ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle · Northridge

Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Alfred B. Nobel Charter posts 41.6% exceeding the standard — versus 16.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

9950 Tampa Avenue, 91324 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Northridge·Grades 6-8·1,784 students·57% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(818) 773-4700·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6743
% Exceeded42%17%
% Met+70%39%
Growth-2.9+1.5
Absence11.9%18.5%
Suspension1.1%3.7%
Scope Score
67
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #188 statewide · #9 of 226 in Los Angeles Unified

Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle scores 67 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 92nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “70% proficient” and call it done. Alfred B. Nobel Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Northridge, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Alfred B. Nobel Charter's low-income kids hit 65.6% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

As a charter, Alfred B. Nobel Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 83rd to the 92nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 70% of students meet the standard today, above the 63% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 666%67%70%76%72%
Grade 772%67%71%71%75%
Grade 868%66%62%77%74%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 659%55%62%70%69%
Grade 757%51%61%61%69%
Grade 858%51%47%59%61%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

40%
33%
27%
Grade 6 · 73% proficient
41%
34%
25%
Grade 7 · 75% proficient
37%
37%
26%
Grade 8 · 74% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 2.6pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

65.6%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Alfred B. Nobel Charter's most underrated number

65.6% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Alfred B. Nobel Charter low-income: 65.6%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
41.6%
State 16.8%
24.7pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-2.9pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
69.9%
State 39.3%
30.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
11.9%
State 18.5%
6.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.1%
State 3.7%
2.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle in Northridge, 65.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 24.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (57.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (67.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 51.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 997 students tested.

All students at this school: 70% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 70%, district —, state 39%70%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 62%, district 36%, state 32%62% · −8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 69%, district 41%, state 42%69% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 71%, district 42%, state 44%71% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 62%, district 36%, state 32%62% · −8 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 75%, district 65%, state 56%75% · +5 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 85%, district 78%, state 72%85% · +15 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 32%, district 14%, state 15%32% · −38 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 86%, district 70%, state 65%86% · +16 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 77%, district 56%, state 56%77% · +7 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 52%, district 30%, state 26%52% · −18 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 26%, district 9%, state 11%26% · −44 vs school
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.9pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.9%, district 24.5%, state 18.5%11.9% · −6.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 3.7%1.1% · −2.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.6%
Grades 7–812.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 20:123:1
Teaching staff79 teachers
Avg. experience17.4 years
Fully credentialed97%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,814, CA average $14,815$20,814 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$1,240 per student

$1,240 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic47.5%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White22.4%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian13.4%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Other11.9%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Black4.8%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 57.1% (7pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$100K · CA $85K
Median home value$906K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population30,699
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,784 students, this school is well above the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 52% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle a good middle school?

Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle has a Scope Score of 67 out of 100, placing it in the 92nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #188 statewide. 41.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 24.7 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 69.9% of students at Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 41.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 28.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 41.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 3,507 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle rank in California?

Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle ranks #188 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 92nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle decreases by 2.9 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle?

11.9% of students at Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle compare to other schools in Northridge?

Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle scores 67/100 (92nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,784 students. Use the schools in Northridge page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle in Northridge, 65.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 24.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (57.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (67.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 51.5 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 997 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
41.6%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 77th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-2.9pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 52th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
69.9%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 74th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.9%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 59th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.1%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 60th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 658940%33%19%9%72%+26
Grade 758541%34%14%11%75%+27
Grade 857737%37%17%9%74%+28
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 658846%22%21%11%69%+34
Grade 758844%24%17%15%69%+35
Grade 858041%20%16%22%61%+29
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1158024%28%41%6%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged99765.6%+25+27
Hispanic/Latino82867.5%+26+29
White39776.5%+8+15
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle ←6741.6%69.9%−2.91.1%
James Jordan Middle2.5 mi5018.5%46.1%+9.23.3%
Ernest Lawrence Middle2.3 mi4823.3%44.3%−5.82.6%
Northridge Middle2.4 mi357.7%24.4%+0.11.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195783#33831.9%63.4%8.9%0.0%+0.7pp
20225483#37329.1%59.4%20.0%0.0%-2.4pp
20235782#39033.2%62.3%14.8%1.4%-11.4pp
20247194#13640.9%69.0%9.2%0.9%-4.9pp
20256792#18841.6%69.9%11.9%1.1%-2.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.9%11.0%+3.1pp
Male9.8%12.5%+2.7pp
Asian2.4%4.5%+2.1pp
Black/African American13.3%18.6%+5.3pp
White3.6%4.4%+0.8pp
Hispanic/Latino10.7%13.3%+2.6pp
Two or More Races10.1%12.3%+2.2pp
Students with Disabilities18.5%16.8%-1.7pp
English Learners13.0%21.1%+8.1pp
Homeless0.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.3%15.3%+4.0pp
All Students8.9%11.8%+2.9pp
Filipino15.4%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction