ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
BP STEM Academy · Baldwin Park

BP STEM Academy: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

BP STEM Academy posts 66% meeting the standard, and 31.3% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

4733 Landis Avenue, 91706 (opens in new tab)·Baldwin Park Unified·Baldwin Park·Grades 3-8·565 students·88% low-income·Magnet·2024–25 CAASPP·(626) 962-8412
Magnet program — specialized public school with themed curriculum. Enrollment via district lottery, not neighborhood-based.
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5645
% Exceeded31%21%
% Met+66%43%
Growth+13.3-2.9
Absence18.2%17.9%
Suspension4.5%1.6%
Scope Score
56
🚀 Growth Engine · Solid
ranked #1,332 statewide · #1 of 9 in Baldwin Park Unified

BP STEM Academy scores 56 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 77th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “66% proficient” and call it done. BP STEM Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Baldwin Park, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 77th-percentile line every tested year since 2022.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Maintained)
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 347%63%61%54%
Grade 462%70%81%85%
Grade 562%65%69%81%
Grade 647%40%34%29%38%
Grade 741%46%49%43%47%
Grade 832%42%46%52%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 347%74%61%54%
Grade 459%63%78%68%
Grade 541%65%38%54%
Grade 637%32%25%29%28%
Grade 724%23%37%23%32%
Grade 822%23%21%27%22%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

25%
29%
46%
Grade 3 · 54% proficient
52%
33%
15%
Grade 4 · 85% proficient
43%
38%
19%
Grade 5 · 81% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 18.2pp across grades; the floor rises 26.9pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
31.3%
State 21.3%
10.0pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+13.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
66.0%
State 42.7%
23.4pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.2%
State 17.9%
0.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.5%
State 1.6%
2.9pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
6.5%
State 18.0%
11.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At BP STEM Academy in Baldwin Park, 47.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. BP STEM Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (45.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 54.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 469 students tested.

All students at this school: 41% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 41%, district —, state 43%41%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 38%, district 33%, state 32%38% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 36%, district 32%, state 32%36% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 40%, district 35%, state 44%40% · −0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 41%, district 34%, state 42%41% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 11%, state 15%10% · −31 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 13%, state 11%5% · −36 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 73%, district 69%, state 72%73% · +32 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 21%, district 23%, state 22%21% · −20 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 30.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.2%, district 21.8%, state 17.9%18.2% · +0.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.5%, district —, state 1.6%4.5% · +2.9pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–617.2%
Grades 7–819.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 21:118:1
Teaching staff32 teachers
Avg. experience16.6 years
Fully credentialed79%
First-year teachers6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,803 – $133,806
Principal salary$161,641 – $181,508
Superintendent salary$301,854

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $27,481, CA average $14,815$27,481 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,004 per student

$1,004 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,647 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support13%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,026 per pupil
2019$14,799 per pupil
2018$14,543 per pupil
2017$10,768 per pupil
2016$9,734 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic87.3%
District 89.3% · CA 56.1%
Asian9.0%
District 7.0% · CA 10.2%
Other2.5%
District 2.3% · CA 9.0%
White0.9%
District 1.0% · CA 19.9%
Black0.3%
District 0.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 88.3% (25pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$609K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population71,082
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 47% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is BP STEM Academy a good elementary school?

BP STEM Academy has a Scope Score of 56 out of 100, placing it in the 77th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,332 statewide. 31.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.0 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are BP STEM Academy's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 66.0% of students at BP STEM Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 31.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 34.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 31.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 179 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does BP STEM Academy rank in California?

BP STEM Academy ranks #1,332 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 77th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is BP STEM Academy getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at BP STEM Academy increases by 13.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at BP STEM Academy?

18.2% of students at BP STEM Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 4.5%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does BP STEM Academy compare to other schools in Baldwin Park?

BP STEM Academy scores 56/100 (77th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 565 students. Use the schools in Baldwin Park page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does BP STEM Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At BP STEM Academy in Baldwin Park, 47.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. BP STEM Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 7.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (45.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 54.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 469 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
31.3%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 60th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+13.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 60th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
66.0%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 68th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 50th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.5%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 26th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
6.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 36th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32425%29%13%33%54%+11
Grade 42752%33%15%0%85%+40
Grade 53743%38%11%8%81%+33
Grade 615514%24%28%34%38%−8
Grade 713117%30%22%31%47%−1
Grade 815715%32%23%30%47%+1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32421%33%21%25%54%+8
Grade 42821%46%18%14%68%+26
Grade 53926%28%28%18%54%+19
Grade 615714%14%24%48%28%−7
Grade 713618%14%24%44%32%−2
Grade 815811%11%24%54%22%−10
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1119714%32%44%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged46947.3%+7+9
Hispanic/Latino46745.0%+6+6
Students with Disabilities8415.5%+0−1
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
BP STEM Academy ←5631.3%66.0%+13.34.5%
Manzanita Elementary1.6 mi7034.3%67.3%+0.80.1%
San Jose Charter Academy2.5 mi5738.9%67.2%−7.60.5%
Kenmore Elementary1.3 mi4822.3%46.1%−6.80.5%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20224874#151226.2%52.9%36.3%8.1%+5.1pp
20235680#112138.1%66.5%25.6%9.2%-3.9pp
20245779#120436.9%64.4%21.4%6.3%-7.7pp
20255677#133231.3%66.0%18.2%4.5%+13.3pp
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.0%19.7%+14.7pp
Male7.8%16.3%+8.5pp
Asian0.0%1.9%+1.9pp
Hispanic/Latino6.0%19.7%+13.7pp
Students with Disabilities10.5%26.4%+15.9pp
English Learners8.9%15.9%+7.0pp
Homeless6.4%18.8%+12.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6.5%18.6%+12.1pp
All Students6.4%18.2%+11.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction