ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Thomas Kelly Elementary · Carmichael

Thomas Kelly Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Thomas Kelly posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 15.9pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

6301 Moraga Drive, 95608 (opens in new tab)·San Juan Unified·Carmichael·Grades TK-5·321 students·56% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 867-2041·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope1845
% Exceeded5%21%
% Met+20%43%
Growth+15.9-2.9
Absence22.0%17.9%
Suspension4.4%1.6%
Scope Score
18
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #5,643 statewide · #45 of 47 in San Juan Unified

Thomas Kelly Elementary scores 18 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 2nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “20% proficient” and call it done. Thomas Kelly deserves a closer read. The school sits in Carmichael, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 2nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELARed(Declined Significantly)MathRed(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 20% meet the standard today, versus 28% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 341%25%33%36%4%
Grade 420%36%31%37%44%
Grade 531%19%25%18%29%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 335%30%29%29%2%
Grade 417%23%21%25%32%
Grade 522%10%7%5%9%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

96%
Grade 3 · 4% proficient
19%
26%
55%
Grade 4 · 45% proficient
22%
71%
Grade 5 · 29% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
5.0%
State 21.3%
16.3pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+15.9pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
20.1%
State 42.7%
22.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
22.0%
State 17.9%
4.1pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.4%
State 1.6%
2.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
4.2%
State 18.0%
13.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Thomas Kelly Elementary in Carmichael, 17.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Thomas Kelly Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 11.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (10.1% Math proficient); White students (19.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 6.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 95 students tested.

All students at this school: 20% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 20%, district —, state 43%20%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 14%, district 24%, state 32%14% · −6 vs school
MaleMale: this school 17%, district 33%, state 42%17% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 20%, district 41%, state 56%20% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 23%, district 35%, state 44%23% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 25%, district 28%, state 32%25% · +5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 0%, district 13%, state 15%0% · −20 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 2%, district 6%, state 11%2% · −17 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 14%, district 41%, state 56%14% · −6 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 17.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 22.0%, district 23.7%, state 17.9%22.0% · +4.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.4%, district —, state 1.6%4.4% · +2.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–622.7%
TK/K28.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 23:125:1
Teaching staff17 teachers
Avg. experience11.0 years
Fully credentialed95%
First-year teachers6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,000 – $118,000
Principal salary$153,210 – $185,821
Superintendent salary$392,080

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $21,250, CA average $14,815$21,250 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,188 per student

$1,188 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,542 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support16%
Student services8%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,962 per pupil
2019$12,705 per pupil
2018$13,148 per pupil
2017$11,096 per pupil
2016$10,446 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White52.6%
District 45.5% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic22.7%
District 26.4% · CA 56.1%
Other11.5%
District 10.5% · CA 9.0%
Black6.8%
District 5.9% · CA 4.8%
Asian6.2%
District 11.7% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 56.1% (8pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$87K · CA $85K
Median home value$599K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population61,440
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 14% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Thomas Kelly Elementary a good elementary school?

Thomas Kelly Elementary has a Scope Score of 18 out of 100, placing it in the 2nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,643 statewide. 5.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Thomas Kelly Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 20.1% of students at Thomas Kelly Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 5.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 15.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 5.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 306 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Thomas Kelly Elementary rank in California?

Thomas Kelly Elementary ranks #5,643 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 2nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Thomas Kelly Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Thomas Kelly Elementary increases by 15.9 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Thomas Kelly Elementary?

22.0% of students at Thomas Kelly Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 4.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Thomas Kelly Elementary compare to other schools in Carmichael?

Thomas Kelly Elementary scores 18/100 (2nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 321 students. Use the schools in Carmichael page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Thomas Kelly Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Thomas Kelly Elementary in Carmichael, 17.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Thomas Kelly Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 11.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (10.1% Math proficient); White students (19.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 6.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 95 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
5.0%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 34th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+15.9pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 23th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
20.1%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 33th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
22.0%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 43th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.4%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 27th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
4.2%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 32th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3472%2%15%81%4%−39
Grade 44319%26%26%30%44%−1
Grade 5557%22%16%55%29%−19
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3520%2%21%77%2%−44
Grade 4530%32%28%40%32%−10
Grade 5562%7%27%64%9%−26
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11564%11%68%18%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9517.9%−11−20
White6719.4%−28−42
Hispanic/Latino4235.7%+1−3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Thomas Kelly Elementary ←185.0%20.1%+15.94.4%
Riverview STEM Elementary2.8 mi8259.1%87.9%−5.80.1%
Mary Deterding Elementary2 mi5133.9%60.9%+1.41.1%
California Montessori Project-San Juan Campuses1.6 mi4918.9%41.6%+13.73.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019258#50529.9%27.6%14.6%2.0%-11.9pp
2022187#53634.8%23.6%40.4%4.3%-12.9pp
20232410#51345.5%24.3%28.4%3.7%-15.0pp
20242712#50485.8%25.0%22.7%4.0%-21.4pp
2025182#56435.0%20.1%22.0%4.4%+15.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 20 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female16.9%22.1%+5.2pp
Male12.9%22.6%+9.7pp
Asian20.0%18.8%-1.2pp
Black/African American18.9%35.7%+16.8pp
Hispanic/Latino16.4%25.0%+8.6pp
Two or More Races12.5%22.9%+10.4pp
Students with Disabilities19.0%22.4%+3.4pp
English Learners15.9%32.1%+16.2pp
Homeless31.3%61.1%+29.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18.2%27.1%+8.9pp
All Students14.7%22.4%+7.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction