ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Cameron Ranch Elementary · Carmichael

Cameron Ranch Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Cameron Ranch posts low test scores — and the same students gain more here than at most schools between grade 3 and grade 5. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

4333 Hackberry Lane, 95608 (opens in new tab)·San Juan Unified·Carmichael·Grades TK-5·406 students·80% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 575-2302·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3145
% Exceeded5%21%
% Met+17%43%
Growth+7.5-2.9
Absence25.2%17.9%
Suspension1.9%1.6%
Scope Score
31
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #4,603 statewide · #29 of 47 in San Juan Unified

Cameron Ranch Elementary scores 31 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 20th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “17% proficient” and call it done. Cameron Ranch deserves a closer read. The school sits in Carmichael, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 6th to the 20th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 600 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 17% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 322%23%16%8%14%
Grade 422%20%26%27%14%
Grade 521%24%26%26%31%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 316%16%23%9%18%
Grade 422%13%19%19%9%
Grade 52%9%10%19%17%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
86%
Grade 3 · 14% proficient
12%
86%
Grade 4 · 14% proficient
15%
16%
69%
Grade 5 · 31% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
4.8%
State 21.3%
16.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+7.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
17.0%
State 42.7%
25.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
25.2%
State 17.9%
7.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.9%
State 1.6%
0.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
2.0%
State 18.0%
16.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask how English learners are supported, and what changes for them after they reclassify.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Cameron Ranch Elementary in Carmichael, 19.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Cameron Ranch Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 9.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.8% Math proficient); English Learner students (7.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 154 students tested.

All students at this school: 18% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 18%, district —, state 43%18%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 17%, district 24%, state 32%17% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 18%, district 33%, state 42%18% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 17%, district 35%, state 44%17% · −1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 7%, district 6%, state 11%7% · −11 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 16%, district 41%, state 56%16% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 28%, state 32%21% · +3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 13%, state 15%5% · −13 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 7%, district 25%, state 72%7% · −10 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 14.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 25.2%, district 23.7%, state 17.9%25.2% · +7.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.9%, district —, state 1.6%1.9% · +0.3pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (34.9% vs 21.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–621.2%
TK/K34.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 23:124:1
Teaching staff25 teachers
Avg. experience12.2 years
Fully credentialed85%
First-year teachers12%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,000 – $118,000
Principal salary$153,210 – $185,821
Superintendent salary$392,080

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $22,246, CA average $14,815$22,246 · spent at this school
Federal share$2,661 per student

$2,661 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,542 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support16%
Student services8%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,962 per pupil
2019$12,705 per pupil
2018$13,148 per pupil
2017$11,096 per pupil
2016$10,446 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White33.0%
District 45.5% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic31.0%
District 26.4% · CA 56.1%
Asian15.5%
District 11.7% · CA 10.2%
Other12.3%
District 10.5% · CA 9.0%
Black8.1%
District 5.9% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 80.0% (16pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$87K · CA $85K
Median home value$599K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population61,440
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 24% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cameron Ranch Elementary a good elementary school?

Cameron Ranch Elementary has a Scope Score of 31 out of 100, placing it in the 20th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,603 statewide. 4.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Cameron Ranch Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 17.0% of students at Cameron Ranch Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 4.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 12.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 4.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 390 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Cameron Ranch Elementary rank in California?

Cameron Ranch Elementary ranks #4,603 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 20th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Cameron Ranch Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Cameron Ranch Elementary increases by 7.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Cameron Ranch Elementary?

25.2% of students at Cameron Ranch Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.9%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Cameron Ranch Elementary compare to other schools in Carmichael?

Cameron Ranch Elementary scores 31/100 (20th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 406 students. Use the schools in Carmichael page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Cameron Ranch Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Cameron Ranch Elementary in Carmichael, 19.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Cameron Ranch Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 9.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.8% Math proficient); English Learner students (7.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 154 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
4.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 34th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+7.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 57th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
17.0%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 30th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
25.2%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 38th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.9%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 48th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
2.0%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 29th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3582%12%31%55%14%−30
Grade 4512%12%33%53%14%−31
Grade 57515%16%27%43%31%−17
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3652%17%25%57%18%−27
Grade 4572%7%23%68%9%−33
Grade 5847%10%19%64%17%−19
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11869%15%44%31%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15419.5%−10−19
English Learners647.8%+2−3
White6319.1%−28−43
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Cameron Ranch Elementary ←314.8%17.0%+7.51.9%
Riverview STEM Elementary2.8 mi8259.1%87.9%−5.80.1%
Mary Deterding Elementary1.5 mi5133.9%60.9%+1.41.1%
California Montessori Project-San Juan Campuses0.7 mi4918.9%41.6%+13.73.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019236#51625.0%17.5%21.1%3.4%-7.3pp
20222213#49685.5%17.4%43.1%0.9%-2.9pp
20232822#44874.9%20.1%31.1%1.4%-1.5pp
20243427#41734.3%18.0%28.0%1.2%+13.7pp
20253120#46034.8%17.0%25.2%1.9%+7.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 19 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female21.3%25.0%+3.7pp
Male21.6%26.4%+4.8pp
Asian6.3%15.1%+8.8pp
Black/African American34.7%31.6%-3.1pp
Hispanic/Latino19.7%37.9%+18.2pp
Two or More Races20.5%28.6%+8.1pp
Students with Disabilities23.7%31.8%+8.1pp
English Learners11.6%20.1%+8.5pp
Homeless26.8%58.1%+31.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged23.1%25.8%+2.7pp
All Students21.5%25.8%+4.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction