39%2%
Total$10,915,063,400100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $10,915,063,400 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$18,180 per pupil
2020$16,355 per pupil
2019$15,793 per pupil
2018$13,247 per pupil
2017$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders3.9%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 90004 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 90004 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$64,826
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)41%
ZIP-area population58,484
Median age36.7 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 90004 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/charles-h-kim-elementary-1989"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Charles H. Kim Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated October 15, 2026

How we analyze · Request a correction