School district · Los Angeles County

San Marino Unified schools

San Marino Unified has two ranked public elementary schools, one middle school and one high school. Carver Elementary is at the 98th percentile, Valentine Elementary the 98th, Huntington Middle the 97th and San Marino High the 96th, each among the California schools we score at its level (spring 2026 tests; high schools, spring 2025).

  1. Elementary

    Carver Elementary

    98thStrong

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

    Valentine Elementary

    98thStrong

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

  2. Middle

    Huntington Middle

    97thStrong

    grades 6–8 · spring 2026 tests

  3. High

    San Marino High

    96thStrong

    grades 9–12 · spring 2025 tests

Schools around San Marino Unified

4 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in San Marino Unified score highest?

Carver Elementary’s 98th percentile means it scored higher than 98 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in San Marino Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Middle schools

Where does the middle school we score in San Marino Unified stand?

Huntington Middle’s 97th percentile means it scored higher than 97 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

High schools

Where does the high school we score in San Marino Unified stand?

San Marino High’s 96th percentile means it scored higher than 96 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

The district

Where does San Marino Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

San Marino Unified spent $16,729 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every San Marino Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction60%
  • Instruction support10%
  • Student services8%
  • Administration10%
  • Buildings & maintenance10%
  • Other2%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$33.2 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 39 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 52% of its $63.5 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 89 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 80% of the money. The plan itself puts 95% of it toward staff.

  • Highly Qualified and Appropriately Assigned Teachers $20.6 million
  • Instructional Assistants $3.5 million
  • AP/Honors Courses $2.5 million
  • 36 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

7 of the plan’s 39 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $265,046
  • English learners $611,756

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • EL Teacher on Special Assignment$288,358
  • English Learner Teachers and Paraprofessionals$284,006
  • Academic Tutoring$141,892
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth) and what changed
For high-need students

It plans $1.6 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $1.4 million and estimates it spent $1.4 million, $0.1 million (4%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $4.6 million (16%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Highly Qualified and Appropriately Assigned Teachers, which went from $17.8 million to $20.6 million.

Largest cuts

  • Intervention Teachers−⁠$162,674
  • Curriculum Adoption−⁠$101,826

Largest increases

  • Highly Qualified and Appropriately Assigned Teachers+⁠$2.8 million
  • Instructional Assistants+⁠$416,024
  • AP/​Honors Courses+⁠$414,810

Ask: What did Intervention Teachers pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $162,674 less?

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Highly Qualified and Appropriately Assigned Teachers · $20,611,174
  • Instructional Assistants · $3,469,180
  • AP/​Honors Courses · $2,524,665
The full plan3 goals, 5 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($33.2 million).

Where does the money go?

67% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1San Marino Unified School District is committed to delivering a World-Class Education with Recognized…$9.5 million29% of action budgets

“San Marino Unified School District is committed to delivering a World-Class Education with Recognized Excellence in Academics, Arts, Athletics, and Activities through rigorous innovative inquiry based learning opportunities grounded in creativity, collaboration, critical thinking and civic responsibility to graduate students who are college and or career ready and responsible, resilient, and adaptive individuals” p. 13 ↗

18 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $8.1 million (+⁠$1.4 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Instructional Assistants$3.5 millionaction 1.18 · p. 48 ↗
  2. AP/​Honors Courses$2.5 millionaction 1.3 · p. 47 ↗
  3. School Counselors$0.8 millionaction 1.15 · p. 48 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Technology: 1:1 student to device ratio$0.5 millionaction 1.17 · p. 48 ↗
  5. CTE / Academic Pathways$0.4 millionaction 1.4 · p. 47 ↗

13 more funded actions in this goal

  • Curriculum Adoption · action 1.13 · p. 48 ↗$0.4 million
  • EL Teacher on Special Assignment · action 1.16 · p. 48 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • English Learner Teachers and Paraprofessionals · action 1.12 · p. 48 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Diagnostic Assessments · action 1.8 · p. 47 ↗$0.2 million
  • Extended School Year · action 1.1 · p. 47 ↗$0.2 million
  • Academic Tutoring · action 1.11 · p. 47 ↗$0.1 million
  • Intervention Teachers · action 1.14 · p. 48 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Dual Enrollment Courses · action 1.5 · p. 47 ↗$0.1 million
  • Higher Educational Institution Partnerships · action 1.6 · p. 47 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Substitutes · action 1.2 · p. 47 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Development · action 1.10 · p. 47 ↗under $0.1 million
  • EL Summer School · action 1.9 · p. 47 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • English Learner Professional Learning · action 1.7 · p. 47 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Instructional Assistants+⁠$0.4 million$3.1 million → $3.5 million · p. 48 ↗
  2. AP/​Honors Courses+⁠$0.4 million$2.1 million → $2.5 million · p. 47 ↗
  3. School Counselors+⁠$192,875$601,823 → $794,698 · p. 48 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Technology: 1:1 student to device ratio · $475,000 → $475,000 · p. 48 ↗unchanged
  • CTE / Academic Pathways · $347,296 → $437,884 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$90,588
  • Curriculum Adoption · $504,884 → $403,058 · p. 48 ↗−⁠$101,826
  • EL Teacher on Special Assignment · $165,448 → $288,358 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$122,910
  • English Learner Teachers and Paraprofessionals · $164,730 → $284,006 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$119,276
  • Diagnostic Assessments · $41,000 → $224,859 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$183,859
  • Extended School Year · $130,863 → $156,732 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$25,869
  • Academic Tutoring · $103,420 → $141,892 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$38,472
  • Intervention Teachers · $275,828 → $113,154 · p. 48 ↗−⁠$162,674
  • Dual Enrollment Courses · $39,680 → $68,584 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$28,904
  • Higher Educational Institution Partnerships · $43,601 → $46,524 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$2,923
  • Substitutes · $21,368 → $27,518 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$6,150
  • Professional Development · $25,000 · p. 47 ↗new or renamed
  • EL Summer School · $12,105 → $10,000 · p. 47 ↗−⁠$2,105
  • English Learner Professional Learning · $817 → $2,553 · p. 47 ↗+⁠$1,736

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 13 ↗.

Goal 2The San Marino Unified School District is committed to fostering and enhancing systems and conditions…$22.3 million67% of action budgets

“The San Marino Unified School District is committed to fostering and enhancing systems and conditions conducive to students' and staff's academic, behavioral and social-emotional well-being. This commitment is operationalized through the intentional development and implementation of systems, structures, and practices focused on promoting personalized growth. expanding expertise, and the development of environments conducive to teaching and learning” p. 26 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $19.3 million (+⁠$3.0 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Highly Qualified and Appropriately Assigned Teachers$20.6 millionaction 2.5 · p. 48 ↗
  2. Health Aide / District Nurse$0.4 millionaction 2.4 · p. 48 ↗
  3. Professional Learning Days$0.3 millionaction 2.8 · p. 48 ↗
  4. Campus Supervision$0.3 millionaction 2.3 · p. 48 ↗
  5. Standards-Aligned Instructional Materials$0.3 millionaction 2.2 · p. 48 ↗

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Teacher on Special Assignment · action 2.7 · p. 48 ↗$0.2 million
  • Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) Induction Program · action 2.1 · p. 48 ↗$0.1 million
  • CalSCHLS Climate Survey · action 2.6 · p. 48 ↗$0.1 million
  • Instructional Technology Professional Development · action 2.9 · p. 48 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Highly Qualified and Appropriately Assigned Teachers+⁠$2.8 million$17.8 million → $20.6 million · p. 48 ↗
  2. Professional Learning Days+⁠$41,770$267,043 → $308,813 · p. 48 ↗
  3. Standards-Aligned Instructional Materials+⁠$38,765$260,134 → $298,899 · p. 48 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Health Aide / District Nurse · $402,114 → $440,720 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$38,606
  • Campus Supervision · $291,896 → $303,195 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$11,299
  • Teacher on Special Assignment · $165,127 → $184,618 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$19,491
  • Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) Induction Program · $83,718 → $93,479 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$9,761
  • CalSCHLS Climate Survey · $47,860 → $54,631 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$6,771
  • Instructional Technology Professional Development · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 48 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 26 ↗.

Goal 3SMUSD will prioritize and strengthen meaningful and authentic engagement to increase students' academic…$1.4 million4% of action budgets

“SMUSD will prioritize and strengthen meaningful and authentic engagement to increase students' academic achievement, school connectedness, well-being and home school connections” p. 33 ↗

12 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.2 million (+⁠$178,854)

Largest funded actions

  1. Student Activities$391,257action 3.8 · p. 49 ↗
  2. Wellness Counselors / Interns$275,696action 3.4 · p. 48 ↗
  3. Community Liaison$149,721action 3.10 · p. 49 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $104,805 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Attendance Letters$128,213action 3.1 · p. 48 ↗
  5. Parent/​Guardian Engagement$98,889action 3.11 · p. 49 ↗

7 more funded actions in this goal

  • Educational Partners Advisory Committees · action 3.6 · p. 48 ↗$89,426
  • Cyber Security Tools · action 3.12 · p. 49 ↗$83,630
  • CalSCHLS Climate Survey · action 3.3 · p. 48 ↗$54,631
  • PBIS / RP · action 3.2 · p. 48 ↗$44,453
  • Additional Support for English Learner Parents/​Guardians Through District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) · action 3.7 · p. 49 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$26,839
  • CWA Designee · action 3.13 · p. 49 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$16,133
  • Superintendent's Student Advisory Panel · action 3.9 · p. 49 ↗$4,303

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Student Activities+⁠$76,055$315,202 → $391,257 · p. 49 ↗
  2. Cyber Security Tools+⁠$38,314$45,316 → $83,630 · p. 49 ↗
  3. PBIS / RP+⁠$34,453$10,000 → $44,453 · p. 48 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Wellness Counselors / Interns · $305,368 → $275,696 · p. 48 ↗−⁠$29,672
  • Community Liaison · $155,047 → $149,721 · p. 49 ↗−⁠$5,326
  • Attendance Letters · $112,892 → $128,213 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$15,321
  • Parent/​Guardian Engagement · $68,575 → $98,889 · p. 49 ↗+⁠$30,314
  • Educational Partners Advisory Committees · $79,788 → $89,426 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$9,638
  • CalSCHLS Climate Survey · $47,860 → $54,631 · p. 48 ↗+⁠$6,771
  • Additional Support for English Learner Parents/​Guardians Through District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) · $40,367 → $26,839 · p. 49 ↗−⁠$13,528
  • CWA Designee · $16,133 · p. 49 ↗new or renamed
  • Superintendent's Student Advisory Panel · $3,922 → $4,303 · p. 49 ↗+⁠$381

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 33 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 3,087 students
1. Asian: 61%2. White: 17%3. Two or more races: 12%4. Hispanic or Latino: 7%5. Filipino: 2%6. Black or African American: <1%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Asian61%
  2. White17%
  3. Two or more races12%
  4. Hispanic or Latino7%
  5. Filipino2%
  6. Black or African American<1%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

12%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 368 of 3,083 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

San Marino Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 68% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (125 of 184 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in San Marino Unified rank highest?

Elementary: 2 schools at the 98th percentile (Strong): Carver Elementary and Valentine Elementary. Middle: Huntington Middle, 97th percentile (Strong). High: San Marino High, 96th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the San Marino Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (4)

Are the public schools in San Marino Unified good?

San Marino Unified’s 2 public elementary schools are all at the 98th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Strong. San Marino Unified has one public middle school we score, Huntington Middle, at the 97th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong. San Marino Unified has one public high school we score, San Marino High, at the 96th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Strong. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How much does San Marino Unified spend per student?

San Marino Unified spent $16,729 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every San Marino Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in San Marino Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $33.2 million into 39 funded actions in 3 goals, 52% of its $63.5 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $22.3 million, 67% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by San Marino Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.