ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Benjamin Franklin Intermediate · Colma

Benjamin Franklin Intermediate: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Benjamin Franklin Intermediate posts 27% meeting the standard and 10.0% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

700 Stewart Avenue, 94015 (opens in new tab)·Jefferson Elementary·Colma·Grades 6-8·497 students·48% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(650) 991-1202
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3243
% Exceeded10%17%
% Met+27%39%
Growth+7.0+1.5
Absence17.2%18.5%
Suspension3.8%3.7%
Scope Score
32
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,598 statewide · #4 of 5 in Jefferson Elementary

Benjamin Franklin Intermediate scores 32 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 29th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “27% proficient” and call it done. Benjamin Franklin Intermediate deserves a closer read. The school sits in Colma, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 29th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 27% meet the standard today, versus 37% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 642%33%29%26%25%
Grade 754%44%35%27%31%
Grade 846%49%35%32%32%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 626%33%27%23%18%
Grade 734%25%30%22%29%
Grade 818%29%19%20%25%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
17%
75%
Grade 6 · 25% proficient
25%
68%
Grade 7 · 32% proficient
24%
69%
Grade 8 · 31% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 6.8pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
10.0%
State 16.8%
6.8pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+7.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
26.7%
State 39.3%
12.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.2%
State 18.5%
1.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.8%
State 3.7%
0.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
21.9%
State 18.0%
3.9pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Benjamin Franklin Intermediate in Colma, 24.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Benjamin Franklin Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 13.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (16.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 250 students tested.

All students at this school: 27% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 27%, district —, state 39%27%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 22%, district 35%, state 32%22% · −5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 29%, district 43%, state 44%29% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 25%, district 41%, state 42%25% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 15%, district 28%, state 32%15% · −11 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 10%, state 11%5% · −22 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 40%, district 50%, state 65%40% · +13 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 50%, district 65%, state 72%50% · +23 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 3%, district 14%, state 15%3% · −24 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 23%, district 31%, state 56%23% · −4 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 3.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -3.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.2%, district 13.1%, state 18.5%17.2% · −1.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.8%, district —, state 3.7%3.8% · +0.1pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–614.0%
Grades 7–818.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 23:118:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience4.7 years
Fully credentialed73%
First-year teachers48%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$68,157 – $127,245
Principal salary$168,234 – $0
Superintendent salary$257,260

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,954, CA average $14,815$18,954 · spent at this school
Federal share$807 per student

$807 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,401 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2019–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,119 per pupil
2020$10,805 per pupil
2020$34,833 per pupil
2019$12,785 per pupil
2019$10,350 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic47.5%
District 41.5% · CA 56.1%
Other33.4%
District 29.7% · CA 9.0%
Asian9.7%
District 17.0% · CA 10.2%
White8.1%
District 8.9% · CA 19.9%
Black1.4%
District 2.9% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 48.3% (16pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$127K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.17M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population64,091
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Benjamin Franklin Intermediate a good middle school?

Benjamin Franklin Intermediate has a Scope Score of 32 out of 100, placing it in the 29th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,598 statewide. 10.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.8 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Benjamin Franklin Intermediate's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 26.7% of students at Benjamin Franklin Intermediate met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 954 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Benjamin Franklin Intermediate rank in California?

Benjamin Franklin Intermediate ranks #1,598 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 29th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Benjamin Franklin Intermediate getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Benjamin Franklin Intermediate increases by 7.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Benjamin Franklin Intermediate?

17.2% of students at Benjamin Franklin Intermediate are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.8%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Benjamin Franklin Intermediate compare to other schools in Colma?

Benjamin Franklin Intermediate scores 32/100 (29th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 497 students. Use the schools in Colma page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Benjamin Franklin Intermediate serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Benjamin Franklin Intermediate in Colma, 24.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Benjamin Franklin Intermediate trails its district average for low-income students by 13.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (16.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 250 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
10.0%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 43th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+7.0pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 39th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
26.7%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 40th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.2%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.8%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 49th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
21.9%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 51th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61378%17%25%50%25%−22
Grade 71597%25%20%48%31%−16
Grade 81747%24%25%43%32%−14
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61418%10%28%54%18%−17
Grade 716317%13%27%44%29%−5
Grade 818013%12%19%56%25%−7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111816%9%56%28%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged25024.0%−14−14
Hispanic/Latino21316.0%−15−23
English Learners1502.7%−6−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Benjamin Franklin Intermediate ←3210.0%26.7%+7.03.8%
Aptos Middle2.6 mi5828.4%55.3%+7.43.8%
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle1.2 mi4514.7%40.0%+7.33.6%
Alta Loma Middle2.9 mi4521.2%42.5%−3.11.9%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193436#128111.0%36.7%9.3%7.7%-1.9pp
20224263#80013.4%35.6%22.9%5.2%+6.4pp
20233434#143411.2%29.0%26.4%8.3%-0.5pp
20242417#18348.9%25.0%22.4%7.4%+1.4pp
20253229#159810.0%26.7%17.2%3.8%+7.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 14 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.5%19.2%+10.7pp
Male10.1%15.1%+5.0pp
Asian6.2%5.8%-0.4pp
Black/African American5.9%
White4.6%6.1%+1.5pp
Hispanic/Latino15.9%27.2%+11.3pp
Two or More Races3.7%11.8%+8.1pp
Students with Disabilities11.7%16.1%+4.4pp
English Learners14.5%21.3%+6.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.3%18.0%+6.7pp
All Students9.3%17.1%+7.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction