ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Winnetka Avenue Elementary · Canoga Park

Winnetka Avenue Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Winnetka Avenue posts 30% meeting the standard and 13.0% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

8240 Winnetka Avenue, 91306 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Canoga Park·Grades TK-5·306 students·93% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(818) 341-5422·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3445
% Exceeded13%21%
% Met+30%43%
Growth-7.5-2.9
Absence27.1%17.9%
Suspension0.2%1.6%
Scope Score
34
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,254 statewide · #501 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Winnetka Avenue Elementary scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 26th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “30% proficient” and call it done. Winnetka Avenue deserves a closer read. The school sits in Canoga Park, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 36th to the 26th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 30% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 336%29%44%39%32%
Grade 434%35%23%25%32%
Grade 535%33%32%30%33%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 337%27%40%39%39%
Grade 431%18%17%17%23%
Grade 523%13%13%18%24%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

14%
19%
67%
Grade 3 · 33% proficient
21%
11%
68%
Grade 4 · 32% proficient
17%
15%
68%
Grade 5 · 32% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.9pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
13.0%
State 21.3%
8.3pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-7.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
30.5%
State 42.7%
12.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
27.1%
State 17.9%
9.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.2%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
11.4%
State 18.0%
6.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Winnetka Avenue Elementary in Canoga Park, 30.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Winnetka Avenue Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.4% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 128 students tested.

All students at this school: 30% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 30%, district —, state 43%30%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 28%, district 36%, state 32%28% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 36%, state 32%28% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 31%, district 42%, state 44%31% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 29%, district 41%, state 42%29% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 12%, district 9%, state 11%12% · −18 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 0%, district 14%, state 15%0% · −30 vs school

7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 2.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 27.1%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%27.1% · +9.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.2%, district —, state 1.6%0.2% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (39.4% vs 23.6%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–623.6%
TK/K39.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 20:120:1
Teaching staff15 teachers
Avg. experience17.3 years
Fully credentialed96%
First-year teachers7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $27,820, CA average $14,815$27,820 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,623 per student

$2,623 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic77.8%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White7.5%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Other5.9%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian4.9%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Black3.9%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 92.8% (29pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$93K · CA $85K
Median home value$800K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+31% · CA 35%
ZIP population47,176
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Winnetka Avenue Elementary a good elementary school?

Winnetka Avenue Elementary has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 26th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,254 statewide. 13.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 8.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Winnetka Avenue Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 30.5% of students at Winnetka Avenue Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 13.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 13.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 283 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Winnetka Avenue Elementary rank in California?

Winnetka Avenue Elementary ranks #4,254 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 26th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Winnetka Avenue Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Winnetka Avenue Elementary decreases by 7.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Winnetka Avenue Elementary?

27.1% of students at Winnetka Avenue Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Winnetka Avenue Elementary compare to other schools in Canoga Park?

Winnetka Avenue Elementary scores 34/100 (26th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 306 students. Use the schools in Canoga Park page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Winnetka Avenue Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Winnetka Avenue Elementary in Canoga Park, 30.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Winnetka Avenue Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 10.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.4% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 128 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
13.0%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 42th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-7.5pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 40th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
30.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 41th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
27.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 35th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
11.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 42th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 33714%19%38%30%32%−11
Grade 45621%11%13%55%32%−13
Grade 54617%15%22%46%33%−15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34110%29%10%51%39%−7
Grade 4575%18%21%56%23%−19
Grade 54611%13%17%59%24%−11
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11469%7%50%35%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12830.5%−10−8
Hispanic/Latino10929.4%−12−9
English Learners267.7%+1−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Winnetka Avenue Elementary ←3413.0%30.5%−7.50.2%
Topeka Charter School for Advanced Studies2.5 mi6945.5%70.2%−3.10.1%
Our Community Charter2.4 mi6638.4%63.3%+7.71.2%
Superior Street Elementary2 mi5936.7%64.5%−15.20.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193736#350613.2%32.6%20.9%0.0%-7.6pp
20222622#447110.1%25.8%49.2%0.0%-4.6pp
20232719#463514.9%28.2%35.8%0.0%-19.2pp
20243530#400710.4%28.1%27.6%0.1%-15.1pp
20253426#425413.0%30.5%27.1%0.2%-7.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female22.1%27.6%+5.5pp
Male20.1%28.6%+8.5pp
Asian12.7%18.8%+6.1pp
Black/African American30.8%0.0%-30.8pp
White11.8%27.3%+15.5pp
Hispanic/Latino20.6%29.7%+9.1pp
Students with Disabilities18.7%30.4%+11.7pp
English Learners14.6%28.2%+13.6pp
Homeless26.3%63.2%+36.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21.9%28.4%+6.5pp
All Students21.1%28.1%+7.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction