ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Garden Village Elementary · Colma

Garden Village Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Garden Village posts 43% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

208 Garden Lane, 94015 (opens in new tab)·Jefferson Elementary·Colma·Grades TK-5·288 students·60% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(650) 991-1233
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5145
% Exceeded19%21%
% Met+43%43%
Growth+7.1-2.9
Absence13.9%17.9%
Suspension0.8%1.6%
Scope Score
51
🚀 Growth Engine · Solid
ranked #1,810 statewide · #3 of 12 in Jefferson Elementary

Garden Village Elementary scores 51 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 68th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “43% proficient” and call it done. Garden Village deserves a closer read. The school sits in Colma, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 6th to the 68th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 3400 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 43% of students meet the standard today, above the 38% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 350%45%40%39%42%
Grade 429%36%33%43%40%
Grade 526%29%54%38%54%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 376%50%40%36%40%
Grade 428%24%37%29%40%
Grade 521%18%32%40%43%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

18%
24%
58%
Grade 3 · 42% proficient
19%
21%
60%
Grade 4 · 40% proficient
20%
34%
46%
Grade 5 · 54% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 11.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
18.8%
State 21.3%
2.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+7.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
43.2%
State 42.7%
0.6pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.9%
State 17.9%
4.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.8%
State 1.6%
0.8pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.3%
State 18.0%
4.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Garden Village Elementary in Colma, 41.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Garden Village Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 82 students tested.

All students at this school: 43% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 43%, district —, state 43%43%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 39%, district 35%, state 32%39% · −4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 39%, district 41%, state 42%39% · −5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 39%, district 28%, state 32%39% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 49%, district 43%, state 44%49% · +5 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 10%, state 11%9% · −34 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 58%, district 50%, state 65%58% · +15 vs school

5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.9%, district 13.1%, state 17.9%13.9% · −4.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.8%, district —, state 1.6%0.8% · −0.8pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (21.3% vs 12.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.0%
TK/K21.3%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Benjamin Franklin Intermediate, which scores 19 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Garden Village Elementary
51/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 23:124:1
Teaching staff16 teachers
Avg. experience8.3 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers50%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$68,157 – $127,245
Principal salary$168,234 – $0
Superintendent salary$257,260

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,815, CA average $14,815$17,815 · spent at this school
Federal share$507 per student

$507 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,401 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2019–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,119 per pupil
2020$10,805 per pupil
2020$34,833 per pupil
2019$12,785 per pupil
2019$10,350 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic46.5%
District 41.5% · CA 56.1%
Other29.9%
District 29.7% · CA 9.0%
White11.8%
District 8.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian10.1%
District 17.0% · CA 10.2%
Black1.7%
District 2.9% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 60.1% (4pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$127K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.17M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population64,091
Median age42 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 33% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Garden Village Elementary a good elementary school?

Garden Village Elementary has a Scope Score of 51 out of 100, placing it in the 68th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,810 statewide. 18.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Garden Village Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 43.2% of students at Garden Village Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 250 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Garden Village Elementary rank in California?

Garden Village Elementary ranks #1,810 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 68th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Garden Village Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Garden Village Elementary increases by 7.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Garden Village Elementary?

13.9% of students at Garden Village Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.8%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Garden Village Elementary compare to other schools in Colma?

Garden Village Elementary scores 51/100 (68th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 288 students. Use the schools in Colma page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Garden Village Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Garden Village Elementary in Colma, 41.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Garden Village Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 82 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
18.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 48th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+7.1pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 68th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
43.2%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 50th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.8%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 57th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 33818%24%21%37%42%−1
Grade 44219%21%21%38%40%−4
Grade 54120%34%17%29%54%+6
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34221%19%19%40%40%−5
Grade 4439%30%26%35%40%−2
Grade 54425%18%32%25%43%+8
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11439%23%49%19%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8241.5%+4+3
Hispanic/Latino6541.5%+11+3
English Learners449.1%+0−1
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Garden Village Elementary ←5118.8%43.2%+7.10.8%
Marjorie H. Tobias Elementary0.8 mi6640.1%63.0%+5.70.4%
Thomas Edison Elementary1.3 mi6131.3%61.7%−9.50.1%
Buri Buri Elementary3.1 mi5837.5%66.8%−8.60.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019236#516017.1%38.4%8.4%0.7%-39.6pp
20222213#501512.9%33.6%18.4%0.1%-23.8pp
20234461#222416.3%39.0%25.6%1.1%+2.9pp
20243841#340414.2%37.7%23.4%0.2%+1.9pp
20255168#181018.8%43.2%13.9%0.8%+7.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.2%14.2%+5.0pp
Male7.6%12.6%+5.0pp
Asian0.0%3.0%+3.0pp
White8.5%7.0%-1.5pp
Hispanic/Latino10.7%20.7%+10.0pp
Students with Disabilities4.3%7.7%+3.4pp
English Learners7.2%16.3%+9.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.8%18.2%+9.4pp
All Students8.3%13.4%+5.1pp
Two or More Races7.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction